05.11.2014 Views

The EVA Challenge: Implementing Value-Added Change in an ...

The EVA Challenge: Implementing Value-Added Change in an ...

The EVA Challenge: Implementing Value-Added Change in an ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Need for a W<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g Strategy <strong>an</strong>d Org<strong>an</strong>ization 41<br />

of org<strong>an</strong>ization is best. Where the firm faces a more complex environment,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d that environment c<strong>an</strong> be segmented appropriately to<br />

address the complexity, the decentralized org<strong>an</strong>ization would be the<br />

form of choice. If no effective segmentation is possible, the functional<br />

org<strong>an</strong>ization becomes the default choice.<br />

In the case of dynamic org<strong>an</strong>izations, some form of lateral, or<br />

even cross-functional, relations may be required to help generate<br />

needed <strong>in</strong>formation or promote <strong>in</strong>tegration across segments or<br />

functions. Lateral relations r<strong>an</strong>ge from <strong>in</strong>formal contacts between<br />

segment m<strong>an</strong>agers or functional m<strong>an</strong>agers, to <strong>in</strong>tegrators (corporate<br />

staff or group executives), to the most complex form: a matrix org<strong>an</strong>ization,<br />

with its dual authority <strong>an</strong>d dotted-l<strong>in</strong>e relationships. Dunc<strong>an</strong><br />

cautioned that the least <strong>in</strong>vasive form of lateral relations that<br />

does the trick is the right one. Matrix org<strong>an</strong>izations c<strong>an</strong> become<br />

very difficult to m<strong>an</strong>age, <strong>in</strong> part because they have the unfortunate<br />

side effect of obscur<strong>in</strong>g accountability.<br />

For most org<strong>an</strong>izations of <strong>an</strong>y signific<strong>an</strong>t size or maturity,<br />

segmentation <strong>an</strong>d decentralization are the <strong>an</strong>swers. Truly <strong>in</strong>divisible<br />

org<strong>an</strong>izations, except small ones, are rare. Segmentation may be<br />

along geographic, process, product, <strong>in</strong>dustry, or customer l<strong>in</strong>es. How<br />

do comp<strong>an</strong>ies embrac<strong>in</strong>g the three different value discipl<strong>in</strong>es that<br />

we have discussed h<strong>an</strong>dle segmentation?<br />

Cost leaders focus on streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g processes to m<strong>in</strong>imize cost;<br />

thus, they tend to st<strong>an</strong>dardize operations as much as possible. If<br />

processes are not particularly <strong>in</strong>terdependent, as is the case with<br />

m<strong>an</strong>y commodities, creat<strong>in</strong>g separate bus<strong>in</strong>ess units for the several<br />

processes is likely to produce the best results. If processes are <strong>in</strong>tegral<br />

to the product, as <strong>in</strong> the production of <strong>in</strong>ternal combustion<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>es, segmentation by product is likely to deliver the highest<br />

value.<br />

Product leaders, by contrast, are product <strong>in</strong>novators. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

will generally operate better with a more loosely knit, flexible org<strong>an</strong>ization<br />

divided along product l<strong>in</strong>es, where each segment has all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!