21.11.2014 Views

Hit the road Positive leadership for troubled times - ICAEW

Hit the road Positive leadership for troubled times - ICAEW

Hit the road Positive leadership for troubled times - ICAEW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COVER STORY<br />

IF THIS IS THE ANSWER, WHY DO SO FEW<br />

COMPANIES BEHAVE THIS WAY?<br />

been ousted by <strong>the</strong>ir board and gone<br />

across town to open a rival agency. Six<br />

percent of <strong>the</strong> revenue had walked out of<br />

<strong>the</strong> door with <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong> company was<br />

losing money, it had too much debt at too<br />

high an interest rate, and it was all<br />

coming due too soon. Additionally, every<br />

client and every employee was asking,<br />

‘Should I stay or leave?’<br />

Talk about tough <strong>times</strong>! This was an<br />

early preview of what has become <strong>the</strong><br />

VUCA world. For <strong>the</strong> first six months I<br />

was <strong>the</strong>re I devoted 100% of my energies<br />

to two things: stabilising clients and staff,<br />

and refinancing <strong>the</strong> company. The reality<br />

was that if I didn’t get those two things<br />

done, nothing else would have mattered.<br />

Looked at in a positive way, given that we<br />

were successful on both fronts,<br />

accomplishing those goals set up all <strong>the</strong><br />

good things that have happened to <strong>the</strong><br />

company ever since.<br />

Bob Seelert is worldwide<br />

chairman of Saatchi & Saatchi.<br />

He is a graduate of Harvard<br />

Business School, has been<br />

CEO of five companies, built<br />

megabrands, been party to<br />

two megamergers, and<br />

enacted numerous<br />

turnarounds.<br />

bob.seelert@saatchiny.com<br />

You might be reading this article<br />

and thinking <strong>the</strong>se five things<br />

make a good deal of sense.<br />

By <strong>the</strong> same token you might<br />

be asking yourself, ‘If that’s <strong>the</strong><br />

case, why is it that so few<br />

companies and leaders behave<br />

this way?’ I believe <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

three fundamental answers to<br />

this dilemma.<br />

1. Failure TO EXPOSE <strong>the</strong> ugly truth<br />

The first stumbling block is that<br />

many companies and leaders<br />

demonstrate a consistent inability<br />

to take <strong>the</strong> first step. They simply<br />

fail to ‘get <strong>the</strong> ugly truth up on<br />

<strong>the</strong> table’.<br />

At General Motors, <strong>for</strong> example,<br />

this problem became systemic over<br />

a very long period of time,<br />

ultimately <strong>for</strong>cing <strong>the</strong> company<br />

into <strong>the</strong> position of requiring<br />

a government bailout to continue<br />

operations. During <strong>the</strong> Auto<br />

Hearings, GM management<br />

revealed <strong>the</strong>y were losing money,<br />

burning cash, and that liabilities<br />

exceeded assets. They attributed<br />

all this to unduly expensive union<br />

contracts, excess capacity, bad<br />

acquisitions, too many trademarks,<br />

runaway health care costs, <strong>for</strong>eign<br />

competition, and <strong>the</strong> need <strong>for</strong><br />

employee layoffs. However,<br />

management at <strong>the</strong> time failed to<br />

mention <strong>the</strong> ‘ugly truth’ – namely<br />

that <strong>for</strong> over a period of fifty years<br />

<strong>the</strong> company had consecutively<br />

lost 34 share points of <strong>the</strong> US auto<br />

market. What should this severe<br />

and consistent loss of market share<br />

have been telling management<br />

over <strong>the</strong>se many years?<br />

Specifically, it was a tell-tale sign<br />

that <strong>the</strong> company was failing to<br />

design, build, and sell cars<br />

Americans wanted to buy, as<br />

evidenced by <strong>the</strong> fact that every<br />

time consumers voted with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

chequebook, <strong>the</strong>y consistently<br />

voted less and less <strong>for</strong> GM. Issues<br />

like excess capacity and <strong>the</strong> need<br />

<strong>for</strong> layoffs were symptoms of a<br />

deeper problem. Now with <strong>the</strong><br />

government bailout behind it and<br />

under new management, GM is<br />

getting a second lease of life. It<br />

has successfully launched an IPO,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are signs of success in China,<br />

and it has regained <strong>the</strong> title of<br />

<strong>the</strong> world’s largest automaker.<br />

It is working to put <strong>the</strong> ‘ugly truth’<br />

behind it.<br />

2. Obsession with an unduly<br />

short time frame<br />

The second reason why is that<br />

people and companies become<br />

obsessed with an unduly short time<br />

frame. For political leaders, it’s all<br />

about <strong>the</strong> next election. For<br />

companies it’s <strong>the</strong> results <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> current quarter. This shortsightedness<br />

often precludes taking<br />

<strong>the</strong> next logical step on <strong>the</strong> path<br />

to long-term progress. My belief<br />

is that this is a self-imposed<br />

problem. Political constituents in<br />

truth want sustainable solutions,<br />

and investors and analysts can<br />

always be convinced to support<br />

actions that have long-term merit.<br />

Leaders need to act accordingly.<br />

3. Too much management,<br />

not enough <strong>leadership</strong><br />

Finally, <strong>the</strong> biggest barrier of all<br />

is that today we have too much<br />

management and not enough<br />

<strong>leadership</strong>. Management is all<br />

about planning, directing,<br />

measuring, and controlling.<br />

Leadership, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, is<br />

all about standing <strong>for</strong> something,<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n going into <strong>the</strong> fray under<br />

that banner. A leader has to know<br />

<strong>the</strong> values, beliefs, principles, and<br />

practices he or she stands <strong>for</strong>, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n adhere to <strong>the</strong>m. For me, those<br />

things have always been a belief in<br />

<strong>the</strong> long-term, in growth, in<br />

continuous improvement, and in<br />

ensuring <strong>the</strong> organizations of<br />

which I am a part consistently are<br />

in a position to out-compete <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

peer group. Knowing who I am and<br />

having <strong>the</strong>se kinds of guideposts<br />

are <strong>the</strong> things that have helped<br />

ensure I take <strong>the</strong> right actions<br />

when leading in tough <strong>times</strong>, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong> things that let my<br />

people know where I am coming<br />

from and what <strong>the</strong>y can expect.<br />

It’s a VUCA world. You may<br />

not like it, but that’s <strong>the</strong> reality.<br />

Get going, with passion and<br />

a wanting-to-win spirit.<br />

FINANCE & MANAGEMENT MAY 2012<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!