29.11.2014 Views

Left Brain Right B - the DBS Vickers Securities Equities Research

Left Brain Right B - the DBS Vickers Securities Equities Research

Left Brain Right B - the DBS Vickers Securities Equities Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Equity Strategy and Large Cap Stock Picks<br />

<strong>Brain</strong>waves<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>’ best ideas from across <strong>the</strong> region<br />

<strong>Left</strong> <strong>Brain</strong><br />

Focuses on logical thinking and analysis<br />

4Q 2009<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

25 September 2009<br />

“In Singapore, this research report or research analyses may<br />

only be distributed to Institutional Investors, Expert Investors<br />

or Accredited Investors as defined in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> and<br />

Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore.”


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Team Directory<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Team Directory<br />

Analyst Sector E-mail<br />

Regional<br />

Timothy Wong Head, Group <strong>Research</strong> timothywongkc@dbsvickers.com<br />

Joanne Goh Regional Equity Strategist joannegohsc@dbs.com<br />

Paul Yong, CFA Singapore & China Industrial & Transport paulyong@dbsvickers.com<br />

Ben Santoso Regional Plantation bensantoso@dbsvickers.com<br />

Lim Sue Lin Singapore and Malaysia Banking suelin@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

June Ng China and Malaysia Power june@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Hong Kong / China<br />

Derek Cheung Head of <strong>Research</strong>, Strategy derek_cheung@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Alice Hui CFA Deputy HOR, Consumer alice_hui@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Gideon Lo CFA Deputy HOR, Oil & Petrochemicals, gideon_lo@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Pharmaceuticals, Shipping<br />

Carol Wu China Property carol_wu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Dennis Lam Electronics & Technology dennis_lam@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Helen Wang Basic Materials helen_wang@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Jasmine Lai Banking & Finance jasmine_lai@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Jeff Yau CFA Hong Kong Property jeff_yau@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Mavis Hui Media & General Retail mavis_hui@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Patricia Yeung Industrials patricia_yeung@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Rachel Miu Infrastructure, Machinery, Agriculture Rachel_miu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Steven Liu CFA Software & Telecom steven_liu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Indonesia<br />

Agus Pramono, CFA Strategy, Banking, Conglomerate/Automotive, Cement agus.pramono@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Yusuf Ade Winoto, CFA Basic Materials, Oil, Gas & Energy, Construction yusuf.winoto@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Team Telecommunications, Plantation, Consumer research@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Malaysia<br />

Wong Ming Tek Head of <strong>Research</strong>, Strategy mingtek@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Goh Yin Foo, CFA Retail/ Technical Product yinfoo@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

June Ng Power, Oil & Gas, Conglomerates, REITs june@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Lim Sue Lin Financial Services suelin@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Yee Mei Hui Gaming, Property meihui@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Juliana Ramli Aviation, Transport, Plantation juliana@hwang.dbsvickers.com.my<br />

Chong Tjen-San, CFA Construction, Infrastructure tjensan@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Kok Chiew Sia Consumer chiewsia@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Lee Wee Keat Oil & Gas, IPO weekeat@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Team Small-Mid Caps general@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Telecommunications, Motor<br />

Steel, Manufacturing, O<strong>the</strong>r Financial Services<br />

Building materials<br />

Singapore<br />

Janice Chua Head of <strong>Research</strong>, Strategy, Industrials janicechua@dbsvickers.com<br />

Chong Wee Lee, CFA Industrials weelee@dbsvickers.com<br />

Ho Pei Hwa Industrials peihwa@dbsvickers.com<br />

Lock Mun Yee Property, Reits mumyee@dbsvickers.com<br />

Adrian Chua Property adrianchua@dbsvickers.com<br />

Derek Tan Reits derektan@dbsvickers.com<br />

Jeremy Thia Industrials, Property jeremythia@dbsvickers.com<br />

Andy Sim, CFA Consumer andysim@dbsvickers.com<br />

Patrick Xu Consumer patrickxu@dbsvickers.com<br />

Tan Ai Teng Electronics aiteng@dbsvickers.com<br />

Sachin Mittal Telecom sachin@dbsvickers.com<br />

Suvro Sarkar Electronics, Industrials survo@dbsvickers.com<br />

Thailand<br />

Chanpen Sirithanarattanakul Head of <strong>Research</strong> chanpens@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Strategy, Property, REITs, Transportation<br />

Chirasit Vuttigrai Strategy, Telecom, Media chirasitv@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Vichitr Kuladejkhuna CFA Building Materials, Energy, Utilities, vichitrk@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Petrochemicals, Chemicals<br />

Sugittra Kongkhajornkidsuk Banks, <strong>Securities</strong> sugittrak@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Parin Kitchatornpitak Automotive, Commerce, Electronics parink@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Nalyne Viriyasathien Construction Materials, Food and Beverage, nalynev@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Korea<br />

Lee Eun Young Basic Materials, Utilities eunyoung@dbsvickers.com<br />

Jung Sung Hoon Consumer sunghoon@dbsvickers.com<br />

Jay (Jaehak) Kim Automotive Jay_kim@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Page 2<br />

“Recipients of this report, received from <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd<br />

(“<strong>DBS</strong>VR”), are to contact <strong>DBS</strong>VR at +65 6398 7954 in respect of any matters arising from<br />

or in connection with this report.”


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Table of Contents<br />

Table of Contents<br />

Strategy Overview<br />

Market Data 4<br />

Stock Profiles Key Data 5<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity 6<br />

Regional Data Monitor 38<br />

Country Assessments & Stock Profiles<br />

Singapore Spinning <strong>the</strong> wheel 41<br />

MobileOne Hitting <strong>the</strong> right buttons for NBN 54<br />

Singapore Airlines Stronger prospects ahead 56<br />

SPH Go for <strong>the</strong> cash 58<br />

Suntec REIT More room to shine 60<br />

UOB On track for recovery 62<br />

Hong Kong / China Party continues 64<br />

Bank of China Hong Kong Tighter cooperation with parent 80<br />

Bank of China An undervalued big three bank 82<br />

China Petroleum & Chem Up-cycle profit, mid-cycle value 84<br />

China Railway Group Heading high growth phase 86<br />

MTR Corporation Defensive growth stock 88<br />

Malaysia Cherry-picking in <strong>the</strong> upcycle 90<br />

Hong Leong Bank Flight to quality 106<br />

MISC Improved outlook 108<br />

Thailand Liquidity driven rally 110<br />

Siam Cement Riding on economic recovery 124<br />

Thai Airways Taking off in <strong>the</strong> high season 126<br />

Total Access Communication Best 3G play 128<br />

Indonesia Raising growth momentum 130<br />

Bank Rakyat Indo Faster than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs 138<br />

Bukit Asam Domestic play 140<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong><br />

Singapore l Hong Kong / China l Thailand l Malaysia l Indonesia<br />

Page 3


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Market Data<br />

Market Data<br />

Relative Valuations & Performance<br />

Stock Market Valuation – September 2009<br />

Market Cap Earnings Growth (%) PE (x)<br />

(US$ bn) 2008 2009F 2010F 2008 2009F 2010F<br />

Hong Kong 975 (31.2) 9.4 22.7 19.0 17.4 14.2<br />

China 1,190 (11.7) 19.5 35.6 21.6 18.1 13.3<br />

Singapore 414 (2.5) (6.3) 15.1 15.6 16.6 14.5<br />

Malaysia 259 (0.8) (8.2) 15.4 16.3 19.1 15.4<br />

Philippines * 76 (16.4) 21.8 15.1 19.8 16.2 14.1<br />

Thailand 120 (30.0) 24.0 16.6 16.4 12.5 10.7<br />

Indonesia 189 (2.3) 9.7 13.0 25.7 16.3 13.3<br />

Korea * 732 (38.6) 42.0 33.7 20.4 14.3 10.7<br />

Taiwan * 579 (69.2) 20.1 80.8 38.5 32.1 17.8<br />

Prices are as at 17 September 2009<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> coverage, except * markets from Datastream Consensus<br />

Market Performance (% change) – 17 September 2009<br />

Singapore (STI)<br />

Hong Kong (HSI)<br />

China (HSCCI/HSCEI)<br />

Kuala Lumpur (KLCI)<br />

Bangkok (SET)<br />

Philippines (PCOMP)<br />

Jakarta (JCI)<br />

Taiwan (TAIEX)<br />

Korea (KOSPI)<br />

Tokyo (Nikkei 225)<br />

New York (Dow Jones)<br />

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0<br />

1-month ago 3-months ago YTD<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

Page 4


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Stock Profiles Key Data<br />

Stock Profiles<br />

Key Data<br />

Bloomberg Code<br />

Company<br />

Price & Index<br />

(17 Sep 09)<br />

Mkt Cap<br />

(USDm)<br />

PE<br />

09 (x)<br />

PE<br />

10 (x)<br />

EPS CAGR<br />

08-10 (%)<br />

EV/EBITDA<br />

09 (x)<br />

P/BV<br />

09 (x)<br />

ROE<br />

09 (%)<br />

SINGAPORE STI 2,673<br />

M1 SP MobileOne S$1.78 1,126 10.9 10.2 2 5.9 6.4 65.8<br />

SIA SP Singapore Airlines ** S$13.60 11,407 39.2 16.9 2 6.6 1.2 3.0<br />

SPH SP SPH S$3.71 4,175 14.9 13.3 (2) 10.2 2.9 19.1<br />

SUN SP Suntec REIT * S$1.12 1,289 9.5 7.8 (37) 18.3 0.5 3.5<br />

UOB SP UOB S$17.00 18,314 15.5 13.2 0 nm 1.6 10.7<br />

* Distribution Yield<br />

HONG KONG HSI / HSCEI 21,769 / 12,668<br />

2388 HK Bank of China HK HK$18.56 25,319 15.3 11.6 125 nm 2.1 14.7<br />

3988 HK Bank of China # HK$4.38 42,963 12.8 9.5 28 nm 2.0 16.2<br />

386 HK China Petroleum & Chem # HK$6.92 14,983 9.2 7.2 57 5.5 1.4 16.5<br />

390 HK China Railway Group # HK$7.04 3,822 20.9 16.7 142 10.1 2.1 10.7<br />

66 HK MTRC Corp HK$27.35 20,159 21.9 20.1 (3) 19.8 0.9 ^ 7.0<br />

# H share market cap<br />

^ P/NAV<br />

MALAYSIA KLCI 1,219<br />

HLBK MK Hong Leong Bank ** RM6.60 3,004 10.9 10.0 7 nm 1.6 15.8<br />

MISF MK MISC ** RM8.95 9,591 23.3 18.6 13 10.8 1.6 6.8<br />

THAILAND SET 709<br />

SCC TB Siam Cement Bt229.00 8,152 12.9 11.8 13 8.4 2.8 22.8<br />

THAI TB Thai Airways Bt21.70 1,094 7.3 5.2 nm 6.2 0.7 10.4<br />

DTAC TB Total Access Communications Bt42.75 3,003 15.6 12.8 (17) 5.9 1.6 10.7<br />

INDONESIA JCI INDEX 2,420<br />

BBRI IJ Bank Rakyat Indonesia IDR7,450 9,286 13.1 10.2 23 nm 3.5 28.8<br />

PTBA IJ Bukit Asam IDR14,800 3,446 10.6 12.0 29 6.7 5.4 62.1<br />

Indo closing prices as of 15 Sep 09<br />

** FY10 & FY11 estimates<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 5


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Asia Equity<br />

In limp mode<br />

The end of US recession in June sealed <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong><br />

financial crisis in our view and we continue to stay on <strong>the</strong><br />

positive side in <strong>the</strong> fourth quarter. At <strong>the</strong> very least,<br />

investors can expect 7% return based on an average<br />

quarterly performance, in view of <strong>the</strong> still positive<br />

momentum. Longer term, we are looking at index gains<br />

of close to 18% by end of 2010. We recommend staying<br />

invested.<br />

We acknowledge that Asia's valuations are getting stretched and that investors<br />

are increasingly concerned about <strong>the</strong> withdrawal of stimulus packages and<br />

formation of asset bubbles in Asia. Given <strong>the</strong> strong rally in <strong>the</strong> last six months,<br />

<strong>the</strong>se worries may serve as reasons for profit taking. However, support levels<br />

using P/B at one standard deviation, suggests that <strong>the</strong> correction may not be<br />

severe. We recommend portfolio re-balancing to exploit <strong>the</strong> opportunities and<br />

mitigate risks for better upside this quarter<br />

Export-oriented economies and markets with higher Industrials and Technology<br />

exposure will benefit more from <strong>the</strong> upturn. We recommend Overweight in<br />

Singapore, Thailand, Korea and Taiwan. These markets are also laggards where<br />

valuations are still attractive. Hong Kong and China are downgraded to Neutral<br />

from Overweight over higher volatility arising from uncertainty over forthcoming<br />

macro policy changes in China. We reduce Indonesia and India by one notch to<br />

Neutral and Underweight respectively. These two markets are <strong>the</strong> best<br />

performing markets this year. We recommend taking profit to switch into<br />

laggard markets. Malaysia remains an Underweight<br />

Joanne Goh • (65) 6878 5233 • joannegohsc@dbs.com<br />

Page 6<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

sa: TW<br />

"This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong> (Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited" disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

For several months <strong>the</strong> stock market has made major gains,<br />

adding up to what was probably <strong>the</strong> greatest bull market in<br />

recent history. Our recommendation to stay positive in <strong>the</strong><br />

second quarter was straightforward as we had identified <strong>the</strong><br />

catalysts for valuation, economic growth and liquidity to<br />

normalize. We stayed positive in <strong>the</strong> third quarter but were of<br />

<strong>the</strong> view that <strong>the</strong> stock market's turbo charge might have<br />

some lag as risk premium normalization had run its course and<br />

markets would need time to justify recent gains. Third quarter's<br />

performance was not as spectacular as <strong>the</strong> second quarter’s<br />

but MSCI Asia ex-Japan still managed to surge 15%, making<br />

both quarters two of <strong>the</strong> best performing quarters in<br />

history.(Fig. 1)<br />

Fig. 1: MSCI Asia ex-Japan quarterly performance<br />

%<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

-30<br />

88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4<br />

Average 3.1 3.2 -1.6 6.7<br />

2009 3.8 29.0 14.4<br />

High 24.8 30.4 16.5 48.2<br />

Low -21.0 -28.5 -24.5 -22.1<br />

Source: Datastream. Average calculations from 1988<br />

Setbacks, that appeared threatening, have proved to be<br />

temporary and served merely as renewed buying opportunities<br />

in an upwardly rising trend. The sharp correction in <strong>the</strong> China<br />

'A' share market and its impact on <strong>the</strong> Hong Kong bourse and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r regional markets was a major setback this quarter and<br />

has been one of <strong>the</strong> major risks in <strong>the</strong> market, which we had<br />

highlighted last quarter.<br />

The end of US recession in June marks <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

crisis in our view and we continue to stay on <strong>the</strong> positive side<br />

in <strong>the</strong> coming quarter.<br />

The fourth quarter has always been <strong>the</strong> best performing<br />

quarter of <strong>the</strong> year with an average performance of 6.7%. In<br />

an upwardly trending market amid positive news flow and<br />

momentum, we believe this should be <strong>the</strong> least that can be<br />

expected for this quarter. We recommend staying invested but<br />

re-jigging portfolio positions to exploit <strong>the</strong> opportunities and<br />

risks in <strong>the</strong> current quarter for better upside.<br />

What will put an end to <strong>the</strong> bull market?<br />

With <strong>the</strong> stock market already up so much in <strong>the</strong> last six<br />

months, <strong>the</strong> inevitable implication is that <strong>the</strong> stock-market<br />

boom must end. The focus now is one when <strong>the</strong> fiscal support,<br />

which was thought to be <strong>the</strong> main pillar for <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

recovery thus far, will be withdrawn. The bear side of <strong>the</strong> story<br />

is that once <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> stimulus dissipates, <strong>the</strong> recovery<br />

will not be sustainable. The stock market, which has been<br />

building on high hopes of an economic recovery, will face a<br />

major sell off soon.<br />

No early exit<br />

At this stage, we remain positive that <strong>the</strong>re is little to worry<br />

about in <strong>the</strong> short term. It is highly unlikely that huge stimulus<br />

packages will be suddenly withdrawn because that would<br />

threaten <strong>the</strong> fragile economic recovery.<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> G20 meeting in early September, Alistair Darling, <strong>the</strong><br />

Chancellor of <strong>the</strong> Exchequer, warned that <strong>the</strong> world could be<br />

dragged into a double-dip recession if governments stopped<br />

stimulating <strong>the</strong>ir economies. As Dominique Strauss-Kahn,<br />

managing director of <strong>the</strong> International Monetary Fund,<br />

mentioned in <strong>the</strong> same meeting, withdrawal of stimulus will<br />

need to be handled delicately, and not before households and<br />

companies are up to <strong>the</strong> task of "taking <strong>the</strong> baton" of<br />

supporting growth from <strong>the</strong> public sector.<br />

In an opening address at Summer Davos in Dalian, China's<br />

premier Wen Jianbao signalled that he will maintain<br />

unprecedented government spending to drive recovery and<br />

that "China's economic rebound is too unstable, unbalanced<br />

and not yet solid" and " ... we cannot and will not change <strong>the</strong><br />

direction of our policies when <strong>the</strong> conditions are not<br />

appropriate". We are of <strong>the</strong> view that <strong>the</strong>re is no early exit in<br />

sight and <strong>the</strong>re are many justifications for that in Asia.<br />

No bubble<br />

Investors are worried about early signs of bubble markets in<br />

Asia, as <strong>the</strong> early restoration of confidence, fiscal support, and<br />

low interest rates have led to an asset boom. These are valid<br />

concerns, but it is probably too early for policy makers to act<br />

Page 7


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

on <strong>the</strong>m. The fundamental checks are (1) whe<strong>the</strong>r asset price<br />

inflation will eventually start spilling over onto <strong>the</strong> CPI and (2) if<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is cost push inflation, especially from <strong>the</strong> labor market,<br />

raw materials and business costs, which will in turn compress<br />

margins. China's CPI and PPI continued to fall in August,<br />

suggesting <strong>the</strong>re is still no price pressure in China.<br />

Unemployment rate in Asia probably hasn't peaked yet. We<br />

look at <strong>the</strong> formation of bubble markets from three aspects:<br />

stock, property and credit markets. The conclusion is that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re may be premature signs of a bubble but not suggestive<br />

of an imminent burst.<br />

Stock market bubble<br />

A stock market bubble is a type of economic bubble taking<br />

place in stock markets when market participants drive stock<br />

prices above <strong>the</strong>ir value in relation to some measures of stock<br />

valuation.<br />

Valuations<br />

We should be worried about market valuations getting<br />

excessive: Asia's price to book value is nearing one standard<br />

deviation above <strong>the</strong> long-term average. Its relationship with<br />

12-month forward return does not suggest an imminent<br />

bursting of <strong>the</strong> bubble but Asia index would likely go nowhere<br />

in <strong>the</strong> next 12 months. Ideally, we would not like to see an<br />

overshooting of Asia's P/B above one standard deviation.<br />

However, in view of <strong>the</strong> still abundant liquidity, this may be just<br />

wishful thinking. It is possible to see an upward revision of<br />

book value, mainly from property asset revaluation and banks'<br />

provisions being ploughed back, which will render book value<br />

less expensive. (Fig. 2)<br />

Fig. 2: Asia ex-Japan P/B vs 12m forward return<br />

2.9<br />

2.6<br />

2.3<br />

2.0<br />

1.7<br />

1.4<br />

1.1<br />

(x) (%)<br />

-60<br />

0.8<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

12-m fwd return (R, inv erse scale) AXJ P/B (L)<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Bands are plus/minus one standard deviation<br />

bands.<br />

Fig. 3: Asia markets: P/B and one standard deviation<br />

targeted levels<br />

Avg Std Current<br />

# of<br />

SD<br />

One SD<br />

PB<br />

Target<br />

upside<br />

Current<br />

Index<br />

Potential<br />

support<br />

level<br />

SET 1.8 0.3 1.9 0.1 2.2 16% 703 814<br />

STI 1.3 0.2 1.3 0.2 1.5 13% 2,638 2,992<br />

China A 2.9 1.1 3.5 0.6 4.0 13% 3,184 3,593<br />

HSI 1.7 0.4 1.9 0.5 2.1 10% 20,866 23,010<br />

TWI 1.9 0.3 2.0 0.4 2.1 8% 7,346 7,943<br />

H-sh 1.8 0.8 2.6 1.0 2.6 0% 12,156 12,122<br />

AXJ 1.7 0.3 2.0 1.0 2.0 -1% 536 533<br />

KLCI 1.6 0.2 1.9 1.0 1.8 -1% 1,207 1,200<br />

KOSPI 1.2 0.3 1.6 1.3 1.5 -4% 1,653 1,579<br />

India 2.5 0.8 3.5 1.3 3.3 -7% 16,454 15,373<br />

JCI 2.3 0.7 3.6 1.7 3.1 -14% 2,420 2,072<br />

-45<br />

-30<br />

-15<br />

0<br />

15<br />

30<br />

45<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Based on P/B at one standard deviation above average, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

still upside for Hang Seng Index, A-share, SET, TWI and STI of<br />

around 8-15% before <strong>the</strong>se indices are considered excessively<br />

overvalued.<br />

Page 8


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Cash calls<br />

Stock market bubbles frequently produce hot markets in Initial<br />

Public Offerings, since investment bankers and <strong>the</strong>ir clients see<br />

opportunities to float new stock issues at inflated prices. These<br />

hot IPO markets mis-allocate investment funds to areas<br />

dictated by speculative trends, ra<strong>the</strong>r than to enterprises<br />

generating long-standing economic value.<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong> bigger markets in Asia are still in <strong>the</strong> early stage<br />

of cash calls. In Hong Kong, we have seen a steady mix of<br />

rights issue, placements, IPOs among Hong Kong and Chinese<br />

companies, raising a total of HK$300bil or 2.4% of market<br />

cap. But this is still way below previous high levels, which<br />

implies <strong>the</strong> stock market can still absorb <strong>the</strong> potential supply<br />

stream. Additionally, liquidity remains abundant and we do not<br />

foresee supply to be a major market dampener.<br />

In Singapore, many big companies have placed rights issues<br />

earlier in <strong>the</strong> year despite <strong>the</strong> lower valuations to streng<strong>the</strong>n<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir balance sheets, in view of <strong>the</strong> uncertainty ahead and to<br />

provide for business opportunities. However, some of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

companies have yet to utilize <strong>the</strong> cash raised or have called for<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r round of cash. There were, however, only 9 new small<br />

companies listed so far. We believe <strong>the</strong> market is hungry for<br />

new stock ideas. Additional capital raising for promising<br />

business acquisitions at attractive pricing should be welcomed<br />

by investors.<br />

In China, <strong>the</strong>re were only 3 'A' share listings since <strong>the</strong><br />

government lifted <strong>the</strong> ban on IPO this June after a 10-month<br />

suspension. Share sale by existing companies continue but we<br />

do not see it as a major threat to <strong>the</strong> market in view of <strong>the</strong> still<br />

abundant liquidity. Afterall, <strong>the</strong> market cap / GDP ratio of<br />

China remains at comparable levels with US (largest economy<br />

to <strong>the</strong> world) or India (similarly Asia emerging market). The<br />

authority is also mulling a separate NASDAQ-like bourse in <strong>the</strong><br />

near future. We believe this should help diverge part of <strong>the</strong><br />

abundant liquidity and risk appetite in <strong>the</strong> market, <strong>the</strong>reby<br />

causing less volatility in <strong>the</strong> mainboard.<br />

Fig. 4: Cash calls in Hong Kong and Singapore<br />

10.0%<br />

9.0%<br />

8.0%<br />

7.0%<br />

6.0%<br />

5.0%<br />

4.0%<br />

3.0%<br />

2.0%<br />

1.0%<br />

0.0%<br />

1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008<br />

Singapore Hong Kong<br />

Source: SGX, HKEX, CEIC, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Fig. 5: Market cap / GDP : China , US, India<br />

160%<br />

140%<br />

120%<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

US India China<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

Page 9


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Against this backdrop, we do not think <strong>the</strong>re is an Asian stock<br />

market bubble but investors should be wary of excessive<br />

valuations. We recommend markets and sectors, which (1)<br />

trade at cheaper price to book value compared to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

historical trends, and (2) have room for earnings upside in <strong>the</strong><br />

next 12 months. Any small positive news will have a long<br />

lasting impact on <strong>the</strong> returns of <strong>the</strong>se stocks.<br />

