General proceedings - Association mondiale de la Route
General proceedings - Association mondiale de la Route
General proceedings - Association mondiale de la Route
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.4. Day 4, Thursday 19 th April 2007<br />
Session Chair:<br />
Cameroon<br />
Mr. Samuel Nengue (pictured), Director <strong>General</strong>, Road Fund<br />
Session 8:<br />
Road Investment P<strong>la</strong>nning and its Management (continued)<br />
Title: Public - Private Partnership as a Viable Alternative of Road Financing un<strong>de</strong>r<br />
Public Budgetary Constraints<br />
Author & Presenter: Massimo Marconi (pictured), Head of Design Department, Stretto<br />
di Messina S.P.A, Italy.<br />
The presentation was based on Italy’s experience on<br />
Public Private Partnerships (PPP). In recent years, Italy<br />
has experienced budget constraints in meeting <strong>de</strong>mand<br />
for infrastructure due to increased traffic levels. To<br />
solve the problem of financial constraints, they resorted<br />
to attracting private investments through Public Private<br />
Partnerships. To attract the private sector,<br />
improvements have been ma<strong>de</strong> to the regu<strong>la</strong>tory<br />
framework in which a number of mo<strong>de</strong>ls have been<br />
established that ba<strong>la</strong>nce the risks between the public and private sectors during the<br />
construction and operational stages. The presenter gave the example of a PPP that is being<br />
used to construct the Strait of Messina bridge which has a suspension length of 3,666 metres<br />
and its estimated cost of Euro 6 billion.<br />
Highlights of the presentation:<br />
• PPPs have been encouraged by the adoption of suitable privatisation policies and<br />
legis<strong>la</strong>tion. In Italy, the percentage of value of PPPs as compared to total investments in<br />
public works has increased from 17% in 2003 to 30% in 2006.<br />
• Risks need to be assessed and ba<strong>la</strong>nced between the key stakehol<strong>de</strong>rs involved in a<br />
project.<br />
• Investors are assured of amortisation of up to 50% in case of a worse scenario such as<br />
political risks that could end the project.<br />
37