Demographic Profile of Seniors in PSA 1-A - Detroit Area Agency on ...
Demographic Profile of Seniors in PSA 1-A - Detroit Area Agency on ...
Demographic Profile of Seniors in PSA 1-A - Detroit Area Agency on ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
While Regi<strong>on</strong> 1-A’s share was the same as that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1-C, and slightly higher than 1-B,<br />
shear numbers led the way as Regi<strong>on</strong>1-A’s share <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the State total, 10.5 percent, fell just<br />
below that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1-C at 11.3 percent, and well beh<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d Regi<strong>on</strong> 1-B. In fact, Regi<strong>on</strong> 1-B<br />
accounted for more than 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> every 4 State seniors who lived al<strong>on</strong>e.<br />
Further Analyses <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Regi<strong>on</strong> 1-A<br />
In order to better understand the changes that have occurred <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Regi<strong>on</strong> 1-A, the analysis<br />
now addresses the regi<strong>on</strong>’s geographic comp<strong>on</strong>ents. Learn<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g more about where the<br />
losses (and ga<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>s) have occurred, as well as the characteristics <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the pers<strong>on</strong>s who reside<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the regi<strong>on</strong>, will allow for a better understand<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these trends and a more focused<br />
approach to service delivery.<br />
Our sub-regi<strong>on</strong>al analysis is be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g c<strong>on</strong>ducted <strong>on</strong> several levels.<br />
1. Community-level – An analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> changes <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 60 and over populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> each<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 9 communities <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
2. Sector-level – An analysis is d<strong>on</strong>e by divid<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Detroit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>to the 10<br />
Plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g Sectors that were developed by the City Plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1997,<br />
and have become the focus <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the City. To extend the geography<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>-wide, two other sectors have been developed – <strong>on</strong>e made up <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Hamtramck<br />
and Highland Park; the other comprised <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the five Grosse Po<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tes and Harper<br />
Woods.<br />
3. Empowerment Z<strong>on</strong>e – by Census Tract and Sub-Z<strong>on</strong>e<br />
4. City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Detroit</str<strong>on</strong>g> (<strong>on</strong>ly) – Subcommunities - 37 Neighborhood divisi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
5. City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Detroit</str<strong>on</strong>g> (<strong>on</strong>ly) – Census Tracts – 313 units, averag<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g about 4,000 people<br />
each.<br />
Community Analysis<br />
Regi<strong>on</strong> 1-A has experienced a steady decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> its elderly populati<strong>on</strong> s<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ce 1970. The<br />
decade <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 1990s represented the largest loss percentage loss, and sec<strong>on</strong>d largest<br />
numerical loss over this 30-year period. While the majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the loss occurred <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Detroit</str<strong>on</strong>g>, which accounts for 87 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the regi<strong>on</strong>’s populati<strong>on</strong>, all communities <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>, with the excepti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the smallest community <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the regi<strong>on</strong>, Grosse Po<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>te Shores<br />
village, experienced loss. As already documented <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Table 3, the heaviest losses occurred<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the cohorts between 60 and 74 years <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> age.<br />
While the analysis to this po<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>t has dem<strong>on</strong>strated a loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 60+ populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Regi<strong>on</strong><br />
1-A, result<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> State share, as well as a loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the number and State share <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
M<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>orities 60+, we still need to better understand the demographic and socioec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />
characteristics <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this populati<strong>on</strong>. In order to do that we turn to the 2000 Census and seek<br />
to m<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e the applicable data. 5<br />
5 The age categories that will be used for this analysis are dependent up<strong>on</strong> the tabulati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fered by the<br />
Census Bureau. As is the case with poverty calculati<strong>on</strong>s, many <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the tabulati<strong>on</strong>s do not allow for the<br />
complete universe <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 60+ to be used. In most cases <strong>on</strong>e is limited to universes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 65+ and 75+.<br />
8