16.10.2014 Views

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Q: Be must have . . .<br />

A: There was a lot: <strong>of</strong> resistance to it to begin with.<br />

Q: What kind <strong>of</strong> resistance was given to it?<br />

A: Well, people just refused to vote fortit or voted against it.<br />

Q: Do you recall any <strong>of</strong> the reasons that . . -<br />

A: Well, you know, there are always two kinds <strong>of</strong> reasons. Announced reasons<br />

and real reasons. I don't remember specifically the reasons. Thexe would<br />

be some who would say, "Well, there is not discrimination. That just<br />

doesn't exist," simply, you know. And there were others who might favor<br />

discrimination but they wouldn't say they favored discrimination, they<br />

would have some other technical kinds <strong>of</strong> reasons that they might pr<strong>of</strong>fer<br />

to avoid the effect <strong>of</strong> the bill. But it did take several years to get it<br />

passed I remember.<br />

Q: Do you remember any individuals who were most opposed to the Armstrong<br />

Law?<br />

A:) No, I really don't, I really don't. I suspect that Representative<br />

Clabaugh probably was in the vanguard <strong>of</strong> the opposition at that time.<br />

later years he came around a little bit.<br />

In<br />

Q: Where was he from, sir?<br />

A: Champaign.<br />

Q: Prom Champaign, yes.<br />

A: He was the chairman <strong>of</strong> the Education Committee in the House den the<br />

Republicans had the House.<br />

Q: I see, yes. Another bill that was introduced by Representative Marks<br />

in 1961 gave superintendents means to investigate discrimination in the<br />

schools. Do you recall . . .<br />

A: I don't recall the specific bill but it would be, certainly a very<br />

necessary bill because one <strong>of</strong> the questfons that was always raised about the<br />

legislature giving an additional duty to a school or to a school board without<br />

giving them the money to do it with--that was, <strong>of</strong> course, an objection<br />

that might be pr<strong>of</strong>fered by someone who would be opposed to the concept. But<br />

they would say, "Well, you can't get this to our school board because they<br />

don't have the money to do it .I' So his passing a bill which gave them the<br />

money to make the investigations would answer those kinds <strong>of</strong> complaints<br />

about it.<br />

Q: And in that case, <strong>of</strong> course, it was approved. They were both approved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!