14.11.2014 Views

Geophysical data acquisition - OGS

Geophysical data acquisition - OGS

Geophysical data acquisition - OGS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The joint inversion of<br />

direct, reflected and<br />

refracted P waves<br />

allows reconstructing<br />

the velocity and depth<br />

in a model (above)<br />

without any<br />

redundancy, unlike in<br />

the elastic case (below).<br />

For a proper comparison of the differences in the seismic response, one has to<br />

compensate all changes that do not depend on the reservoir itself, as the recording<br />

geometry and equipment. A factor usually neglected that we studied is the seasonal<br />

variation of the seawater velocity, due to changing currents and the temperature<br />

of the mixed layer. These variations can be of the same order of magnitude (or even<br />

larger) than those expected at the reservoir; furthermore, since they are spatially<br />

organized, they can be attributed to the reservoir, so totally distorting the timelapse<br />

analysis. In the Figure, we see that two 3D surveys acquired at the North sea<br />

in 1989 and 1992 provide very different estimates for the sound speed in the sea<br />

water, obtained by the joint inversion of reflected and head waves. (We remark that<br />

these plots can be quite interesting for oceanographic studies too).<br />

Outside the reservoir, we do not expect variations of the seismic velocities and the<br />

reflector structure. Thus, we can impose that the Earth model in depth, obtained<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!