Manual for Training of Extension Workers and Farmers on ... - DTIE

• types <strong>of</strong> pesticides currently used <strong>for</strong> the control <strong>of</strong> soil-borne pests knowledge
<strong>of</strong> MeBr problems
• possible, or real, new methods to control soil-borne pests
• other IPM techniques
The final evaluation is an opportunity <strong>for</strong> trained farmers to pass on in<strong>for</strong>mation
about the alternatives, adaptations <strong>and</strong> other details. Some time may be dedicated
to this exercise during one particular day, <strong>and</strong> the farmers should be able to
describe:
• the efficacy <strong>of</strong> new alternatives
• how to use them
• the difference between new alternatives <strong>and</strong> MeBr treatment, emphasizing
possible technical <strong>and</strong> economic advantages
• the characteristics <strong>of</strong> major pests <strong>and</strong> crop losses caused
• IPM principles
After the FFS, extension workers, under the supervision <strong>of</strong> the TOT trainer, should
follow up the application <strong>of</strong> the alternatives in the farmers’ fields in order to
ensure their adoption <strong>and</strong> continued use.
To ensure successful application, the follow-up should consist <strong>of</strong> visits to farms on
a monthly basis to ensure the correct application <strong>of</strong> new alternatives <strong>and</strong> rectify
possible shortcomings.
Trainers will also benefit from such visits. <strong>Farmers</strong>' experiences would provide
useful feedback <strong>for</strong> future research <strong>and</strong> training activities on MeBr alternatives in
the country.
The successful results achieved with new alternatives should be extended to other
farmers who are still using MeBr. In many cases, experienced farmers may serve
as facilitators <strong>of</strong> new FFSs.
12