data - Greensboro Housing Coalition

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Exhibit 3-7: Geographic Distribution of the Sheltered Homeless Population by Household Type, 2008 100% 90% 80% 32.0% 29.0% 38.3% 70% 60% 64% 76% 50% 40% 30% 68.0% 71.0% 61.7% 20% 10% 36% 24% 0% Percentage of All Sheltered Persons Percentage of All Sheltered Individuals Percentage of All Sheltered Persons in Families U.S. Poverty Population Total U.S. Population Principal Cities Suburban and Rural Areas Sources: Homeless Management Information System data, 2008 Movement into the Shelter System In addition to the type of location where people receive homeless residential services, communities participating in the AHAR also provided information on where people stayed the night before they entered the shelter system. In 2008, the night before entering an emergency shelter or transitional housing facility, about two-fifths of all sheltered persons came from another homeless situation, two-fifths moved from a Movement into the Shelter housed situation (their own or someone else’s System, 2008 home), and the remaining one-fifth were split between institutional settings (e.g., a psychiatric hospital or jail) and hotels, motels, or other unspecified living arrangements (see Exhibit 3- Compared to sheltered persons in families, individuals were: 8). The most common prior living arrangements were staying with friends or family (28.5 1.5 times more likely to come from an existing homeless situation percent) and staying in another homeless 5.7 times more likely to come from residential service facility (24.3 percent). About an institutional setting 13 percent were on the streets or another place 1.6 times less likely to be housed on not meant for human habitation the night before their own or with family or friends program entry, and a similar proportion came from a home they rented or owned. 34 Chapter 3: Sheltered Homeless People in 2008
A comparison of living arrangements between sheltered individuals and persons in families reveals several striking differences. More than 6 in 10 persons in families came from a housing situation, with most staying with family and friends. Only about one-quarter of persons in families were already homeless prior to entering the shelter system during the oneyear reporting period, and very few were in institutional settings. By comparison, fewer than 4 in 10 individuals came from a housing situation, two-fifths were already homeless, and more than 1 in 10 came from an institutional setting. Thus, for individuals, the most common pathway into the shelter system during the one-year reporting period was another homeless location, whereas among persons in families it was from a “housed” situation. Exhibit 3-8: Previous Living Situation of People Using Homeless Residential Services, 2008 a Living Arrangement the Night before Program Entry Total Percentage of Individual Adults b Percentage of Adults in Families Total Already Homeless 37.2% 39.4% 25.9% Place not meant for human habitation 12.9% 14.7% 4.0% Emergency shelter or transitional housing 24.3% 24.8% 22.0% Total from “Housing” 41.0% 37.0% 61.5% Rented or owned housing unit c 12.5% 11.2% 19.2% Staying with family 16.4% 14.2% 27.8% Staying with friends 12.1% 11.6% 14.5% Total from Institutional Settings 11.9% 13.6% 2.4% Psychiatric facility, substance abuse center, or hospital 6.7% 7.6% 1.8% Jail, prison, or juvenile detention 4.8% 5.6% 0.5% Foster care home 0.4% 0.4% 0.1% Total from Other Situations 10.1% 10.0% 10.2% Hotel, motel (no voucher) or “other” 10.1% 10.0% 10.2% Number of Homeless Adults 1,283,272 1,092,612 203,199 a The exhibit reports on adults and unaccompanied youth only because the HMIS Data and Technical Standards require the information to be collected only from these persons. About 21 percent of the records in HMIS were missing this information in 2008. b This category includes unaccompanied adults and youth as well as multiple-adult households without children. c Includes a small percentage in permanent supportive housing. Sources: Homeless Management Information System data, 2008 Chapter 3: Sheltered Homeless People in 2008 35
