Young v. Saanich Police Department, 2003 BCSC 926 (CanLII).

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Young v. Saanich Police Department, et al Page 8 Mr. Young has never provided his consent to the Minister regarding the release of the above-mentioned information to police agencies. [11] Mr. Young’s exemption was renewed from time to time pursuant to s. 56 and remained in effect at all material times. Specifically, the exemption was renewed on the following dates: September 1, 2000; March 5, 2001; 2003 BCSC 926 (CanLII) December 12, 2001; March 12, 2002; September 5, 2002 and October 4, 2002. [12] On December 12, 2001, the Minister of Health granted a similar exemption to Mrs. Young, permitting her to possess and produce marihuana for the sole purpose of assisting Mr. Young with the treatment of his medical condition. Mrs. Young’s exemption has also been renewed from time to time and has been in effect at all material times. The Housing Complex [13] The petitioners reside in a complex known as Beechwood Park. The CRHC owns and manages the complex, which consists of townhouses and a three story apartment building. Some, but not all, of the units are subsidized.
Young v. Saanich Police Department, et al Page 9 [14] The petitioners moved into a two-bedroom first floor suite in the apartment building at the beginning of September 2001. They pay market rent. Marihuana Use in the Building [15] Mr. Young has smoked marihuana in his suite or on his patio on a regular basis since the commencement of the tenancy. He deposed that he smokes the equivalent of 1/4 of a 2003 BCSC 926 (CanLII) tobacco cigarette every two to three hours or 1 1/2 tobacco cigarettes per day. He further deposed that he and his wife take steps to minimize the marihuana smoke in their suite by opening windows and using fans and an air purifier. He also maintains that the building is designed with pressurized hallways that create an airflow from the hallway into the suites for the purpose of minimizing smoke in the hallway in the event of a fire. Difficulties with the Neighbours [16] The petitioners' difficulties with their fellow tenants began on October 7, 2001, with the receipt of an anonymous letter in their mailbox. The handwritten letter read as follows:
Page 1 and 2: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COL
Page 3 and 4: Young v. Saanich Police Department,
Page 7: Young v. Saanich Police Department,
Page 59 and 60:
Young v. Saanich Police Department,
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
show all

Young v. Saanich Police Department, 2003 BCSC 926 (CanLII).

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?