Fig. 6: Asia sectors: Price to book value below long-term<br />

average<br />

Current<br />

P/B<br />

Average<br />

P/B<br />

Std Dev<br />

P/B<br />

# of SD away<br />

from avg<br />

Hong Kong Banks 1.7 2.3 0.5 -1.2<br />

Taiwan Financials 1.2 2.5 1.7 -0.8<br />

Taiwan Tech 2.1 2.9 1.2 -0.7<br />

Malaysia Utilities 1.4 1.8 0.5 -0.7<br />

Malaysia Telecom 2.0 2.5 0.9 -0.6<br />

Singapore Telecom 2.7 4.8 3.3 -0.6<br />

Thai Banks 1.4 1.7 0.6 -0.5<br />

Singapore Banks 1.4 1.5 0.3 -0.4<br />

Hong Kong Telecoms 2.5 4.0 3.7 -0.4<br />

Malaysia Travel & Leisure 1.8 2.2 0.9 -0.4<br />

Thai Telecoms 4.3 7.3 8.4 -0.4<br />

India Tech 6.7 10.3 10.9 -0.3<br />

Malaysia Oil & Gas 2.2 2.5 0.9 -0.3<br />

Hong Kong Ind Gds & Svs 1.1 1.2 0.3 -0.2<br />

Taiwan Inds Gd & Svs 2.7 2.8 0.7 -0.2<br />

Malaysia Banks 1.9 2.1 0.7 -0.2<br />

Singapore Ind Gds & Svs 0.9 1.0 0.3 -0.2<br />

Hong Kong Utilities 2.4 2.5 0.6 -0.2<br />

Taiwan Chemicals 1.9 1.9 0.5 -0.1<br />

Indonesia Banks 3.3 3.7 3.4 -0.1<br />

Hong Kong Oil & Gas 2.7 3.0 3.4 -0.1<br />

Thailand Oil & Gas 2.1 2.2 0.9 -0.1<br />

Taiwan Telecom 1.8 1.8 0.4 0.0<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Highlighted rows are cyclical sectors with<br />

earnings upgrade potential<br />

Fig. 7: Asia sectors: Price to book value more than one<br />

standard deviation<br />

Current<br />

P/B<br />

Average<br />

P/B<br />

Std Dev<br />

P/B<br />

# of SD away<br />

from avg<br />

Korea Pers & H/H Gds 2.9 1.9 0.4 2.2<br />

India Basic Resource 4.5 2.0 1.3 2.0<br />

India Inds Gds & Svs 6.7 3.2 1.8 1.9<br />

India Utilities 3.0 1.6 0.8 1.8<br />

Korea Basic Resource 1.4 0.9 0.3 1.8<br />

Taiwan Oil & Gas 4.0 3.0 0.6 1.8<br />

Indonesia Utilities 11.4 6.4 3.0 1.7<br />

Indonesia Basic Resource 2.8 1.2 0.9 1.7<br />

Indonesia Pers & H/H Gds 6.0 4.3 1.2 1.4<br />

India Oil & Gas 2.9 1.9 0.8 1.3<br />

Korea Auto & Parts 1.4 0.9 0.4 1.3<br />

Indonesia Auto & Parts 3.7 1.8 1.4 1.3<br />

Hong Kong Technology 7.8 4.7 2.5 1.3<br />

India Banks 1.8 1.2 0.5 1.2<br />

China Basic Resource 2.8 1.5 1.1 1.2<br />

Korea Inds Gds & Svs 1.8 1.2 0.6 1.1<br />

China Insurance 4.7 3.3 1.4 1.1<br />

Hong Kong Real Estate 1.3 1.0 0.3 1.0<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Highlighted rows are defensive sectors<br />

Is <strong>the</strong>re a housing bubble?<br />

Bubbles are hard to spot and economists can't agree on what<br />

counts as a bubble. After <strong>the</strong> US housing debacle believed to<br />

have been brought about by easy US monetary policy between<br />

2003-2007, recent house price rises in Asia have investors<br />

worried of ano<strong>the</strong>r imminent housing bubble.<br />

We believe that not all price rallies are unjustified. Pent-up<br />

demand after <strong>the</strong> initial sharp contraction in anticipation of a<br />

deep recession was <strong>the</strong> key driver of property prices in <strong>the</strong><br />

recent few months. Low interest rates, economic recovery and<br />

inflationary concerns will continue to drive expectations of<br />

higher property prices and thus demand. Our "bubble" check<br />

focuses on affordability and assessment of policy tightening.<br />

At this point our conclusion for most Asian markets is that<br />

affordability levels remain healthy and falling inflation and still<br />

weak demand growth means policy tightening will come only<br />

next year. However, <strong>the</strong>re are early signs of speculative<br />

activities in some markets which may call for a fine-tuning of<br />

government regulations on <strong>the</strong> property sector. We believe<br />

that policy makers will be quick to respond to abnormal price<br />

behaviour this time round to prevent <strong>the</strong> likes of <strong>the</strong> US<br />

housing bubble.<br />

For markets in Hong Kong, Singapore and China, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

"physical signs" of a red hot property market, such as long<br />

queues and units being snapped at new launches, significant<br />

increase in take-up rate and "verbal" intervention by<br />

governments to cool down <strong>the</strong> euphoria. Our analysts have<br />

argued that housing affordability ratios (measured as a<br />

proportion of mortgages to monthly household income) are<br />

still lower than previous crisis levels. In Singapore, <strong>the</strong><br />

government has announced control measures to pre-empt<br />

excessive property speculation.<br />

Hong Kong: Housing remains much more affordable than at<br />

any time between 1994-2000, primarily due to cheap<br />

mortgages. As a result of keen competition among banks,<br />

effective mortgage rates have fallen to 2.5% or lower, near <strong>the</strong><br />

lowest for almost 15 years. Tight future supply should also<br />

support home prices.<br />

Page 10


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 8: Hong Kong: Affordability vs mortgage lending<br />

rate<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Jan-94<br />

Jun-95<br />

Nov-96<br />

Apr-98<br />

Sep-99<br />

Feb-01<br />

Jul-02<br />

Dec-03<br />

May-05<br />

Affordability ratio (LHS)<br />

Oct-06<br />

Mortgage lending rate (RHS)<br />

Source: Centaline Property Agency, CEIC, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Mar-08<br />

12%<br />

10%<br />

China: We don't see a bubble across <strong>the</strong> board in China as <strong>the</strong><br />

nationwide affordability ratio is still lower than that in 2005<br />

when most people viewed property prices as affordable.<br />

However, some cities, such as Beijing, Shenzhen, Tianjin did<br />

see affordability ratios rise to a level much higher than in 2005.<br />

Having said that, housing prices in <strong>the</strong>se cities are still more<br />

affordable than those in 2007. As China statistics tend to<br />

underestimate household incomes, we would believe actual<br />

affordability is better than <strong>the</strong> reported numbers.<br />

Jul-09<br />

Fig. 9: Affordability ratio by different cities in China<br />

Basd on price of<br />

Jul 09 2007 2005<br />

China 44% 52% 49%<br />

Shanghai 61% 66% 61%<br />

Beijing 89% 75% 61%<br />

Shenzhen 53% 75% 45%<br />

Tianjin 58% 57% 51%<br />

Hangzhou 61% 72% 58%<br />

Chengdu 46% 55% 45%<br />

Chongqing 29% 38% 31%<br />

Guangzhou 53% 67% 51%<br />

Wuhan 47% 62% 49%<br />

Source: CEIC, Soufun<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

Singapore: Based on our affordability ratio calculations, where<br />

we assume a 30-year loan tenure at an average 5.5% interest<br />

cost (vs current rates at under 2%) for a 110 sqm mass-market<br />

condominium unit, affordability still remains reasonable (about<br />

40% of monthly income for <strong>the</strong> 85th percentile household)<br />

even with a 20% increase in home prices from trough levels.<br />

We have also assumed that household incomes fall 10% in<br />

2009 and show zero growth in 2010. This is still a much<br />

healthier ratio as compared to during <strong>the</strong> pre-Asian Financial<br />

Crisis housing bubble.<br />

Fig. 10: Singapore affordability ratio<br />

$1,200,000<br />

$1,000,000<br />

$800,000<br />

$600,000<br />

$400,000<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Credit<br />

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010F<br />

Median Price of Mass Condo (LHS)<br />

% Household Income for Mortgage (RHS)<br />

65%<br />

60%<br />

55%<br />

50%<br />

45%<br />

40%<br />

35%<br />

30%<br />

25%<br />

Economic bubbles are often referred to as credit bubbles as<br />

credit is easily made available to everyone and deflated<br />

through a subsequent tightening of credit. What we have<br />

found in Asia is that credit growth is still way below past crisis<br />

levels except for China where this year's credit growth has<br />

been phenomenal and a credit tightening is on <strong>the</strong> cards. Our<br />

China banking analyst believes that a slowdown in China's<br />

lending growth in <strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong> year is consistent with<br />

seasonality and should not be a major concern. Government<br />

officials have clearly stated <strong>the</strong> "moderately loose" monetary<br />

policy will remain, and only market tools (instead of<br />

administrative measures) will be used when conducting<br />

"dynamic fine-tuning". We believe market tools to be used<br />

include open market operations or even mild hikes of RRR and<br />

interest rates. While guidelines to ensure loans are directed to<br />

<strong>the</strong> real economy are possible, administrative controls such as<br />

loan quota policy is unlikely.<br />

Page 11


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 11: Credit growth in Asia by markets, %YoY<br />

Dec-07 Dec-08 Mar-09 Jun-09 Jul-09<br />

HK 19.5 -6.6 -0.7 9.6 8.2<br />

S'pore 19.9 16.6 8.6 4.2 2.3<br />

Malaysia 8.5 15.8 15.4 11.9 12.5<br />

Indonesia 26.4 30.7 26.1 19.2* NA<br />

Thailand 4.9 9.3 6.4 3.2 2.7<br />

Taiwan 4.0 3.6 1.1 -0.3 -0.8<br />

Korea 14.9 14.1 12.1 8.8 7.7<br />

China 16.2 15.9 27.1 31.9 31.4<br />

India 20.4 22.3 17.4 16.3* NA<br />

Source: Datastream. * Refers to May’s number<br />

Fig. 12: Credit growth in China<br />

(RMBbn)<br />

4,000<br />

3,600<br />

3,200<br />

2,800<br />

2,400<br />

2,000<br />

1,600<br />

1,200<br />

800<br />

400<br />

0<br />

568<br />

414<br />

442<br />

422<br />

247<br />

452<br />

231<br />

303<br />

284<br />

136<br />

Source: CEIC, <strong>DBS</strong><strong>Vickers</strong><br />

87<br />

48<br />

Opportunities and Risks<br />

804<br />

243<br />

283<br />

464<br />

382<br />

332<br />

319<br />

272<br />

375<br />

182<br />

477<br />

1Q09: 4,580 (50% of total)<br />

2Q09: 2,787 (30% of total)<br />

3Q09F: 1,100 (12% of total)<br />

4Q09F: 742 (8% of total)<br />

Our asset allocation strategy for <strong>the</strong> fourth quarter is based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> premise that <strong>the</strong> index will remain in consolidation mode,<br />

with an upside bias. The major resistance will come from<br />

higher valuations and slower earnings upgrade momentum in<br />

Asia. While <strong>the</strong> outlook for recovery remains bright in our view,<br />

uncertainty of forthcoming macro policy changes remain <strong>the</strong><br />

key dampener for sentiment. We take <strong>the</strong> view that it is too<br />

early to worry about this.<br />

Investors can look forward to <strong>the</strong> following opportunities<br />

whilst staying mindful of <strong>the</strong> following risks in <strong>the</strong> coming<br />

quarter:-<br />

1. Synchronised global upturn in <strong>the</strong> making. We believe<br />

<strong>the</strong> global GDP data will improve sequentially,<br />

beginning with Asia which had bottomed in 1Q, US in<br />

2Q, and subsequently Europe in 3Q. The likelihood for<br />

data to disappoint is low in our view and bottoming<br />

may come in earlier than expected. Meanwhile, world<br />

valuations are still at very low levels which mean <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is still room for P/E expansion. The potential for global<br />

772<br />

1,620<br />

1,070<br />

1,890<br />

592<br />

665<br />

1,530<br />

356<br />

420<br />

Jan-07<br />

Mar-07<br />

May-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Sep-07<br />

Nov-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Mar-08<br />

May-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Sep-08<br />

Nov-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Mar-09<br />

May-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Nov-09<br />

markets to re-rate in line with a sharp recovery in GDP<br />

growth over <strong>the</strong> next 6-12 months should keep <strong>the</strong><br />

global equities market uptrend intact. Asia's growth,<br />

being high in beta, should continue to benefit from<br />

<strong>the</strong> positive trend in economic momentum.<br />

2. Against this backdrop, Asia's valuation is high when<br />

compared to <strong>the</strong> world, and given that economic<br />

momentum will be slower. There is a threat of fund<br />

flows favoring <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> world vs Asia since<br />

emerging markets already had its fair share of<br />

recovery gains earlier in <strong>the</strong> year. There are two<br />

reasons to believe that Asia is still a good bet:-<br />

a. Cash levels for allocation has dwindled near<br />

towards <strong>the</strong> low pre crisis for both emerging<br />

markets and global funds. From this angle <strong>the</strong><br />

easy allocation from cash to put money to work<br />

is not available anymore - new money has to be<br />

drawn into equity markets.<br />

b. In terms of net sales, emerging market has been<br />

able to attract more new sales when compared<br />

to global and international funds. The<br />

attractiveness of emerging market growth versus<br />

growth in developed markets has been well<br />

proven. Asia's growth has demonstrated a very<br />

sharp v-shaped recovery and economic growth is<br />

expected to exceed 6% in <strong>the</strong> next two years.<br />

This is about 3 times <strong>the</strong> growth rate in G3. With<br />

<strong>the</strong> ongoing uncertainty and herd mentality, we<br />

continue to believe emerging markets including<br />

Asia can continue to attract new flows.<br />

Fig. 13: US mutual funds cash levels by fund category<br />

%<br />

%<br />

12<br />

11<br />

10<br />

Emerging (R)<br />

9<br />

Global (L)<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

International (R)<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

Jan-07<br />

Mar-07<br />

May-07<br />

Current 2007TDAvg Low<br />

Global 7.7% 7.4% 6.6%<br />

International 3.6% 4.3% 4.1%<br />

Emerging 4.5% 4.4% 4.5%<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Jul-07<br />

Sep-07<br />

Nov-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Mar-08<br />

May-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Sep-08<br />

Nov-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Mar-09<br />

May-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

6.5<br />

6.0<br />

5.5<br />

5.0<br />

4.5<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

Page 12


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 14: US mutual funds cumulative (YTD) net new<br />

sales by fund category<br />

US$bil<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Our US economist pointed out that with <strong>the</strong><br />

slowdown in US jobless claims we will be able to see<br />

job loss turning into job gains in a few months time.<br />

4. The impact of cash calls for US banks remain<br />

uncertain as banks' balance sheets still need to be<br />

streng<strong>the</strong>ned. But from <strong>the</strong> market's point of view<br />

share prices should remain steady before <strong>the</strong> cash<br />

raising exercise.<br />

0<br />

(2)<br />

(4)<br />

(6)<br />

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul<br />

Emerging Markets International Global<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

3. Third quarter's earnings results for <strong>the</strong> US still remain<br />

uncertain when measured against upgraded<br />

expectations. However, with <strong>the</strong> US leading indicator<br />

turning decidedly upwards, we remain hopeful that<br />

we continue to see US earnings being upgraded. (Fig.<br />

15)<br />

5. Remember that <strong>the</strong> Fed would probably end its<br />

Treasury purchase programme in October and <strong>the</strong><br />

mortgage bond re-purchase programme in<br />

December. The impact on <strong>the</strong> bond market is most<br />

likely to be negative where bond yields are expected<br />

to rise. Our fixed income strategist is of <strong>the</strong> view that<br />

US 10-year interest rates should remain in <strong>the</strong> range<br />

between 3-4% unless we see substantially higher<br />

US GDP growth and core inflation.<br />

6. Should US GDP growth rise higher than potential<br />

(3% range) in <strong>the</strong> coming quarter, <strong>the</strong> bond market<br />

should react with a spike up in yields. (Fig. 16)<br />

Accordingly we forecast that Fed funds hike can<br />

come as early as 2Q10. Even so, <strong>the</strong> negative impact<br />

of a rate hike cycle is inclusive on <strong>the</strong> stock markets<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> past four cycles. (Fig. 17)<br />

Fig. 15: S&P 12m fwd EPS forecast vs US Leading<br />

indicator<br />

Fig. 16: US Bond yield vs real GDP growth<br />

8<br />

6<br />

110<br />

110<br />

100<br />

7<br />

4<br />

90<br />

100<br />

2<br />

80<br />

6<br />

90<br />

0<br />

70<br />

5<br />

-2<br />

60<br />

80<br />

50<br />

4<br />

-4<br />

40<br />

70<br />

-6<br />

30<br />

3<br />

60<br />

-8<br />

20<br />

2<br />

-10<br />

10<br />

50<br />

92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08<br />

85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

US 10-year bond yield (LHS)<br />

S & P 500 Index - 12Mth Fwd Wtd EPS (LHS)<br />

US GDP growth minus 3% potential growth (RHS)<br />

US Leading Economic Indicators Index (RHS)<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Source: Datasream, IBES, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Fig. 17: Stock market performance in past four FED rate hike cycles<br />

Market performance<br />

US Interest rate hikes S&P 500 MSCI Asia<br />

From To Change (bps) From To % From To %<br />

2/4/94 2/1/95 3 6 300 481 470 -2% 409 308 -25%<br />

3/25/97 3/25/97 5.25 5.5 25 791 789 0% 378 380 1%<br />

6/30/99 5/16/00 4.75 6.5 175 1351 1466 8% 360 345 -4%<br />

6/30/04 6/29/06 1 5.25 425 1136 1273 12% 297 413 39%<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Page 13


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

7. Timing is <strong>the</strong> soul of investing in China and some<br />

investors hype it with China's 60th party anniversary<br />

celebration. Our belief is that China will continue<br />

with its reform policy and Premier Wen Jiabao made<br />

it very clear during <strong>the</strong> Davos speech that <strong>the</strong> fiscal<br />

stimulus is not about US$4t spending but a stimulus<br />

programme to encourage domestic investment and<br />

spending that would benefit China in <strong>the</strong> long term.<br />

Not forgetting that China's exports demand should<br />

also start to shift to recovery mode which would<br />

accelerate China's growths in <strong>the</strong> next few quarters.<br />

8. There are signs that <strong>the</strong> USD may start to weaken as<br />

<strong>the</strong> recovery matures into <strong>the</strong> growth stage from <strong>the</strong><br />

"worst is over" stage. This should allow for Asian<br />

currency appreciation. At this juncture, our currency<br />

strategist expects Asian central banks to slow <strong>the</strong><br />

appreciation pace of <strong>the</strong>ir currencies and maintain a<br />

modest USD depreciation profile. A weak USD<br />

should favor commodities and Asian asset markets<br />

9. With <strong>the</strong> abundant liquidity around, we believe<br />

investors will be chasing for higher yields. Against<br />

this backdrop, carry trades and high risk appetite<br />

should favor Asian assets.<br />

10. We are uncomfortable with <strong>the</strong> recent sharp rise in<br />

<strong>the</strong> gold price:- It may be signaling an increase in<br />

risk aversion or a rising fear of inflation, or <strong>the</strong><br />

collapse of <strong>the</strong> USD. All of which will add volatility<br />

and will not be positive for Asian stock markets.<br />

Asset allocation strategy<br />

The coincident relationship between economic and stock<br />

market cycles suggests that upward momentum will continue<br />

as long as <strong>the</strong> economy remains on track. The powerful impact<br />

of <strong>the</strong> synchronised global upturn could be under-estimated<br />

<strong>the</strong> same way <strong>the</strong> synchronised global downturn came along.<br />

We believe markets have <strong>the</strong> propensity to touch <strong>the</strong> pre-crisis<br />

high levels. A clearing level would be for Asia earnings to<br />

return to pre-crisis levels by 2010 as we have forecast for GDP<br />

levels to return to pre-crisis levels by end 2010. We arrive at<br />

2010 year end targets using this assumption.<br />

We acknowledge that Asia's valuations are getting stretched<br />

and investors may be concerned about <strong>the</strong> withdrawal of<br />

stimulus packages and formation of asset bubbles in Asia.<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> strong rally in <strong>the</strong> last six months, <strong>the</strong>se worries may<br />

serve as reasons for profit taking. Support levels using P/B at<br />

one standard deviation calculations show correction may not<br />

be severe. We recommend staying invested but re-jig <strong>the</strong><br />

portfolio to exploit <strong>the</strong> risks and opportunities in <strong>the</strong> coming<br />

quarter.<br />

We are making <strong>the</strong> following changes to our market strategy:-<br />

a. Reduce our overweight in Hong Kong and China 'H'<br />

to Neutral to mitigate China's macro policy risk<br />

b. Reduce Singapore overweight to a slight overweight.<br />

Early signs of housing bubble and government's<br />

intervention may dampen positive sentiments in <strong>the</strong><br />

Singapore market in <strong>the</strong> short term. Like Hong Kong<br />

and China 'H', <strong>the</strong>se high beta markets have returned<br />

in excess of 80% from <strong>the</strong> low on 9th March and will<br />

be more prone to profit taking. Our slightly<br />

overweight position is maintained on Singapore over<br />

Hong Kong due to its cheaper valuations and strong<br />

re-rating drivers in <strong>the</strong> coming quarter - a correction,<br />

if any, will see Singapore holding better than Hong<br />

Kong<br />

c. We raise Taiwan and Korea to Overweight in view of<br />

<strong>the</strong> synchronised global upturn. Taiwan and Korea<br />

stock indices are heavily weighted towards Industrials<br />

and Technology which will benefit from <strong>the</strong> upturn. A<br />

stronger won forecast now also justifies <strong>the</strong> Korea<br />

upgrade. Our preference in Taiwan over Korea is<br />

maintained due to higher policy risk in Korea and<br />

Taiwan's cheaper valuations (based on historical<br />

standards). Taiwan's cyclical sectors like Chemicals,<br />

Industrials, Telcos, Banks and Technology were<br />

captured in <strong>the</strong> attractive P/B sector screen. Re-rating<br />

potential in Taiwan is higher due to improving crossstraits<br />

relationships while <strong>the</strong> North Korea threat will<br />

always linger.<br />

d. We raise Thailand to Overweight on <strong>the</strong> back of<br />

attractive valuations. Big sector weights like Banks and<br />

Oil & Gas sectors are still good value plays<br />

e. We continue to believe in <strong>the</strong> longer term higher<br />

potential growth of Indonesia and that <strong>the</strong> market can<br />

re-rate fur<strong>the</strong>r despite an already consensus<br />

overweight position and higher valuations. The lower<br />

interest rate and inflation scenarios may set ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

growth regime for Indonesia on <strong>the</strong> back of a<br />

constructive political environment. World Bank<br />

recently upgraded Indonesia's GDP growth forecast to<br />

6.5% next year, which will be near its potential level.<br />

Indonesia's valuations, though high, are still<br />

comparable with China's and India's - <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two<br />

high growth economies in Asia. This quarter ,<br />

however, we reduce it from Overweight to Neutral on<br />

a tactical move to exploit better opportunities<br />

elsewhere.<br />

Page 14


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

f. We reduce India to Underweight. We believe <strong>the</strong>re<br />

maybe downside surprise in India's economic growth<br />

as <strong>the</strong> drought drags on, affecting agricultural output.<br />

Inflationary pressure is building up on rising<br />

commodity costs which may delay an economic<br />

recovery as well as exerting pressure on <strong>the</strong> need for<br />

rate hikes. Not forgetting that India's fiscal budget<br />

spending is based on tax revenue collection from high<br />

growth forecasts, fiscal position is also set to worsen<br />

considerably.<br />

Our market recommendations and target returns are summarised as follows:-<br />

Fig. 18: Table of recommendations and index targets<br />

Levels below which 2009 2010<br />

16-Sep valuations are Yr-end Yr-end<br />

Forecast<br />

Return<br />

Market Index Index Rec not excesive* Target Target 2009 2010<br />

Singapore STI 2674 O/W 2992 2800 3400 5% 27%<br />

Taiwan TWI 7440 O/W 7943 7943 10150 7% 36%<br />

Korea KOSPI 1683 O/W 1579 1800 2025 7% 20%<br />

Thailand SET 710 O/W 814 760 828 7% 17%<br />

Hong Kong HSI 21403 N 23010 22608 28688 6% 34%<br />

China 'H' H-sh 12525 N 12122 13000 16888 4% 35%<br />

Indonesia JCI 2439 N 2072 2600 3000 7% 23%<br />

Malaysia KLCI 1213 U/W 1200 1250 1448 3% 19%<br />

India Sensex 16677 U/W 15373 17000 22483 2% 35%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong>. * Calculations from Fig. 3. - Indicate levels to add position for longer term gains if index is below. O/W: Overweight;<br />

