31.10.2014 Views

Read the full report (PDF27.8 MB) - CO2CRC

Read the full report (PDF27.8 MB) - CO2CRC

Read the full report (PDF27.8 MB) - CO2CRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6. Southwest Bowen Basin Study Area - Wunger<br />

Ridge Flank<br />

6.1. Seismic Interpretation<br />

6.1.1. Previous Work and Structural Framework<br />

A regional interpretation of <strong>the</strong> Bowen Basin was carried out in <strong>the</strong> 1990’s by <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n Bureau of<br />

Mineral Resources, now Geoscience Australia, in conjunction with what is now <strong>the</strong> Queensland<br />

Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (QDNRME). The interpretation used regional<br />

seismic lines tied to a regional array of wells as well as deep crustal transects. Significantly more<br />

seismic data existed locally within <strong>the</strong> Wunger Ridge flank study area than were utilised in <strong>the</strong><br />

regional studies, so that fault trends and maps of individual horizons interpreted by <strong>the</strong> Bureau of<br />

Mineral Resources (data and interpretation available from Geoscience Australia) were considered<br />

too generalised for <strong>the</strong> purpose of this study. All available seismic data within <strong>the</strong> Wunger Ridge<br />

flank study area (Figure 2.2c) were thus used so as to produce a more detailed interpretation.<br />

This section presents interpretive results: detailed geophysical reviews are summarised in<br />

(Appendix 10.6.6.).<br />

Previous regional interpretations included those carried out at a sequence stratigraphy level (Brakel<br />

et al., in press); deep crustal transect level (Korsch et al., 1992) and at a regional structural and<br />

exploration level (Korsch et al., 1998; Shaw et al., 1999).<br />

Key tectono-history summaries contained in <strong>the</strong> above references, and pertinent to <strong>the</strong> study area,<br />

are summarised below.<br />

• A late Carboniferous to Early Permian extensional or rift phase is recognised in <strong>the</strong> Bowen<br />

Basin from <strong>the</strong> presence of large-scale half grabens and associated extrusion of volcanic<br />

rocks (Korsch et al., 1992). Large scale faults imaged on deep crustal transects were not<br />

observed on <strong>the</strong> shallow seismic data used in this study.<br />

• During <strong>the</strong> Permian, <strong>the</strong> rift phase and subsequent <strong>the</strong>rmal subsidence phase switched to a<br />

compressional regime associated with east-to-west thrust belts. These thrusts were imaged<br />

on deep crustal transects and observed in outcrop geology (Korsch et al., 1992). Foreland<br />

loading from <strong>the</strong> east during <strong>the</strong> late Permian to mid Triassic produced significant downwarping<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Taroom Trough (Figure 3.5): <strong>the</strong> Trough received significant sedimentation<br />

from <strong>the</strong> east resulting in <strong>the</strong> deposition of <strong>the</strong> Rewan Formation. It is interpreted that downwarping<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Taroom Trough in <strong>the</strong> east may have caused some degree of flexure in <strong>the</strong><br />

west, probably resulting in relatively low accommodation space in <strong>the</strong> west Bowen Basin.<br />

• The final Bowen Basin phase in <strong>the</strong> mid–late Triassic was one of uplift and erosion, forming<br />

<strong>the</strong> unconformable boundary between <strong>the</strong> Bowen and <strong>the</strong> overlying Surat Basin.<br />

6.1.2. Time Interpretation<br />

Seismic horizons<br />

Six seismic horizons were interpreted within <strong>the</strong> study area, and an additional two horizons were<br />

phantomed (copied from an already interpreted horizon and shifted in time (Table 6.1).<br />

For example, <strong>the</strong> Showgrounds Sandstone was phantomed down from <strong>the</strong> Snake Creek Mudstone<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> thin interval that prevented <strong>the</strong> resolution of both horizons within acceptable accuracy on<br />

printed sections. The Rewan Formation was also phantomed through an unconformity down from<br />

<strong>the</strong> Snake Creek Mudstone for similar reasons, so that intervals are of constant thickness with <strong>the</strong><br />

exception of near <strong>the</strong> zero edges where both <strong>the</strong> Showgrounds Sandstone and Rewan Formation<br />

were adjusted. Figure 6.1 shows typical horizons interpreted on different vintages of data, where<br />

different seismic processing flows used resulted in non-uniformity of seismic character; itself<br />

leading to difficulties in tying different vintages of data.<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!