AFRICANUS Vol 30 No 2 ISSN 0304-615X - University of South Africa
AFRICANUS Vol 30 No 2 ISSN 0304-615X - University of South Africa
AFRICANUS Vol 30 No 2 ISSN 0304-615X - University of South Africa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Indicators for indigenous financial<br />
efforts: theory, evidence and<br />
prospects 1<br />
N J Vermaak<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
This paper evaluates indigenous financial efforts (IFEs) in rural areas in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> their contribution to rural community development. It will be argued<br />
that IFEs are <strong>of</strong>ten associated and evaluated with quantitative criteria in spite<br />
<strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ound non-economic benefits such schemes have for community<br />
development. Evidence from success stories in the developing world and<br />
fieldwork done in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> reveal that successful IFEs are <strong>of</strong>ten determined<br />
by indicators <strong>of</strong> a qualitative nature and that the non-economic<br />
attributes <strong>of</strong> IFEs support and facilitate local development.<br />
1 INTRODUCTION<br />
Since agriculture is an important economic activity in the developing world<br />
(Todaro 1997: 295) and, in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>'s case, will be so for at least another<br />
two or three decades (Van Aardt 1997: 263), financial initiatives are much<br />
needed to accommodate the rural poor ± something which is <strong>of</strong>ten considered<br />
irreconcilable with the objectives <strong>of</strong> NGOs, such as realising pr<strong>of</strong>its in order to<br />
be successful (Schoombee 1998: 390).<br />
During the 1970s, when economic development was recognised to be the<br />
dominant paradigm, scant attention was <strong>of</strong>ten paid to non-economic benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
financial incentives in rural areas. In this report it will be argued that indigenous<br />
rural financial efforts (IFEs) are in many instances mainly evaluated with<br />
quantitative criteria, in spite <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> non-economic benefits that are<br />
<strong>Africa</strong>nus <strong>30</strong>(2)2000 38