Salt Lake City International Airport Terminal Redevelopment ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY meet purpose and need for the Proposed Action and is not retained for detailed evaluation. Alternatives Eliminated from Detailed Consideration Alternatives that would not meet the purpose and need for the Proposed Action are not reasonable alternatives and are not carried forward for detailed consideration. Similarly, alternatives that would entail substantially greater environmental, social, or economic costs than the Proposed Action are not considered to be prudent and are not carried forward. Table ES-1 summarizes the reasons these alternatives are not carried forward. TABLE ES-1 Alternatives Eliminated from Detailed Consideration Alternative Reason for Elimination Multiple Terminals Hybrid Terminal Renovation and Rehabilitation Replacing the Airport (New Airport) Using Another Airport Implementing Demand Management Measures Using Other Modes of Transportation or Communications Would not meet the purpose and need for the Proposed Action and would have environmental consequences similar to those of the Proposed Action. Would not meet the purpose and need for the Proposed Action and would have environmental consequences similar to those of the Proposed Action. Would not meet the purpose and need for the Proposed Action. Some degree of renovation and rehabilitation would be undertaken as part of the No Action Alternative. Would entail substantially greater environmental, social, and/or economic costs than the Proposed Action. Would entail substantially greater environmental, social, and/or economic costs than the Proposed Action. Would not meet the purpose and need for the Proposed Action. Would not meet the purpose and need for the Proposed Action. Evaluation of Reasonable Alternatives Two alternatives are retained for detailed evaluation: the Proposed Action and the No Action Alternative. To define the issues and provide a clear basis for choice between these two alternatives, Table ES-2 compares the alternatives with respect to the ability to meet the identified purpose and need, technical and economic factors, passenger terminal LOS, environmental impacts, and regulatory requirements. ES-12 RDD/102790005 (NLH4349.DOCX) TBG012712153950RDD
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE ES-2 Comparison of Alternatives Retained for Detailed Evaluation Alternatives Evaluation Criteria Ability to Meet Purpose and Need Replace Aging Infrastructure Respond to Changes in the Air Transportation System Enhance Operational Efficiency Technical and Economic Factors No Action Would not replace existing infrastructure. Renovation and rehabilitation efforts described in Section 3.1.2.1 would be required to maintain the existing facilities, but would not eliminate existing inefficiencies. Would not reconfigure terminals to support current and future air service patterns. Would continue redundancy in passenger handling facilities and inefficient aircraft circulation in the terminal area. Proposed Action Would replace existing infrastructure with modern, energy efficient facilities. Would provide flexible facilities to meet functional needs of the current air transportation system and avoid functional obsolescence in the future. Would reduce redundancy in passenger handling facilities and enhance the efficiency of aircraft circulation in the terminal area. Average Aircraft Delay (minutes per operation) Annual Cost of Aircraft Delay and Taxi In and Out Time Roadway LOS (peak period, on arrival and departure roadways) 4.55 (2025). 4.04 (2025). $153 million (2025). $145 million (2025). E/F – very unacceptable (2025). A/B – good (2025). Passenger Terminal LOS Public Circulation Areas – Industry Standard = 20.5 ft 2 /PHP a Departure Lounge Areas – Industry Standard = 10.8 ft 2 /PHP a 15.7 ft 2 /PHP (28 MAP, about 2025). 10.8 ft 2 /PHP (28 MAP, about 2025). 35.0 ft 2 /PHP (28 MAP, about 2025). 14.9 ft 2 /PHP (28 MAP, about 2025). Baggage Claim Areas – 6.4 ft 2 /PHP (28 MAP, about 2025). 9.3 ft 2 /PHP (28 MAP, about Industry Standard = 17.2 ft 2 /PHP a 2025). 1,420 ft 2 /PHP (28 MAP, about Security Screening Checkpoints – 1,750 ft 2 /checkpoint b Industry Standard = 2025). 1,980 ft 2 /PHP (28 MAP, about 2025). Public Restrooms – 2.1 ft 2 /PHP (28 MAP, about 2025). 4.8 ft 2 /PHP (28 MAP, about Industry Standard = 3.5 ft 2 /PHP c 2025). 4,950 ft 2 /PHP (28 MAP, about Retail and Food/Beverage 10,000 ft 2 /MEP c Concessions – Industry Standard = 2025). 7,640 ft 2 /PHP (28 MAP, about 2025). RDD/102790005 (NLH4349.DOCX) TBG012712153950RDD ES-13
Page 1: FINAL Salt Lake City International
Page 6 and 7: Executive Summary This Environmenta
Page 8 and 9: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Proposed Action T
Page 10 and 11: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Additional facili
Page 12 and 13: B 215 D A C E C 80 F Airport Bounda
Page 14 and 15: Existing 1975 Terminal Area Plan 19
