07.11.2014 Views

Hurricane Katrina: Legal Issues - Columbus School of Law

Hurricane Katrina: Legal Issues - Columbus School of Law

Hurricane Katrina: Legal Issues - Columbus School of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Liability for damages<br />

Does a property owner have a right to sue another property owner whose property, debris or trees<br />

were transported to his land by a storm?<br />

Probably not. Although adjacent property owners generally have a duty to exercise reasonable care and remove<br />

dangerous conditions from their property, no one is liable for an injury caused by an act <strong>of</strong> God. This includes an<br />

injury due directly and exclusively to natural causes without human intervention, which could not have been<br />

prevented by the exercise <strong>of</strong> reasonable care and foresight. City <strong>of</strong> Hattiesburg v. Hillman, 76 So. 368, 370 (Miss.<br />

1954).<br />

What if an owner’s property is damaged by a neighbor’s tree that was dead before the storm?<br />

Visibly dead or decaying trees are an exception to the act <strong>of</strong> God rule. A city or property owner that has actual<br />

knowledge (i.e., visible signs <strong>of</strong> defects or a dangerous state) will be held liable for damages if they failed to exercise<br />

ordinary due care before the storm. Warren v. City <strong>of</strong> Tupelo, 194 So. 293 (Miss. 1946).<br />

Can the state be held liable for property damage as a result <strong>of</strong> their emergency management<br />

activities?<br />

Neither the state, nor any <strong>of</strong> its political subdivisions, nor other agencies, or their respective agents, employees or<br />

representatives can be held liable for property damage, except in cases <strong>of</strong> willful misconduct, if they are complying<br />

with the Emergency Management <strong>Law</strong>. Miss. Code Ann. § 33-15-21 (2005).<br />

Are government authorities involved in the clearance and removal operation liable for personal<br />

injury or property damage incurred as a result <strong>of</strong> their actions?<br />

Under the Emergency Management <strong>Law</strong>, a state employee or agent performing duties related to a removal operation<br />

is not liable for property damage except in cases <strong>of</strong> wilful misconduct, gross negligence, or bad faith. Miss. Code<br />

Ann. § 33-15-49 (2005).<br />

If I voluntarily open my property as a shelter during a natural disaster, am I liable to others for<br />

any resulting personal injury or property damage?<br />

Any person who voluntarily and without payment allows property to be used as a shelter or who provides assistance<br />

to persons during or in recovery from an actual natural disaster, cannot be held liable for causing the death or injury<br />

<strong>of</strong> an another person. Miss. Code Ann. § 33-15-21 (2005).<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> private property by others<br />

When may an individual in an emergency use the property <strong>of</strong> another?<br />

The defense <strong>of</strong> criminal necessity allows an individual to use the property <strong>of</strong> another without liability for trespass.<br />

The defense requires that individuals: (1) must have sought to prevent a significant evil; (2) had no adequate<br />

alternative; and (3) the harm caused must not have been disproportionate to the harm avoided. McMillan v. City <strong>of</strong><br />

Jackson, 701 So. 2d 1105 (Miss. 1997). The defense <strong>of</strong> necessity ceases if other alternatives (such as shelters)<br />

become available to the person. McMillan v. City <strong>of</strong> Jackson, 701 So. 2d 1105 (Miss. 1997).<br />

When may an owner or occupant use force to remove trespassers?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!