Report - Sida Studi
Report - Sida Studi
Report - Sida Studi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Friday 30 September 2005: New Trends<br />
7 Plenary session 2: Education & Entertainment<br />
7 Plenary session 2:<br />
Education &<br />
Entertainment<br />
7.1 The Safe Sex Comedy Show, Amsterdam<br />
In the afternoon the conference enjoyed a presentation by<br />
the Safe Sex Comedy Show from Amsterdam. The group<br />
comprised young men and women who treated us to a<br />
series of sketches illustrating a range of subjects around<br />
HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, sexual<br />
health, relationships and sexuality. Through this medium<br />
the conference heard from a range of characters each<br />
talking about these subjects in imaginary situations. The<br />
performances included representations of the nervousness<br />
and anxiety with which people approach their first<br />
sexual intercourse and especially the pressure boys feel<br />
because of the assumption that, ‘…you gonna know what<br />
to do’. We heard too about the career of ‘Mr Herpes’ and<br />
his family of sexually transmitted diseases; and about<br />
the desperation and isolation felt by young women<br />
abandoned in pregnancy by young men who, ‘…came<br />
and saw and … disappeared’ leaving them to become a<br />
woman who is still only, ‘…a child carrying and growing<br />
a child inside’. There was a call from a young woman to<br />
challenge sexism in social life and service provision. We<br />
followed a young man through his experiences of visiting<br />
an STI clinic and another who was ‘Janet trapped inside<br />
the body of John’ and another macho man ending with<br />
a challenge to deal with homophobia and sexism, and all<br />
other assumptions we make about other people’s sex and<br />
sexuality, to ‘mind our own’. More information about the<br />
Safe Sex Comedy Show is included in appendix 5.<br />
7.2 Forum discussion<br />
The performance was followed by a forum discussion in<br />
which the performers responded to questions and comments<br />
from conference participants. In reply to a question<br />
about how they had formed the group, the performers<br />
explained that they are all entertainers working in<br />
Amsterdam and they were convened into a group through<br />
word of mouth. Asked about whether they worked in<br />
schools and the reception the performances get, they<br />
noted that their experience was as yet limited to working<br />
in two schools where the show had been positively<br />
received. It was noted that they distributed condoms to<br />
students as part of the performance.<br />
In response to a question about whether either a script or<br />
recording of the performance was available, the performers<br />
pointed out that a DVD may be accessible through<br />
Juan Walter but that there is no script available for circulation.<br />
They noted that they wrote their own scripts and<br />
thought that they could not perform in the way that they<br />
did unless they spoke from their own hearts, although<br />
they emphasised that the development of material did<br />
involve consulting with other young people on a local<br />
basis so as to ensure cultural relevance. Replying to a<br />
question about whether audiences seem to find the material<br />
culturally relevant and to an observation that the<br />
material is both relatively explicit and heavily influenced<br />
by Black American culture, the group noted that there<br />
was no driving intention behind their work to achieve<br />
cultural inclusiveness but recognition. This they felt had<br />
been achieved since they recognised these references<br />
themselves as young people.<br />
It was also noted that the performance could be modified<br />
to suit particular audiences. Another questioner concurred<br />
with this view but asked how teachers and parents<br />
responded to the performance. The performers noted<br />
that teachers were shocked about things that were said in<br />
the course of the show but they usually accepted that the<br />
response of young people was an accurate assessment of<br />
its relevance and appropriateness. They noted that this<br />
was reflective of a wider issue about generational differences<br />
and that the gap between what young people want<br />
and what adults provide is growing. They emphasised<br />
that in matters like HIV/AIDS, in their view there was<br />
no choice but to talk about sex and sexuality in ways<br />
that are understood by young people. Asked if the group<br />
itself was representative of young people from a strong<br />
religious faith background, the performers reiterated the<br />
point that the performance could be modified to reflect<br />
the specific needs and concerns of groups of young people<br />
and acknowledged that they would consider additional<br />
consultation or involvement with young people from a<br />
strong faith background in order to be able to represent<br />
their experiences faithfully.<br />
Juan Walter provided some additional background information<br />
about the demand placed on him by supporting<br />
the show. He noted that the process involved providing<br />
education, supporting self-exploration, and helping with<br />
the development of material.<br />
Since this segment overran significantly, a proposal to<br />
cancel the planned workshops for the afternoon was<br />
accepted and the session closed with the performance<br />
of two rap songs written by a member of the Safe Sex<br />
Comedy Show.<br />
17