Page 18 and 19: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE ES-2 Compar
Page 20 and 21: W 2670 N 2200 32 00 W 2100 N 16 R 1
Page 22 and 23: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY contamination, as
Page 24 and 25: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY aircraft flying i
Page 26 and 27: Contents, Continued Page 4 Affected
Page 28 and 29: Contents, Continued Page 5.15 Socia
Page 30 and 31: Contents, Continued Page Exhibits 1
Page 32 and 33: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS I-15 Int
Page 34 and 35: CHAPTER 1 Purpose and Need Paragrap
Page 36 and 37: Existing terminal complex is 50 yea
Page 38 and 39: $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000
Page 40 and 41: CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE AND NEED terminal
Page 42 and 43: CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE AND NEED industry
Page 44 and 45: CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE AND NEED conditio
Page 46 and 47: 18 16 14 En nplaned Pass sengers (m
Page 48 and 49: CHAPTER 2 Proposed Action This chap
Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER 2 PROPOSED ACTION 2.1.1 Air
Page 52 and 53: CHAPTER 2 PROPOSED ACTION provide s
Page 54 and 55: CHAPTER 2 PROPOSED ACTION The Propo
Page 56 and 57: Source: HNTB AutoCAD drawings, Janu
Page 58 and 59: CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES terminal sit
Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES 3.1.1.2 Conc
Page 62 and 63: CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES The concepts
Page 64 and 65: CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES 3.1.2 Other
Page 66 and 67:
CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES 3.1.3.1 Repl
Page 68 and 69:
CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES consideratio
Page 70 and 71:
CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES the mix of g
Page 72 and 73:
CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES 74 gates, or
Page 74 and 75:
CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES TABLE 3-2 Co
Page 76 and 77:
16 R 16 L 17 14 HAROLD GATTY DR WRI
Page 78 and 79:
CHAPTER 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT SLC
Page 80 and 81:
CHAPTER 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 4.2.
Page 82 and 83:
CHAPTER 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT TABL
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
CHAPTER 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT TABL
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
20 B2 B18 A1 A A14 C C19 D E D23 E
Page 92 and 93:
CHAPTER 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT cour
Page 94 and 95:
CHAPTER 5 Environmental Consequence
Page 96 and 97:
CHAPTER 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCE
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
West Drainage Area 17 ! 003A East D
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
¹ 0 500 3,000 Feet Imagery taken f
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
CHAPTER 6 AGENCY AND PUBLIC INVOLVE
Page 150 and 151:
CHAPTER 6 AGENCY AND PUBLIC INVOLVE
Page 152 and 153:
CHAPTER 8 References Allison, J.R.,
Page 154 and 155:
CHAPTER 8 REFERENCES Salt Lake City
Page 156 and 157:
Appendix A Technical Memorandum: Av
Page 158 and 159:
Contents Page 1.0 Introduction and
Page 160 and 161:
Tables Page 1 Salt Lake City CMSA P
Page 162 and 163:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS future fl
Page 164 and 165:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS 1.4 Aircr
Page 166 and 167:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS Salt Lake
Page 168 and 169:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS Table 2 U
Page 170 and 171:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS 2.0 Econo
Page 172 and 173:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS 2.1.2 Emp
Page 174 and 175:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS Table 4 H
Page 176 and 177:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS TABLE 5 M
Page 178 and 179:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS During th
Page 180 and 181:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS 2.2.2 Uta
Page 182 and 183:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS Table 7 S
Page 184 and 185:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS 3.0 Histo
Page 186 and 187:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS TABLE 9 H
Page 188 and 189:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS 9 Histori
Page 190 and 191:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS Since 200
Page 192 and 193:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS 3.3.2 Ori
Page 194 and 195:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS Table 12
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS An incr
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS historica
Page 208 and 209:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS system or
