23.11.2014 Views

Getting better value from public sector research ... - CentreForum

Getting better value from public sector research ... - CentreForum

Getting better value from public sector research ... - CentreForum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Getting</strong> <strong>better</strong> <strong>value</strong> <strong>from</strong> Public Sector Research Establishments<br />

were very positive about the benefits to them and their<br />

careers of the move <strong>from</strong> the <strong>public</strong> to the private <strong>sector</strong>.<br />

As one senior scientist commented: “[We now have] a more<br />

focused approach to getting the output which customers<br />

want. I’m very positive about what has been achieved. I’m<br />

very positive or I would not still be here.” Similar comments<br />

have been made by staff who have moved <strong>from</strong> the civil<br />

service to a GOCO management company, such as at NPL.<br />

Factors affecting performance<br />

In reviewing the detailed case studies of those organisations<br />

which had increased private <strong>sector</strong> involvement, we<br />

identified some factors which when removed or alleviated<br />

had a significant positive impact on their performance. This<br />

suggests that <strong>public</strong>ly owned and operated organisations<br />

are likely to be adversely affected by these factors.<br />

They are:<br />

:<br />

Extent of technology transfer - the most effective<br />

technology transfer arises if it is at the centre of an<br />

organisation’s business model, rather than stuck on<br />

as an adjunct. The government PSREs - GOGOs and<br />

GOCOs - register patents each year and some have set<br />

up spin-off companies. But the privatised organisations<br />

such as QinetiQ and LGC are fundamentally in the<br />

business of technology transfer, in a way the government<br />

owned bodies are not. This has been a key factor in<br />

their significant growth and employment creation. For<br />

example, LGC has grown very strongly and profitably by<br />

a process of spotting technology areas with potentially<br />

broad commercial <strong>value</strong>, investing in targeted R&D<br />

in these areas, and then leveraged the capital of its<br />

shareholders to make small, strategic acquisitions to<br />

bolster capability. Technology transfer is intrinsic to the<br />

way it operates and has grown. This type of freedom to<br />

exploit key technical/scientific knowledge as part of the<br />

core business model, with access to capital for strategic<br />

investments, is not generally available to <strong>public</strong>ly owned<br />

and operated laboratories.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!