10.10.2014 Views

General proceedings - Association mondiale de la Route

General proceedings - Association mondiale de la Route

General proceedings - Association mondiale de la Route

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Session 11:<br />

Cross cutting issues/ Good Governance<br />

Title: Round Table Discussion on Governance in Road Transport,<br />

Authors & Presenters: Charles Melhuish (pictured right) & Stephen Vincent<br />

(pictured left) of Global Transport Knowledge Partnership (gTKP – UK)<br />

The roundtable discussion on Governance in Road Transport was conducted for 2 hours.<br />

Presentation<br />

The Presenter dwelt on Strategic focus of gTKP that are<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntify the best and most relevant transport<br />

knowledge; increasing the practical application of good<br />

practice; stimu<strong>la</strong>ting <strong>de</strong>bate and discussion on priority<br />

issues and approaches to tackling them; promoting<br />

networking between transport practitioners and building<br />

long-term partnerships. He further presented the gTKP<br />

Organisation. He presented also the gTKP Activities<br />

that inclu<strong>de</strong>: Develop knowledge communities;<br />

Seminars and workshops; Learning and education<br />

material; Document case studies; Fill knowledge gaps<br />

and Disseminate knowledge from existing research<br />

programmes. The Presenter listed various Governance<br />

roundtable discussions conducted worldwi<strong>de</strong>. He<br />

further presented the output from Mani<strong>la</strong> roundtable<br />

held from 07-08 March 2007 and that held at World<br />

Bank, Washington, 30 th March 2007.<br />

Output Issues from the Mani<strong>la</strong> roundtable discussions inclu<strong>de</strong>d:<br />

What are the main governance issues in the transport sector?<br />

Weak p<strong>la</strong>nning process; Inappropriate political interference; Lack of long term view – (e.g.<br />

12 months budget cycle); F<strong>la</strong>wed procurement processes; Corruption; Transparency – being<br />

able to see what is really happening; Ina<strong>de</strong>quate technical skills; Ina<strong>de</strong>quate contract<br />

supervision & poor quality control; and Weak enforcement of <strong>la</strong>ws and regu<strong>la</strong>tions (e.g.<br />

overloading).<br />

What interventions were tried to improve governance in the transport sector, what<br />

worked, and what did not work?<br />

These inclu<strong>de</strong>: Contracting out maintenance (worked – but maybe limit to 5 years);<br />

Contracting out <strong>de</strong>sign and supervision (worked); Separate supervising consultant (worked);<br />

Standard methodologies for project appraisal (worked); and Effective technical & financial<br />

audits (worked); Decentralisation (mixed results – perceived good, practical problems); Road<br />

fund initiatives (<strong>de</strong><strong>la</strong>yed implementation, political interference); Information ma<strong>de</strong> avai<strong>la</strong>ble<br />

to stakehol<strong>de</strong>rs (positive effect); Multi-sectoral involvement (positive effect)<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!