Young v. Saanich Police Department, 2003 BCSC 926 (CanLII).

Young v. Saanich Police Department, et al Page 54
(2) because they deprived the accused of the right to
make decisions of fundamental personal importance,
namely, the choice of medication to alleviate the
effects of an illness with life-threatening
consequences (para. 92).
The court also found that the accused's right to security of
the person had been infringed on the grounds that:
2003 BCSC 926 (CanLII)
... Depriving a patient of medication in such
circumstances, through a criminal sanction, also
constitutes a serious interference with both
physical and psychological integrity. (para. 97)
[117] In the case at bar, Mr. Young never faced any threat
of criminal prosecution or imprisonment. All that remains to
be considered is whether the policies or actions of the CRHC
interfere with Mr. Young's ability to make decisions of
fundamental personal importance or cause serious interference
with his physical or psychological integrity.
Liberty
[118] Mr. Young complains that the CRHC's zero-tolerance
policy deprives him of his right to smoke marihuana for the
alleviation of his symptoms. According to Parker, one's
choice of medication to alleviate the effects of an illness
with life-threatening consequences is of sufficient