N: Neutral; U/W Underweight. 2010 levels based on existing forecast of FY11 EPS and +1SD forward P/E valuations. Assumption is<br />

also for FY11 EPS to return to pre-crisis peak levels.<br />

Page 15


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Market Outlook<br />

Singapore's re-rating<br />

We are maintaining our Overweight for Singapore despite <strong>the</strong><br />

risk of profit taking after <strong>the</strong> market had rebounded 80% from<br />

<strong>the</strong> bottom. Singapore's valuations are among <strong>the</strong> most<br />

attractive in <strong>the</strong> region. That should leave room for a re-rating<br />

in <strong>the</strong> market as its P/E premium to <strong>the</strong> region looms near <strong>the</strong><br />

historical low end (Fig. 20). A look at Singapore's historical<br />

market P/E vs GDP growth clearly establishes a strong case for<br />

Singapore's current valuations to re-rate on <strong>the</strong> back of a<br />

strong economic recovery. (Fig. 19)<br />

Fig. 19: Singapore fwd PE vs. GDP growth<br />

(% ) (x)<br />

15<br />

26<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Singapore real GDP growth (%YoY, LHS)<br />

Singapore 12-month forward PER (x, RHS)<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong>, IBES<br />

Fig. 20: Singapore P/E relative to <strong>the</strong> region<br />

1.7<br />

1.6<br />

1.5<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

re-rate<br />

(x)<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong>, IBES<br />

re-rate<br />

de-rate<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

24<br />

22<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

Upturn after <strong>the</strong> downturn<br />

The Singapore economy emerged from <strong>the</strong> recession with a big<br />

bang by posting a remarkable 20.7% QoQ saar in <strong>the</strong> second<br />

quarter, led by <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector. Recovery in that<br />

sector was broad based, while <strong>the</strong> recovery in services sector<br />

was mainly from financial services. The impact of <strong>the</strong> recession<br />

has also been less severe than initially feared, thanks to <strong>the</strong><br />

slew of "counter measures" introduced by <strong>the</strong> government.<br />

Going forward, we believe Singapore can post better second<br />

half growth vs <strong>the</strong> region as <strong>the</strong> synchronized global upturn<br />

evolves.<br />

Structural changes<br />

It may be too early to declare success on fighting <strong>the</strong> recession.<br />

But Singapore government has laid in place plans for structural<br />

changes even before <strong>the</strong> downturn came, which partly<br />

explained <strong>the</strong> speedy recovery we had so far. Some earlier<br />

initiatives are geographical and products diversification in<br />

exports, fiscal incentives for <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

services sector and promoting diversified industries in<br />

establishing bases here in Singapore. In addition, <strong>the</strong> major<br />

longer-term on-going structural transformation on population<br />

targets to promote domestic demand for a self-sustaining<br />

model.<br />

The latest initiatives are <strong>the</strong> construction of integrated resorts,<br />

which is estimated to add 1.5% to Singapore's GDP, creating<br />

60,000 direct and spin-off jobs in <strong>the</strong> process. The ripple effect<br />

from <strong>the</strong>se two iconic developments is expected to be far<br />

reaching, ranging from gaming, hospitality, property to service<br />

providers such as retail, media and transport operators.<br />

Stock market revamped<br />

In line with <strong>the</strong> revamp of <strong>the</strong> financial services industry, we<br />

also see major changes happening in <strong>the</strong> stock exchange as<br />

well. O<strong>the</strong>r than having stocks, which are exposed to <strong>the</strong><br />

domestic economy, <strong>the</strong> stock market now has sizeable<br />

exposure to emerging markets in growth sectors such as palm<br />

oil, coal, oil & gas; and o<strong>the</strong>r markets such as Indonesia, China,<br />

India and Vietnam. Structurally, Singapore's P/E de-rating was<br />

also largely due to its loss of luster as an emerging Asia<br />

country as <strong>the</strong> economy matures and new emerging market<br />

darlings like <strong>the</strong> BRICs markets, Taiwan and Korea were<br />

attracting a lot of investors' interest and fund flows. With <strong>the</strong><br />

revamp, Singapore should now be more attractive to investors<br />

who are interested in developed markets with emerging<br />

markets' exposure. Singapore's P/E de-rating is also very much<br />

evident in relation to Hong Kong - its closest developed market<br />

peer in <strong>the</strong> region with similar dynamics. It now trades at a<br />

discount to Hong Kong, which we believe is unjustifiable and<br />

<strong>the</strong> market should re-rate accordingly. (Fig. 21)<br />

Page 16


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 21: Singapore relative to Hong Kong fwd PE<br />

(x)<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

However, EPS upgrade has been slower than expected vs <strong>the</strong><br />

rest of <strong>the</strong> region. (Fig. 22). This is mainly due to 1) dilutive<br />

effect of <strong>the</strong> rights issues which we estimate at about 15%<br />

overall dilution on <strong>the</strong> market, and 2) earnings for <strong>the</strong><br />

Industrials sector have yet to be upgraded. Singapore sectors<br />

are highly cyclical, with about 55% exposed to domestic<br />

cyclicals (financials, consumer discretionary), and 21%<br />

externally (Industrials). We expect earnings for <strong>the</strong> domestic<br />

cyclicals to be upgraded in line with <strong>the</strong> domestic economy and<br />

for Industrials to be upgraded according with <strong>the</strong> improvement<br />

in global IP. (Fig. 23 & 24)<br />

Fig. 23: Singapore 12-mth forward GDP growth and<br />

earnings growth forecast trend<br />

8<br />

6<br />

(%) (%)<br />

40<br />

GDP growth (L)<br />

30<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong>, IBES<br />

High upgrade potential<br />

4<br />

20<br />

We have upgraded our 2009 Singapore's economic growth<br />

forecast to -3%, up from -5% in <strong>the</strong> previous quarter. 2010<br />

forecast is now at 5.2% vs 4.8% previously. Net profit growth<br />

for 2009 remains negative at -6% (based on <strong>DBS</strong>V coverage),<br />

but was up from -12% in <strong>the</strong> last quarter.<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

Earnings growth (R)<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

Fig. 22: 12-month fwd EPS integer: Singapore, Hong<br />

Kong and Asia ex-Japan<br />

(index)<br />

115<br />

110<br />

-4<br />

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Consensus Economics Inc, <strong>DBS</strong>, IBES<br />

Fig. 24: Global IP vs Singapore Industrials earnings<br />

forecasts<br />

-20<br />

105<br />

100<br />

95<br />

(index)<br />

115<br />

110<br />

105<br />

(index)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

90<br />

85<br />

100<br />

95<br />

90<br />

15<br />

10<br />

80<br />

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep<br />

Singapore Hong Kong Asia ex-Japan<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong>, IBES<br />

85<br />

80<br />

75<br />

95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Global Industrial Production Index (L)<br />

MSCI Sing Industrials - 12-month forward EPS (R)<br />

Source: Datasream<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Page 17


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

2010 growth (%)<br />

Risk premiums declining as risk appetites improve<br />

Providing more fuel to our argument that Singapore's equity<br />

valuations have more room for upside is <strong>the</strong> equity risk<br />

premium (ERP). After <strong>the</strong> significant decrease in risk aversion<br />

since March 2009, <strong>the</strong> ERP has reverted to its long-term<br />

average levels of 4.2%. (Fig. 25)<br />

Fig. 25: Singapore equity risk premium<br />

10.0<br />

9.0<br />

8.0<br />

7.0<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

(%)<br />

1.0<br />

0.0<br />

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Earnings yield minus Singapore 10-year bond<br />

yield<br />

Our sensitivity analysis points to a fur<strong>the</strong>r 2% upside for <strong>the</strong><br />

FSSTI index if consensus forecasts of 18% earnings growth in<br />

FY10 holds. We arrive at a target of 2800 for <strong>the</strong> next 3<br />

months, where it will be supported by P/B and ERP calculations.<br />

In 2010, we could be looking at support levels of up to 18%<br />

from current levels if we expect “e” to return to pre-crisis levels<br />

by 2011. (Fig. 26)<br />

Fig. 26: Potential return from Interest rate / Growth<br />

sensitivity analysis based on ERP mean revision<br />

Singapore Long Bond yield (%)<br />

1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3<br />

18 11% 7% 2% -2% -5% -9% -12%<br />

23 16% 12% 7% 3% 0% -4% -7%<br />

28 21% 17% 12% 8% 5% 1% -2%<br />

33 26% 22% 17% 13% 10% 6% 3%<br />

38 31% 27% 22% 18% 15% 11% 8%<br />

43 36% 32% 27% 23% 20% 16% 13%<br />

48 41% 37% 32% 28% 25% 21% 18%<br />

Current support<br />

12-mth target<br />

Source: Datastream. Based on current index of 2681 and bond yield of<br />

2%<br />

The regional strategy team is arriving at a STI index target of<br />

3400 by end 2010. This is derived from a forward PER of 16.3x<br />

on 2011 “e” returning to pre-crisis high in 2007. We believe it<br />

is achievable for <strong>the</strong> “e” to return to pre-crisis level as<br />

accordingly absolute GDP level will return to pre-crisis levels by<br />

end of 2010 based on our nominal GDP growth forecasts.<br />

Hong Kong / China downgraded to Neutral<br />

Our Hong Kong strategist, Derek Cheung, is concerned of a<br />

correction on a market which has been driven by (1) high<br />

hopes of a US economic recovery, which may disappoint and<br />

(2) huge PRC pump-priming, which may dissipate (See Hong<br />

Kong strategy: “Wolatility, - wake up call"). While <strong>the</strong> regional<br />

team agrees that a pull back as a result of profit taking is<br />

probable, <strong>the</strong> downside should remain well supported at<br />

average valuations as <strong>the</strong> anticipated earnings upgrade after<br />

<strong>the</strong> result season has been on track. Derek's forecast for HSI at<br />

14000 represents a worst-case scenario should negative events<br />

converge on <strong>the</strong> market, which has thus far been more<br />

focused on upside surprises.<br />

Hong Kong's valuations are not excessive<br />

HSI managed to hold steady despite <strong>the</strong> sharp correction in <strong>the</strong><br />

'A' share market in August. Calculations based on P/B and P/E<br />

valuations showed strong support at current levels (Fig.<br />

27&28). Bottom-up P/B screening also identify Hong Kong<br />

banks and industrials as being attractive in terms of P/B<br />

valuations (Fig. 29&30). With <strong>the</strong> recent M&A interests in<br />

Hong Kong Banks, and <strong>the</strong> strength in China's PMI and global<br />

IP, we expect <strong>the</strong>se two sectors to drive <strong>the</strong> index higher.<br />

Fig. 27: HSI 12month fwd PER<br />

25<br />

23<br />

21<br />

19<br />

17<br />

15<br />

13<br />

11<br />

9<br />

7<br />

5<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Page 18


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 28: Hong Kong: Price to book<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Fig. 29: Hong Kong Banks Price to book<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Fig. 30: Hong Kong Industrials Price to book<br />

2.5<br />

2.3<br />

2.1<br />

1.9<br />

1.7<br />

1.5<br />

1.3<br />

1.1<br />

0.9<br />

0.7<br />

0.5<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Accordingly our 3-month target is at 22608. On a 12-month<br />

basis, we are looking at HSI potentially at 28688 by end of<br />

2010, based on <strong>the</strong> peak cycle (plus one standard deviation)<br />

P/E valuation and current earnings growth forecast of 14%.<br />

More earnings upgrade potential<br />

Earnings upgrade after <strong>the</strong> half-year result season has been<br />

strong. 2010 earnings growth remains at 14% but 2009<br />

forecast earnings growth has climbed steadily from -15% in<br />

April to -5%. We believe it is quite likely that 2009 growth<br />

estimates may turn positive in <strong>the</strong> next few months,<br />

considering <strong>the</strong> strong half-year results. Our GDP growth for<br />

Hong Kong was revised up from -6.5% to -2.4%. The nominal<br />

GDP and earnings model indicate an upside growth of 40% for<br />

2010F (consensus 14%, <strong>DBS</strong>V 22%), which we believe it is<br />

likely that part of <strong>the</strong> growth will be front loaded to 2009.<br />

Fig. 31: Hong Kong: 2009 EPS growth forecast trend and<br />

3-month EPS revision trend<br />

-4.0<br />

-6.0<br />

-8.0<br />

-10.0<br />

-12.0<br />

-14.0<br />

-16.0<br />

Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep<br />

2009 EPS growth forecast trend (LHS)<br />

3-mth % revisions in FY1 EPS (RHS)<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong>, Datastream<br />

Fig. 32: Hong Kong GDP and EPS Index<br />

750<br />

650<br />

550<br />

450<br />

350<br />

250<br />

150<br />

50<br />

(index)<br />

90<br />

92<br />

94<br />

96<br />

GDP level<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong>, Datastream<br />

98<br />

Forecasts to<br />

return to precrisis<br />

levels<br />

00<br />

02<br />

04<br />

06<br />

08<br />

EPS level<br />

10<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

Page 19


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Thailand - Poised for domestic and external upturn<br />

Thai market has performed remarkably well since we upgraded<br />

<strong>the</strong> market to Neutral last quarter. Improving economic<br />

numbers, ample liquidity, easing political tension and strong<br />

foreign funds flow contributed to <strong>the</strong> 16% performance for<br />

<strong>the</strong> quarter. We continue to expect Thailand to trade in line<br />

with <strong>the</strong> region given <strong>the</strong> low interest rate environment and<br />

demand driven by fiscal boost. An improving external<br />

environment should also lift Thailand's growth prospects. The<br />

big picture we are expecting is one of a large sequential pickup<br />

in GDP in 3Q, similar to that witnessed in 2Q, followed by a<br />

moderation in growth pace to a circa 4% annual rate from 3Q<br />

onwards. We recommend an increased position in Banks,<br />

property and selected undervalued Energy stocks. We choose<br />

Thailand as a valuation laggard and recommend Overweight in<br />

<strong>the</strong> fourth quarter.<br />

Taiwan and Korea benefiting from synchronized global<br />

upturn<br />

In view of <strong>the</strong> synchronized global upturn scenario, we are<br />

raising our recommendation for Taiwan and Korea to<br />

Overweight. This is in view of <strong>the</strong> proportionately larger<br />

exposure in Industrials and technology, which should benefit<br />

from <strong>the</strong> upturn. A stronger won forecast now also justifies an<br />

upgrade in <strong>the</strong> Korean market as investors seek both currency<br />

and stock gains which move closely in tandem in <strong>the</strong> relatively<br />

more open financial account.<br />

Page 20


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Asia-vu (2): back to <strong>the</strong> ‘90s (David Carbon, davidcarbon@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets –<br />

Strategy, 4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• Asia’s V-shaped recovery continues, with no help<br />

from <strong>the</strong> US<br />

• This has surprised <strong>the</strong> conventional wisdom (CW),<br />

which thought <strong>the</strong> US would have to lead Asia out of<br />

recession<br />

• Ra<strong>the</strong>r than accept defeat, <strong>the</strong> CW has doubled its<br />

bets: it now believes Asia will face slow growth for<br />

several years<br />

• We think <strong>the</strong> opposite: Growth in Asia over <strong>the</strong> next<br />

5 years will be faster than average, not slower. More<br />

generally, we think Asia is headed back to a period<br />

that resembles <strong>the</strong> early-90s in many ways<br />

• Besides faster growth, capital inflows and a marked<br />

shift toward external deficit will be key features of<br />

<strong>the</strong> next 5-10 years<br />

• Structural, cyclical and ‘new world’ factors will drive<br />

this shift<br />

This report picks up where Asia-vu (1) left off (p3, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Quarterly, Economics-Markets-Strategy, 15Jun07). As noted,<br />

our bottom line is that everything seems poised to change back<br />

again. In short, if we call <strong>the</strong> 10 years before and after <strong>the</strong> ‘97<br />

crisis P1 and P2, Asia now appears on <strong>the</strong> verge of entering a<br />

third period, P3, which looks an awful lot like P1 (first chart on<br />

right). As Mr Berra might have said, Asia-vu again.<br />

But what does it matter? And why bo<strong>the</strong>r with all this P1 and<br />

P2? The answer to <strong>the</strong> first question is clear: if Asia is headed<br />

back into boom times that’s worth knowing about. Why P1<br />

and P2? Because, <strong>the</strong> longer-term perspective offers a clear<br />

framework for understanding where Asia has been, where it is<br />

going and why. And, because it makes it easy to dispatch with<br />

some of <strong>the</strong> conventional wisdoms that interfere with that<br />

understanding, including:<br />

1. <strong>the</strong> premise that growth in Asia has been “fast” of<br />

late and that little headroom remains for faster<br />

growth ahead;<br />

2. <strong>the</strong> premise that current account surpluses are<br />

responsible for Asia’s “fast” growth and that deficits<br />

would imply slower growth;<br />

3. <strong>the</strong> premise that lower consumption / higher savings,<br />

in <strong>the</strong> US for example, implies slower growth ahead;<br />

and finally, <strong>the</strong> CW conclusion,<br />

4. that Asia is destined for a period of slow growth<br />

ahead.<br />

Asia-vu: back to <strong>the</strong> 90s<br />

Asian<br />

financial<br />

crisis<br />

US<br />

financial<br />

crisis<br />

Period 1 Period 2 Period 3<br />

Capital inflow<br />

Current acct deficits<br />

Rising leverage<br />

Rising external debt<br />

Rapid fixed capital form'n<br />

Above-avg GDP growth<br />

Capital outflow<br />

Current acct surpluses<br />

De-leveraging<br />

Repaying external debt<br />

Paltry fixed capital form'n<br />

Below-avg GDP growth<br />

Asia-vu:<br />

A return to period 1:<br />

Capital inflow<br />

External balance / deficit<br />

Above-avg GDP growth<br />

1987 1997 2007 2017<br />

P1, P2 and <strong>the</strong> Asian myths<br />

Let’s begin. There are 5-6 features of P1 and P2 that will help<br />

us understand what is and is not going on. We considered<br />

<strong>the</strong>m in detail in Asia-vu (1) so let’s take <strong>the</strong> bullet point / chart<br />

approach here:<br />

Growth (chart below): The first myth to address is <strong>the</strong> idea<br />

that growth in Asia has been unusually / unsustainably fast of<br />

late. In fact, growth has been below average for <strong>the</strong> past ten<br />

years. If you want to see fast growth, look at P1, <strong>the</strong> 10 years<br />

leading up to <strong>the</strong> crisis. Growth averaged 8% per year in <strong>the</strong><br />

Asia-9 <strong>the</strong>n. Since <strong>the</strong>n, growth has averaged only 4.7%. Even<br />

in <strong>the</strong> past 5 years it has averaged only 6%. That’s less than<br />

<strong>the</strong> full period average of 6.3% and a full two points below<br />

growth in P1. The next time someone tells you that growth out<br />

here has been running too fast, look <strong>the</strong>m in <strong>the</strong> face and say,<br />

not really.<br />

Asia 9 – average GDP growth<br />

% per year, simple avg<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

8.0<br />

Full period average: 6.3%<br />

4.7<br />

87-96 97-08 past 5 yrs<br />

Current account balances: Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most noticeable<br />

change between P1 and P2 was <strong>the</strong> swing in current account<br />

balances. The Asia-9 ran deficits in <strong>the</strong> pre-crisis period<br />

averaging 2% of GDP by 1995. The crisis-4 countries (TH, MY,<br />

ID, KR) ran higher deficits of 6% of GDP and in some instances<br />

6.0<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report<br />

Page 21


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

(Malaysia and Thailand, mainly) deficits reached 8%-10% of<br />

GDP.<br />

That changed in mid-97. When <strong>the</strong> baht broke from its basket,<br />

capital flight ensued in earnest and deficits turned to surplus<br />

overnight. Foreigners no longer wanted to lend and locals no<br />

longer wanted to borrow. Deficits jumped to surpluses<br />

equivalent to 8% of GDP in <strong>the</strong> Asia-8 (10% in <strong>the</strong> crisis-4)<br />

and averaged about 5% for <strong>the</strong> next decade.<br />

Although China garnered <strong>the</strong> headlines, it’s important to note<br />

that Asia’s current account surpluses were just a China affair –<br />

as a percentage of GDP, Asia’s surpluses were about <strong>the</strong> same<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r China was included in <strong>the</strong> calculations or not.<br />

So what about <strong>the</strong> conventional wisdom that Asia’s growth<br />

has relied on running surpluses? And that absent those<br />

surpluses, growth will fall?<br />

Asia’s experience says <strong>the</strong> conventional wisdom has it<br />

backwards. Asia ran big deficits in P1 and its growth was<br />

above-average. It ran big surpluses in P2 and growth was much<br />

lower. The truth is, you don’t need surpluses to generate fast<br />

growth. In fact, <strong>the</strong>y hold you down. Why? All that surplus<br />

output could be driving local investment and faster growth at<br />

home ra<strong>the</strong>r than abroad. If you want fast growth, borrow<br />

from foreigners, don’t lend to <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Capital inflow: Asia might have run big deficits in <strong>the</strong> precrisis<br />

period but inflows more than financed <strong>the</strong>m. Foreign<br />

reserves rose in spite of <strong>the</strong> deficits and currencies faced<br />

substantial appreciation pressure.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> post-crisis period, capital flowed out of <strong>the</strong> country, first<br />

as investors fled and later as locals paid down as much external<br />

debt as <strong>the</strong>y could (chart right top). Current account inflows<br />

turned to capital account outflows almost on <strong>the</strong> spot.<br />

More recently, current account surpluses more than offset<br />

capital outflows and currencies have once again faced upward<br />

pressure. Indeed, between 2003 and 2007, reserve increases as<br />

a percentage of GDP were even greater than during <strong>the</strong> go-go<br />

pre-crisis years (chart right center).<br />

finance its current account deficits) and <strong>the</strong> high domestic<br />

leverage ratios that came with it, <strong>the</strong>n damn <strong>the</strong> torpedoes,<br />

Asia didn’t need <strong>the</strong> IMF or anyone else telling it that things<br />

had to change. Asia itself went about cutting external debt –<br />

and <strong>the</strong> baggage that went with it – to <strong>the</strong> greatest extent<br />

possible.<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> next ten years, Asia’s debtor countries cut <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

external debt from a peak of 40% of GDP to nearly zero by<br />

2007 (chart bottom). Notably, Malaysia and Thailand became<br />

net creditor countries during this decade, thanks to high<br />

current account surpluses that funded <strong>the</strong> reduction in external<br />

debt.<br />

Asia -8 – capital outflow post - 1997<br />

capital account balance as % of GDP<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

-6<br />

-8<br />

Risk aversion owing to US financial crisis<br />

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08<br />

Asia 9 - buildup of foreign reserves as % of GDP<br />

USD terms, official + fwd commitments, simple avg<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08<br />

Asia – net foreign debt as % of GDP<br />

ext debt less reserves as % of GDP<br />

50<br />

40<br />

Below, we explain why reserve accumulation and upward<br />

pressure on currencies will again be key features in Asia over<br />

<strong>the</strong> next 10 years.<br />

External debt: The financial crisis drove home to Asia<br />

Polonius’s adage to nei<strong>the</strong>r a borrower nor a lender be. If this<br />

kind of crisis was <strong>the</strong> result of cheap foreign funds (foreigners<br />

were, after all, sending far more funds to Asia it needed to<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

-30<br />

net debtor<br />

net creditor<br />

Asia* ex-CH<br />

Asia*:<br />

CH, KR, MY, ID,<br />

TH, PH, IN<br />

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08<br />

Page 22


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Two points here: First, Asia’s low debt burden at present<br />

means it is well placed to handle <strong>the</strong> inflow (and implied higher<br />

debt) we expect it will see over <strong>the</strong> next decade.<br />

Second, <strong>the</strong> conventional wisdom of <strong>the</strong> past few years has<br />

been that Asia’s current account surpluses have been <strong>the</strong> result<br />

of mercantilist policies and that Asia’s “growth model” had to<br />

change.<br />

When viewed from this longer-term perspective, though, one<br />

sees that Asia was simply paying down debt acquired in <strong>the</strong><br />

previous decade – debt which many who belong to <strong>the</strong> current<br />

