Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
the word I seek now is . . . quota kind <strong>of</strong> basis almost, Even that, as<br />
s<strong>of</strong>t as it was and as mild as it was and as weak as it was, was very fiercely<br />
opposed.<br />
Q: Do you recall any <strong>of</strong> that opposition? Apparently it would have been in<br />
the committee action primarily.<br />
A: Yes, I don't remember specifically year by year. But I could tell you<br />
the full story <strong>of</strong> the bills. Later, I guess I put in my first one In 1959<br />
or somewhere along there and . . .<br />
Q: In 1961, 1 believe it was.<br />
A: In 1961? Well, we couldn't get it passed in the House when we first<br />
put it in. Eventually, we did get it passed in the House and then for a<br />
long number <strong>of</strong> years, it passed the House but we couldn't pass it in the<br />
Senate. I think I put it in in 1961, 1963, 1965, and eventually, I think<br />
in 1965, I passed it in the House. And then it went over to the Senate in<br />
1967. By that time I was in the Senate and it always gat killed in the<br />
committee. They sent it to the License and Miscellany Committee for one<br />
reason or the other and it got killed. The Republicans always killed it.<br />
They had the larger number <strong>of</strong> people in the committees. It always got<br />
killed. Eventually, we got very very close to passage, but we never<br />
actually passed the fair housing law in the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Illinois</strong>.<br />
Same things intervened which made it perhaps unnecessary for passage. One<br />
thing was the Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> the United States, in an opinion, established<br />
the precedent for open housing. And then there was congressional legislation<br />
which gave people an avenue for enforcing open housing. And more than<br />
that, in the 1970 Constitution, the concept for fair housing was made a<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the constitution.<br />
Then we absolutely refused then to go ahead with a specific bill because<br />
we thought that any kind <strong>of</strong> bill that you could pass, if indeed you could,<br />
wauld lessen the impact <strong>of</strong> the overall statement for fair housing in the<br />
constitution. So then we didn't seek to pass a law itself because a law<br />
would have the effect <strong>of</strong> circumscribing those situations in which fair<br />
housing was allowed and would not have the strength, vitality, or it would<br />
not be as large in scope as the constitutional provision itself.<br />
SESSION 5, TAPE 5, SIDE 2<br />
Q: You called for the Human Relations Board to take over the management<br />
<strong>of</strong> this rather than trping to set up a separate commission. Do you<br />
remember the . .<br />
A: Well, yes, there were several different kinds <strong>of</strong> approaches made. I<br />
think at one time I even gave thought to--I don't know if I ever put it in