Getting better value from public sector research ... - CentreForum
Getting better value from public sector research ... - CentreForum
Getting better value from public sector research ... - CentreForum
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Getting</strong> <strong>better</strong> <strong>value</strong> <strong>from</strong> Public Sector Research Establishments<br />
:<br />
:<br />
:<br />
:<br />
:<br />
:<br />
:<br />
AHVLA was recently created through a merger, and was<br />
tasked with reducing overheads by 33%. Its constituent<br />
organisations have met their financial objectives over<br />
time, but have suffered declining turnover and some<br />
significant operating deficits.<br />
Cefas has met its financial targets, but £2.5m costs were<br />
incurred when the new Waveney site plan was cancelled.<br />
Cefas funding has risen recently (some of it attributable<br />
to significant funds “flow through” to subcontractors),<br />
and it has increased non-Defra income to 32% in 09/10<br />
<strong>from</strong> 18% in 03/04.<br />
Dstl turnover has fluctuated since privatisation, falling<br />
significantly between 2002 and 2005, but has recently<br />
risen to a level somewhat below 2002 turnover and has<br />
made operating surpluses.<br />
Fera made a small operating loss in 2009/10, and has<br />
been streamlining unprofitable parts of its business.<br />
FSS has struggled to complete a radical restructuring plan<br />
whilst competing in a competitive market with shrinking<br />
demand. In 2010 it made a loss of £53m.<br />
HPA has seen a significant recent fall in revenue as funding<br />
cuts bite, although external income has increased 114%<br />
since the Agency’s establishment in 2003.<br />
HSL’s revenue has also declined as government spending<br />
is reduced.<br />
Government Owned Contractor Operated (GOCO)<br />
This group consists of two establishments with significant<br />
core funding (AWE and NPL), and one with none (NNL).<br />
NNL’s GOCO arrangement is different <strong>from</strong> AWE and NPL<br />
in that contractor staff are seconded into the government<br />
owned entity, rather than all management/operations being<br />
undertaken by a contractor owned operating vehicle.<br />
Performance by all three organisations has been good<br />
against both financial and quality/requirement criteria.<br />
However, government has not fully defined a remit for NNL<br />
that includes providing technical support and advice to<br />
32