CW undoubtedly argued needed to be cut 10 years ago.<br />

Consistency has never been a CW hallmark. Investment and<br />

GDP growth: The downside to paying off old debts is that you<br />

Investment and GDP growth: The downside to paying off<br />

old debts is that you can’t buy new things, like capital<br />

equipment. In <strong>the</strong> post-crisis decade, domestic investment in<br />

Asia dropped to a shadow of its former self. In <strong>the</strong> Asia-8, for<br />

example, gross fixed capital formation growth that averaged<br />

12% per year between 1986 and 1996 dropped to 2% on<br />

average between 1997-2007. In short, it took Asia nearly a<br />

decade for investment to return to pre-crisis levels. As a<br />

percentage of GDP, investment dropped by a third or more<br />

(charts below).<br />

Asia – real investment since 97 crisis<br />

GFCF, 1997=100<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

Asia 8<br />

Crisis-4<br />

(TH, ID,<br />

MY, KR)<br />

60<br />

95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

Asia – domestic investment <strong>the</strong>n and now<br />

% of GDP, GFCF<br />

44<br />

40<br />

36<br />

32<br />

28<br />

1996 2006<br />

Low investment means low growth. End of story. More than<br />

anything else, this is what kept Asia’s GDP growth sub par in<br />

<strong>the</strong> post-crisis decade. Current account surpluses went to pay<br />

down old debts and <strong>the</strong>re was little saving left over to fund<br />

investment, hence growth. Dismal indeed be <strong>the</strong> facts of<br />

economic life.<br />

One constant: high savings<br />

One thing didn’t change between P1 and P2 was Asia’s high<br />

savings rate. All of Asia’s saving rates today are within a<br />

whisker of where <strong>the</strong>y were 12 years ago, save for India, where<br />

in recent years higher savings have powered faster GDP<br />

growth. Singapore and China continue to top <strong>the</strong> league tables<br />

with gross domestic savings rates of about 50% of GDP,<br />

followed by Malaysia (42%) and Thailand and Korea at about<br />

34% (chart below).<br />

India’s experience is worth noting – savings <strong>the</strong>re rose by 10<br />

percentage points of GDP between 1996 and 2008. This<br />

helped lift GDP growth to 9% on average between 2003 and<br />

2008 from 5.5% in <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> 1990’s.<br />

Once again, Asia speaks to <strong>the</strong> conventional wisdom running<br />

through <strong>the</strong> markets of late. One fear is that <strong>the</strong> US<br />

consumption / savings balance needs to shift mightily toward<br />

savings. And, it is said, higher savings will be bad for growth<br />

<strong>the</strong>re and, by extension, for Asia too.<br />

High savings bad for growth? Come again? Not in India. Not in<br />

China, ei<strong>the</strong>r. Nor anywhere in Asia for that matter. On <strong>the</strong><br />

contrary, if <strong>the</strong>re is any conventional wisdom that does stand<br />

up to scrutiny, it is that high savings go hand-in-hand with<br />

stronger growth. If it’s true in Asia, why would it be any<br />

different in <strong>the</strong> US? The next time someone tells you <strong>the</strong> US<br />

needs to save more and this will be bad for growth, ask <strong>the</strong>m<br />

“What about Asia?”<br />

Asia savings rates – <strong>the</strong>n and now<br />

Gross dom saving (GFC + Net X) as % of GDP<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

1996 2008<br />

24<br />

20<br />

16<br />

0<br />

Spore China Malay Thai Korea HK Indon Taiwan India Phils<br />

12<br />

TH MY KR SG HK ID PH TW CH<br />

Page 23


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

China: Fine-tuning (Chris Leung, chrisleung@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy, 4Q09” dated<br />

17 September 2009)<br />

• The availability of new credit for <strong>the</strong> remainder of<br />

<strong>the</strong> year will probably equate to around one-third of<br />

<strong>the</strong> CNY7.3trn made in <strong>the</strong> first half of 2009.<br />

Growth should remain intact as new loans in 1H09<br />

were equivalent to 25% of GDP. It will take time for<br />

this to filter into <strong>the</strong> economy. We have upgraded<br />

our GDP forecast for 2009 and 2010 to 8% and 9%<br />

• Heavy reliance on credit expansion to drive fixed<br />

asset investment, and hence, GDP growth has<br />

yielded almost instantaneous results. The worry is<br />

that this has created overcapacity. Fine-tuning <strong>the</strong><br />

pace and intensity of new credit creation should be<br />

expected<br />

• Such a move should not be read as a prelude to a<br />

full-fledged tightening because overcapacity also<br />

reflects weak external demand. Although <strong>the</strong> US<br />

economy is on <strong>the</strong> mend, policymakers will want to<br />

see a stronger export recovery before making<br />

significant policy changes<br />

• Retail sales show widening asymmetries amongst<br />

provinces. GDP growth of inner provinces is clearly<br />

higher than in coastal provinces due to less exports<br />

dependence<br />

• Near-term monetary tightening seems unlikely.<br />

Higher rates could jeopardize long-term fiscal<br />

projects. We do not expect increases in interest<br />

rates or in <strong>the</strong> reserve requirement ratio for <strong>the</strong><br />

remainder of <strong>the</strong> year.<br />

• The CNY should remain stable and trade in a tight<br />

range in 4Q09<br />

Credit growth deceleration is unlikely to derail growth<br />

momentum<br />

Seeing that rampant lending growth has helped restore market<br />

confidence and reinstate stability in <strong>the</strong> region, it is not difficult<br />

to understand why investors' are concerned about possible<br />

credit growth deceleration in <strong>the</strong> near future. By <strong>the</strong> second<br />

quarter of this year, <strong>the</strong> real economy has rebounded strongly<br />

to 7.9% YoY from <strong>the</strong> trough of 6.1% in <strong>the</strong> first quarter.<br />

Growth was primarily driven by fixed asset investments, which<br />

has contributed to 87.4% of GDP growth in <strong>the</strong> first half of<br />

<strong>the</strong> year (Chart 1). China's investment frenzy has also lifted<br />

demand for imports from <strong>the</strong> rest of Asia. Unrestrained credit<br />

expansion may produce instantaneous results, but <strong>the</strong> flip side<br />

is it can create long-term damages to <strong>the</strong> economy.<br />

Numerous think-tanks have repeatedly warned about<br />

inflationary risks that may come with a lax credit policy.<br />

However, many have chosen to brush aside inflation concerns<br />

amid a still falling CPI, and focus on <strong>the</strong> problems of<br />

overcapacity. Rapid credit expansion has artificially driven up<br />

<strong>the</strong> supply of products such as steel, cement and coal. Steel<br />

prices, for instance, plunged 8.6% MoM in August in response<br />

to <strong>the</strong> staggering increase in supply.<br />

Ei<strong>the</strong>r way, <strong>the</strong>re is a need to fine tune <strong>the</strong> pace and intensity<br />

of credit expansion before problems run deeper. However,<br />

investors should not be too worried about this development.<br />

There is a wealth of economic literature in China which shows<br />

that credit growth will not create more real output in <strong>the</strong> longrun.<br />

Similarly, deceleration of credit growth will not take<br />

substantial tolls on economic growth. The most recent<br />

empirical evidence was <strong>the</strong> episode in 2004-05 where loan<br />

growth fell from 24% YoY in Aug03 to a low of 12.4% in<br />

May05. Fixed asset investment growth only fell slightly to<br />

26.8% in 2004 from 27.7% in 2003. Yet, real GDP growth<br />

rose slightly from 10.0% in 2003 to 10.1% in 2004 and<br />

10.4% in 2005.<br />

Chinese authorities will probably focus on curbing short-term<br />

loans with tenor of less than a year. The availability of shortterm<br />

loans at low interest rates encourages individuals and<br />

corporate to take speculative risks in both <strong>the</strong> equity and<br />

property markets. The sharp 28% YoY jump in corporate<br />

deposits alongside 27% fall in SOE's profit in <strong>the</strong> first half of<br />

<strong>the</strong> year imply that <strong>the</strong> surge of funds at corporate accounts<br />

most likely originated from bank credit.<br />

We are confident <strong>the</strong> authority will not slow down medium-tolong<br />

term loans (tenors ranging from 3yrs-5yrs) too much as<br />

52% of outstanding loans in <strong>the</strong> state banking sector were<br />

used for financing long-term fiscal projects. Sudden withdrawal<br />

of credit support will jeopardize <strong>the</strong> progress of <strong>the</strong>se projects<br />

and create enormous amounts of economic wastage. In fact,<br />

projects like railway constructions will not start to yield<br />

economic value-added until <strong>the</strong>y are completed and fully<br />

functional.<br />

Page 24<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Chart 1: State-driven investment fueled by loans<br />

% YoY YTD<br />

% YoY<br />

35.0<br />

50.0<br />

45.0<br />

30.0<br />

Medium/Long Term Loans (RHS)<br />

FAI by SOEs<br />

40.0<br />

35.0<br />

25.0<br />

30.0<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

Latest: Jun 09<br />

5.0<br />

10.0<br />

0.0<br />

Mar-04 Dec-04 Sep-05 Jun-06 Mar-07 Dec-07 Sep-08 Jun-09<br />

Chart 2: Loan vs Corporate deposits<br />

% YoY<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Loan<br />

Corporate Deposit<br />

0<br />

Apr-99 Apr-01 Apr-03 Apr-05 Apr-07 Apr-09<br />

External trade recovering gradually<br />

Unlike <strong>the</strong> rest of Asia which can count on China's<br />

expansionary fiscal program to help lift exports, China's export<br />

sector may take relatively longer to heal because of its<br />

dependence on <strong>the</strong> US and EU. Although exports improved<br />

gradually from 2.2% (MoM, sa) in Jun to 3.2% and 3.4% in<br />

Jul and Aug respectively, performance measured in year-onyear<br />

terms is not encouraging. Exports fell 22.2% YoY in Jan-<br />

Aug. In fact, <strong>the</strong> rate of decline accelerated to 23.4% in Aug<br />

from 22.8% in Jul.<br />

Export of low-priced consumer products such as<br />

handbags/travelling bags only stopped contracting in July,<br />

registering an increase of 4.6% (MoM sa). General apparels<br />

and footwear also edged up by 2.3% and 4.4% respectively<br />

after declining most of <strong>the</strong> time in <strong>the</strong> second quarter. The<br />

behavior of this group suggests consumer spending in <strong>the</strong> rest<br />

of <strong>the</strong> world has just begun to improve. Policymakers will have<br />

to witness more sustainable growth before considering "exit"<br />

strategies.<br />

With imports likely to improve faster than exports for <strong>the</strong><br />

remainder of <strong>the</strong> year, <strong>the</strong> trade surplus for 2009 is projected<br />

to shrink to USD223bn from USD295bn in 2008 (accumulative<br />

trade surplus in <strong>the</strong> first seven months fell 13.6% YoY to<br />

USD108bn). Likewise, <strong>the</strong> country's current account surplus is<br />

projected to fall to USD280bn in 2009 from USD450bn in<br />

2008. In <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> year, <strong>the</strong> current account surplus<br />

fell 32% YoY to USD130bn from USD191bn in <strong>the</strong> first half of<br />

2008. As a share of GDP, it fell to 6.3% in 1H09 from 9.7% in<br />

1H08. The data suggest China will unlikely restore <strong>the</strong><br />

appreciation bias on its currency anytime soon. The dominant<br />

strategy is to maintain <strong>the</strong> status quo and keep <strong>the</strong> CNY stable<br />

in a tight range.<br />

Chart 3: Exports by destination<br />

% YoY, 3mma<br />

70<br />

60<br />

Asia Europe USA<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

Latest: Aug 09<br />

-30<br />

Jan-95 Aug-96 Mar-98 Oct-99 May-01 Dec-02 Jul-04 Feb-06 Sep-07 Apr-09<br />

Conclusion<br />

China has reached a point where <strong>the</strong> intensity and pace of<br />

monetary stimulus should be reassessed. However, <strong>the</strong> present<br />

macroeconomic landscape does not provide enough<br />

justifications for pursuing a full-fledge monetary tightening.<br />

Fiscal policy will work hand in hand with monetary policy.<br />

Deceleration of credit expansion should not derail economic<br />

growth. It will reduce <strong>the</strong> risk of inflation over <strong>the</strong> mediumterm<br />

and mitigate growing overcapacity problems in certain<br />

industries. The core part of <strong>the</strong> infrastructure program will not<br />

be affected because <strong>the</strong>y are mostly supported by medium-tolong<br />

term loans. The economy is projected to advance 8% and<br />

9% respectively in 2009 and 2010.<br />

Private consumption cannot stand entirely on its own feet for<br />

<strong>the</strong> time being. Although Chinese consumers are debt-free<br />

with those in <strong>the</strong> services sector still enjoying wage growth, <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that <strong>the</strong>y are saving even more than before suggests that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are o<strong>the</strong>r structural restraints at play. Until exports show<br />

a stronger recovery, <strong>the</strong> role of state-driven investment remains<br />

pivotal. In this regard, we nei<strong>the</strong>r expect any hikes on interest<br />

rates nor reserve requirement ratio for <strong>the</strong> remainder of <strong>the</strong><br />

year. The dominant strategy will continue to be<br />

accommodative monetary policies, whilst keeping CNY stable.<br />

Page 25


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

US: Recession over (David Carbon, davidcarbon@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy, 4Q09”<br />

dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• Fed Chairman Bernanke thinks recession is over.<br />

Central bank heads never say this kind of thing<br />

until <strong>the</strong>y have been sure for several months<br />

• Recession is indeed over. The NBER will likely<br />

declare June to have been <strong>the</strong> trough<br />

• Consumption, investment, exports and housing<br />

are all rising. The manufacturing sector is staging a<br />

sharp V-shaped recovery<br />

• We continue to think 2Q10 is <strong>the</strong> best target for<br />

when <strong>the</strong> Fed will begin to hike rates.<br />

Normalization will be brisk<br />

• The real recession began with <strong>the</strong> collapse of<br />

Lehman Bro<strong>the</strong>rs and lasted 9 months. That’s short<br />

given <strong>the</strong> financial crisis was <strong>the</strong> worst in 100 years.<br />

Don’t take home <strong>the</strong> wrong lesson from this:<br />

bailing out banks is not <strong>the</strong> way forward. Reform<br />

is needed<br />

Strong data have pushed equity markets to new 2009 highs<br />

and led Fed Chairman Bernanke to declare that “recession is<br />

very likely over”. Although he hedged / prefaced his<br />

statement with “from a technical perspective” it’s still a big<br />

deal: central bank heads don’t say things like this until <strong>the</strong>y<br />

have been sure for months. There’s nothing to gain and lots<br />

to lose.<br />

But <strong>the</strong> supply side data is telling a pretty compelling story.<br />

The V-shaped recovery in <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector (chart<br />

top right) is perhaps <strong>the</strong> sharpest on record and industrial<br />

production has been rising since June. That’s big too, to <strong>the</strong><br />

folks at <strong>the</strong> NBER who are charged with <strong>the</strong> official dating<br />

of US recessions. In 5 of <strong>the</strong> past 5 downturns, <strong>the</strong> NBER<br />

has declared recession over once IP starts to rise. That would<br />

put <strong>the</strong> bottom of <strong>the</strong> current recession in June and it’s very<br />

likely that six months hence it will be officially declared so.<br />

And it’s not all that technical ei<strong>the</strong>r. On <strong>the</strong> demand side,<br />

retail sales have been rising strongly since Dec08. This<br />

underwrote a bottom in total consumption a couple of<br />

months later. Durable goods orders and investment are<br />

rising too. Ditto for exports. Even housing – <strong>the</strong> sector that<br />

started it all – is headed north again. Sales have been rising<br />

for six months, prices have been rising for three months and<br />

housing starts are up 25% from <strong>the</strong>ir April bottom. The rise<br />

on <strong>the</strong> supply side merely reflects / corroborates <strong>the</strong> rise<br />

seen on <strong>the</strong> demand side. “Technical” or o<strong>the</strong>rwise, it’s a<br />

full-compass view.<br />

US - ISM survey (prod'n and orders)<br />

Index, 50="neutral" (no accel / decel)<br />

65<br />

Prod<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

Prod & orders<br />

More than<br />

40 sub-indices<br />

a V-shaped<br />

35 (55% of total)<br />

recovery<br />

30<br />

Orders<br />

25<br />

20<br />

Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10<br />

US - retail sales (control group)<br />

295<br />

290<br />

285<br />

280<br />

275<br />

270<br />

265<br />

260<br />

255<br />

( g p)<br />

US$bn/mth, sa, total less auto dealers and bldg mtrls<br />

5.2% (saar)<br />

trend growth since<br />

2004<br />

1H08 tax-rebate<br />

upward distortion<br />

Fin mkt<br />

crash<br />

Oct08<br />

Nov08<br />

Dec08<br />

rebate<br />

unwinds<br />

Feb09<br />

250<br />

Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09<br />

US – home sales<br />

thous, saar<br />

1400<br />

1300<br />

1200<br />

1100<br />

1000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

existing<br />

(RHS)<br />

new<br />

(LHS)<br />

Sep09(f)<br />

Grinding north<br />

again at a 6%<br />

saar pace<br />

July09<br />

mn, saar<br />

3<br />

05 06 07 08 09 10<br />

The broadest economic compass out <strong>the</strong>re is GDP and it<br />

looks set to grow by about 4.5% (QoQ, saar) in <strong>the</strong> third<br />

quarter, data for which will be released in ano<strong>the</strong>r 5 weeks.<br />

That’s far above potential (widely judged to be 2.75% to<br />

3%) and it will likely remain that fast in Q4 too, as<br />

underlying final demand growth triggers a release in pent<br />

up inventory restocking. The inventory surge should not be<br />

belittled as “technical” ei<strong>the</strong>r. That’s <strong>the</strong> way all recoveries<br />

start and, more importantly, inventory surges only occur<br />

when businesses see and feel that <strong>the</strong> underlying final<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

Page 26<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

demand is <strong>the</strong>re. No doubt, restocking won’t last forever<br />

(it’s a zero-sum game over several quarters). We thus expect<br />

above-average GDP growth in Q3 and Q4 will give way to<br />

slower growth of 2.5% – 2.75% over <strong>the</strong> course of 2010.<br />

Economic normalization is being aided by normalization in<br />

financial markets. Equity markets are at 2009 highs, risktaking<br />

is resuming and Libor spreads over expected policy<br />

(OIS) rates – a key proxy for how frozen credit markets have<br />

been since Aug07 – are now back below pre-crisis levels.<br />

US – three month libor and spread over OIS<br />

percent<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

3m libor<br />

(LHS)<br />

Spread over<br />

3m OIS<br />

(expected policy rate)<br />

(RHS)<br />

Back to<br />

pre-crisis<br />

levels<br />

basis points<br />

0.0<br />

0<br />

Aug-07 Nov-07 Feb-08 May-08 Aug-08 Nov-08 Feb-09 May-09 Aug-09 Nov-09<br />

Fed<br />

Economic and financial market normalization eventually<br />

bring normalization from <strong>the</strong> Fed. The Fed has begun to talk<br />

about its exit strategies and with <strong>the</strong> data coming as<br />

strongly as it is, it won’t be long before <strong>the</strong> Fed has to walk<br />

<strong>the</strong> talk.<br />

The main, indeed <strong>the</strong> only thing holding <strong>the</strong> Fed back from<br />

implementing an exit strategy right now is labor markets.<br />

Jobs continue to be shed from <strong>the</strong> economy at a rate of<br />

about 215k per month. Although this is far less than <strong>the</strong><br />

peak of 740k job losses back in Jan09, <strong>the</strong> unemployment<br />

rate remains high at nearly 10%. It would be unacceptable<br />

politically for <strong>the</strong> Fed to begin hiking while <strong>the</strong><br />

unemployment remains this high and while jobs continue to<br />

be lost ra<strong>the</strong>r than gained.<br />

Continued job losses in <strong>the</strong> early stages of a recovery are<br />

normal and we expect nonfarm payrolls will not turn<br />

positive until about November. O<strong>the</strong>r things equal, this is<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

when <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate should peak as well and start<br />

to fall <strong>the</strong>reafter. Historically, only when job growth has<br />

become well entrenched has <strong>the</strong> Fed begun to tighten<br />

policy.<br />

We continue to think that <strong>the</strong> second quarter of 2010 is <strong>the</strong><br />

best target date for when <strong>the</strong> Fed is likely to begin raising<br />

interest rates. That would be early by historical standards.<br />

The Fed often waits a year or more after <strong>the</strong> unemployment<br />

rate starts to fall before raising rates. But we have never<br />

regarded this downturn as <strong>the</strong> garden-variety sort. Ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

we have looked at it as “shell-shock” arising mainly from<br />

<strong>the</strong> panic associated with <strong>the</strong> Lehman Bro<strong>the</strong>rs debacle and<br />

have always expected <strong>the</strong> sharp upswing that is now under<br />

way. That upswing will continue, we think, leading <strong>the</strong> Fed<br />

to tighten well before it has historically.<br />

We expect 50bps of hikes in 2Q10 followed by ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

50bps in 3Q10 and for rates to normalize / rise more quickly<br />

<strong>the</strong>reafter.<br />

Longer-term risks<br />

The ‘real’ recession in <strong>the</strong> US began with <strong>the</strong> collapse of<br />

Lehman Bro<strong>the</strong>rs a year ago. But if recession is over as<br />

Bernanke believes and it ended in June or July as <strong>the</strong> NBER<br />

will likely declare six months hence, <strong>the</strong> biggest financial<br />

crisis in 100 years will have engendered a 9 month<br />

recession. That’s about as short as US recessions come.<br />

It’s tempting to say that this was all a tempest in a teacup<br />

and that everything’s hunky dory nine months on. It’s not.<br />

Bailing out banks schmoozed <strong>the</strong> US through this crisis but<br />

that is not <strong>the</strong> correct lesson to take forward. Precisely <strong>the</strong><br />

opposite. Bailing out banks at public expense is bad<br />

capitalism because it sews <strong>the</strong> seeds of a repeat crisis and<br />

for <strong>the</strong> simple reason that it’s unfair to <strong>the</strong> taxpayer. Good<br />

capitalism puts risk and reward on <strong>the</strong> same shoulders.<br />

Reform of financial markets is needed and until it is<br />

delivered risks will remain for a similar blowout in <strong>the</strong><br />

future. It’s not a near-term risk, mind you; memories are not<br />

that short. But bailing out banks does not solve <strong>the</strong> problem<br />

and <strong>the</strong> biggest risk out <strong>the</strong>re may be that people come to<br />

believe it is.<br />

Page 27


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Hong Kong: Inadequate price adjustment (Chris Leung, chrisleung@dbs.com, extracted from<br />

“Economics – Markets – Strategy, 4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• While a low-interest rate environment may be<br />

instrumental in driving a quick economic turnaround<br />

for Hong Kong, <strong>the</strong> strong inflow of liquidity from<br />

mainland China as a partial result of its lax credit<br />

policy may play even a bigger role. Downward price<br />

adjustment in <strong>the</strong> current downturn have been <strong>the</strong><br />

mildest amongst o<strong>the</strong>r major crisis in <strong>the</strong> past decade<br />

• Unlike <strong>the</strong> 97/98 Asian Financial Crisis where asset<br />

prices endured a free fall, <strong>the</strong> quick turnaround in<br />

asset prices this time round has helped prevent <strong>the</strong><br />

labor market from deteriorating rapidly. Following<br />

<strong>the</strong> credit crisis, unemployment was widely expected<br />

to climb in similar fashion to <strong>the</strong> Asian Financial Crisis.<br />

However, this did not materialize. Stabilization of <strong>the</strong><br />

labor market has significantly reduced consumers'<br />

fears<br />

• The multi-year deleveraging process post-1997 and<br />

<strong>the</strong> concomitant buildup of wealth in <strong>the</strong> past<br />

decade have developed a strong cushion for Hong<br />

Kong against exogenous shocks. The rise in <strong>the</strong><br />

current account surplus as a share of GDP from 4.1%<br />

in 2000 to 14.2% in 2008 is one solid indication of<br />

this wealth accumulation. Fiscal reserves as a share of<br />

GDP also exceeded 30% in FY07/08 before <strong>the</strong><br />

onslaught of <strong>the</strong> credit crisis. Against this backdrop,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Hong Kong economy should be able to wea<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> storm, especially with support from <strong>the</strong> strong<br />

