23.10.2014 Views

foundation of canada asia pacific - Content Tagged with

foundation of canada asia pacific - Content Tagged with

foundation of canada asia pacific - Content Tagged with

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6<br />

DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE<br />

ODA for a<br />

borderless world<br />

59<br />

Canadians are a generous people, both in our self-image and in the real world. We believe<br />

in helping those less well <strong>of</strong>f than ourselves. As a middle-sized economic power, and a<br />

strong advocate <strong>of</strong> cooperative welfare programs, Canada has always sought to use some<br />

<strong>of</strong> its national wealth to help the people <strong>of</strong> less developed countries through <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

development assistance (ODA). Unfortunately, at a time <strong>of</strong> budget restraint, we have<br />

been forced to curb our ambitions to match the resources available to meet them. This<br />

has been a frustrating task. One result is that Canada’s ODA as a share <strong>of</strong> GNP has declined<br />

sharply. From a high <strong>of</strong> 0.49% in 1991-92, the share fell to about 0.29% in 1998-99, the<br />

lowest in almost 30 years. In that time, Canadian ODA to Asia fell more than 40%. It is<br />

unlikely that the government will reach its commitment <strong>of</strong> allocating 0.7% <strong>of</strong> GNP to<br />

ODA any time soon, even though it has pledged more resources to international assistance<br />

in the 2000 budget. At the same time, there is a new challenge emerging for our<br />

international assistance program which affects not only how much we spend on ODA, but<br />

what it is we spend it on and how we deliver the aid. In the globalized economy, there<br />

are new needs to meet and alternate ways <strong>of</strong> addressing them. This has seen a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

government departments and agencies become newly involved in international assistance<br />

programs. It has reached a point where we must develop a partnership approach to the<br />

delivery <strong>of</strong> aid so that different arms <strong>of</strong> the Canadian government do not overlap or compete<br />

in the planning and delivery <strong>of</strong> projects.<br />

Today, borders mean less than ever to the flow <strong>of</strong> goods and money. This applies to ODA<br />

as much as it does to commerce. It means that Canada is sometimes helping developing<br />

economies as a group or across a region rather than as individual countries, which are the<br />

traditional focus <strong>of</strong> ODA. Cross-border needs that hardly existed a decade ago are now<br />

attracting attention. To meet these new needs, Canada’s aid delivery has become more<br />

diffuse, <strong>with</strong> many government departments and agencies increasingly involved in<br />

international projects. Asia is at the centre <strong>of</strong> this evolution. The emergence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cooperative, if unfocused, approach <strong>of</strong> APEC to regional development has been the catalyst<br />

for much <strong>of</strong> this change. Government departments which until a few years ago had a<br />

purely domestic mandate are becoming involved in overseas cooperation projects, driven<br />

by their participation in APEC working groups or reacting to international regulatory<br />

requirements set out in agreements like the Kyoto Convention. One result is a growing<br />

concern about overlapping commitments by different arms <strong>of</strong> government.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!