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS 18 Histor
Page 214 and 215:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS Figure 20
Page 216 and 217:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS 5.2.4 All
Page 218 and 219:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS 22 Histor
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS Passenger
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS 6.0 Compa
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS Table A-1
Page 232 and 233:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS on the fo
Page 234 and 235:
AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS Departure
Page 236 and 237:
Table B-2 Forecasts of Average Annu
Page 238 and 239:
Table B-3 Average Annual Day Aircra
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Table B-6 Active Aircraft Fleets by
Page 246 and 247:
Table B-6 (page 3 of 7) Active Airc
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Aviation + Transportation SLC Termi
Page 254 and 255:
PROJECT UPDATE SALT LAKE CITY INTER
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Appendix C Environmental Data Resou
Page 274 and 275:
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Exec
Page 276 and 277:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Federal CERCLIS l
Page 278 and 279:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CERCLIS: The Comp
Page 280 and 281:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RCRA-CESQG: RCRAI
Page 282 and 283:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY _________________
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TRIS: The Toxic C
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
EDR Inc. 138 kV 138 kV 138 kV 138 k
Page 296 and 297:
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target
Page 298 and 299:
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target
Page 300 and 301:
Map ID Direction Distance Elevation
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 414 and 415:
Page 416 and 417:
Page 418 and 419:
Page 420 and 421:
Page 422 and 423:
Page 424 and 425:
Page 426 and 427:
Page 428 and 429:
Page 430 and 431:
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440 and 441:
Page 442 and 443:
Page 444 and 445:
Page 446 and 447:
Page 448 and 449:
Page 450 and 451:
Page 452 and 453:
Page 454 and 455:
Page 456 and 457:
Page 458 and 459:
Page 460 and 461:
Page 462 and 463:
Page 464 and 465:
Page 466 and 467:
Page 468 and 469:
Page 470 and 471:
Page 472 and 473:
Page 474 and 475:
Page 476 and 477:
Page 478 and 479:
Page 480 and 481:
Page 482 and 483:
Page 484 and 485:
Page 486 and 487:
Page 488 and 489:
Page 490 and 491:
Page 492 and 493:
Page 494 and 495:
Page 496 and 497:
Page 498 and 499:
Page 500 and 501:
Page 502 and 503:
Page 504 and 505:
Page 506 and 507:
Page 508 and 509:
Page 510 and 511:
Page 512 and 513:
Page 514 and 515:
Page 516 and 517:
Page 518 and 519:
Page 520 and 521:
Page 522 and 523:
Page 524 and 525:
Page 526 and 527:
Page 528 and 529:
Page 530 and 531:
Page 532 and 533:
Page 534 and 535:
Page 536 and 537:
Page 538 and 539:
Page 540 and 541:
Page 542 and 543:
Page 544 and 545:
Page 546 and 547:
Page 548 and 549:
Page 550 and 551:
Page 552 and 553:
Page 554 and 555:
Page 556 and 557:
Page 558 and 559:
Page 560 and 561:
Page 562 and 563:
Page 564 and 565:
Page 566 and 567:
Page 568 and 569:
Page 570 and 571:
Page 572 and 573:
Page 574 and 575:
Page 576 and 577:
Page 578 and 579:
Page 580 and 581:
Page 582 and 583:
Page 584 and 585:
Page 586 and 587:
Page 588 and 589:
Page 590 and 591:
Page 592 and 593:
Page 594 and 595:
Page 596 and 597:
Page 598 and 599:
Page 600 and 601:
Page 602 and 603:
ORPHAN SUMMARY City EDR ID Site Nam
Page 604 and 605:
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA
Page 606 and 607:
Page 608 and 609:
Page 610 and 611:
Page 612 and 613:
Page 614 and 615:
Page 616 and 617:
Page 618 and 619:
Page 620 and 621:
Page 622 and 623:
GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOUR
Page 624 and 625:
Page 626 and 627:
Page 628 and 629:
Page 630 and 631:
Page 632 and 633:
Page 634 and 635:
Page 636 and 637:
Page 638 and 639:
Page 640 and 641:
Page 642 and 643:
Page 644 and 645:
Page 646 and 647:
Page 648 and 649:
Page 650 and 651:
Page 652 and 653:
Page 654 and 655:
Page 656 and 657:
Page 658 and 659:
Page 660 and 661:
Page 662 and 663:
Page 664 and 665:
Page 666 and 667:
Page 668 and 669:
Page 670 and 671:
Page 672 and 673:
Page 674 and 675:
Page 676 and 677:
Page 678 and 679:
Page 680 and 681:
Page 682 and 683:
Page 684 and 685:
Page 686 and 687:
Page 688 and 689:
Page 690 and 691:
Page 692 and 693:
Page 694 and 695:
Page 696 and 697:
Page 698 and 699:
Page 700 and 701:
Page 702 and 703:
Page 704 and 705:
Page 706 and 707:
Page 708 and 709:
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEA
Page 710 and 711:
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEA
Page 712 and 713:
Technical Memorandum: Emissions Mod
Page 714 and 715:
EMISSIONS MODELING Contents Page 1.
