05.11.2014 Views

April 2013 - AFMA

April 2013 - AFMA

April 2013 - AFMA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

How to overcome anti-nutritional<br />

factors using a range of enzymes<br />

By J-P Ruckebusch, DSM Nutritional Products Ltd, Kaiseraugst, Switserland; I. Knap,<br />

DSM Nutritional Products, Village-Neuf, France & M Umar Faruk and E Upton Augustsson,<br />

Novozymes A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark<br />

Anti-nutritional factors (ANFs)<br />

are substances generated<br />

in natural feedstuffs by the<br />

normal metabolism of plant<br />

species (Kulmar, 1992). Cereal<br />

grains and vegetable proteins are the<br />

main ingredients used to meet the energy<br />

and protein requirements in poultry and<br />

swine diets. However, these ingredients all<br />

contain varying levels of ANFs which interfere<br />

with the optimal utilisation of dietary<br />

nutrients. ANFs act by reducing protein digestibility,<br />

binding to various nutrients, increasing<br />

gut viscosity and thereby reducing<br />

digestive efficiency (Lange, 2000).<br />

There is a continuous effort to fully<br />

characterise and understand the full impact<br />

that ANFs have in feed, and also the<br />

full impact that the removal of these factors<br />

will have on animal production.<br />

Exogenous feed enzymes<br />

Exogenous feed enzymes have been used<br />

in commercial diets for several decades<br />

to increase the nutrient value of feed ingredients<br />

by the targeted degrading or<br />

modification of ANFs such as phytin and<br />

non-starch polysaccharides (NSPs), and<br />

more recently protease inhibitors and<br />

lectin present in soybean meals – leading<br />

to substantial cost savings in animal feed<br />

formulations. The use of feed enzymes furthermore<br />

does not only provide flexibility<br />

in feed formulation, allowing for cheaper<br />

raw materials to be used in animal diets,<br />

but also improves the sustainability of livestock<br />

production.<br />

An enzyme can only be a valuable solution<br />

if the substrate that it can degrade<br />

is causing a problem, for example, an antinutritional<br />

factor, or if the substrate is a nutrient<br />

that is not utilised in the optimal way.<br />

Commercially available products may contain<br />

single (mono-component) enzymes,<br />

a blend of several mono-components or a<br />

cocktail of enzymes which contains guaranteed<br />

levels of certain enzymes together<br />

with unspecified enzymes’ so-called side<br />

activities.<br />

Phytic acid<br />

The most well-known ANF in non-ruminant<br />

nutrition is phytic acid, of which the<br />

content in various feedstuffs as well as its<br />

effect on phosphorous availability have<br />

been well documented. It is also well documented<br />

that the anti-nutritional effect of<br />

phytic acid goes beyond that of reducing<br />

phosphorus (P) and calcium (Ca) availability,<br />

and its destruction leads to a lift in digestibility<br />

of minerals, energy and amino<br />

acids availability. The use of phytase is now<br />

a standard practice in swine and poultry<br />

diets.<br />

The negative effects of non-starch polysaccharides<br />

(NSPs) on digestibility and the<br />

rate of absorption of nutrients from starch,<br />

proteins and fats have been demonstrated<br />

in several studies (Choct et al., 1992; Cowieson,<br />

2005). The effect of NSPs on the availability<br />

of nutrients is three-fold:<br />

• Increasing of the gut viscosity.<br />

• Reducing the flow of available nutrients<br />

into the duodenum.<br />

• Physically hindering the access of digestive<br />

enzymes to nutrients enclosed<br />

by the NSPs present in the plant cell<br />

walls (cage effect).<br />

Specifically in poultry, the NSP content of<br />

cereal grain or vegetable protein and its<br />

effects on both increasing the intestinal<br />

viscosity as well as entrapping nutrients<br />

by cage effect, have been shown to have<br />

a negative effect on the nutritive value of<br />

the feed. An increase in viscosity by the<br />

soluble fibre fraction in plant cell walls,<br />

such as arabino-xylans, beta-glucans and<br />

pectinsis, is negatively associated with nutrient<br />

availability. This is particularly true<br />

for grains with a high level of soluble NSPs,<br />

such as wheat and barley.<br />

Effect of viscosity<br />

The contribution of NSP’s degrading enzymes<br />

on the effect of viscosity has been<br />

measured in vitro. These in vitro results are<br />

used in predictive models to estimate the<br />

ME content of the grain as well as the contribution<br />

of NSP’s degrading enzymes (or<br />

carbohydrates). Recently a balance study<br />

and growth studies on broilers receiving<br />

a mono component endo-xylanase in<br />

wheat-based diets confirmed significant<br />

beneficial effects on the digestibility of dry<br />

matter, protein, lipids, the feed conversion<br />

ratio and the AME of diets. Viscosity alone<br />

was reduced by an average 50% (Francesch<br />

et al., 2012).<br />

The effect of the insoluble NSP fraction<br />

has, however, been more abstract and<br />

makes it difficult to predict the value of the<br />

entrapped nutrients (starch and protein)<br />

within the starchy endoderm. It has been<br />

shown that even small reductions in xylans<br />

content of grains can result in improved<br />

feed conversion and animal performance.<br />

By puncturing the arabino-xylan cell<br />

wall cages, the diet digestibility is increased<br />

by either intact nutrient released from the<br />

“cages” available for further enzymatic digestion,<br />

or digestive enzymes could enter<br />

and degrade the substrates within the cells.<br />

Digests from stomach samples of piglets<br />

showed the presence of intact plant cells<br />

resulting in the contents of some cells escaping<br />

digestion after feeding (Le et al.,<br />

<strong>2013</strong>). It is a common misconception that<br />

the feed grinding and pelleting process<br />

opens all the cell walls of the endosperm or<br />

the aleurone.<br />

Feed science<br />

<strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX ● APRIL <strong>2013</strong> 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!