08.11.2014 Views

2205 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2205 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2205 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IMPACT OF THE EU SUGAR REGIME ON BCCCA MEMBER COMPANIES<br />

The CMO provides additional aids to the sugar industry namely refining aid which is granted to<br />

the refining industry and covers certain costs of raw sugar, and production refunds granted for<br />

sugar used by the pharmaceutical and chemical industries, allowing them to buy sugar at world<br />

market prices to which shipping costs are added.<br />

• Trade regime. In terms of the management of external trade, the current CMO provides two<br />

instruments, namely border protection and export refunds 4 . Border protection is in the form of a<br />

combination of two duties, one fixed and another resulting from the application of the special<br />

safeguard clause justified by the volatility of the world market price for sugar. Protection for<br />

sugar (CN 1701) comprises a fixed duty of €419 per tonne, except in the case of raw sugar for<br />

refining to which a duty of only €339 per tonne applies. On average the additional duty was €115<br />

per tonne in 2003 (€87 per tonne in 2002).<br />

Export refunds are intended to cover the difference between the EU price and the world price for<br />

sugar, allowing it to be sold on the world market. The average export price for white EU sugar<br />

was €280 per tonne for the 2001/2002 marketing year and €223 per tonne for 2002/03. Refunds<br />

are paid for sugar obtained from beet or cane harvested in the EU and sugar imported under the<br />

ACP Protocol/Agreement with India 5 . For the marketing year 2001/02 refunds were €443 per<br />

tonne and for 2002/03 €485 per tonne.<br />

4<br />

In preparation for EU enlargement, a number of ‘double zero’ agreements were established between the EU and accession countries<br />

aimed at further liberalising trade on agricultural products and providing for reciprocal elimination of export refunds and the elimination of<br />

import tariffs<br />

5<br />

The ACP Protocol/Agreement with India establishes close links with a number of sugar-producing ACP States and India. This peculiarity<br />

originated in the Commonwealth Agreements governing the import of raw cane sugar into the UK for refining and marketing. This sugar<br />

covered two thirds of UK consumption. The Agreements were taken over by the European Community and adjusted to suit its needs<br />

when the UK first joined the EEC. The Protocol on sugar attached to the 1975 Lomé Agreement between the ACP countries and the<br />

Community sets out a commitment from both parties, a commitment by the Community to buy certain quantities of sugar at guaranteed<br />

prices and a commitment by the 16 ACP signatory countries to supply that sugar. Under the Protocol on sugar, the signatory ACP<br />

countries benefit from a total exemption from import duties on sugar, whether cane, raw or white. Sugar is marketed in the Community<br />

at a price freely negotiated between buyers and sellers but the Community undertakes to buy at a guaranteed price any sugar that cannot<br />

be marketed at a price equal to or higher than the guaranteed price. An identical agreement was concluded at the same time with India.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!