05.11.2014 Views

April 2013 - AFMA

April 2013 - AFMA

April 2013 - AFMA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

digestion. As a consequence of this, foods<br />

equal in digestibility, but which differ in<br />

NDF content, will promote different feed<br />

intakes. The more NDF a diet contains, as<br />

well as level of lignification, the more VFI<br />

will be depressed.<br />

“Another important concept<br />

is that ruminant animals<br />

consume feeds to maintain a<br />

constant amount of DM in the<br />

rumen”<br />

Mechanical grinding of roughage<br />

accelerates breakdown by destroying<br />

the structural organisation of cell walls,<br />

thereby accelerating their breakdown in<br />

the rumen and increasing intake. Note<br />

that fine particles pass rapidly out of the<br />

rumen, leaving room for more food, but<br />

allowing some digestible material to<br />

escape undigested.<br />

The deficiency of essential nutrients<br />

or the presence of deleterious substances<br />

that reduce the activities of rumen microorganisms,<br />

are liable to reduce feed intake.<br />

The most common is a protein/nitrogen<br />

deficiency. Other nutrients whose deficiencies<br />

are liable to restrict food intake<br />

in ruminants are phosphorus, sulphur, sodium<br />

and cobalt.<br />

Although the concept of palatability<br />

is not easily defined, it is not thought to<br />

be an important factor determining intake,<br />

except where the food is protected<br />

against consumption or contaminated in<br />

some way. However, if a particular flavour<br />

of food becomes associated in the minds<br />

of ruminants with unpleasant consequences<br />

(especially sheep), they tend to<br />

avoid food with that flavour.<br />

Animal factors<br />

Consumption of feed dry matter (DM)<br />

usually ranges from 1,5 to 2% of body<br />

weight in older animals on a maintenance<br />

ration, to about 2,5 to 3,5% for finishing<br />

lambs and beef cattle. It may also be as<br />

much as 3,8 to 4% for dairy cows during<br />

peak production.<br />

Intake seems to be restricted due to<br />

the capacity of the gastro-intestinal tract,<br />

i.e. rumen, with stretch and tension receptors<br />

in the rumen wall signalling the degree<br />

of “fill” to the brain. What constitutes<br />

the maximum (critical) fill of the rumen<br />

is still uncertain. Circumstances that may<br />

change the relationship between the size<br />

of the rumen and the size of the whole<br />

animal (abdominal fat depots, stage of<br />

pregnancy, proportionality to metabolic<br />

body weight, W0.75) are likely to affect<br />

intake as well.<br />

The notion that voluminous foods (hay<br />

and straw) will fill the rumen to a greater<br />

degree than concentrates has received<br />

some attention, although after rumination,<br />

these voluminous foods are not as<br />

“bulky” as in the feeding trough. There is<br />

also evidence that foods with high water<br />

content (about 900g/kg) promote a lesser<br />

DM-intake than comparable foods with<br />

lower water content.<br />

Another important concept is that ruminant<br />

animals consume feeds to maintain<br />

a constant amount of DM in the<br />

rumen. Ruminants appear to limit feed intake<br />

in relation to its capacity to dispose<br />

of energy via the pathways of oxidation<br />

and synthesis. Prolonged under-nutrition<br />

results in an enhanced capacity to utilise<br />

energy, as often reflected in compensatory<br />

growth, and its attendant increase in<br />

feed intake.<br />

The feed intake of pregnant (hormonal<br />

changes) or lactating animals, apart from<br />

volume restrictions mentioned above,<br />

may increase due to the increased need<br />

for nutrients, the latter being mainly<br />

physiological in origin.<br />

According to food choice, when two<br />

feeds differ in the concentration of one<br />

nutrient in relation to energy requirements,<br />

the animal’s interests are best<br />

served by eating the two in such a ratio<br />

that the intake of the nutrient in question<br />

is optimised. As mentioned above,<br />

ruminants may also exhibit “neophobia”,<br />

a reluctance to accept a new food.<br />

Regarding extensive production systems,<br />

ruminants attempt to graze for the<br />

shortest period of time possible because<br />

the energy expenditure in eating is related<br />

to time rather than to ingested mass.<br />

Environmental factors<br />

Voluntary intake of pasture by grazing<br />

ruminants is not only influenced by<br />

chemical composition and digestibility,<br />

but also by its physical structure and<br />

spatial distribution (walking distance).<br />

Therefore its intake is primarily determined<br />

by bite size, bite rate and grazing<br />

time. Ruminants tend to choose long<br />

fibrous foods rather than finely ground<br />

foods for normal rumen functions, as a<br />

lack of fibre leads to fluctuations in rumen<br />

pH and an absence of rumination.<br />

Grazing animals also tend to prefer<br />

rapidly digested leaves to more slowly<br />

digested stems. Some plants may be<br />

rendered unpalatable and ultimately<br />

be rejected due to protected spines or<br />

contamination with excreta. In intensive<br />

systems, frequent feeding of a total<br />

mixed ration (TMR) does not necessarily<br />

increase VFI, but may help to stabilise rumen<br />

fermentation.<br />

Another feature regarding the environment<br />

is the effect of day length on VFI.<br />

Small ruminants tend to decrease their intake<br />

as day length declines, where short<br />

days coincide with a shortage of food.<br />

Like in monogastric animals, feed<br />

intake is also influenced by environmental<br />

temperatures, water intake and ill health.<br />

Prediction of intake<br />

Animals are commonly fed according to<br />

appetite, and it is not possible to predict<br />

their performance using feeding standards<br />

without an intake estimate. For pigs<br />

and poultry it may be relatively simple,<br />

but predictions for ruminants are more<br />

difficult as many food variables have to<br />

be taken into account.<br />

There will always be a significant proportion<br />

of variation in behaviour of individuals<br />

that cannot be predicted from<br />

knowledge of their physiological state<br />

and the composition of foods on offer.<br />

Due to the complexity of modulation and<br />

prediction equations, it cannot be fully<br />

discussed here (animal features and environmental<br />

effects).<br />

References available from the authors.<br />

Please email EinkamererOB@ufs.ac.za<br />

<br />

Processing<br />

<strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX ● APRIL <strong>2013</strong> 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!