Chinese economy<br />

• In <strong>the</strong> near-term, both <strong>the</strong> Fed and <strong>the</strong> PBOC are<br />

likely to refrain from raising interest rates, not until<br />

<strong>the</strong>y see sustainable domestic-demand recovery.<br />

Assuming growth of 10% (QoQ, saar) and 5% in<br />

3Q09 and 4Q09 respectively, our real GDP growth<br />

projection for 2009 has been revised upward to -<br />

2.4% YoY, from -6.5% previously. Growth should<br />

come to 5.5% in 2010<br />

• Once China restores <strong>the</strong> appreciation bias on <strong>the</strong><br />

CNY (possibly in 2010) inflows are likely to present<br />

<strong>the</strong> usual problems for local inflation<br />

Challenges ahead<br />

Like <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> world, Hong Kong has been counting on<br />

both <strong>the</strong> US and China to lead <strong>the</strong> global economy out of <strong>the</strong><br />

woods. In <strong>the</strong> latest G7 meeting, policymakers pledged to keep<br />

monetary policy accommodative until <strong>the</strong>y see sustainable<br />

domestic-demand recovery. The PBOC will refrain from raising<br />

interest rates too soon.<br />

A low-interest rate environment alongside previous wealth<br />

accumulation will continue to help support property prices. If<br />

<strong>the</strong> real estate sector was able to sail through <strong>the</strong> recent crisis,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is even less reason to expect a substantial downward<br />

correction now that <strong>the</strong> global economy is on a recovery path.<br />

If property prices do not adjust downward, o<strong>the</strong>r prices will<br />

remain sticky. Many are projecting that CPI inflation will return<br />

to <strong>the</strong> positive territory by <strong>the</strong> first quarter of next year. Once<br />

China restores <strong>the</strong> appreciation bias of <strong>the</strong> CNY, possibly in<br />

2010, inflows will present <strong>the</strong> usual inflation problems for<br />

Hong Kong.<br />

However, wage/salary growth will likely be absent for at least<br />

two years. In fact, we will probably see downward adjustments<br />

in future payroll data, as suggested by <strong>the</strong> popular adoption of<br />

"no pay leave" by many business enterprises. Corporates must<br />

see earnings improve visibly before <strong>the</strong>y will want to hire again.<br />

Salary growth will also only resume after corporate balance<br />

sheets improve. In <strong>the</strong> meantime, <strong>the</strong> financial burden will fall<br />

disproportionately on <strong>the</strong> middle class.<br />

Under our growth assumptions of 10% (QoQ, saar) and 5% in<br />

3Q09 and 4Q09 respectively, our full-year GDP projection for<br />

2009 now comes to -2.4% YoY , up from a previous forecast<br />

of -6.5% YoY. We expect <strong>the</strong> economy to grow a fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

5.5% in 2010. However, <strong>the</strong>se figures do not reveal <strong>the</strong><br />

structural challenges ahead.<br />

Current Account balance<br />

% of GDP<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Latest: 2008<br />

Dec-98 Dec-00 Dec-02 Dec-04 Dec-06 Dec-08<br />

Page 28<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Singapore: Break of dawn (Irvin Seah, irvinseah@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy,<br />

4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• The economy emerged from <strong>the</strong> recession with a<br />

remarkable 20.7% (QoQ, saar) expansion in <strong>the</strong><br />

second quarter<br />

• The recovery was largely led by <strong>the</strong> manufacturing<br />

sector on <strong>the</strong> back of pharma and electronics<br />

• The labour market has stabilised and job losses<br />

have been lower than earlier expected<br />

• GDP growth is expected to register -3.0% in 2009<br />

and 5.2% next year<br />

• Inflation should average 0.0% in 2009 and 1.7%<br />

in 2010<br />

• The exchange rate policy stance should remain<br />

unchanged in <strong>the</strong> forthcoming policy review in<br />

October<br />

A broad-based turnaround in manufacturing<br />

The turnaround in <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector has been<br />

nothing short of remarkable. After having hit <strong>the</strong> bottom<br />

around Jan-Feb09, both NODX and <strong>the</strong> industrial production<br />

index (IPI) have embarked on a “V-shape” recovery. While<br />

<strong>the</strong> surge in pharmaceutical output (probably due to <strong>the</strong><br />

H1N1 outbreak) as well as restocking in <strong>the</strong> electronics<br />

industry have been widely cited as <strong>the</strong> key reasons behind<br />

<strong>the</strong> stronger manufacturing numbers, it should be noted<br />

that <strong>the</strong> recovery in <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector has in fact<br />

been ra<strong>the</strong>r broad-based. All key manufacturing segments<br />

have recorded significant improvements in output over <strong>the</strong><br />

last few months.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> sustainability of <strong>the</strong> surge in pharmaceutical<br />

output remains questionable, continued improvement in <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r industries going forward should be able to offset any<br />

potential downside risks in <strong>the</strong> pharmaceutical industry. For<br />

example, most recent PMI readings have remained above<br />

<strong>the</strong> crucial 50 level, reflecting <strong>the</strong> expectation that <strong>the</strong><br />

manufacturing sector will continue to expand. In addition,<br />

leading indicators for <strong>the</strong> electronics industry, namely <strong>the</strong><br />

electronics PMI as well as <strong>the</strong> US SEMI book-to-bill ratio,<br />

have continued to point to stronger electronics<br />

performance. In fact, <strong>the</strong> SEMI book-to-bill ratio has went<br />

above <strong>the</strong> parity threshold for <strong>the</strong> first time since Jan07. This<br />

could well signal <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> doldrums for <strong>the</strong> electronics<br />

sector. None<strong>the</strong>less, some segments within Singapore’s<br />

electronics industry have been plagued by a structural<br />

“hollowing out” problem. The disk drive segment is a good<br />

example, which saw disk drive maker, Seagate, announcing<br />

<strong>the</strong> retrenchment of 2,000 workers as it continues <strong>the</strong><br />

relocation of its manufacturing operations out of Singapore.<br />

None<strong>the</strong>less, most recent (Jul09) NODX and IPI were up by<br />

6.1% and 23.0% respectively as compared to <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

month. Consumer sentiment worldwide has improved<br />

significantly and as a result, NODX and IPI have continued to<br />

trend higher. The manufacturing sector is now expected to<br />

register a smaller decline of 5.4% YoY in 2009, up from -<br />

10.2% previously. Forecast for NODX growth in 2009 has<br />

also been lifted to -11.9%, up from -16.1%.<br />

Growth forecasts lifted<br />

Overall, <strong>the</strong> improving outlook in <strong>the</strong> external economic<br />

environment should continue to underpin <strong>the</strong> recovery in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Singapore economy. The fiscal and monetary measures<br />

introduced by government around <strong>the</strong> world have helped to<br />

“jump-start” <strong>the</strong> global economy. While downside risks<br />

remain, such as <strong>the</strong> weakness in <strong>the</strong> labour markets of <strong>the</strong><br />

developed economies, improving fundamentals globally,<br />

particularly in Asia, should help to sustain <strong>the</strong> recovery<br />

process.<br />

Domestically, in addition to <strong>the</strong> short-term policy responses<br />

that have helped <strong>the</strong> economy to wea<strong>the</strong>r this recession<br />

relatively well, measures to streng<strong>the</strong>n its longer term<br />

competitiveness and moves to solidify <strong>the</strong> foundation of its<br />

economic structure will fur<strong>the</strong>r ensure continued robust<br />

growth going forward. More importantly, <strong>the</strong> same<br />

openness of <strong>the</strong> Singapore economy that has brought about<br />

its deepest recession in decades should also enable it to<br />

recover faster and stronger than many o<strong>the</strong>r countries. We<br />

are maintaining our full-year GDP growth forecasts for 2009<br />

and 2010 at -3.0% and 5.2% respectively.<br />

Page 29<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Malaysia: Bump and grind (Irvin Seah, irvinseah@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy,<br />

4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• GDP growth in <strong>the</strong> second quarter registered a<br />

solid 13.4% QoQ saar<br />

• The recovery was driven largely by domestic<br />

demand<br />

• Exports and industrial production continue to grind<br />

north, pointing to a more robust recovery going<br />

forward<br />

• Full year GDP growth forecast for 2009 and 2010<br />

are raised to -2.9% and 4.5% respectively<br />

• Inflation is also likely to be higher at 0.7% in 2009<br />

and 1.6% in 2010<br />

• Bank Negara will likely start hiking rates in 3Q10<br />

Outlook turning brighter<br />

Economic data around <strong>the</strong> world have been heading up,<br />

reflecting <strong>the</strong> improving fundamentals of <strong>the</strong> global<br />

economy as recovery sets in. Despite <strong>the</strong> fact that headline<br />

GDP growth has remained negative on a year-on-year basis,<br />

<strong>the</strong> overall outlook of export dependent economies such as<br />

Malaysia has improved significantly, in line with <strong>the</strong> more<br />

favorable external economic conditions. Exports have been<br />

grinding gradually northward, growing by an average of<br />

about 2.3% MoM sa from Feb09 onwards after hitting a<br />

bottom in Jan09. Likewise, industrial production is also<br />

heading in a similar direction given <strong>the</strong> improvement in<br />

export demand. In fact, <strong>the</strong> increase in imports of capital<br />

goods (exclude transport equipment) in recent months<br />

seems to suggest that producers are gearing up for stronger<br />

orders ahead. And judging from <strong>the</strong> sharp spike-up in <strong>the</strong><br />

SEMI book-to-bill ratio, <strong>the</strong>y have every reason to do so,<br />

especially for electronics manufacturers and those in related<br />

industries. The SEMI book-to-bill ratio went above <strong>the</strong><br />

crucial parity level for <strong>the</strong> first time since Jan07. A reading<br />

above one indicates that <strong>the</strong> global semicon and to some<br />

extent, <strong>the</strong> electronics industry are in expansion mode. And<br />

<strong>the</strong> atest reading of 1.06 for Jul09 could well provide a hint<br />

of better things to come for <strong>the</strong> electronics as well as <strong>the</strong><br />

overall manufacturing industry.<br />

Domestic economic conditions have also made <strong>the</strong> turn and<br />

are improving. While unemployment rate has risen to 4.0%<br />

in 1Q09, up from 3.1% in 4Q09, higher frequency data are<br />

in fact showing significant improvement in <strong>the</strong> domestic<br />

economy. For example, motorcycle and car sales have<br />

started to pick up after <strong>the</strong> slump earlier in <strong>the</strong> year. The<br />

indices on business and consumer sentiment compiled by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Malaysia Institute of Economic research (MIER), which<br />

literally fell off <strong>the</strong> cliff in 4Q08 and 1Q09 have also turned<br />

around. In addition, as <strong>the</strong> positive effects of <strong>the</strong> MYR 67bn<br />

stimulus package continue to filter through <strong>the</strong> system,<br />

consumer sentiment and business activity will certainly<br />

improve fur<strong>the</strong>r. And domestic demand, traditionally an<br />

important engine of growth for Malaysia especially when<br />

external demand is weak, should once again provide <strong>the</strong><br />

much needed support for <strong>the</strong> economy in <strong>the</strong> current<br />

recovery phase.<br />

Growth forecast raised<br />

While <strong>the</strong> general growth outlook in <strong>the</strong> coming quarters is<br />

expected to remain positive, <strong>the</strong> trajectory of <strong>the</strong> growth<br />

profile is likely to be more subdued as compared <strong>the</strong> second<br />

quarter. Global monetary policy direction is expected to<br />

remain accommodative in <strong>the</strong> medium term while<br />

governments around <strong>the</strong> world are also likely to persist with<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir earlier expansionary fiscal policies until a more robust<br />

recovery is secured. The positive impact of <strong>the</strong>se policy<br />

measures as well as <strong>the</strong> global recovery will continue to<br />

cascade down to Malaysia’s export-oriented sectors.<br />

Domestic driven industries will benefit from <strong>the</strong> fiscal<br />

stimulus package introduced by <strong>the</strong> government as well as<br />

<strong>the</strong> improving employment outlook and consumer<br />

sentiments. Under such scenario, our full year GDP growth<br />

forecast for 2009 of -4.0% was beginning to look ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

conservative. As such, we have revised this year’s GDP<br />

growth forecast to -2.9%. Growth forecast for 2010 has also<br />

been raised to 4.5%, from <strong>the</strong> earlier forecast of 3.8%.<br />

Page 30<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Taiwan: Ideals vs reality (Ma Tie Ying, matieying@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy,<br />

4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• Taiwan’s recession was driven by exports. They are<br />

now driving recovery. We expect <strong>the</strong> upturn in global<br />

demand to continue and for this to translate into<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r growth in production and employment<br />

• There are high expectations about Taiwan’s longterm<br />

economic prospects as a result of cross-strait<br />

liberalization, which have triggered inflows and<br />

revived asset markets. But achieving an ideal<br />

structural recovery will take time<br />

• The central bank will focus on <strong>the</strong> near-term<br />

economic reality, i.e., <strong>the</strong> fact that recovery has been<br />

export-driven and domestic demand remains weak.<br />

We forecast no rate change in <strong>the</strong> rest of this year,<br />

and only modest rate hikes in 1H10<br />

Export driven recovery<br />

The economy expanded 20.7% (QoQ, saar) in 2Q09, ending<br />

four quarters of contraction with <strong>the</strong> second strongest growth<br />

quarter on record.<br />

Exports drove <strong>the</strong> recession and <strong>the</strong>y are now driving recovery.<br />

As of July, <strong>the</strong> volume of export orders has fully returned to its<br />

peak level before global financial crisis broke out. Real exports<br />

and industrial production have also each recouped one half of<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir respective losses during <strong>the</strong> crisis. We expect <strong>the</strong> upturn<br />

to be sustained. Chinese demand should continue to grow<br />

steadily in 2H09, so long as China maintains an<br />

accommodative fiscal and monetary policy stance. US demand<br />

is improving and we expect above-potential growth in Q3 and<br />

Q4.<br />

The recovery in exports should lead to investment, especially<br />

for manufacturers in <strong>the</strong> export-oriented tech industry.<br />

Already, imports of machinery and electrical equipments have<br />

made a decisive turn in 2Q09 and continued to edge up in July.<br />

Gross fixed capital formation fell by 40% in <strong>the</strong> three quarters<br />

ending 1Q09, even more than <strong>the</strong> 30% drop in exports. This<br />

inspite of <strong>the</strong> fact <strong>the</strong>re was little overcapacity to begin with.<br />

Corporates have been unenthusiastic about capital spending<br />

ever since 2001, preferring to invest in <strong>the</strong> mainland instead<br />

following China’s accession to WTO. Political chaos at home<br />

didn’t help ei<strong>the</strong>r. Gross fixed capital formation grew by a<br />

mere 0.9% per year between 2001-2007, far below GDP<br />

growth of 3.8%. After <strong>the</strong> drastic capacity reduction during<br />

<strong>the</strong> global crisis last year, <strong>the</strong> ratio of GFCF to GDP slipped<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r 16.7%, a 20-year low. In short, we think <strong>the</strong> cut in<br />

private sector investment had been excessive and look for a<br />

significant rebound going forward.<br />

A structural recovery still takes time<br />

Uncertainties remain, such as <strong>the</strong> sustainability of policy<br />

stimulus in <strong>the</strong> US and o<strong>the</strong>r advanced economies, and<br />

inflation risk and earlier-than-expected tightening in <strong>the</strong><br />

emerging markets, most importantly in China. Meanwhile,<br />

Taiwan’s structural problem of hollowing-out still exists. The<br />

gap between export orders and exports is large and widening,<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> high ratio of overseas production, especially in<br />

China. To reduce its vulnerability to global shocks, Taiwan will<br />

need to restructure its economy and nurture domestic growth<br />

drivers.<br />

The liberalization of cross-strait relations is widely viewed as a<br />

possible solution. Since last year, cross-strait negotiations have<br />

made good strides in <strong>the</strong> areas of transportation, tourism,<br />

investment and financial sector cooperation. The two sides are<br />

currently mulling fur<strong>the</strong>r steps toward a formal Economic<br />

Cooperation Framework Agreement that would allow free<br />

trade in many goods and services and investment flows across<br />

<strong>the</strong> strait. The effects from <strong>the</strong>se policy initiatives so far are<br />

mainly seen in fund flows and <strong>the</strong> asset markets. In <strong>the</strong> BoP<br />

accounts, for example, local residents’ “currency & deposits”<br />

have been <strong>the</strong> recipient of inflows for six quarters, with <strong>the</strong><br />

cumulative value reaching USD 31bn. Foreign portfolio inflows<br />

have also increased since 2Q09, offsetting <strong>the</strong> rebound in<br />

outward portfolio investment. The TAIEX is up 60% year-todate.<br />

The volume of residential property transaction has also<br />

risen since 1Q09, and home prices (as proxied by <strong>the</strong> Sinyi<br />

index) have rebounded in 2Q09.<br />

Still, <strong>the</strong> ideal scenario would be an expansion in real<br />

investment. Moreover, one that would not be limited to <strong>the</strong><br />

export-oriented tech industry, but occur in a large number of<br />

sectors linked to cross-strait liberalization such as<br />

transportation, retail trade, tourism, finance and construction.<br />

To encourage longer-term investment, ensuring <strong>the</strong> continuity<br />

and timeliness of liberalization policies will be essential. In this<br />

regard, it remains to be seen how well <strong>the</strong> new cabinet<br />

executes a number of tasks including post-typhoon<br />

reconstruction, H1N1 pandemic prevention, fiscal policy exit<br />

strategy and <strong>the</strong> cross-strait negotiations related to a free trade<br />

pact with China.<br />

Page 31<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Korea: Growth vs quality (Ma Tie Ying, matieying@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy,<br />

4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• Korea’s growth numbers are undoubtedly strong,<br />

thanks to <strong>the</strong> currency depreciation, fiscal expansion<br />

and monetary easing<br />

• But <strong>the</strong> quality of growth is a concern. Currency<br />

depreciation helped exporters, but also eroded<br />

businesses and consumers’ international purchasing<br />

power. Moreover, <strong>the</strong>re are doubts about whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> recovery will be sustainined once fiscal and<br />

monetary stimulus fades<br />

• House prices, bank loans and household debt all<br />

experienced fast growth over <strong>the</strong> past several years,<br />

and are rising again. The authorities are worried<br />

about a possible bubble in <strong>the</strong> property market and<br />

problems in <strong>the</strong> banking and household sectors. The<br />

central bank could raise rates as early as 1Q10<br />

The Korean economy grew 11% QoQ saar in 2Q09 after a<br />

0.5% gain in 1Q09. Compared to <strong>the</strong> -18.8% drop in GDP<br />

during <strong>the</strong> outbreak of global financial crisis in 4Q08, <strong>the</strong><br />

recovery so far has amounted to about one half of <strong>the</strong> original<br />

drop in output.<br />

One key growth engine is exports. As of July, custom exports<br />

have increased a cumulative 40% (sa) from <strong>the</strong> bottom in<br />

January, and in real terms, exports have already approached<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir peak levels seen in Sep08 (producers’ shipment index for<br />

exports: 135.0 sa in Jul09, versus 137.1 in Sep08).<br />

Going forward, we expect exports will continue to closely<br />

follow <strong>the</strong> upturn in global demand. Korea has a high exposure<br />

to <strong>the</strong> emerging markets which are leading <strong>the</strong> current global<br />

recovery. As high as 44% of Korea’s exports head to ex-Japan<br />

Asia (including 22% to China), and an additional 15% of<br />

shipments are sold to Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Middle East.<br />

More importantly, <strong>the</strong> price competitiveness of Korean<br />

exporters remains intact as a result of currency weakness.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> Korean won has streng<strong>the</strong>ned in <strong>the</strong> past several<br />

months in tandem with a globally weaker US dollar, <strong>the</strong><br />

USD/KRW rate remains 20% away from <strong>the</strong> pre-crisis level of<br />

1000. And we forecast only a gradual recovery in <strong>the</strong> won<br />

going forward, similar to <strong>the</strong> trajectory witnessed after <strong>the</strong><br />

1997/98 Asian financial crisis (<strong>DBS</strong>f of USD/KRW: 1190 in end-<br />

09 and 1120 in end-10. The dollar-denominated export prices<br />

currently remain low relative to those of <strong>the</strong> major trade rivals<br />

such as Japan and Taiwan, and such a price advantage is<br />

unlikely to be eliminated soon.<br />

Public investment is ano<strong>the</strong>r source of growth. Public<br />

construction orders have jumped since 1Q09, thanks to <strong>the</strong><br />

government’s decisive and aggressive fiscal actions to<br />

counteract recession. The government has engaged in largescale<br />

spending on civil engineering projects such as roads,<br />

bridges and railways. Machinery orders in <strong>the</strong> public sector<br />

have also soared, boosted by spending in transport and electric<br />

power areas. As <strong>the</strong> newly started infrastructure projects<br />

require certain amount of time to be completed, <strong>the</strong> growth in<br />

public investment would remain robust and underpin growth<br />

in <strong>the</strong> next several months.<br />

Quality is not enough<br />

Korea’s growth figures are undoubtedly strong. But we would<br />

caution that <strong>the</strong> underlying quality of growth is still not great.<br />

The strength in exports is partly due to currency weakness,<br />

which also simultaneously erodes businesses and consumers’<br />

international purchasing power and thus hurts domestic<br />

demand. This is especially true if we consider Korea’s high<br />

reliance on fuel imports and large external debt levels. The<br />

negative effects of KRW weakness are currently masked, as <strong>the</strong><br />

plunge in global fuel prices has significantly lowered<br />

production/living costs for manufacturers and consumers. The<br />

drop in crude oil prices from USD 90/bbl in 2008 to USD 50/bbl<br />

in 1H09 is estimated to help <strong>the</strong> economy to save an amount<br />

equivalent to 4% of GDP on an annual basis. More recently,<br />

<strong>the</strong> stabilization of international financial markets has allowed<br />

Korean banks to roll over or refinance a large portion of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

external debt. The nation’s short-term external debt has<br />

stopped falling in 2Q09 (USD 147.2bn in June, versus USD<br />

146.1bn in March), and gross external debt has started to<br />

increase once again due to higher long-term borrowings (USD<br />

380.1bn in June, up from USD 369.1bn in March). The<br />

potential negative effects from KRW depreciation should not<br />

be completely dismissed, however, as global commodities<br />

prices have bottomed out, and <strong>the</strong> repayment of external<br />

obligations will still have to be done some day.<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> ongoing recovery largely relies on government<br />

policy support. It remains to be seen if <strong>the</strong> recovery in <strong>the</strong><br />

private sector will be self-sustaining, once <strong>the</strong> government<br />

exits. The rebound in private consumption in 1H09 was<br />

primarily due to a surge in automobile sales, following <strong>the</strong><br />

government’s tax reduction on new car purchases. Retail sales<br />

Page 32<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

excluding automobiles actually showed little sign of<br />

improvement. Obviously, this support to private consumption<br />

from government policy is one-off and not sustainable.<br />

Also, <strong>the</strong> labor market is mainly aided by a temporary job<br />

creation program adopted by <strong>the</strong> government. The jobless rate<br />

has fallen slightly, but <strong>the</strong> details show that employment<br />

growth concentrated in <strong>the</strong> areas of public administration and<br />

social work. In spite of <strong>the</strong> recovery in exports, <strong>the</strong> impact on<br />

jobs might be limited. Because of gains in productivity,<br />

manufacturing now accounts for only 17% of Korea’s total<br />

employment, much less than its 26% share in <strong>the</strong> GDP<br />

accounts; and employment growth in <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector<br />

has been persistently negative in <strong>the</strong> past four years (an<br />

average of -1.3% in 2005-2008). Ano<strong>the</strong>r fact is that 80% of<br />

<strong>the</strong> country’s employed persons work in small-and-medium<br />

sized enterprises that are undergoing debt rescheduling and<br />

corporate restructuring. With <strong>the</strong>se uncertainties lingering over<br />

<strong>the</strong> outlook for <strong>the</strong> labor market, it would be difficult to expect<br />

private consumption to drive <strong>the</strong> economy, in our view.<br />

Monetary policy: asset inflation and credit/debt growth<br />

on watch<br />

Like elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> region, asset prices in Korea have risen<br />

due to domestic monetary easing and renewed foreign fund<br />

inflows. House prices corrected downward only slightly during<br />

<strong>the</strong> crisis, and began to pick up once again in 2Q09, especially<br />

in <strong>the</strong> metropolitan areas such as Seoul. Note that house prices<br />

had been rising fast ever since <strong>the</strong> bottom in 2000 (6.3% per<br />

annum in 2001-2008), although <strong>the</strong> authorities adopted<br />

various measures to cool <strong>the</strong> market. The nation-wide house<br />

prices do not appear to be overvalued, as judged by <strong>the</strong> priceto-rent<br />

ratio which has stayed near <strong>the</strong> long-term average. But<br />

housing valuation in Seoul is clearly high, and continues to<br />

appreciate.<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> rebound in house prices is accompanied by a<br />

renewed expansion in mortgage lending and a continued<br />

buildup of household debt. Note that bank loans growth ran at<br />

15% YoY in 2001-2008, persistently and significantly<br />

outpacing nominal GDP growth of 6.9%. The growth of<br />

households’ financial debt reaccelerated to 10% YoY in 2005-<br />

2008 following a slowdown during <strong>the</strong> 2004 credit card crisis,<br />

also much faster than <strong>the</strong> 4.6% growth in household<br />

disposable income over <strong>the</strong> past four years.<br />

It is no surprise that <strong>the</strong> authorities are now concerned about<br />

