data - Greensboro Housing Coalition

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Exhibit 2-6: Percentage Change in the Point-in-Time Estimates of Homeless Persons by State, 2007-2008 Source: 2007 and 2008 Continuum of Care Application: Exhibit 1, CoC Point-in-Time Homeless Population and Subpopulations Charts Despite some increases in homelessness in rural areas, urban areas represented a large percentage of the total homeless population in many states in 2008. For example: Arizona: Nearly 6 in 10 homeless persons (58 percent) were located in the Phoenix/Mesa/Maricopa County CoC. Arkansas: More than one-half of the total homeless population (56 percent) was located in the Little Rock/Central Arkansas CoC. California: The Los Angeles City and County CoC had 44 percent of California’s total homeless population. Colorado: Nearly 6 in 10 homeless persons (58 percent) were located in the Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative CoC. Illinois: The Chicago CoC accounted for 41 percent of all homeless persons in Illinois. Michigan: Almost two-thirds of homeless persons (64 percent) were located in the Detroit CoC. 14 Chapter 2: National Estimates of All Homeless People, Sheltered and Unsheltered
Nevada: The Las Vegas/Clark County CoC contained 91 percent of the state’s total homeless population. New Mexico: Albuquerque served more than 4 in 10 (42 percent) of the state’s homeless population. New York: More than 8 of 10 homeless persons (82 percent) were located in the New York City CoC. Pennsylvania: The Philadelphia CoC served nearly one-half of the homeless population (45 percent) in the state. Utah: Two-thirds of homeless persons (67 percent) were located in Salt Lake City and County CoC. On the night of the January 2008 PIT count, one in five homeless persons (20 percent) was located in Los Angeles, New York, and Detroit. 2.3 PIT Counts of Homeless Subpopulations Information from CoC applications also includes counts of particular homeless subpopulations: people who are chronically homeless; people with severe mental illness; people who have substance abuse problems; veterans; unaccompanied youth; and people living with HIV/AIDS. Estimates of homeless subpopulations are only of sheltered homeless people. For many years, national policy was focused on ending About 124,000 of those chronic homelessness through funding incentives to found homeless on a develop permanent supportive housing and through the dissemination of best practice strategies for reducing single night in January chronic homelessness. Measuring the scope of chronic 2008 were chronically homelessness remains challenging, because the definition homeless people. of chronic homelessness 5 is based on both historical information about a person’s experiences being homeless and specific demographic characteristics, and because communities have difficulty collecting such information for their PIT counts. Thus, the PIT estimates of chronically homeless persons reported in CoC applications should continue to be interpreted as approximations. On a single night in January 2008, CoCs reported a total of 124,135 persons experiencing chronic homelessness or about 19 percent of the total homeless population and 30 percent of homeless individuals. The number of chronically homeless persons declined considerably between 2006 and 5 A chronically homeless person is defined as an unaccompanied homeless individual with a disabling condition who has either been continuously homeless for a year or more or has had at least four episodes of homelessness in the past three years. To be considered chronically homeless, a person must have been on the streets or in emergency shelter (e.g., not in transitional or permanent housing) during these stays. Chapter 2: National Estimates of All Homeless People, Sheltered and Unsheltered 15
Page 3: The 2008 Annual Homeless Assessment
Page 7: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This 2008 Annual H
Page 11 and 12: Executive Summary The U.S. Departme
Page 13 and 14: One-Year Estimates of Sheltered Hom
Page 15 and 16: may suggest that communities have a
Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1 Introduction This report
Page 19 and 20: transitional housing) or unsheltere
Page 21: sheltered homeless people in numero
Page 24 and 25: substance abuse issues; veterans; u
Page 26 and 27: Exhibit 2-2: Point-in-Time Counts o
Page 28 and 29: Care). On a single night in January
Page 32 and 33: 2007, but was level between 2007 an
Page 34 and 35: 2.4 Estimates of Sheltered Homeless
Page 36 and 37: percent in 2007 to 14.4 percent in
Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3 Sheltered Homeless People
Page 41 and 42: Exhibit 3-2 Demographic Characteris
Page 43 and 44: the men who are being counted in th
Page 45 and 46: Exhibit 3-3: Demographic Characteri
Page 47 and 48: Characteristics of Sheltered Person
Page 49 and 50: 3.2 Location of Homeless Service Us
Page 51 and 52: A comparison of living arrangements
Page 53 and 54: 2008, compared with 69 percent of p
Page 55: 3.4 Summary of All Sheltered Homele
Page 58 and 59: Changes in the patterns of becoming
Page 60 and 61: Exhibit 4-2: Change in the Geograph
Page 62 and 63: The increase in the share of person
Page 64 and 65: facility the night before. In 2008,
Page 66 and 67: Exhibit 4-8: Change in Previous Liv
Page 68 and 69: Exhibit 4-10: Lengths of Stay in Em
Page 70 and 71: least a month. Families experiencin
Page 72 and 73: program, or it could reflect greate
Page 74 and 75: While the 2008 data collection peri
Page 76 and 77: 614,042 beds (see Exhibit 5-1). 32
Page 78 and 79: housing inventory included nearly 1
Page 80 and 81:
Exhibit 5-5: National Inventory of
Page 82 and 83:
Exhibit 5-7: Distribution of Bed In
Page 84 and 85:
Transitional Housing Compared to em
Page 86 and 87:
housing beds during this period. It
Page 88 and 89:
Exhibit 5-12: Average Daily Utiliza
Page 91 and 92:
Chapter 6 Looking Ahead The 2008 AH
Page 93 and 94:
Appendix A: List of 2008 AHAR Sampl
Page 95 and 96:
Appendix A A-3
Page 97 and 98:
Appendix A A-5
Page 99 and 100:
Appendix A A-7
Page 101 and 102:
Appendix A A-9
Page 103 and 104:
Appendix A A-11
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix A A-13
Page 107:
Appendix A A-15
Page 110 and 111:
B.1 Introduction This document summ
Page 112 and 113:
Homeless Management Information Sys
Page 114 and 115:
B.3 Sample Selection This section d
Page 116 and 117:
area to account for the fact that t
Page 118 and 119:
Selection of Non-Certainty Sample T
Page 120 and 121:
In 2008, 22 new rural communities w
Page 122 and 123:
Average daily bed utilization rate
Page 124 and 125:
Exhibit B-4: Communities Participat
Page 126 and 127:
Step 2: The raw data were adjusted
Page 128 and 129:
site was not able to provide data,
Page 130 and 131:
category. However, to aggregate the
Page 132 and 133:
C1: Changes in Point-In-Time Estima
Page 134 and 135:
C2: Point-In-Time Estimates from Ja
Page 136 and 137:
Appendix C-3 C-6 Appendix C
Page 138 and 139:
C-8 Appendix C
Page 140 and 141:
C-10 Appendix C
Page 142 and 143:
C-12 Appendix C
Page 144 and 145:
C-14 Appendix C
Page 146 and 147:
C-16 Appendix C
Page 149 and 150:
Appendix D: Counts of Homeless Shel
Page 151 and 152:
Appendix D-3: Seasonal Point-in-Tim
Page 153 and 154:
Appendix D-4: Demographic Character
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Appendix D-9: Earlier Living Situat
Page 163 and 164:
Appendix D-11: Earlier Living Situa
Page 165:
Appendix D-13: Length of Stay in Tr
show all

data - Greensboro Housing Coalition

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?