26.11.2014 Views

on carleman estimates for elliptic and parabolic operators ...

on carleman estimates for elliptic and parabolic operators ...

on carleman estimates for elliptic and parabolic operators ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 JÉRÔME LE ROUSSEAU AND GILLES LEBEAU<br />

7.2. Estimate at the boundary. If we place ourselves in the neighborhood of the boundary we have the<br />

following result.<br />

Theorem 7.5 (Carleman estimate at the boundary). Let x 0 ∈ ∂Ω <strong>and</strong> K be a compact set of Ω, x 0 ∈ K, <strong>and</strong><br />

V an open subset of Ω that is a neighborhood of K in Ω, with K <strong>and</strong> V chosen sufficiently small. Let ϕ be a<br />

weight functi<strong>on</strong> that satisfies Assumpti<strong>on</strong> 7.1 in V, with (7.1) replaced by (7.3), <strong>and</strong> ∂ n ϕ| ∂Ω∩V < 0, where n<br />

is the outward pointing unit normal to Ω. Then there exist C > 0 <strong>and</strong> δ 3 > 0 such that<br />

‖h 1 2 e ϕ/h u‖ 2 L 2 (Q) + ‖h 3/2 e ϕ/h ∇ x u‖ 2 L 2 (Q) ≤ C‖h 2 e ϕ/h Pu‖ 2 L 2 (Q),<br />

<strong>for</strong> 0 < (T + T 2 )ε ≤ δ 3 , h = εt(T − t) <strong>and</strong> u ∈ C ∞ ([0, T] × Ω), with supp(u(t)) ⊂ K <strong>for</strong> all t ∈ [0, T], <strong>and</strong><br />

u| (0,T)×(∂Ω∩V) = 0.<br />

The proof of this estimate is more technical than that of Theorem 7.3. We have placed it in Appendix<br />

A.9. The idea of the proof is to use the Gårding inequality in the tangential directi<strong>on</strong>s, including the<br />

time directi<strong>on</strong>. The original proof <strong>for</strong> this estimate is available in [FI96]. However, following the approach<br />

of [FI96] does not put <strong>for</strong>ward the sufficiency of the sub-<strong>elliptic</strong>ity c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> (7.3).<br />

7.3. Global estimate. We now focus our attenti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> global Carleman <strong>estimates</strong>. We proceed by patching<br />

together the local <strong>estimates</strong> we have presented here, in the interior <strong>and</strong> at the boundary. The global aspect<br />

of the estimate will impose an “observati<strong>on</strong>” term over (0, T) × ω, with ω ⋐ Ω in the r.h.s. of the estimate.<br />

To patch these local <strong>estimates</strong> together we choose a global weight functi<strong>on</strong> that can be used to derive<br />

each of these local <strong>estimates</strong> by satisfying the following requirements.<br />

Assumpti<strong>on</strong> 7.6. Let ω 0 ⋐ ω ⋐ Ω. The weight functi<strong>on</strong> ϕ satisfies<br />

ϕ| ∂Ω = Cst, ∂ n ϕ| ∂Ω < 0, sup ϕ(x) < 0, |ϕ ′ (x)| 0, x ∈ Ω \ ω 0 ,<br />

x∈Ω<br />

q 2 | ε=0 = 0 ⇒ {q 2 | ε=0 , q 1 | ε=0 } > 0, x ∈ Ω \ ω 0 ,<br />

Such c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s can be fulfilled by taking ϕ of the <strong>for</strong>m<br />

ϕ(x) = e λψ(x) − e λK , with K > ‖ψ‖ ∞ , |ψ ′ (x)| 0, x ∈ Ω \ ω 0 , <strong>and</strong><br />

ψ| ∂Ω = 0, ∂ n ψ| ∂Ω < 0, ψ(x) > 0, x ∈ Ω,<br />

<strong>and</strong> by taking the positive parameter λ sufficiently large. For the c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> of such a functi<strong>on</strong> ψ we refer<br />

to [FI96, Lemma 1.1]. The c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> makes use of Morse functi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the associated approximati<strong>on</strong><br />

theorem [AE84].<br />

Theorem 7.7 (Global Carleman estimate). Let ϕ be a functi<strong>on</strong> that satisfies Assumpti<strong>on</strong> 7.6. Then there<br />

exist δ 4 > 0 <strong>and</strong> C ≥ 0 such that<br />

(<br />

)<br />

‖h 1 2 e ϕ/h u‖ 2 L 2 (Q) + ‖h 3/2 e ϕ/h ∇ x u‖ 2 L 2 (Q) ≤ C ‖h 2 e ϕ/h Pu‖ 2 L 2 (Q) + ‖h 1 2 e ϕ/h u‖ 2 L 2 ((0,T)×ω) ,<br />

<strong>for</strong> 0 < (T + T 2 )ε ≤ δ 4 , h = εt(T − t) <strong>and</strong> u ∈ C ∞ ([0, T] × Ω) such that u| (0,T)×∂Ω = 0.<br />

Proof. Let ω 1 be such that ω 0 ⋐ ω 1 ⋐ ω. For all x ∈ Ω \ ω 1 , there exist an open subset V x of Ω, with<br />

x ∈ V x ⊂ Ω \ ω 0 <strong>for</strong> which the local Carleman estimate, in the interior or at the boundary, holds with the<br />

weight functi<strong>on</strong> ϕ, <strong>for</strong> smooth functi<strong>on</strong>s with support in the compact K x = V x .<br />

From the covering of Ω \ ω 1 by the open sets V x , x ∈ Ω \ ω 1 we can extract a finite covering (V i ) i∈I , such<br />

that <strong>for</strong> all i ∈ I the Carleman estimate in V i holds <strong>for</strong> h < h i , C = C i > 0 <strong>and</strong> supp(u) ⊂ K i = V i .<br />

Let (χ i ) i∈I be a partiti<strong>on</strong> of unity subordinated to the covering V i , i ∈ I, [Trè67, Hör90], i.e.,<br />

χ i ∈ C ∞ ∑<br />

(Ω), supp( χ i ) ⊂ K i = V i , 0 ≤ χ i ≤ 1, i ∈ I, <strong>and</strong> χ i = 1 in Ω \ ω 1<br />

Note that we have supp( χ i ) ∩ ω 0 = ∅. For all i ∈ I, we set u i = χ i u. Then <strong>for</strong> each u i we have a local<br />

Carleman estimate. We now observe that we have<br />

Pu i = P( χ i u) = χ i Pu + [P, χ i ]u = χ i Pu − [∆, χ i ]u,<br />

i∈I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!