Page 3: The 2008 Annual Homeless Assessment
Page 7: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This 2008 Annual H
Page 11 and 12: Executive Summary The U.S. Departme
Page 13 and 14: One-Year Estimates of Sheltered Hom
Page 15 and 16: may suggest that communities have a
Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1 Introduction This report
Page 19 and 20: transitional housing) or unsheltere
Page 21: sheltered homeless people in numero
Page 24 and 25: substance abuse issues; veterans; u
Page 26 and 27: Exhibit 2-2: Point-in-Time Counts o
Page 28 and 29: Care). On a single night in January
Page 30 and 31: Exhibit 2-6: Percentage Change in t
Page 32 and 33: 2007, but was level between 2007 an
Page 34 and 35: 2.4 Estimates of Sheltered Homeless
Page 36 and 37: percent in 2007 to 14.4 percent in
Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3 Sheltered Homeless People
Page 41 and 42: Exhibit 3-2 Demographic Characteris
Page 43 and 44: the men who are being counted in th
Page 45 and 46: Exhibit 3-3: Demographic Characteri
Page 47 and 48: Characteristics of Sheltered Person
Page 49: 3.2 Location of Homeless Service Us
Page 53 and 54: 2008, compared with 69 percent of p
Page 55: 3.4 Summary of All Sheltered Homele
Page 58 and 59: Changes in the patterns of becoming
Page 60 and 61: Exhibit 4-2: Change in the Geograph
Page 62 and 63: The increase in the share of person
Page 64 and 65: facility the night before. In 2008,
Page 66 and 67: Exhibit 4-8: Change in Previous Liv
Page 68 and 69: Exhibit 4-10: Lengths of Stay in Em
Page 70 and 71: least a month. Families experiencin
Page 72 and 73: program, or it could reflect greate
Page 74 and 75: While the 2008 data collection peri
Page 76 and 77: 614,042 beds (see Exhibit 5-1). 32
Page 78 and 79: housing inventory included nearly 1
Page 80 and 81: Exhibit 5-5: National Inventory of
Page 82 and 83: Exhibit 5-7: Distribution of Bed In
Page 84 and 85: Transitional Housing Compared to em
Page 86 and 87: housing beds during this period. It
Page 88 and 89: Exhibit 5-12: Average Daily Utiliza
Page 91 and 92: Chapter 6 Looking Ahead The 2008 AH
Page 93 and 94: Appendix A: List of 2008 AHAR Sampl
Page 95 and 96: Appendix A A-3
Page 101 and 102:
Appendix A A-9
Page 103 and 104:
Appendix A A-11
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix A A-13
Page 107:
Appendix A A-15
Page 110 and 111:
B.1 Introduction This document summ
Page 112 and 113:
Homeless Management Information Sys
Page 114 and 115:
B.3 Sample Selection This section d
Page 116 and 117:
area to account for the fact that t
Page 118 and 119:
Selection of Non-Certainty Sample T
Page 120 and 121:
In 2008, 22 new rural communities w
Page 122 and 123:
Average daily bed utilization rate
Page 124 and 125:
Exhibit B-4: Communities Participat
Page 126 and 127:
Step 2: The raw data were adjusted
Page 128 and 129:
site was not able to provide data,
Page 130 and 131:
category. However, to aggregate the
Page 132 and 133:
C1: Changes in Point-In-Time Estima
Page 134 and 135:
C2: Point-In-Time Estimates from Ja
Page 136 and 137:
Appendix C-3 C-6 Appendix C
Page 138 and 139:
C-8 Appendix C
Page 140 and 141:
C-10 Appendix C
Page 142 and 143:
C-12 Appendix C
Page 144 and 145:
C-14 Appendix C
Page 146 and 147:
C-16 Appendix C
Page 149 and 150:
Appendix D: Counts of Homeless Shel
Page 151 and 152:
Appendix D-3: Seasonal Point-in-Tim
Page 153 and 154:
Appendix D-4: Demographic Character
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Appendix D-9: Earlier Living Situat
Page 163 and 164:
Appendix D-11: Earlier Living Situa
Page 165:
Appendix D-13: Length of Stay in Tr
show all

data - Greensboro Housing Coalition

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?