Get my PhD Thesis
Get my PhD Thesis
Get my PhD Thesis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Part 1<br />
Improving Self-consistent Field Convergence<br />
T<br />
occ occ = N<br />
C SC I , (1.23)<br />
where F 0 is typically obtained as a weighted sum of the previous Fock matrices such as F in Eq.<br />
(1.15). Since Eq. (1.22) represents a crude model of the true Hartree-Fock energy (with the same<br />
first-order term, but different zero- and second-order terms), it has a rather small trust radius. A<br />
global minimization of E RH (D), as accomplished by the solution of the Roothaan–Hall eigenvalue<br />
problem Eq. (1.6), may therefore easily lead to steps that are longer than the trust radius and hence<br />
unreliable. To avoid such steps, we shall impose on the optimization of Eq. (1.22) the constraint that<br />
the new density matrix D does not differ much from the old D 0 , that is, the S-norm of the density<br />
difference should be equal to a small number ∆<br />
2<br />
2<br />
D− D0 S<br />
= Tr ( D−D0 ) S( D− D0 ) S = − 2Tr D0SDS + N = ∆, (1.24)<br />
where N is the number of electrons – see Eq. (1.2) – and the S-norm used throughout this thesis is<br />
defined as<br />
2<br />
S<br />
A = Tr ASAS (1.25)<br />
for symmetric A. The optimization of Eq. (1.22) subject to the constraints Eq. (1.23) and Eq. (1.24)<br />
may be carried out by introducing the Lagrangian<br />
1<br />
T<br />
L = 2TrFD 0 −2µ<br />
( TrDSDS 0 − ( N −∆)<br />
) −2Trη( CoccSCocc<br />
−I N ) , (1.26)<br />
2<br />
where µ is the undetermined multiplier associated with the constraint Eq. (1.24), whereas the<br />
symmetric matrix η contains the multipliers associated with the MO orthonormality constraints.<br />
Differentiating this Lagrangian with respect to the MO coefficients and setting the result equal to<br />
zero, we arrive at the level-shifted Roothaan–Hall equations:<br />
( F − µ SD S) C ( µ ) = SC ( µ ) λ ( µ ). (1.27)<br />
0 0 occ occ<br />
Since the density matrix, Eq. (1.8), is invariant to unitary transformations among the occupied MOs<br />
in C occ ( µ ), we may transform this eigenvalue problem to the canonical basis:<br />
( F − µ SD S) C ( µ ) = SC ( µ ) ε ( µ ) , (1.28)<br />
0 0 occ occ<br />
where the diagonal matrix ε(µ) contains the orbital energies. Note that, since D 0 S projects onto the<br />
part of C occ that is occupied in D 0 (see ref. 46 ), the level-shift parameter µ shifts only the energies of<br />
the occupied MOs. Therefore, the role of µ is to modify the difference between the energies of the<br />
occupied and virtual MOs - in particular, the HOMO–LUMO gap.<br />
Clearly, the success of the trust region Roothaan–Hall (TRRH) method will depend on our ability to<br />
make a judicious choice of the level-shift parameter µ in Eq. (1.28). In our standard TRRH<br />
implementation, we determine µ by requiring that D(µ) does not differ much from D 0 in the sense of<br />
2<br />
14