Page 716 and 717:
EMISSIONS MODELING 2.0 Assumptions
Page 718 and 719:
EMISSIONS MODELING 3.0 Results Emis
Page 720 and 721:
EMISSIONS MODELING Attachment A: ED
Page 722 and 723:
EMISSIONS MODELING Aircraft Annual
Page 724 and 725:
Technical Memorandum: Airfield Simu
Page 726 and 727:
AIRFIELD SIMULATION Contents Page 1
Page 728 and 729:
AIRFIELD SIMULATION Figure 1 TERMIN
Page 730 and 731:
AIRFIELD SIMULATION 2.0 Modeling As
Page 732 and 733:
AIRFIELD SIMULATION 2.2 Weather and
Page 734 and 735:
AIRFIELD SIMULATION runways in peak
Page 736 and 737:
AIRFIELD SIMULATION (1) east of Con
Page 738 and 739:
AIRFIELD SIMULATION Figure 5 TRP TA
Page 740 and 741:
AIRFIELD SIMULATION Table 3 AIRFIEL
Page 742 and 743:
AIRFIELD SIMULATION both future yea
Page 744 and 745:
Technical Memorandum: Traffic Analy
Page 746 and 747:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Contents Page 1.0
Page 748 and 749:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 1.0 Overview This
Page 750 and 751:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The parking garage
Page 752 and 753:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Figure 3 FUTURE AI
Page 754 and 755:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The proportion of
Page 756 and 757:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Figure 4 ESTIMATED
Page 758 and 759:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Figure 6 ESTIMATED
Page 760 and 761:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS at the crosswalks
Page 762 and 763:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS car companies, and
Page 764 and 765:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Figure 8 3D VIEW O
Page 766 and 767:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 2.4 Calculations T
Page 768 and 769:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Figure 10 CURBSIDE
Page 770 and 771:
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table 4 ANNUAL VMT
Page 772 and 773:
T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U
Page 774 and 775:
UPDATED FOR REVISED PHASING AND CON
Page 776 and 777:
UPDATED FOR REVISED PHASING AND CON
Page 778 and 779:
ASSUMPTIONS - 10 hour work days - O
Page 780 and 781:
Lavatory, with Sensor Faucet 22 EA
Page 782 and 783:
MECHANICAL PLANT Line Items and Qua
Page 784 and 785:
Basement Excavation, Backfill, Disp
Page 786 and 787:
Landside Roadways Line Items and Qu
Page 788 and 789:
TERMINAL BUILDING Line Items and Qu
Page 790 and 791:
Distribution Boards, Panelboards, F
Page 792 and 793:
SOUTH CONCOURSE WEST Line Items and
Page 794 and 795:
Electrical Distibution (Continued)
Page 796 and 797:
SOUTH CONCOURSE EAST Line Items and
Page 798 and 799:
Connect Walkways 1 EA NA Connect PC
Page 800 and 801:
RAC BUILDING Line Items and Quantit
Page 802 and 803:
Electrical (Continued) QUANTITY UNI
Page 804 and 805:
NEW PARKING GARAGE Line Items and Q
Page 806 and 807:
CONNECTORS RENOVATION Line Items an
Page 808 and 809:
CONCOURSE C RENOVATION Line Items a
Page 810 and 811:
Potable Water Cabinets 9 EA NA 1 Ch
Page 812 and 813:
Interior Finishes (Continued) QUANT
Page 814 and 815:
CONCOURSE B RENOVATION Line Items a
Page 816 and 817:
Equipment type Hours of use Cement
Page 818 and 819:
SPREAD SHEEET FOR CALCULATIONS OF C
Page 820 and 821:
Page 822 and 823:
Page 824 and 825:
Page 826 and 827:
Page 828 and 829:
Page 830 and 831:
Page 832 and 833:
Page 834 and 835:
Page 836 and 837:
Page 838 and 839:
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
Page 840 and 841:
PEAK EMISSION ACTIVITIES BY CONSTRU
Page 842 and 843:
Appendix E Technical Memorandum: Sa
