Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements When<br />
used in this discussion, the words “anticipate,” “should,”<br />
“expect,” “estimate,” “project” and similar expressions are<br />
intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forwardlooking<br />
statements contained in this report are made pursuant to<br />
the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation<br />
Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve predictions of<br />
future company performance, and are thus dependent on a<br />
number of factors affecting the company’s performance. Where<br />
possible, specific factors that may impact performance materially<br />
have been identified in connection with specific forward-looking<br />
statements. Additional risks and uncertainties include, without<br />
limitation, the impact of competition and general economic<br />
conditions in the global vision care and ophthalmic surgical and<br />
pharmaceuticals markets, where the company’s businesses<br />
compete, changes in global and localized economic and political<br />
conditions (for example, the company does business in Asia and<br />
Brazil, where recently, economies and associated currency risks<br />
have been volatile), changing trends in practitioner and consumer<br />
preferences and tastes, changes in technology, medical<br />
developments relating to the use of the company’s products, legal<br />
proceedings initiated by or against the company, changes in<br />
government regulation of the company’s products and operations,<br />
changes in private and regulatory schemes providing for<br />
the reimbursement of patient medical expenses, difficulties or<br />
delays in the development, production, testing, regulatory<br />
approval, marketing of products, the effect of changes within the<br />
company’s organization, and such other factors as are described<br />
in greater detail in the company’s filings with the Securities and<br />
Exchange Commission, including its <strong>1999</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> on<br />
Form 10-K.<br />
Purchased In-Process Research<br />
And Development<br />
In connection with the 1998 acquisitions of Chiron Vision and<br />
Storz, the company immediately expensed $41 ($28 for Storz<br />
and $13 for Chiron Vision) of the combined purchase price of<br />
these businesses, representing amounts for in-process research<br />
and development (IPR&D). The expensed IPR&D represented<br />
the value of projects that had not yet reached technological feasibility<br />
and for which the assets to be used in such projects had no<br />
alternative future uses (See Note 2 – Acquisitions). The company<br />
expects that products developed arising from the acquired<br />
IPR&D will begin to generate sales and positive cash flows in the<br />
time frames discussed in the following paragraphs. However,<br />
development of these technologies remains a significant risk due<br />
to the remaining effort to achieve technical viability, rapidly<br />
changing customer markets, uncertain standards for new products<br />
and significant competitive threats from numerous companies.<br />
See the future 17 <strong>Bausch</strong> & <strong>Lomb</strong><br />
Failure to bring the products associated with these projects to<br />
market in a timely manner could result in a loss of market share<br />
or a lost opportunity that could have a material adverse impact on<br />
the company’s businesses and operating results.<br />
The company estimated the fair value of the purchased<br />
IPR&D for each of these acquisitions using an income approach.<br />
Such methodology involved estimating the fair value of the purchased<br />
IPR&D using the present value of the estimated after-tax<br />
cash flows expected to be generated as a result of these projects<br />
and using risk-adjusted discount rates and revenue forecasts as<br />
appropriate. The selection of the discount rate was based on<br />
consideration of the company’s weighted average cost of capital,<br />
as well as other factors, including the useful life of each project,<br />
anticipated profitability levels of each project and the uncertainty<br />
surrounding successful development of each project<br />
known at the time. The amount expensed was also impacted by<br />
the percentage of completion for each project. The company<br />
expects to fund all R&D efforts, including acquired IPR&D,<br />
from cash flow from operations.<br />
Set forth below are descriptions of certain acquired IPR&D<br />
projects, including their status at the end of <strong>1999</strong>:<br />
Storz At the beginning of 1998, the company acquired Storz,<br />
a leading manufacturer of high-quality ophthalmic surgical<br />
instruments, surgical and diagnostic equipment, intraocular lens<br />
(IOL) implants and ophthalmic pharmaceuticals. The allocation<br />
of $28 of the $370 purchase price to IPR&D represented its<br />
estimated fair value using the methodology described above. The<br />
$28 was allocated to the following projects: Cidofovir, $12;<br />
Ocuvite, $10 and other technologies, $6.<br />
Cidofovir – The company estimated that revenues attributed<br />
to Cidofovir, a broad spectrum anti-viral agent for the<br />
treatment of ocular infections, were expected to average in excess<br />
of $50 per year for the six years beginning in 2001. The discount<br />
rate and stage of completion used to derive the IPR&D amount<br />
were 18% and 32%, respectively. During 1998 and <strong>1999</strong> the<br />
company spent approximately $3 on R&D efforts for this<br />
product. Product development, however, has been discontinued<br />
due to a failure to meet expected performance attributes.<br />
Consequently, the company will not realize its forecasted<br />
revenues from this project.<br />
Ocuvite – Revenues attributed to alternative formulations<br />
of a currently marketed product, Ocuvite, a high-potency<br />
vitamin/mineral supplement, were expected to total approximately<br />
$37 for the three years ending in 2004, and then average<br />
approximately $40 annually through 2011. The discount rate<br />
and stage of completion used to derive the IPR&D amount<br />
were 22% and 54%, respectively. The company believes<br />
development costs and revenue projections made at the time of<br />
acquisition are still valid.