<strong>the</strong> risks of a bubble in <strong>the</strong> property market and debt/credit<br />

problems in <strong>the</strong> household and banking sectors. The Financial<br />

Supervisory Service called on banks to lower <strong>the</strong> loan-to-value<br />

ratio for mortgage lending in Seoul and its vicinity (Jul 7th),<br />

and took fur<strong>the</strong>r steps to impose a debt-to-income ratio on<br />

mortgage lending for a wider range of areas around Seoul (Sep<br />

7th). The Bank of Korea has also begun to withdraw <strong>the</strong><br />

liquidity it had injected into <strong>the</strong> financial system during <strong>the</strong><br />

crisis period. The outstanding amount of monetary stabilization<br />

bonds has increased KRW 38trn from Nov08 to Jul09, and base<br />

money growth has fallen markedly on a sequential basis. It is<br />

widely anticipated that <strong>the</strong> BOK will raise interest rates as <strong>the</strong><br />

next step. In our rate forecast, we have penciled in a total of<br />

100bps of hikes for next year, starting from 1Q10 (25bps per<br />

quarter).<br />

That said, <strong>the</strong> odds of immediate and / or aggressive rate hikes<br />

(such as in 4Q09 or in 50bps increment) should be low. This is<br />

because <strong>the</strong> real economy has not fully recovered and <strong>the</strong><br />

ability of <strong>the</strong> private sector to sustain <strong>the</strong> recovery remains a<br />

question. Administrative regulation may still be preferred over<br />

monetary tightening to cool <strong>the</strong> property and credit markets, in<br />

<strong>the</strong> near term.<br />

Currency outlook (by Philip Wee)<br />

We see Korean policymakers pursuing two goals in managing<br />

<strong>the</strong> exchange rate. First, <strong>the</strong>y would probably prefer keeping<br />

<strong>the</strong> KRW aligned with <strong>the</strong> currencies of its major trading<br />

partners. This was best reflected by <strong>the</strong> high correlation<br />

between KRW and SGD, a popular proxy for Asian currencies.<br />

Second, <strong>the</strong>y would probably continue to reduce exchange rate<br />

volatility in order to provide a more conducive environment to<br />

revive business investment. Besides, a less volatile exchange<br />

rate would also be consistent with a stable USD/CNY. The EUR<br />

will also be important given <strong>the</strong> target to finalize a free trade<br />

pact between Korea and its second largest export market, <strong>the</strong><br />

European Union, by <strong>the</strong> end of 2009.<br />

Finally, <strong>the</strong> KRW should also draw support from expectations<br />

for Korea to be amongst <strong>the</strong> first countries to hike interest<br />

rates. The Bank of Korea (BOK) is uncomfortable with its<br />

exceptionally low base rate, which has stayed below inflation in<br />

12 out of <strong>the</strong> past 15 months ending Aug09. With CPI inflation<br />

likely to have bottomed at 1.6% YoY in Jul09, and rebounding<br />

strongly to 2.2% in Aug09, <strong>the</strong> central bank is increasingly<br />

worried about asset price inflation, especially in <strong>the</strong> real estate<br />

sector, as <strong>the</strong> recovery picks up momentum.<br />

Currency and interest rate forecasts<br />

eop Close 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10<br />

USD/KRW 1217 1190 1175 1155 1140 1120<br />

7D repo 2.00 2.00 2.25 2.5 2.75 3.00<br />

Page 33


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Thailand: Mixed (Ramya Suryanarayanan, ramya@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy, 4Q09”<br />

dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• GDP grew by 9% (QoQ, saar) in <strong>the</strong> second quarter,<br />

marking <strong>the</strong> end of recession; <strong>the</strong> breakdown was<br />

not as encouraging<br />

• One positive development was that government<br />

investment spending finally rose sharply<br />

• Political uncertainties continue to resurface,<br />

depressing domestic demand. A recovery will,<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore, have to come from exports<br />

• After ano<strong>the</strong>r quarter of strong growth of 7% (QoQ,<br />

saar) in 3Q09, we expect growth momentum to drop<br />

to 3% in 4Q09 and 2010. This translates to 2009<br />

and 2010 GDP growth of -3.2% and 4%<br />

• Inflation pressures are likely to be mild with <strong>the</strong><br />

economy currently operating significantly below<br />

potential. We expect <strong>the</strong> central bank to start lifting<br />

rates only from 3Q10, when we expect 25bps of rate<br />

hikes<br />

Government stimulus<br />

There will be continued, albeit moderating support from fiscal<br />

stimulus going forward. The fiscal deficit (including spending<br />

on an additional stimulus package) is expected to average<br />

around 5% of GDP in 2009/10 (Oct09-Sep10), up from an<br />

estimated 4% of GDP in 2008/09. In 2010/11, <strong>the</strong> deficit will<br />

rise by less, to 5.5% of GDP. One positive development<br />

perhaps is that government investment spending finally rose<br />

sharply in 2Q (60% QoQ, saar), though from low levels - a<br />

possible sign that <strong>the</strong> government is committed to overcoming<br />

<strong>the</strong> challenges to project implementation that arise from<br />

political instability.<br />

External demand<br />

While exports did not stage a sharp recovery in Thailand in<br />

value or in volume terms until July, <strong>the</strong>re are reasons to believe<br />

<strong>the</strong> outlook is not bleak. Export data already show a sharp<br />

45% rise in exports to China and HK from <strong>the</strong> bottom, which<br />

may simply mean that China is leading <strong>the</strong> recovery. At <strong>the</strong><br />

same time, imports are rebounding strongly, suggesting that<br />

<strong>the</strong> outlook for orders per se must be encouraging, given <strong>the</strong><br />

large intermediate import content. Anecdotal evidence from<br />

manufacturers also supports this view. As such, we expect to<br />

see a significant rise in exports in 3Q09. This should restrict <strong>the</strong><br />

contraction in full-year (nominal) exports to 14% (YoY). This<br />

should also be <strong>the</strong> key driver of GDP growth of 7% (QoQ, saar)<br />

in 3Q09 and limit <strong>the</strong> full-year rate of contraction in GDP this<br />

year to -3.2%.<br />

Inflation and monetary policy<br />

Inflation pressures are likely to be mild, with <strong>the</strong> economy<br />

currently operating significantly below potential. Indeed, we do<br />

not foresee output returning to <strong>the</strong> peak reached in 2008, until<br />

<strong>the</strong> second half of 2010. Therefore, although <strong>the</strong> growth rate<br />

of GDP is forecasted at 4% in 2010, a negative output gap<br />

should remain over most of 2010. As such, we see little reason<br />

for early monetary policy tightening. We see monthly prices<br />

rising by less than 2% (MoM, saar) on average until end-2010.<br />

This translates to average inflation of -1.1% and 2.1% in 2009<br />

and 2010. Technical factors such as <strong>the</strong> unwinding of rebates<br />

previously introduced as part of stimulus plans may push <strong>the</strong><br />

CPI higher, but this rise would be temporary and should not<br />

materially alter <strong>the</strong> timing or quantum of rate hikes.<br />

Consequently, we expect <strong>the</strong> central bank to start lifting rates<br />

only from 3Q10, when we expect 25bps of rate hikes. Fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

out, we reckon rate normalization should pick up pace with<br />

rates being lifted to 2.00% by end-2010, and 3.25% by end-<br />

2011.<br />

Deficits and stability<br />

The flip side of weak domestic demand growth over <strong>the</strong> past<br />

five years is that <strong>the</strong> economy has significant room for higher<br />

spending without hurting indicators of fiscal stability.<br />

Importantly, from a currency perspective, <strong>the</strong> balance of<br />

payments remains particularly strong supported by continued<br />

current account surpluses and capital inflows. Running a large<br />

fiscal deficit of circa 5% of GDP this year and <strong>the</strong> next also<br />

does not alter <strong>the</strong> economy’s risk profile materially. Indeed, <strong>the</strong><br />

real risk for Thailand is still politics and under-spending on<br />

infrastructure, ra<strong>the</strong>r than high fiscal deficits. The economy is<br />

sensitive to higher oil prices in part due to its high oil intensity.<br />

Building rail and road infrastructure is expected to ultimately<br />

improve productivity and reduce dependence on oil.<br />

.<br />

Page 34<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Indonesia: Upside risks (Lim Su Sian, limsusian@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy, 4Q09”<br />

dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• Indonesia remains on track for 4.3% growth this year,<br />

and 5.5% in 2010. The economy has not suffered a<br />

major fall-out from <strong>the</strong> global financial crisis, thanks<br />

to prompt policy response and strong domestic<br />

demand<br />

• Risks to now lie to <strong>the</strong> upside in 2010. Although BI<br />

has concluded its rate cut cycle, lending rates should<br />

fall 200bps in <strong>the</strong> coming months. This easing in<br />

credit conditions will be bolstered by ongoing fiscal<br />

stimulus<br />

• Domestic and foreign investor sentiment should<br />

continue to improve. President Yudhoyono and his<br />

new cabinet are set to unveil more details about<br />

longer-term plans for infrastructure spending in<br />

October<br />

Bank Indonesia caps deposit rates<br />

On August 21, Bank Indonesia (BI) announced that fourteen<br />

major banks had agreed to slash <strong>the</strong>ir deposit rates. Banks can<br />

now at most pay 8% on deposits; in December this ceiling will<br />

fall to 7%, or just 50bps above <strong>the</strong> policy rate. The agreement<br />

significantly lowers <strong>the</strong> cost of funds for banks, and ultimately<br />

aims to lower lending rates for borrowers.<br />

Although BI had cut its policy rate by 300bps since Dec08,<br />

lending rates had fallen by less than half that. This inefficiency<br />

was a result of <strong>the</strong> liquidity crisis. Banks were also unable to<br />

lower lending rates because <strong>the</strong>ir funding costs – or deposit<br />

rates – were elevated, a legacy of those few months when<br />

scarce rupiah liquidity resulted in intense competition for<br />

deposits.<br />

With a coordinated drop in deposit rates now in place, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

should be no major disruptions to flows within <strong>the</strong> banking<br />

system. BI has also attained <strong>the</strong> support of state-owned<br />

enterprise not to withdraw funds, and in any case stands ready<br />

to provide liquidity to banks via a 3-mth repo facility.<br />

Lending rates should fall<br />

We believe BI’s decision should pay off soon enough in <strong>the</strong><br />

form of lower lending rates. Typically, lending rates have<br />

closely tracked deposit rates, with very little lag. Assuming that<br />

banks maintain <strong>the</strong> spread between deposit and lending rates,<br />

lending rates could fall by some 200bps in <strong>the</strong> coming months,<br />

from 13% to around 11%.<br />

Implications for <strong>the</strong> real economy<br />

An additional 200bp fall in lending rates will have stimulative<br />

effects on <strong>the</strong> economy, even as we look to BI holding its<br />

policy rate steady at 6.50% until end-2Q09.<br />

Even under a constrained post-crisis credit environment,<br />

economic momentum has managed to accelerate. This<br />

acceleration is not apparent when looking at YoY GDP growth,<br />

but according to our estimates, QoQ sa growth has in fact<br />

gained every quarter post-crisis. Growth paused at nearly 0%<br />

QoQ sa in 4Q08, but by 2Q09 had reached 1.3% QoQ sa<br />

4.3% growth this year, 5.5% next year with upside risks<br />

Our base case continues to be for <strong>the</strong> economy to achieve<br />

growth of 4.3% this year, and 5.5% in 2010. Sequentially, this<br />

reflects an acceleration in growth to a near-potential 1.5%<br />

QoQ sa by 4Q09, as budget spending accelerates. In 2010, this<br />

momentum <strong>the</strong>n normalizes, slowing a touch to 1.3%-1.4%<br />

QoQ sa each quarter.<br />

As is clear from <strong>the</strong> discussion above, <strong>the</strong>se assumptions may<br />

well prove overly conservative, particularly for 2010. If lending<br />

rates do fall as materially at <strong>the</strong> tail-end of this year, it would<br />

pave <strong>the</strong> way for significant multiplier effects on <strong>the</strong> economy<br />

in 2010. This could potentially see growth accelerating to over<br />

6% next year.<br />

This upside risk as yet appears to be under-appreciated by <strong>the</strong><br />

markets, representing an opportunity for investors. Consensus<br />

polls show that <strong>the</strong> majority of banks made steep and<br />

unwarranted cuts to <strong>the</strong>ir growth forecasts between March<br />

and May, and have begun to lift <strong>the</strong>m back up only in recent<br />

months, and modestly at that.<br />

We will consider upgrading our forecasts once <strong>the</strong> data<br />

confirms a sustained acceleration in credit growth. A mitigating<br />

concern, however, is <strong>the</strong> rise in inflation expectations. While<br />

not yet at elevated levels, expectations have risen steadily since<br />

Feb09, fuelled in part by buoyant economic conditions.<br />

This could pose a risk to actual inflation. Based on our growth<br />

forecasts it seems reasonable to project inflation of 5% this<br />

year, and 5.4% in 2010. Any higher than that, and BI may<br />

have to hike interest rates earlier than 3Q10. This may shorten<br />

<strong>the</strong> recovery in <strong>the</strong> credit cycle.<br />

Page 35<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

India: Risks remain (Ramya Suryanarayanan, ramya@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy,<br />

4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• The economy is rebounding faster than expected, led<br />

by manufacturing<br />

• But drought like conditions lead us to trim FY09 GDP<br />

growth expectations to 5.7%. We have raised FY10<br />

growth to 7.5% from 6.9%<br />

• At projected sub-8% growth rates, we do not expect<br />

price pressures to intensify for a while. But<br />

expectations of higher prices will form and we expect<br />

200bps of rate hikes in 2010.<br />

• Wider deficits raise risks to economic and financial<br />

stability. Higher than expected inflation could also<br />

arise from <strong>the</strong>se imbalances<br />

• We maintain <strong>the</strong> view that a ratings downgrade is<br />

possible. The longer term consequence of <strong>the</strong> higher<br />

deficit could be higher inflation followed by<br />

monetary tightening. Higher rates could “crowd<br />

out” private sector investment and is a negative for<br />

<strong>the</strong> long-term growth outlook<br />

GDP review and outlook<br />

The non-agricultural economy is rebounding faster than<br />

expected, led by <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector. At <strong>the</strong> same time,<br />

<strong>the</strong> agriculture sector is facing a setback from <strong>the</strong> drought-like<br />

conditions in nearly half of <strong>the</strong> country. While it is clear that<br />

<strong>the</strong> spectre facing <strong>the</strong> agriculture sector is temporary, <strong>the</strong><br />

bigger question is if <strong>the</strong> recovery in manufacturing is durable.<br />

Our take is that pent up demand is in part driving <strong>the</strong> rise in<br />

consumer demand, and consumption is o<strong>the</strong>rwise not on a<br />

solid footing. At <strong>the</strong> same time, supply side constraints - partly<br />

temporary and partly structural (such as infrastructure) - appear<br />

to be pushing prices higher in <strong>the</strong> interim. We believe this<br />

would have to be dealt with by <strong>the</strong> removal of policy<br />

accommodation to prevent inflation expectations from<br />

hardening.<br />

All told, while we pencil in faster non-agricultural GDP growth<br />

than a quarter ago, a sustainable return to 8-9% growth rates<br />

is not envisaged in <strong>the</strong> near-term. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> wider<br />

fiscal deficit announced in <strong>the</strong> July budget has fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

worsened <strong>the</strong> risk profile of <strong>the</strong> economy.<br />

Assuming a 2% drop in agriculture GDP as a result of <strong>the</strong> circa<br />

20% deficiency in <strong>the</strong> monsoon, <strong>the</strong> direct hit on GDP from<br />

<strong>the</strong> drought works to a 0.4%-pt reduction in overall GDP<br />

growth. We do not expect any material indirect effect on<br />

consumer demand from <strong>the</strong> drought.<br />

What about prices ?<br />

Constraints on <strong>the</strong> supply side and pressures from high food<br />

prices have led to 5-7% (MoM, saar) rise in prices since<br />

Mar09. While we expect <strong>the</strong> price increase to moderate to<br />

circa 5% (MoM, saar) in <strong>the</strong> months ahead, <strong>the</strong> pace of rise in<br />

prices clearly is at odds with <strong>the</strong> apparently sub-potential rate<br />

of economic growth.<br />

At <strong>the</strong>se growth rates, we do not expect price pressures to<br />

intensify like <strong>the</strong>y did in 2007 or first half of 2008. However, a<br />

removal of policy accommodation is warranted to prevent<br />

inflation expectations from hardening. This is especially so after<br />

<strong>the</strong> 5% rise in dearness allowance sanctioned last week to<br />

central government employees.<br />

Consequently, we expect 150bps of repo and reverse repo rate<br />

hikes from Jan-June 2010 and ano<strong>the</strong>r 50bps of rate hikes in<br />

July-Dec 2010. This should take <strong>the</strong> repo rate to 6.75% and<br />

reverse repo rate to 5.25% by Dec10. In addition, cash reserve<br />

ratio (CRR) hikes would likely kick in simultaneously or ahead<br />

of rate hikes to assist in withdrawal of liquidity and clamp<br />

credit growth directly.<br />

Risks assessment<br />

We believe risks to economic and financial stability remain<br />

significant especially after <strong>the</strong> July budget has revealed a<br />

greater than expected fiscal deficit projection (6.8% of GDP),<br />

and that even after optimistic revenue assumptions. We expect<br />

<strong>the</strong> national fiscal balance to register a deficit of close to 10%<br />

of GDP in FY09, over 1%-pt wider than <strong>the</strong> government’s<br />

estimates, as commodity prices rise. Ratings agencies are<br />

waiting at present for <strong>the</strong> 13th Finance Commission report out<br />

late October for <strong>the</strong> government’s long-term strategy for fiscal<br />

consolidation. We maintain <strong>the</strong> view that a ratings downgrade<br />

is a real risk. The longer term consequence of <strong>the</strong> higher deficit<br />

- in a benign scenario, as is our core scenario - might manifest<br />

in higher inflation followed by higher rates. This, of course,<br />

would point to a crowding out of private sector as a result of<br />

<strong>the</strong> government’s fiscal profligacy. This is <strong>the</strong> ultimate risk lying<br />

ahead for <strong>the</strong> economy.<br />

Page 36<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Disclaimer:<br />

The information herein is published by <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd (<strong>the</strong> "Company"). It is based on information obtained from sources believed<br />

to be reliable, but <strong>the</strong> Company does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy,<br />

completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Any<br />

recommendation contained here in does not have regard to <strong>the</strong> specific investment objectives, financial situation and <strong>the</strong><br />

particular needs of any specific addressee. The information herein is published for <strong>the</strong> information of addressees only and is not to<br />

be taken in substitution for <strong>the</strong> exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. The<br />

Company, or any of its related companies or any individuals connected with <strong>the</strong> group accepts no liability for any direct, special,<br />

indirect, consequential, incidental damages or any o<strong>the</strong>r loss or damages of any kind arising from any use of <strong>the</strong> information<br />

herein (including any error, omission or misstatement herein, negligent or o<strong>the</strong>rwise) or fur<strong>the</strong>r communication <strong>the</strong>reof, even if<br />

<strong>the</strong> Company or any o<strong>the</strong>r person has been advised of <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>the</strong>reof. The information herein is not to be construed as an<br />

offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, futures, options or o<strong>the</strong>r financial instruments or to provide any<br />

investment advice or services. The Company and its associates, <strong>the</strong>ir directors, officers and/or employees may have positions or<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r interests in, and may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein and may also perform or seek to perform broking,<br />

investment banking and o<strong>the</strong>r banking or financial services for <strong>the</strong>se companies. The information herein is not intended for<br />

distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to<br />

law or regulation.<br />

Page 37


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Regional Data Monitor<br />

Funds Monitor<br />

US Funds Flow into Asian <strong>Equities</strong>, by Country<br />

US$m 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09<br />

Hong Kong Net purchase of 94 -8,592 -1,513 -400 4,956<br />

equities by US buyer seller seller seller buyer<br />

HSI 24,130 20,670 14,081 13,222 17,357<br />

Singapore Net purchase of -897 543 -4,067 -133 693<br />

equities by US seller buyer seller seller buyer<br />

STI 3,096 2,676 1,763 1,680 2,194<br />

Malaysia Net purchase of -155 -419 -248 -16 147<br />

equities by US seller seller seller seller buyer<br />

KLCI 1,248 1,094 869 883 1,037<br />

Thailand Net purchase of -731 89 -243 -37 -59<br />

equities by US seller buyer seller seller seller<br />

SET 812 652 423 434 550<br />

Philippine Net purchase of -7 -13 -95 -53 74<br />

equities by US seller seller seller seller buyer<br />

PCOMP 2,679 2,612 1,932 1,895 2,310<br />

Indonesia Net purchase of 385 11 98 146 -104<br />

equities by US buyer buyer buyer buyer seller<br />

JCI 2,366 2,101 1,285 1,351 1,889<br />

Korea Net purchase of -1,034 -3,526 -1,517 1,117 896<br />

equities by US seller seller seller buyer buyer<br />

KOSPI 1,784 1,506 1,105 1,144 1,385<br />

Taiwan Net purchase of 11 -881 -679 -11 1,548<br />

equities by US buyer seller seller seller buyer<br />

TWSE 8,354 6,596 4,641 4,672 6,438<br />

Total US<br />

Net purchase of Asian<br />

Equity (US$m)<br />

-2,334 -12,788 -8,264 613 8,151<br />

US Dow Jones Index 12,269 11,257 8,977 7,558 8,372<br />

US 10-yr bond yield 3.9 3.9 3.3 2.7 3.3<br />

Source: US Treasury<br />

UK Unit Trusts<br />

US$m 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09<br />

59.2 58.7 55.1 55.5 55.3<br />

% of all <strong>Equities</strong> (251.7) (212.1) (199.4) (223.4) (240.0)<br />

17.5 19.3 20.0 19.5 19.2<br />

Funds Bonds (74.1) (69.9) (72.4) (78.5) (83.4)<br />

6.1 5.8 6.5 7.3 7.8<br />

% of Asia (x Japan) (15.4) (12.4) (13.0) (16.3) (18.7)<br />

59.7 59.7 59.7 59.7 59.7<br />

Equity Domestic (145.9) (116.8) (111.7) (125.3) (133.1)<br />

35.9 39.1 37.4 36.6 36.7<br />

Funds O<strong>the</strong>rs (90.4) (82.9) (74.7) (81.7) (88.1)<br />

Source: Association of unit Trusts and investment funds.<br />

Notes: Figures in paren<strong>the</strong>ses denote value of funds in pounds bn. 'O<strong>the</strong>rs' Category include<br />

US, Japan, International and emerging markets funds. 3Q'09 data up to Jul only.<br />

Page 38


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Regional Data Monitor<br />

Earnings Monitor<br />

Revisions in Earnings Forecast<br />

Forecast revisions during 3Q09<br />

% Increase % Decrease % Net<br />

Singapore 30 16 14<br />

Hong Kong 50 47 3<br />

China 35 13 22<br />

Msia 53 16 37<br />

Thailand 92 25 67<br />

Indonesia 52 4 48<br />

Notes: % increase (decrease) denote <strong>the</strong> % of companies’ earnings that were raised (lowered) during 3Q09.<br />

Forecast revisions during 2Q09<br />

% Increase % Decrease % Net<br />

Singapore 24 27 -4<br />

Hong Kong 25 23 2<br />

China 28 30 -1<br />

Msia 94 9 85<br />

Thailand 53 23 30<br />

Indonesia 33 7 27<br />

Notes: % increase (decrease) denote <strong>the</strong> % of companies’ earnings that were raised (lowered) during 2Q09.<br />

