qdts-camping-options-toolkit
qdts-camping-options-toolkit
qdts-camping-options-toolkit
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Stakeholders engaged, understanding needs<br />
The aim of Stage 1 is for local government to engage the<br />
key stakeholders and gain an understanding of their<br />
needs. This will help them determine which option will<br />
best meet the needs of the visitors and the community<br />
(including local businesses). The decision may be for no<br />
change or that there is a need to act seasonally, not yearround.<br />
However, before a local government adopts the<br />
chosen option or encourages adoption of that option by<br />
the private sector, the proper foundations must be in place<br />
in the planning scheme. Currently there are variations in<br />
planning scheme definitions and in expectations of the<br />
private sector and, in some cases, there is an inconsistent<br />
approach to public infrastructure.<br />
Figure 9 Adopting standard definitions<br />
Urban<br />
Rural<br />
Remote<br />
Following best practice, local governments could consider<br />
these questions:<br />
• If the need for additional <strong>camping</strong> <strong>options</strong> is in<br />
budget <strong>camping</strong> in the urban area, does the local<br />
government have policies to support the private<br />
sector to provide these, either through basic caravan<br />
parks or basic <strong>camping</strong> grounds?<br />
• If the need is outside the urban footprint and may<br />
need to be met by the local government and possibly<br />
demand-built to encourage investment down<br />
the track, are there clear basic <strong>camping</strong> ground<br />
definitions and could the facility eventually become<br />
a commercial operation?<br />
• If the need is in a remote area, does the local<br />
government have a bush camp definition in the<br />
planning scheme?<br />
Remote: Consider a basic <strong>camping</strong> ground, bush camp<br />
or caravan park based on expected demand and site<br />
carrying capacity.<br />
Rural: Work with existing businesses to define the need<br />
and consider either a <strong>camping</strong> ground or caravan park with<br />
a focus on showcasing the attractions of the destination to<br />
maximise spending in the community.<br />
Urban: Work with existing businesses first, then consider<br />
a caravan park or <strong>camping</strong> ground that meets the<br />
identified market.<br />
For planning scheme definitions, performance criteria and<br />
acceptable solutions for all three types of <strong>camping</strong> sites,<br />
see Fact sheet G: Adopting standard definitions.<br />
Note<br />
Definitions for these zone classifications are not provided<br />
in this <strong>toolkit</strong>, as it is assumed they are defined in the local<br />
planning scheme.<br />
Further, any definitions provided in the document are<br />
provided as a guide and would likely be amended by local<br />
governments in their application of the <strong>toolkit</strong>.<br />
Distance as a definition<br />
The distance a <strong>camping</strong> facility is located from a<br />
commercial establishment is a point of some contention.<br />
This <strong>toolkit</strong> does not attempt to prescribe an approach<br />
but rather identifies some pros and cons:<br />
Pros<br />
• It is a clear and transparent policy tool.<br />
• It provides consistency through one approach to<br />
all situations.<br />
Cons<br />
• An acceptable distance may differ depending on<br />
the zone and setting (different in the Outback<br />
from in a city).<br />
• An arbitrary distance may overlook obvious local<br />
conditions that need to be considered.<br />
29