Page 844 and 845:
SALT LAKE CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPOR
Page 846 and 847:
SALT LAKE CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPOR
Page 848 and 849:
Appendix F Historic, Architectural,
Page 850 and 851:
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Historical/Arc
Page 852 and 853:
HISTORICAL/ARCHITECTURAL, ARCHAEOLO
Page 854 and 855:
Page 856 and 857:
Page 858 and 859:
FAA Section 106 Coordination Letter
Page 861 and 862:
Applicant’s Determination of Elig
Page 864 and 865:
Appendix G Agency and Public Involv
Page 866 and 867:
Agency and Public Scoping Meeting P
Page 868 and 869:
Why is this Environmental Assessmen
Page 870 and 871:
Why is the Terminal Redevelopment P
Page 872 and 873:
Proposed Action: Terminal Redevelop
Page 874 and 875:
Proposed Action: Terminal Redevelop
Page 876:
Schedule - Key dates Public/Agency
Page 879 and 880:
June 1, 2010 Scott Baird, Division
Page 881 and 882:
June 1, 2010 Walter Baker, Division
Page 883 and 884:
June 1, 2010 Darin Bird, Deputy Dir
Page 885 and 886:
June 1, 2010 Chuck Chappell Executi
Page 887 and 888:
June 1, 2010 Larry Crist, Field Sup
Page 889 and 890:
June 1, 2010 Forrest Cuch Executive
Page 891 and 892:
June 1, 2010 Royal DeLegge Director
Page 893 and 894:
June 1, 2010 Royal DeLegge SLVHD En
Page 895 and 896:
June 1, 2010 Royal DeLegge SLVHD En
Page 897 and 898:
June 1, 2010 Mary DeLoretto Environ
Page 899 and 900:
June 1, 2010 Mike George, Environme
Page 901 and 902:
June 1, 2010 Cheryl Heying Division
Page 903 and 904:
June 1, 2010 Hollis Jencks Project
Page 905 and 906:
June 1, 2010 Charmaine Knighton Dep
Page 907 and 908:
June 1, 2010 Kevin Luey, Northwest
Page 909 and 910:
June 1, 2010 Wilson Martin Associat
Page 911 and 912:
June 1, 2010 Allen McCandless Direc
Page 913 and 914:
June 1, 2010 Jeff Niermeyer Directo
Page 915 and 916:
June 1, 2010 Randy Park Region Dire
Page 917 and 918:
June 1, 2010 Matthew Sibul Senior P
Page 919 and 920:
June 1, 2010 Amanda Smith, Executiv
Page 921 and 922:
June 1, 2010 Ed Woolford Environmen
Page 923:
Public Information Meeting Notices,
Page 926 and 927:
Ad published June 7, 2010
Page 929 and 930:
Salt Lake City International Airpor
Page 931 and 932:
Today’s Presentation • What is
Page 933 and 934:
What is the Terminal Redevelopment
Page 935 and 936:
What Alternatives Were Considered?
Page 937 and 938:
Comparison of Alternatives: Purpose
Page 939 and 940:
Comparison of Alternatives: Levels
Page 941 and 942:
Findings: No Significant Adverse Im
Page 943 and 944:
Findings: No Significant Adverse Im
Page 945 and 946:
Schedule • Draft EA published - M
Page 953:
Agency and Public Comments, and Res
Page 958 and 959:
From: To: Subject: Date: Swank, Ali
Page 960 and 961:
, , cc, SubjectSalt Lake City Air
Page 962 and 963:
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Willki
Page 964 and 965:
s/ Doug Fullmer 758 East 4125 South
Page 966 and 967:
materials such as transformers, and
Page 968 and 969:
planned right, a new airport can be
Page 970 and 971:
letter, an agency scoping meeting w
Page 972 and 973:
Page 974 and 975:
Page 976 and 977:
Page 978 and 979:
From: Nelis, Patty [mailto:Patty.Ne
Page 981 and 982:
Comments and Responses Regarding th
Page 983 and 984:
AS ‐ 5 AS ‐ 6 AS ‐ 7 AS ‐ 8
Page 985 and 986:
AS ‐ 14 AS ‐ 15 “Rental car e
Page 987 and 988:
RDD/122330004 (NLH4768.DOCX) 7 TBG0
Page 989 and 990:
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES REGARDING TH
Page 991 and 992:
Page 994:
show all

Salt Lake City International Airport Terminal Redevelopment ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?