16.10.2014 Views

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the word I seek now is . . . quota kind <strong>of</strong> basis almost, Even that, as<br />

s<strong>of</strong>t as it was and as mild as it was and as weak as it was, was very fiercely<br />

opposed.<br />

Q: Do you recall any <strong>of</strong> that opposition? Apparently it would have been in<br />

the committee action primarily.<br />

A: Yes, I don't remember specifically year by year. But I could tell you<br />

the full story <strong>of</strong> the bills. Later, I guess I put in my first one In 1959<br />

or somewhere along there and . . .<br />

Q: In 1961, 1 believe it was.<br />

A: In 1961? Well, we couldn't get it passed in the House when we first<br />

put it in. Eventually, we did get it passed in the House and then for a<br />

long number <strong>of</strong> years, it passed the House but we couldn't pass it in the<br />

Senate. I think I put it in in 1961, 1963, 1965, and eventually, I think<br />

in 1965, I passed it in the House. And then it went over to the Senate in<br />

1967. By that time I was in the Senate and it always gat killed in the<br />

committee. They sent it to the License and Miscellany Committee for one<br />

reason or the other and it got killed. The Republicans always killed it.<br />

They had the larger number <strong>of</strong> people in the committees. It always got<br />

killed. Eventually, we got very very close to passage, but we never<br />

actually passed the fair housing law in the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Illinois</strong>.<br />

Same things intervened which made it perhaps unnecessary for passage. One<br />

thing was the Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> the United States, in an opinion, established<br />

the precedent for open housing. And then there was congressional legislation<br />

which gave people an avenue for enforcing open housing. And more than<br />

that, in the 1970 Constitution, the concept for fair housing was made a<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the constitution.<br />

Then we absolutely refused then to go ahead with a specific bill because<br />

we thought that any kind <strong>of</strong> bill that you could pass, if indeed you could,<br />

wauld lessen the impact <strong>of</strong> the overall statement for fair housing in the<br />

constitution. So then we didn't seek to pass a law itself because a law<br />

would have the effect <strong>of</strong> circumscribing those situations in which fair<br />

housing was allowed and would not have the strength, vitality, or it would<br />

not be as large in scope as the constitutional provision itself.<br />

SESSION 5, TAPE 5, SIDE 2<br />

Q: You called for the Human Relations Board to take over the management<br />

<strong>of</strong> this rather than trping to set up a separate commission. Do you<br />

remember the . .<br />

A: Well, yes, there were several different kinds <strong>of</strong> approaches made. I<br />

think at one time I even gave thought to--I don't know if I ever put it in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!