Revisions in Recommendation<br />

Changes in recommendation during 3Q09<br />

% Up % Down % Net<br />

Singapore 11 19 -7<br />

Hong Kong 29 15 15<br />

China 16 7 10<br />

Msia 15 10 4<br />

Thailand 15 8 7<br />

Indonesia 30 17 13<br />

Notes: % increase (decrease) denote <strong>the</strong> % of recommendations that were raised (lowered) during 3Q09.<br />

Changes in recommendation during 2Q09<br />

% Up % Down % Net<br />

Singapore 19 22 -3<br />

Hong Kong 25 18 7<br />

China 15 14 1<br />

Msia 12 3 9<br />

Thailand 17 7 10<br />

Indonesia 47 37 10<br />

Notes: % increase (decrease) denote <strong>the</strong> % of recommendations that were raised (lowered) during 2Q09.<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 39


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessments & Stock Profiles<br />

Country Assessments<br />

&<br />

Stock Profiles<br />

Page 40


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Singapore<br />

Spinning <strong>the</strong> wheel<br />

With <strong>the</strong> market’s near term upside capped at 2800, we<br />

expect interest to rotate from early cyclical recovery plays<br />

into large cap laggards with potential for earnings<br />

upside, and undervalued yield plays. Our yield picks<br />

include REITS, SPH and M1. Laggards include <strong>the</strong> Banks,<br />

and selected Consumer discretionary plays. We expect<br />

integrated resorts beneficiaries to remain in focus, as we<br />

approach <strong>the</strong> launch of Resorts World Sentosa.<br />

Market is fairly valued, a correction is healthy. The STI currently trading at PE of<br />

17.5x(09F) and 14.8x(10F) and price to book at historical average multiples of<br />

1.4x. With valuations at mid-cycle levels, <strong>the</strong> market needs a healthy correction<br />

as it awaits signs of a recovery follow through on <strong>the</strong> earnings front. Assuming<br />

support at –1 standard deviation from <strong>the</strong> current PE, <strong>the</strong> STI could potentially<br />

correct to 2275 (based on 2010 earnings).<br />

Go for yield : SPH, M1, and REITS. With <strong>the</strong> index 5% away from our target of<br />

2800, we would rotate into stocks which provide yield support, with upside to<br />

underlying earnings. SPH is our top pick, which will ride on <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

recovery and launch of integrated resorts, with potential dividend yield upside to<br />

6.5%. M1 offers <strong>the</strong> highest yield, and is a key beneficiary of <strong>the</strong> National<br />

Broadband Network. Despite its sterling performance recently, we expect<br />

potential upside from SREITS average yield of 6.5% via acquisitions and<br />

stronger than expected organic growth, while <strong>the</strong> integrated resorts <strong>the</strong>me<br />

provides an additional kicker to retail and hospitality reits.<br />

Spearheading growth are Banks which will enjoy upside from buoyant capital<br />

market activities and lower provisions, while Consumer Services’ spectacular<br />

growth is driven by earnings recovery at SIA. SIA, has seen air traffic bottom,<br />

and it will be a beneficiary of <strong>the</strong> global synchronized recovery and influx of<br />

tourist arrivals with <strong>the</strong> launch of <strong>the</strong> integrated resorts. With <strong>the</strong> prospect of<br />

weak US$ and rising commodity prices, we continue to like Olam and Noble.<br />

Janice Chua . (65) 6398 7954 . janicechua@dbsvickers.com<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

sa: TW<br />

Page 41


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

Index Close Chng Net -1 mth -3 mth -6 mth -12 mth 52 week<br />

17 Sep 09 1m (%) (%) (%) (%) High Low<br />

FSSTI 2,673 127 5.0 17.7 71.4 10.5 2707 1455<br />

FTSE Mid Cap 620 45 7.8 19.5 102.8 14.4 629 292<br />

FTSE Small Cap 554 52 10.4 30.9 127.1 29.4 564 236<br />

FTSE Financials 670 41 6.6 17.5 89.1 9.6 681 324<br />

FTSE Real Estate 601 53 9.7 18.2 96.0 13.6 611 284<br />

FTSE Re Hold & Dev 627 33 5.6 12.6 95.3 26.4 654 282<br />

FTSE Re Invest Trust 559 86 18.3 30.2 96.0 (6.5) 619 276<br />

FTSE Oil & Gas 601 57 10.5 15.3 169.7 40.3 614 168<br />

FTSE Basic Materials 328 27 8.8 27.3 84.2 10.1 357 142<br />

FTSE Industrials 580 27 4.9 19.7 78.7 8.4 588 286<br />

FTSE Consumer Goods 706 8 1.1 25.7 98.5 55.6 756 249<br />

FTSE Healthcare 629 48 8.3 25.2 67.1 18.3 635 335<br />

FTSE Consumer Services 780 62 8.6 26.3 72.0 13.4 801 428<br />

FTSE Telecommunication 775 8 1.1 5.6 29.1 (6.2) 885 493<br />

FTSE Utilities 493 52 11.7 35.1 104.6 12.0 512 217<br />

FTSE Technology 759 111 17.2 36.8 162.4 37.9 775 268<br />

FTSE China 283 21 7.9 21.1 101.6 13.1 289 129<br />

Transactions:<br />

YTD<br />

Volume (bn) 341<br />

Value (S$bn) 264<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

MARKET REVIEW<br />

The STI took a brea<strong>the</strong>r in June and part of July after<br />

registering strong gains from March. Concerns that shares<br />

are too expensive relative to earnings prospects, uncertainty<br />

about global economic recovery and lack of fresh catalysts<br />

started to surface. In mid July, <strong>the</strong> market sprang to life<br />

again on <strong>the</strong> back of strong primary home sales for June,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> over-whelming interest in new property launches.<br />

Property stocks led <strong>the</strong> gains, which soon filtered down to<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r blue chips. Rotational interest into mid/small caps was<br />

evident while <strong>the</strong> blue chips took a back seat towards <strong>the</strong><br />

close of <strong>the</strong> quarter, capping <strong>the</strong> STI at 2700. This resulted in<br />

strong gains for mid/small caps, especially those in <strong>the</strong> O&M<br />

and technology sectors.<br />

Cash calls continued to surface. Companies continued to<br />

cash in on <strong>the</strong> rising market. The euphoria has now shifted<br />

to <strong>the</strong> mid/small cap segments. Significant cash calls in 3Q<br />

were placements from Yanlord (S$249.6m), Midas (S$90m),<br />

Areits (S$314.5m), First Ship Lease (S$42m), Sinomem<br />

(S$31m) and Sinotel (S$14m). <strong>Right</strong>s issue include Genting<br />

(S$1.6bn), Fortune Reit (S$351m), CitySpring Trust<br />

(S$235m), FCOT (S$214m), Starhill Global Trust (S$337m),<br />

Mermaid Maritime (S$156m) and Otto Marine (S$119m).<br />

These issues were well absorbed with ample liquidity in <strong>the</strong><br />

market, as investors reacted positively to additional capital<br />

raising for potential business acquisitions.<br />

Revival in M&A market. M&A activity is coming back as more<br />

countries emerged from recession. Abu Dhabi’s ATIC $5.6bn<br />

bid for Chartered announced recently is <strong>the</strong> biggest M&A<br />

deal since 2001, when UOB acquired OUB. More deals are<br />

expected, as confidence returns to <strong>the</strong> market and liquidity is<br />

still ample. O<strong>the</strong>r smaller deals in 3Q include <strong>the</strong> takeover of<br />

DMX and Sihuan Pharmaceutical.<br />

Page 42


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Index Key Events<br />

2800<br />

2700<br />

Economic recovery hopes<br />

and strong showing from<br />

market leaders like US and<br />

China<br />

Government said to monitor<br />

closely speculative activities in<br />

property market<br />

Sharp correction in SSEC;<br />

weaker-than-expected US<br />

consumer sentiment report<br />

2600<br />

2500<br />

FED funds rate unchanged and<br />

FED commented that this would<br />

stay at exceptionally low levels’<br />

for ‘an extended period’<br />

Singapore 2Q09 GDP came<br />

in higher than initial estimate<br />

Jul industrial production<br />

expanded 12.4% yoy; raised<br />

09 GDP growth forecast to -<br />

3.0% and 2010 to 5.2%<br />

Rosy US job<br />

report<br />

2400<br />

2300<br />

Property stocks rallied;<br />

positive sentiment filtered to<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r big caps; small caps<br />

surged<br />

2200<br />

2100<br />

Government announced<br />

proposal to amend income<br />

tax rule associated with<br />

property sales<br />

Better than expected 2Q09<br />

GDP growth; strong primary<br />

home sales for June<br />

18-Jun<br />

23-Jun<br />

28-Jun<br />

03-Jul<br />

08-Jul<br />

13-Jul<br />

18-Jul<br />

23-Jul<br />

28-Jul<br />

02-Aug<br />

07-Aug<br />

12-Aug<br />

17-Aug<br />

22-Aug<br />

27-Aug<br />

01-Sep<br />

06-Sep<br />

11-Sep<br />

16-Sep<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Sector Performance (Sorted in Descending Order on 3 months Performance)<br />

Sector 1 Mth Ago (%) 3 Mth Ago (%) 6 Mth Ago (%) 1 yr Ago (%)<br />

Health Care 10 32 78 26<br />

Consumer Goods 3 30 110 114<br />

REITS 18 29 96 -5<br />

Consumer Services 10 28 61 16<br />

Technology 12 25 120 8<br />

Basic Materials 6 23 136 56<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage 6 18 78 15<br />

Financials 5 17 86 5<br />

Oil & Gas 10 15 173 31<br />

Industrials 5 15 76 4<br />

Real Estate 6 12 112 26<br />

Telecommunications 1 6 28 -5<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Rotational interest from early cyclical plays into defensive<br />

sectors and laggards. With <strong>the</strong> broader STI index capped in a<br />

trading range since August, <strong>the</strong> market switched from high<br />

beta picks to laggards and defensive sectors such as health<br />

care, REITS and Consumer Services Sectors.<br />

Switch from Property into REITS towards <strong>the</strong> latter half.<br />

Investors switched from property sector into REITS which<br />

was a laggard while property stocks had a good run in <strong>the</strong><br />

previous two quarters. REITS outperformed <strong>the</strong> market in<br />

3Q, <strong>the</strong> sector has been substantially recapitalized while<br />

better than expected earnings in 2Q drove a re-rating of <strong>the</strong><br />

sector. The out-performance was mainly driven by retail and<br />

Page 43


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

hospitality REITS. Investors have been betting on <strong>the</strong> positive<br />

impact from <strong>the</strong> opening of <strong>the</strong> two IRs and <strong>the</strong> anticipated<br />

increase in tourism arrivals.<br />

Technology stocks surged as outlook improved. Tech stocks<br />

did well on <strong>the</strong> back of upbeat earnings from US tech<br />

counters like Intel, IBM, Apple and Yahoo. Margin<br />

improvement as seen in 2Q09 results led to more upside<br />

surprises. Most of <strong>the</strong> tech stocks in our coverage registered<br />

>30% gain, except for Hi-P and CSM.<br />

Developers registered strong gains in <strong>the</strong> early part of 3Q<br />

but came under profit taking on <strong>the</strong> government’s antispeculation<br />

measures. Residential stocks reaped handsome<br />

returns in 3Q, ranging from 20% to 80% gain, on positive<br />

market data and over-whelming interest in new property<br />

launches. Most of <strong>the</strong> gains were seen in July to August<br />

period. With <strong>the</strong> recently announced measures by <strong>the</strong><br />

government to deflate some of <strong>the</strong> speculative froth in <strong>the</strong><br />

property market, property stocks came under profit taking.<br />

Small cap oil and gas plays were in focus. SPC’s takeover<br />

offer capped performance of <strong>the</strong> oil and gas sector but<br />

attention was focused on small/mid cap stocks like Swissco<br />

and Ezra which registered sterling gains on <strong>the</strong> back of <strong>the</strong><br />

global economic recovery. Swissco doubled while Ezra was<br />

up >50%. Our new initiations, Ezion and Mermaid,<br />

performed well and rose 40% and 85% respectively over <strong>the</strong><br />

past three months.<br />

GROWTH<br />

Recovery intact; GDP growth forecasts lifted. On <strong>the</strong><br />

economics front, 2Q GDP growth of 20.4% Q-o-Q and –<br />

3.7% y-o-y has beaten market consensus by a wide margin.<br />

The government has revised up full year 2009 GDP estimate<br />

to 4%-6% contraction, vs earlier estimate of 6%-9%<br />

contraction. <strong>DBS</strong>’ economist has recently raised full-year real<br />

GDP growth forecast for 2009 to -3.0%, up from -5.0%<br />

previously. GDP growth forecast for 2010 has also been lifted<br />

to 5.2%, from <strong>the</strong> earlier estimate of 4.8%. This revision<br />

essentially takes into account <strong>the</strong> significant upward revision<br />

in <strong>the</strong> headline GDP growth in 1H09 as well as assumes that<br />

<strong>the</strong> recovery process will continue to gain momentum in <strong>the</strong><br />

quarters ahead.<br />

2Q09 earnings report card<br />

(S$m) 2Q08 2Q09<br />

2Q09<br />

YoY<br />

2Q09<br />

QoQ<br />

% Chng % chng<br />

Basic Materials 92 50 -45% -32%<br />

Consumer Goods 804 886 10% 19%<br />

Consumer Services 639 -81 nm nm<br />

Financials 1,777 1,722 -3% 19%<br />

Health Care 42 56 32% 63%<br />

Industrials 1,483 1,576 6% 68%<br />

Oil & Gas 256 104 -59% nm<br />

Real Estate 1,152 -251 nm nm<br />

REITS 363 352 -3% -4%<br />

Technology 120 0 nm nm<br />

Telecommunications 982 1,060 8% 3%<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage 7,709 5,475 -29% 0%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Sales growth and Ebit margin<br />

Sales Growth Ebit Margin<br />

Sector<br />

y-o-y<br />

chng<br />

q-o-q<br />

chng 2Q08 1Q09 2Q09<br />

Basic Materials 5% 23% 26% 31% 28%<br />

Consumer Goods -25% 14% 13% 13% 12%<br />

Consumer Services -23% -8% 14% 5% 1%<br />

Financials 1% 38% 60% 56% 63%<br />

Health Care 9% 9% 16% 14% 17%<br />

Industrials -14% 9% 12% 9% 13%<br />

Oil & Gas -44% 19% 15% 8% 8%<br />

Real Estate 27% 62% 24% 28% 32%<br />

REITS 9% 0% 58% 61% 68%<br />

Technology -21% 14% 4% -9% 1%<br />

Telecommunications 1% 7% 18% 21% 18%<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage -16% 12% 15% 13% 15%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

2Q09 Net Earnings down 29% yoy due mainly to one-off<br />

items and asset write-downs. 2Q09 earnings fell 29% yoy<br />

but was flat qoq – key drag in earnings came from Basic<br />

Materials, Consumer Services, Oil and Gas and Real estate.<br />

Basic Materials and Oil and Gas sectors were affected by oneoff<br />

exceptional charges for Straits Asia Resources and SPC<br />

respectively. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> decline in real estate earnings was<br />

due to write down in values of investment properties<br />

specifically for Singland, UIC and Capitaland.<br />

Recovery underway with sequential improvement in core<br />

earnings over 1Q09. Technology posted a remarkable<br />

turnaround from 1Q09 losses of $148m, driven by sales<br />

recovery ahead of <strong>the</strong> year end restocking and launch of new<br />

products. In addition margins recovered with cost cutting<br />

measures in place. Industrials and Healthcare showed a<br />

marked improvement of >60% from 1Q09. Financials’<br />

sterling performance was driven by strong fee based income<br />

Page 44


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

with NPLs and provisions stabilizing. Consumer Goods<br />

earnings were bolstered by higher CPO prices for plantation<br />

stocks listed on SGX.<br />

Driven by topline growth and recovery in margins. Overall<br />

sales showed a sequential improvement (+12%) over 1Q09,<br />

led by Real Estate, Basic Materials, Oil and Gas and Financials.<br />

EBIT margins recovered from 1Q09 lows to previous year’s<br />

level of 15%, following cost cutting measures undertaken<br />

and improvement in top line. Margin recovery was evident in<br />

Healthcare, Industrials, Reits and Technology sectors.<br />

Earnings revisions by sector<br />

(S$m) Pre-Results Post-Result % Chng<br />

Sector 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010<br />

Basic Materials 366 318 265 323 -27% 2%<br />

Consumer Goods 2,753 3,046 3,197 3,569 16% 17%<br />

Consumer Services 1,820 1,934 1,398 1,861 -23% -4%<br />

Financials 5,196 5,865 5,253 6,374 1% 9%<br />

Health Care 140 151 151 166 8% 10%<br />

Industrials 3,860 3,806 4,118 3,858 7% 1%<br />

Oil & Gas 591 582 621 604 5% 4%<br />

Real Estate 2,671 3,037 3,280 3,293 23% 8%<br />

REITS 1,427 1,427 1,477 1,501 4% 5%<br />

Technology -158 -11 -5 45 nm nm<br />

Telecommunications 4,223 4,687 4,310 4,707 2% 0%<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage 22,888 24,842 24,065 26,300 5% 6%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Recovery in earnings<br />

%<br />

Negative earnings<br />

50<br />

growth most likely in<br />

40<br />

recession years, but<br />

followed by sharp<br />

30<br />

rebound on recovery<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

Earnings growth<br />

-30 GDP growth<br />

-40<br />

-50<br />

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09F10F<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

More room for earnings upgrades. Earnings have bottomed,<br />

in line with <strong>the</strong> economy and we expect <strong>the</strong> recovery<br />

momentum to remain intact. We have raised earnings by 5%<br />

and 6% for FY09F and FY10F respectively, led by Consumer<br />

Goods (plantation stocks), Financials, Healthcare, Real Estate<br />

and REITS. Currently, our EPS growth for STI stocks at 18%<br />

for 2010 is a far cry from <strong>the</strong> recovery years of 1999 and<br />

2003, where we saw earnings growth of >40%. We believe<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is potential upside to earnings growth for 2010, which<br />

will underpin <strong>the</strong> longer term recovery plays.<br />

Expect a better 2H09 - earnings upgrades across <strong>the</strong> board.<br />

Unlike 1Q09 where upgrades were focused in <strong>the</strong> telcoms<br />

and plantation sectors, we note earnings upgrades across all<br />

sectors for 2010. We expect 2H09 to post a strong 26% yoy<br />

growth, after <strong>the</strong> 29% yoy fall in 1H09, mainly due to <strong>the</strong><br />

low base in 4Q08, particularly asset based companies which<br />

suffered from write down in value of investments.<br />

Page 45


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Earnings Estimates by Sector<br />

Eanings Growth<br />

PER<br />

Sector 2008 2009F 2010F<br />

CAGR<br />

08-10 2008 2009F 2010F<br />

Basic Materials 96.7 -8.7 20.8 5.0 13.0 14.2 11.7<br />

Consumer Goods 83.8 6.1 16.9 11.4 16.8 15.8 13.5<br />

Consumer Services -38.8 -40.5 103.2 10.0 22.8 38.3 18.8<br />

Financials -13.3 -12.8 21.1 2.8 15.1 17.4 14.3<br />

Health Care 10.0 5.5 15.4 10.3 20.0 19.0 16.5<br />

Industrials 9.4 -20.0 -5.1 -12.9 11.4 14.2 15.0<br />

Oil & Gas -25.0 13.7 16.0 14.9 13.1 11.6 10.0<br />

Real Estate -1.7 22.0 5.4 13.4 18.7 15.3 14.5<br />

REITS 33.2 2.0 3.0 2.5 15.6 15.3 14.9<br />

Technology -74.7 Loss Loss nm 45.0 nm nm<br />

Telecommunications -6.4 10.0 9.2 9.6 14.2 12.9 11.9<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage (Before EI) -2.5 -6.3 15.1 3.8 15.6 16.6 14.5<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage (After EI) -23.2 -10.8 18.8 2.9 15.4 17.3 14.5<br />

STI <strong>DBS</strong>V Forecast Avg (Before EI) -18.7 -18.9 18.3 -2.1 14.2 17.5 14.8<br />

STI <strong>DBS</strong>V Forecast Avg (Aft EI) -20.7 -20.6 15.1 -4.4 13.6 16.9 14.7<br />

STI Consensus Avg -18.7 -21.9 18.3 -3.9 13.6 17.5 14.8<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

VALUATION AND OUTLOOK<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> Economist has upgraded our 2009 and 2010 GDP<br />

forecasts to –3% and +5.2% respectively. Providing <strong>the</strong><br />

additional kicker to GDP growth is <strong>the</strong> upcoming launch of<br />

<strong>the</strong> integrated resorts, which will add at least 1.5% to<br />

Singapore’s GDP, creating 60,000 jobs. The ripple effects are<br />

wide, ranging from gaming, property, hospitality, property<br />

to service providers such as retail, media and transport<br />

operators.<br />

Singapore 12-mth forward GDP growth and earnings<br />

growth forecast trend<br />

(%) (%)<br />

8<br />

40<br />

GDP growth (L)<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

Earnings growth (R)<br />

-10<br />

-4<br />

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

-20<br />

Source: Consensus Economics Inc, <strong>DBS</strong>, IBES<br />

Page 46


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

2010 growth (%)<br />

While we have upgraded earnings growth from 12% to<br />

18% for 2010, EPS upgrade is slower than <strong>the</strong> region, due<br />

to 1) dilutive effect of recent rights issues and cash calls, and<br />

2) earnings for industrial sector, a late cycle play which has<br />

yet to be upgraded. Singapore earnings are highly cyclical,<br />

with 55% exposed to domestic cyclicals (Financials,<br />

consumer discretionary) and 21% externally via industrials.<br />

As such, we expect earnings upgrade curve to be steep, in<br />

line with <strong>the</strong> V shaped recovery in Singapore and <strong>the</strong> region.<br />

Following <strong>the</strong> decrease in risk aversion since March 2009,<br />

Equity Risk premium has normalized to its long term average<br />

of 4.2%. Assuming ERP at 4.2%, our sensitivity analysis<br />

points to a fur<strong>the</strong>r 2% upside for <strong>the</strong> FSSTI Index if our<br />

growth forecasts stay at 18% in FY2010. We arrive at a<br />

target of 2800 over <strong>the</strong> next 3 months, supported by price<br />

to book and average PE of 16x on FY10 earnings.<br />

Singapore equity risk premium<br />

10.0<br />

9.0<br />

8.0<br />

7.0<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

(%)<br />

0.0<br />

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Earnings yield minus Singapore 10-year<br />

bond yield<br />

Potential return from Interest rate / Growth sensitivity<br />

analysis based on ERP mean revision<br />

Singapore Long Bond yield (%)<br />

1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3<br />

18 11% 7% 2% -2% -5% -9% -12%<br />

23 16% 12% 7% 3% 0% -4% -7%<br />

28 21% 17% 12% 8% 5% 1% -2%<br />

33 26% 22% 17% 13% 10% 6% 3%<br />

38 31% 27% 22% 18% 15% 11% 8%<br />

43 36% 32% 27% 23% 20% 16% 13%<br />

48 41% 37% 32% 28% 25% 21% 18%<br />

Based on our nominal GDP growth forecasts, absolute GDP<br />

level will return to pre-crisis levels by end of 2010. Assuming<br />

earnings return to pre-crisis levels, this will translate to<br />

earnings growth of 38% from current, which will lead to a<br />

12 month target of 3160.<br />

Possible correction presents opportunities to accumulate.<br />

With valuations at mid-cycle levels, <strong>the</strong> market needs a<br />

healthy correction as it awaits clearer signs of a recovery on<br />

<strong>the</strong> economic and earnings front. In our view, <strong>the</strong> equity<br />

market in 2009 mirrors <strong>the</strong> recovery cycle in 1998. In 1998,<br />

<strong>the</strong> equity market surged 60% from its low, corrected by 1/3<br />

in <strong>the</strong> 2Q of recovery before resuming its uptrend(see chart<br />

on Singapore market recovery in previous crisis). Assuming<br />

support at –1 standard deviation from <strong>the</strong> current average<br />

PE, <strong>the</strong> STI could potentially correct to 2275 (based on 2010<br />

earnings).<br />

In our view, key risk factors are a) unforeseen external<br />

shocks leading to a rise in equity risk premium b) inflation<br />

concerns if commodity and oil prices continued its rise, due<br />

to supply shortage and slide in US$ c) concerns over<br />

overheating in China; and d) fear of rising interest rates<br />

given that <strong>the</strong> next move from <strong>the</strong> current low levels will be<br />

up.<br />

MSCI Singapore 12m fwd P/E (x)<br />

MSCI Forward PE<br />

26.0<br />

24.0<br />

22.0<br />

20.0<br />

18.0<br />

16.0<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

(x)<br />

90 91 92 94 95 96 98 99 00 02 03 04 06 07 09<br />

MSCI Singapore - 12MTH FWD PE RATIO<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Current support 12-mth target<br />

