Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Q: Be must have . . .<br />
A: There was a lot: <strong>of</strong> resistance to it to begin with.<br />
Q: What kind <strong>of</strong> resistance was given to it?<br />
A: Well, people just refused to vote fortit or voted against it.<br />
Q: Do you recall any <strong>of</strong> the reasons that . . -<br />
A: Well, you know, there are always two kinds <strong>of</strong> reasons. Announced reasons<br />
and real reasons. I don't remember specifically the reasons. Thexe would<br />
be some who would say, "Well, there is not discrimination. That just<br />
doesn't exist," simply, you know. And there were others who might favor<br />
discrimination but they wouldn't say they favored discrimination, they<br />
would have some other technical kinds <strong>of</strong> reasons that they might pr<strong>of</strong>fer<br />
to avoid the effect <strong>of</strong> the bill. But it did take several years to get it<br />
passed I remember.<br />
Q: Do you remember any individuals who were most opposed to the Armstrong<br />
Law?<br />
A:) No, I really don't, I really don't. I suspect that Representative<br />
Clabaugh probably was in the vanguard <strong>of</strong> the opposition at that time.<br />
later years he came around a little bit.<br />
In<br />
Q: Where was he from, sir?<br />
A: Champaign.<br />
Q: Prom Champaign, yes.<br />
A: He was the chairman <strong>of</strong> the Education Committee in the House den the<br />
Republicans had the House.<br />
Q: I see, yes. Another bill that was introduced by Representative Marks<br />
in 1961 gave superintendents means to investigate discrimination in the<br />
schools. Do you recall . . .<br />
A: I don't recall the specific bill but it would be, certainly a very<br />
necessary bill because one <strong>of</strong> the questfons that was always raised about the<br />
legislature giving an additional duty to a school or to a school board without<br />
giving them the money to do it with--that was, <strong>of</strong> course, an objection<br />
that might be pr<strong>of</strong>fered by someone who would be opposed to the concept. But<br />
they would say, "Well, you can't get this to our school board because they<br />
don't have the money to do it .I' So his passing a bill which gave them the<br />
money to make the investigations would answer those kinds <strong>of</strong> complaints<br />
about it.<br />
Q: And in that case, <strong>of</strong> course, it was approved. They were both approved