04.11.2014 Views

Report - Sida Studi

Report - Sida Studi

Report - Sida Studi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix 10: Evaluation<br />

24. How did you find the collaboration with the<br />

other participants?<br />

26. Which presentations were the most<br />

interesting for you?<br />

Workshop Very Not Not<br />

satisfying Satisfying satisfying satisfying at all<br />

<br />

<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7 3 1<br />

8 <br />

9 <br />

10 <br />

11<br />

<br />

<br />

Other remarks:<br />

• A co-facilitator was not in a stable condition to lead the<br />

workshop because of too many personal feelings. There<br />

were also some interruptions (between a reporter and<br />

co-facilitator) that made the situation stressful. However<br />

it was overall a good workshop due to the collaboration<br />

of the participants. The topic was very interesting and<br />

important.<br />

• All countries involved in A&M Europe should get exactly<br />

the same measurement of support so that AIDS & Mobility<br />

will live longer. For instance, we have and get everything<br />

we need in Sweden. Swedish government takes problems<br />

in society in all categories into serious consideration.<br />

• I chose to continue in the same working group for the<br />

benefit of my attendance. I was very satisfied. I received<br />

invitations to come to Belgium to explain my work.<br />

• One facilitator and one participant took up all the time.<br />

(working group 7)<br />

• It was impossible to arrive at conclusions, it’s a very specific<br />

theme with specific parameters. (working group 10)<br />

Closing session<br />

25. Was the closing session on Sunday,<br />

October 2, 2005 useful to you?<br />

Yes Partly No<br />

8 3<br />

Prof. Bernardo Sousa, representative of<br />

the Portuguese High Commission for<br />

Migration and Ethnic Minorities 9<br />

Mr. Simon Forrest, general rapporteur<br />

3<br />

Mr. Paulo Nossa, Universidade do Minho 6<br />

Closing words of Mr. Edwin Goossens Vaerewyck <br />

General impression<br />

27. What is your overall impression of the 8th<br />

European Migrants Meeting?<br />

Very Not Not<br />

satisfying Satisfying satisfying satisfying at all<br />

0 <br />

28. Did the meeting fulfil your expectations?<br />

Main benefits<br />

Yes Partly No<br />

4 7 <br />

29. What are the main benefits you derived from<br />

the 8th European Migrants Meeting?<br />

Yes Partly No<br />

New information 4 7 3<br />

New ideas 0 1<br />

New suggestions for interventions 17 6 1<br />

Exchange of experience 9 4<br />

Meeting colleagues from other countries 21 1 1<br />

Other remarks:<br />

• The next meeting should be held in Denmark!<br />

• I will definitely love to have it organised in Sweden,<br />

because of the fact that society’s problems are very vital<br />

and the Swedish government cares much about it.<br />

• Insufficiencies in the communication with illiterate people<br />

• National network<br />

• Not satisfied with organisation of working day – workshops<br />

after entertainment<br />

• Plays were full of useful ideas. I also liked it that the<br />

meeting was focused on young people.<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!