24.10.2014 Views

qdts-camping-options-toolkit

qdts-camping-options-toolkit

qdts-camping-options-toolkit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Stakeholders engaged, understanding needs<br />

The aim of Stage 1 is for local government to engage the<br />

key stakeholders and gain an understanding of their<br />

needs. This will help them determine which option will<br />

best meet the needs of the visitors and the community<br />

(including local businesses). The decision may be for no<br />

change or that there is a need to act seasonally, not yearround.<br />

However, before a local government adopts the<br />

chosen option or encourages adoption of that option by<br />

the private sector, the proper foundations must be in place<br />

in the planning scheme. Currently there are variations in<br />

planning scheme definitions and in expectations of the<br />

private sector and, in some cases, there is an inconsistent<br />

approach to public infrastructure.<br />

Figure 9 Adopting standard definitions<br />

Urban<br />

Rural<br />

Remote<br />

Following best practice, local governments could consider<br />

these questions:<br />

• If the need for additional <strong>camping</strong> <strong>options</strong> is in<br />

budget <strong>camping</strong> in the urban area, does the local<br />

government have policies to support the private<br />

sector to provide these, either through basic caravan<br />

parks or basic <strong>camping</strong> grounds?<br />

• If the need is outside the urban footprint and may<br />

need to be met by the local government and possibly<br />

demand-built to encourage investment down<br />

the track, are there clear basic <strong>camping</strong> ground<br />

definitions and could the facility eventually become<br />

a commercial operation?<br />

• If the need is in a remote area, does the local<br />

government have a bush camp definition in the<br />

planning scheme?<br />

Remote: Consider a basic <strong>camping</strong> ground, bush camp<br />

or caravan park based on expected demand and site<br />

carrying capacity.<br />

Rural: Work with existing businesses to define the need<br />

and consider either a <strong>camping</strong> ground or caravan park with<br />

a focus on showcasing the attractions of the destination to<br />

maximise spending in the community.<br />

Urban: Work with existing businesses first, then consider<br />

a caravan park or <strong>camping</strong> ground that meets the<br />

identified market.<br />

For planning scheme definitions, performance criteria and<br />

acceptable solutions for all three types of <strong>camping</strong> sites,<br />

see Fact sheet G: Adopting standard definitions.<br />

Note<br />

Definitions for these zone classifications are not provided<br />

in this <strong>toolkit</strong>, as it is assumed they are defined in the local<br />

planning scheme.<br />

Further, any definitions provided in the document are<br />

provided as a guide and would likely be amended by local<br />

governments in their application of the <strong>toolkit</strong>.<br />

Distance as a definition<br />

The distance a <strong>camping</strong> facility is located from a<br />

commercial establishment is a point of some contention.<br />

This <strong>toolkit</strong> does not attempt to prescribe an approach<br />

but rather identifies some pros and cons:<br />

Pros<br />

• It is a clear and transparent policy tool.<br />

• It provides consistency through one approach to<br />

all situations.<br />

Cons<br />

• An acceptable distance may differ depending on<br />

the zone and setting (different in the Outback<br />

from in a city).<br />

• An arbitrary distance may overlook obvious local<br />

conditions that need to be considered.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!