22.10.2014 Views

Diploma report Implementation and verification of a simple ... - LPAS

Diploma report Implementation and verification of a simple ... - LPAS

Diploma report Implementation and verification of a simple ... - LPAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

where Z 0 = Z 0 (z) = ρ 0 (z)c 0 (z) is the impedance <strong>of</strong> the medium. This equation might provide<br />

an explanation for the difference in size between the two peaks. Calculations <strong>of</strong> p ′low <strong>and</strong> p ′up<br />

are made using the values <strong>of</strong> w ′ , ρ 0 <strong>and</strong> c 0 in Table 1 <strong>and</strong> give 196.7960 Pa <strong>and</strong> 141.6410 Pa<br />

for the lower <strong>and</strong> upper wave respectively. These values are close to the values <strong>of</strong> p ′ obtained<br />

in the simulation that figures in Table 1.<br />

As second test case, a top hat perturbation with half width <strong>of</strong> 800 m is initialised in<br />

the middle <strong>of</strong> the domain. This shape <strong>of</strong> perturbation is generally more difficult to simulate<br />

than a Gaussian shape as it features steep slopes. In this case, oscillations generally appear<br />

near the bottom <strong>and</strong> the top <strong>of</strong> these steep slopes. The background state <strong>and</strong> the integration<br />

method are the same than in the previous example.<br />

400<br />

t=0s<br />

300<br />

t=9s<br />

350<br />

250<br />

300<br />

200<br />

250<br />

150<br />

p’[Pa]<br />

200<br />

150<br />

p’[Pa]<br />

100<br />

100<br />

50<br />

50<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000<br />

z[m]<br />

−50<br />

0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000<br />

z[m]<br />

300<br />

t=18s<br />

250<br />

t=33s<br />

250<br />

200<br />

200<br />

150<br />

150<br />

p’[Pa]<br />

100<br />

p’[Pa]<br />

100<br />

50<br />

50<br />

0<br />

0<br />

−50<br />

0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000<br />

z[m]<br />

−50<br />

0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000<br />

z[m]<br />

Figure 8: Evolution <strong>of</strong> a top hat shaped pressure perturbation with 12.5 m resolution.<br />

Only a single simulation with 12.5 m resolution is presented here as an illustration. The<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> the perturbation is shown in Figure 8. As the perturbation is superimposed<br />

onto a stratified background, the top does not appear flat in the first plot in 8. In the plots<br />

for t = 9, 18 <strong>and</strong> 33 s, the above mentioned oscillations can be observed <strong>and</strong> are relatively<br />

pronounced. The different amplitudes <strong>and</strong> propagation speeds <strong>of</strong> the two waves are analogous<br />

with the previous case. Finally, in the plot for t = 33 s the slope at the top <strong>of</strong> the perturbation<br />

is inverted due to the reflection at the boundary.<br />

Further tests with various values <strong>of</strong> filter coefficient should be performed in order to<br />

attempt to reduce the oscillations. Besides this, simulations with higher grid resolutions<br />

should be done as they might provide better results.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!