24.10.2014 Views

Get my PhD Thesis

Get my PhD Thesis

Get my PhD Thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Part 1<br />

Improving Self-consistent Field Convergence<br />

T<br />

occ occ = N<br />

C SC I , (1.23)<br />

where F 0 is typically obtained as a weighted sum of the previous Fock matrices such as F in Eq.<br />

(1.15). Since Eq. (1.22) represents a crude model of the true Hartree-Fock energy (with the same<br />

first-order term, but different zero- and second-order terms), it has a rather small trust radius. A<br />

global minimization of E RH (D), as accomplished by the solution of the Roothaan–Hall eigenvalue<br />

problem Eq. (1.6), may therefore easily lead to steps that are longer than the trust radius and hence<br />

unreliable. To avoid such steps, we shall impose on the optimization of Eq. (1.22) the constraint that<br />

the new density matrix D does not differ much from the old D 0 , that is, the S-norm of the density<br />

difference should be equal to a small number ∆<br />

2<br />

2<br />

D− D0 S<br />

= Tr ( D−D0 ) S( D− D0 ) S = − 2Tr D0SDS + N = ∆, (1.24)<br />

where N is the number of electrons – see Eq. (1.2) – and the S-norm used throughout this thesis is<br />

defined as<br />

2<br />

S<br />

A = Tr ASAS (1.25)<br />

for symmetric A. The optimization of Eq. (1.22) subject to the constraints Eq. (1.23) and Eq. (1.24)<br />

may be carried out by introducing the Lagrangian<br />

1<br />

T<br />

L = 2TrFD 0 −2µ<br />

( TrDSDS 0 − ( N −∆)<br />

) −2Trη( CoccSCocc<br />

−I N ) , (1.26)<br />

2<br />

where µ is the undetermined multiplier associated with the constraint Eq. (1.24), whereas the<br />

symmetric matrix η contains the multipliers associated with the MO orthonormality constraints.<br />

Differentiating this Lagrangian with respect to the MO coefficients and setting the result equal to<br />

zero, we arrive at the level-shifted Roothaan–Hall equations:<br />

( F − µ SD S) C ( µ ) = SC ( µ ) λ ( µ ). (1.27)<br />

0 0 occ occ<br />

Since the density matrix, Eq. (1.8), is invariant to unitary transformations among the occupied MOs<br />

in C occ ( µ ), we may transform this eigenvalue problem to the canonical basis:<br />

( F − µ SD S) C ( µ ) = SC ( µ ) ε ( µ ) , (1.28)<br />

0 0 occ occ<br />

where the diagonal matrix ε(µ) contains the orbital energies. Note that, since D 0 S projects onto the<br />

part of C occ that is occupied in D 0 (see ref. 46 ), the level-shift parameter µ shifts only the energies of<br />

the occupied MOs. Therefore, the role of µ is to modify the difference between the energies of the<br />

occupied and virtual MOs - in particular, the HOMO–LUMO gap.<br />

Clearly, the success of the trust region Roothaan–Hall (TRRH) method will depend on our ability to<br />

make a judicious choice of the level-shift parameter µ in Eq. (1.28). In our standard TRRH<br />

implementation, we determine µ by requiring that D(µ) does not differ much from D 0 in the sense of<br />

2<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!