Source: Datastream. Based on current index of 2681 and bond yield<br />

of 2%<br />

Page 47


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Singapore Market Price / Book<br />

P/BV<br />

(x)<br />

2.60<br />

2.40<br />

2.20<br />

2.00<br />

1.80<br />

1.60<br />

1.40<br />

1.20<br />

1.00<br />

0.80<br />

0.60<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Singapore market recovery trades in previous crisis –<br />

correction in <strong>the</strong> 3Q of recovery in 1998/1999 before<br />

resuming its uptrend<br />

240<br />

220<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Correction in<br />

3Q of recovery<br />

Current 2009<br />

profile<br />

80<br />

-12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12<br />

Months before and after market bottomed<br />

1998 economic<br />

recovery<br />

1985<br />

economic<br />

recovery<br />

2003: fiscal and<br />

monetary<br />

easing<br />

environment<br />

2001: tech<br />

bubble recovery<br />

STRATEGY<br />

1. Go for yield: SPH, M1, and REITS. With <strong>the</strong> index 5%<br />

away from our target of 2800, we would rotate into stocks<br />

which provide yield support with upside from organic<br />

growth. Appended below are a list of stocks with yields of<br />

>5%, compared to <strong>the</strong> market’s average yield of 3%. SPH is<br />

our top pick, we now expect Adex growth to rise from 2%<br />

to 4% with economic recovery kicking in and an increase in<br />

adex once <strong>the</strong> integrated resorts commence in 1Q10. In<br />

addition, we expect upside surprise in its payout this quarter<br />

when it reports its final results, raising dividend yield to<br />

6.5%.<br />

Among telcos, we prefer M1, which is a key beneficiary of<br />

<strong>the</strong> National Broadband Network offering yield of 8%.<br />

Sreits – acquisitions will spice up growth. SREITS have<br />

outperformed over <strong>the</strong> past two months, average yield<br />

hovering at its long term average of 6.5%. Despite this,<br />

yield spread is decent at >300bp and <strong>DBS</strong>’ economists<br />

expect interest rates to be low in <strong>the</strong> near term, before we<br />

see <strong>the</strong> first sign of a rise in interest rates in 2Q10. Upside<br />

for SREITS’ yield comes from acquisition potential as well as<br />

improvements in operational performance. Indeed, <strong>the</strong><br />

recent re-rating was sparked off by stronger than expected<br />

results in 2Q, demonstrating <strong>the</strong> resilience of <strong>the</strong>se assets.<br />

REITS which are primed for acquisitions are Fraser<br />

Centrepoint, CDL HT, Parkway REIT and Mapletree Logistics<br />

Trust.<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Stock picks with div yields (>US$1 bn, > 5% yield and buys)<br />

FYE Mkt Price Target ROE<br />

Company Cap (S$) Price % PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) Div Yld (%)<br />

(S$m) 17-Sep (S$) Upside Rcmd 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 09F<br />

Suntec REIT Dec 1,824 1.12 1.23 10% Buy 14.3x 18.0x 18.3x 18.7x 0.5x 0.6x 9.5% 4%<br />

A-REIT Mar 3,385 1.81 1.84 2% Buy 12.5x 14.0x 15.6x 15.6x 1.0x 1.1x 8.4% 8%<br />

StarHub Limited Dec 3,700 2.16 2.50 16% Buy 11.7x 11.7x 6.6x 6.4x 31.4x 29.6x 8.3% 280%<br />

MobileOne Dec 1,593 1.78 2.05 15% Buy 10.9x 10.2x 5.9x 5.5x 6.4x 5.7x 7.6% 66%<br />

Singapore Post Mar 1,772 0.92 1.05 14% Buy 12.0x 11.7x 9.1x 9.0x 7.1x 6.4x 6.8% 65%<br />

Venture Corporation Dec 2,526 9.21 9.40 2% Buy 15.3x 14.1x 9.5x 8.7x 1.3x 1.3x 5.4% 9%<br />

SPH Aug 5,907 3.71 4.21 13% Buy 14.9x 13.3x 10.2x 9.6x 2.9x 2.7x 5.4% 19%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 48


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

2. Rotate into growth leaders with upside potential –<br />

Consumer Goods, Consumer Services and Financial. We<br />

advocate investors rotate from early cyclical plays into<br />

growth leaders with upside potential. These are largely<br />

Consumer stocks (both goods and services) and <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

sector.<br />

Consumer Services sector is poised for a dramatic recovery,<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> recovery in load factors for SIA. Our top picks in<br />

this sector are SIA and SPH – both are beneficiaries of <strong>the</strong><br />

economic recovery. With a global synchronized recovery,<br />

SIA’s premier global positioning will place it in a favourable<br />

position even as air traffic has bottomed, and is poised for<br />

an upturn.<br />

Financial sector is poised for fur<strong>the</strong>r upside in earnings<br />

growth (currently +21%), as we expect lower provisioning<br />

and strong growth from fee-based income, amidst active<br />

capital market activities, M&A transactions. Among financial<br />

stocks, our preference lies with UOB as its valuations hinges<br />

in <strong>the</strong> recovery of its book value. In <strong>the</strong> longer term, UOB's<br />

ROE stacks up better than its peers at 13%.<br />

Recent weakness in <strong>the</strong> US$, if it continues, will benefit<br />

commodity prices and <strong>the</strong> Consumer Goods sector. In<br />

particular, we expect CPO prices to recover from RM2300 to<br />

Rm2440 over <strong>the</strong> next 12 - 18 months, in anticipation of<br />

tighter edible oils inventory, higher crude oil prices and lower<br />

US$. Toge<strong>the</strong>r with volume growth and acquisitions, this will<br />

underpinned earnings growth of 17% next year. Our top<br />

picks are Olam and Noble.<br />

3. Integrated Resorts <strong>the</strong>me<br />

We would expect IR plays to remain in vogue, as we<br />

approach <strong>the</strong> upcoming launch of Resorts World Sentosa,<br />

which could happen as early as January 2010. Separately,<br />

Marina Bay Sands is targeting to soft launch by Feb 2010.<br />

This will usher in <strong>the</strong> influx of tourists benefiting hospitality<br />

related companies. Apart from <strong>the</strong> gaming operators and<br />

hotel related companies, (CDL HT, Ascott Residencel Trust)<br />

indirect beneficiaries include SIA, SPH, Comfort Delgro,<br />

Suntec REIT and Starhill Global REIT.<br />

Stock Picks<br />

FYE Mkt Price Target ROE<br />

Company Cap (S$) Price % PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) Div Yld (%)<br />

(S$m) 17-Sep (S$) Upside Rcmd 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 09F<br />

MobileOne Dec 1,593 1.78 2.05 15% Buy 10.9x 10.2x 5.9x 5.5x 6.4x 5.7x 7.6% 66%<br />

Singapore Airlines Mar 16,137 13.60 15.25 12% Buy 17.5x 39.2x 4.9x 6.6x 1.2x 1.2x 2.9% 7%<br />

SPH Aug 5,907 3.71 4.21 13% Buy 14.9x 13.3x 10.2x 9.6x 2.9x 2.7x 5.4% 19%<br />

Suntec REIT Dec 1,824 1.12 1.23 10% Buy 14.3x 18.0x 18.3x 18.7x 0.5x 0.6x 9.5% 4%<br />

UOB Dec 25,909 17.00 18.60 9% Buy 15.5x 13.2x na na 1.6x 1.5x 3.2% 11%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 49


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Singapore<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Banks & Finance<br />

Overweight<br />

Consumer Goods<br />

Overweight<br />

Consumer Services<br />

Overweight<br />

We believe that loan demand is picking up especially for <strong>the</strong> consumer segment<br />

with positive signs in <strong>the</strong> rejuvenation of housing loans. We also understand that<br />

loan approvals have improved. For <strong>the</strong> rest of 2009, loan growth should<br />

predominantly be driven by <strong>the</strong> remaining drawdown from <strong>the</strong> Integrated Resorts<br />

loans, SME loans from <strong>the</strong> SPRING scheme and recovery of mortgage loans<br />

following <strong>the</strong> euphoria in property launches over <strong>the</strong> last few months. However,<br />

with corporate repayments outweighing <strong>the</strong> quantum of new loans, loan growth<br />

for 2009 may remain relatively subdued. We note that loan spreads for <strong>the</strong><br />

corporate and SMEs having peaked while loan rates for consumer loans, especially<br />

housing loans remain competitive and as such NIM upside may be capped. We<br />

expect provisions to trend down for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> year and we believe <strong>the</strong> worst of<br />

spiking NPLs is over with NPLs to peak by this year end. Capital ratios for banks<br />

remain robust while dividends remain intact. In terms of picks, we prefer UOB (Buy,<br />

TP S$18.60) as its valuation lies in <strong>the</strong> recovery of its book value. In <strong>the</strong> longer term,<br />

UOB's ROE of 13% stacks up better than its peers. Meanwhile, we have a Hold call<br />

for OCBC with TP at S$8.00 as we believe most good news have been priced in.<br />

For plantation, we expect 4Q09 palm oil price to rebound on seasonally slower palm<br />

oil supply growth and run down in US soybean oil inventory by 1Q10. Recent pause<br />

in some plantation stock prices means that <strong>the</strong>re is more upside on <strong>the</strong> horizon once<br />

palm oil prices do recover. In <strong>the</strong> mean time, we recommend investors pick those<br />

with significant volume growth potential. Our top pick is Kencana Agri, given decent<br />

upsides to our DCF valuations.<br />

We are turning positive to <strong>the</strong> consumer goods sector as <strong>the</strong> world economy is<br />

gradually trekking out of recession. We’ve been seeing reports of shortages of<br />

workers for factories in China’s coastal provinces since 3Q09, and stats show that<br />

YoY growth of retail sales in China has improved from its lowest point at 11.6% in<br />

Feb 2009 to 15.4% in Aug 2009. Our top pick for <strong>the</strong> downstream consumer goods<br />

is Pacific Andes Resources. We believe it will benefit from a robust domestic<br />

consumption demand from <strong>the</strong> PRC, given that PRC contributes more than 50% of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Group’s revenue. Valuations are undemanding at c.5.3x on FY10F PER, which is<br />

at a significant discount from peers. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, its 65% stake in China Fishery<br />

Group is worth about S$816m, more than <strong>the</strong> market capitalization Pacific Andes<br />

itself (S$765m).<br />

We raise this sector to overweight largely on <strong>the</strong> defensiveness of earnings (land<br />

transport), and recovery of operational earnings (for SPH and SIA). For land<br />

transport, we take <strong>the</strong> view that with a market correction likely, after <strong>the</strong> market<br />

rally for 6 months, <strong>the</strong> preference is for defensive counters like ComfortDelGro. We<br />

like CD given its resilient earnings, coupled with good operational peformance<br />

continuing into 3Q results (from 2Q) on lower oil prices yoy and stronger GBP and<br />

AUD qoq. We believe SPH's ad revenues has seen its worst drop earlier this year and<br />

this is poised to recover in 4Q09/1Q10 in line with <strong>the</strong> economy. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

could be upside surprise to our final DPS expectation of 13cents, up to a potential of<br />

16 cents. For SIA, we expect demand to improve gradually along with <strong>the</strong> economy,<br />

boosted by <strong>the</strong> upcoming opening of Singapore's two Integrated Resorts. Load<br />

factor and yield should also see an uptrend, as supply has been trimmed industrywide.<br />

UOB<br />

Kencana Agri and Pacific<br />

Andes; Olam, Noble<br />

SIA, SPH and<br />

ComfortDelGro.<br />

Page 50


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Singapore<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Industrials<br />

Underweight<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Neutral<br />

Property<br />

Neutral<br />

We believe that <strong>the</strong> market’s hope for early Petrobras’ contracts may disappoint as<br />

we expect Petrobras’ award of its first batch of 28 offshore rigs (7-9 units) to occur<br />

only in 1H 2010. This is due to: 1) Still high equipment cost, 2) High local content<br />

requirement, 3) Petrobras has <strong>the</strong> benefit of “time” to sit out for better prices, 4)<br />

Lower margins for yards, 5) Tight credit market, 6) Probe by Brazilian Congress on<br />

past deals. Hence, <strong>the</strong>re is potential risks of earnings downgrades in <strong>the</strong> event<br />

contract win assumptions are too optimistic for 2009. However, we believe that <strong>the</strong><br />

offshore/rig newbuilding activities would pick up in 2H 2010 as credit normalizes<br />

upon economic recovery, and equipment prices decline as suppliers relent on<br />

diminished order books. For dry bulk shipping, <strong>the</strong> oversupply situation is now<br />

aggravated by <strong>the</strong> higher-than-expected deliveries since mid-2009 and <strong>the</strong> credit<br />

slowdown in 2H 2009 in China. This will be negative for China shipyards, and <strong>the</strong><br />

momemtum for contract cancellations could continue. Within industrial, our<br />

preference is for water and environmental plays, as we expect Hyflux and Epure to<br />

benefit from more contract wins resulting in fur<strong>the</strong>r earnings upgrades. Our stock<br />

picks for industrial sector are Hyflux and Epure.<br />

Our industry analysis and channel checks show that offshore deepwater activities<br />

are holding up relatively well. We expect <strong>the</strong> ratio of mid-large AHTS (>8,000 bhp)<br />

to floater to be 2.3-2.6x in <strong>the</strong> 2009-13 periods, contrary to market’s concern on<br />

severe oversupply issues. This is at <strong>the</strong> lower half of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical 2-3x healthy<br />

range. We expect day rates for mid-large AHTS to drop ano<strong>the</strong>r 5-10% from<br />

current levels, at most. This represents a decline of about 20% or less from peak<br />

levels in 2008. The outlook is stronger for subsea vessels, as <strong>the</strong> utilisation rates<br />

have improved since late 2Q 2009, and charter rates have stabilised at


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Singapore<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Reits<br />

Overweight<br />

Technology<br />

Neutral<br />

Telecom<br />

Overweight<br />

Sreits had generally performed well in 3Q09, particularly <strong>the</strong> Integrated Resort<br />

<strong>the</strong>matic plays. The sector is currently yielding c7% FY10 earnings. Looking into Q4,<br />

we expect Sreits to hold up relatively better than developers as investor attention<br />

shift towards more defensive targets with good dividend yields as we see little room<br />

for significant RNAV upgrades for developers in <strong>the</strong> short term. Our strategy for<br />

Sreits this quarter would be to prefer those with potential for growth from new<br />

acquisitions as well as attractive valuations. Our preferred picks are FCT, ART and<br />

Suntec.<br />

Our optimism on <strong>the</strong> Technology sector since April has paid off with an average of<br />

80% appreciation vs broader market 41% gain. We believe earnings will continue<br />

to improve in <strong>the</strong> near term, per our view that 4Q09 would be <strong>the</strong> first quarter of<br />

on-year growth considering <strong>the</strong> low base in 4Q08. However, we do not expect<br />

much earnings upsides compared to <strong>the</strong> last two quarters since most of <strong>the</strong><br />

production ramp for this year would have been completed by Q3 if not early Q4. In<br />

fact, most tech stocks have normalized to historical means and thus have priced in<br />

most of <strong>the</strong> earnings recovery for now. Pending more concrete signs of end<br />

demand absorbing past quarters' seasonal buildup, we see little price upside for <strong>the</strong><br />

sector hereon. As such, we have downgraded our rating on <strong>the</strong> sector to NEUTRAL.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, we remain positive on Venture as 2H ramp up is bolstered by new<br />

customers as well as market share gain from a competitor's hiccup. Ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

catalyst would be its CDO writeback ( c. 50cts/share) end of <strong>the</strong> year.<br />

Mobile ARPU, after its recent sharp decline, is on recovery path as roaming<br />

contribution is starting to come back. Pay TV and broadband ARPU may take longer<br />

time to recover as consumers may not upgrade to <strong>the</strong> high-end plans in <strong>the</strong> near<br />

term. Higher take-up of mobile data plans provides opportunity to raise mobile<br />

ARPU over <strong>the</strong> longer term. M1, being a pure mobile player is likely to benefit<br />

more than o<strong>the</strong>rs, and is <strong>the</strong> only beneficiary of National Broadband Network (NBN)<br />

from FY10F onwards. Potentially high cost of sports content is already refelcted in<br />

StarHub's stock price and <strong>the</strong> possibility of content-sharing could lift <strong>the</strong> stock price.<br />

M1 and StarHub offer dividend yields of 8% and 8.5% respectively, highest in <strong>the</strong><br />

Asian telecom space. Top pick -M1<br />

Frasers Centrepoint Trust,<br />

Ascott Residencel Trust and<br />

Suntec Reit<br />

Venture<br />

M1<br />

Page 52


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

This page has been left blank intentionally<br />

Page 53


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

MobileOne<br />

Bloomberg: M1 SP | Reuters: MONE.SI<br />

BUY S$1.78 STI : 2,672.60<br />

Price Target : 12-Month S$2.05<br />

Potential Catalyst: Clear strategy for NBN in place<br />

Analyst<br />

Sachin Mittal +65 6398 7950<br />

sachin@dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

2.50<br />

2.30<br />

2.10<br />

1.90<br />

1.70<br />

1.50<br />

1.30<br />

1.10<br />

S$<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

M o b ile O n e (LH S) R e la tive ST I IN D E X (R H S)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

R elative In d ex<br />

FY Dec (S$ m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 801 780 794 804<br />

EBITDA 314 302 312 313<br />

Pre-tax Profit 185 182 190 192<br />

Net Profit 150 151 156 158<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 150 146 156 158<br />

EPS (S cts) 16.9 17.0 17.5 17.7<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 16.9 16.4 17.5 17.7<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (13) (3) 7 1<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 16.8 17.0 17.4 17.7<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 13.5 13.6 14.0 14.2<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 24.1 27.6 31.5 35.2<br />

PE (X) 10.6 10.5 10.2 10.0<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 10.6 10.9 10.2 10.0<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.9<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 5.8 5.9 5.5 5.3<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 7.6 7.6 7.9 8.0<br />

P/Book Value (X) 7.4 6.4 5.7 5.1<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3<br />

ROAE (%) 72.1 65.8 59.1 53.1<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 16.4 16.6 17.4<br />

ICB Industry : Telecommunications<br />

ICB Sector: Mobile Telecommunications<br />

Principal Business: MobileOne is one of <strong>the</strong> main<br />

telecommunication operators in Singapore.<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

214<br />

194<br />

174<br />

154<br />

134<br />

114<br />

94<br />

74<br />

54<br />

Hitting <strong>the</strong> right buttons for NBN<br />

• M1’s acquisition of Qala demonstrates a clear<br />

strategy of leveraging on corporate broadband<br />

opportunities through National Broadband Network<br />

(NBN).<br />

• Execution has evidently improved under <strong>the</strong> new<br />

CEO, who came on board in Jan 09.<br />

• BUY for 18% potential upside, 8% regular yield and<br />

likelihood of an additional 10% yield in FY10F,<br />

through capital management.<br />

Qala acquisition demonstrates M1’s clear broadband<br />

strategy. M1’s recent acquisition of Internet service<br />

provider Qala is likely to help achieve its target of at least<br />

20% broadband market share by 2015. By acquiring<br />

corporate data capability through Qala, M1 should be able<br />

to secure some market share among SMEs, given Qala’s 9<br />

years experience in <strong>the</strong> space. We estimate M1’s top line<br />

and bottom-line to grow by at least 20% and 10%<br />

respectively in <strong>the</strong> next five years from broadband alone.<br />

Most importantly, broadband offering would allow<br />

bundling multiple services toge<strong>the</strong>r, which could lower <strong>the</strong><br />

churn rate for <strong>the</strong> operator.<br />

Better execution under <strong>the</strong> new CEO. Ms Karen Kooi<br />

has set a clear goal of defending <strong>the</strong> market share and she<br />

delivered on her goal by arresting market share decline in<br />

2Q09, without hurting <strong>the</strong> margins. Management is likely<br />

to achieve S$10m cost savings in FY09F through<br />

renegotiation of contract with network vendor and<br />

outsourcing of call centre operations. There is ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

S$10m backhaul cost savings in FY10F as M1 uses its own<br />

backhaul ra<strong>the</strong>r than leasing <strong>the</strong> network from SingTel.<br />

M1 remains our top sector pick. Our target price is<br />

S$2.05, pegged to 12x average FY09F-10F EPS, at 10%<br />

discount to our 13x target PER for StarHub. If M1<br />

demonstrates solid execution on <strong>the</strong> NBN front, 10%<br />

discount to StarHub may potentially be removed.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 895<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 1,593 / 1,126<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Axiata Group (%) 29.7<br />

Keppel T&T Ltd (%) 20.0<br />

Singapore Press Holdings (%) 13.9<br />

Free Float (%) 36.4<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 927<br />

Page 54<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: JS / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

MobileOne<br />

Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 801 780 794 804 Net Fixed Assets 611 589 569 557<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (490) (478) (493) (501) Invts in Associates & JVs 0 0 0 0<br />

Gross Profit 311 302 302 303 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 83 83 83 83<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (118) (117) (104) (103) Cash & ST Invts 18 65 124 172<br />

Operating Profit 193 184 197 200 Inventory 8 8 8 8<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 81 78 80 81<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 3 3 3 3<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (8) (8) (8) (8) Total Assets 804 826 868 904<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 6 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 185 182 190 192 ST Debt 0 0 0 0<br />

Tax (35) (31) (34) (35) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 233 224 230 233<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0 LT Debt 250 250 250 250<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 107 107 107 107<br />

Net Profit 150 151 156 158 Shareholder’s Equity 215 246 280 314<br />

Net Profit before Except. 150 146 156 158 Minority Interests 0 0 0 0<br />

EBITDA 314 302 312 313 Total Cap. & Liab. 804 827 868 904<br />

Sales Gth (%) (0.4) (2.6) 1.8 1.2 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (141) (134) (139) (141)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (1.9) (3.8) 3.3 0.4 Net Cash/(Debt) (232) (185) (126) (78)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (5.4) (4.4) 6.9 1.3<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (12.6) 0.9 2.7 1.4<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 18.9 17.0 18.0 18.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 185 182 190 192 Gross Margins (%) 38.8 38.7 38.0 37.7<br />

Dep. & Amort. 121 117 114 113 Opg Profit Margin (%) 24.1 23.7 24.8 24.9<br />

Tax Paid (48) (35) (31) (34) Net Profit Margin (%) 18.7 19.4 19.6 19.6<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) 0 0 0 0 ROAE (%) 72.1 65.8 59.1 53.1<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 0 (3) 2 1 ROA (%) 18.2 18.6 18.4 17.8<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF (3) 0 0 0 ROCE (%) 26.9 26.1 26.1 25.1<br />

Net Operating CF 255 262 275 273 Div Payout Ratio (%) 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (95) (95) (95) (101) Net Interest Cover (x) 24.3 24.3 26.0 26.4<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 0 0 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 0 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 36.8 37.2 36.4 36.5<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 195.5 197.0 187.2 185.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF (2) 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 8.3 8.4 7.9 7.9<br />

Net Investing CF (97) (95) (95) (101) Current Ratio (x) 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1<br />

Div Paid (128) (120) (121) (124) Quick Ratio (x) 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.1<br />

Chg in Gross Debt (35) 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity (X) 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF 0 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 38.0 38.0 38.0 40.2<br />

Net Financing CF (163) (120) (121) (124) Z-Score (X) 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.5<br />

Net Cashflow (5) 47 59 48 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (S cts) (26.1) (20.8) (14.2) (8.8)<br />

Opg CFPS (S cts) 28.6 29.8 30.7 30.5<br />

Free CFPS (S cts) 17.9 18.8 20.2 19.3<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 197 195 186 191 Revenues (S$ m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (123) (116) (110) (112) Post Paid Cellular 538 512 522 528<br />

Gross Profit 74 79 76 78 Pre Paid Cellular 68 63 66 68<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (29) (32) (31) (32) IDD Revenue 140 144 146 147<br />

Operating Profit 44 47 46 47 Equipment Sales revenues 55 61 61 61<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 0 0 0 Total 801 780 794 804<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (2) (2) (2) (2) (S$ m)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 42 45 44 45 Key Assumptions<br />

Tax (8) (9) (2) (8)<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Profit 34 37 42 37<br />

Net profit bef Except. 34 37 42 37<br />

EBITDA 44 47 46 47<br />

Sales Gth (%) (4.2) (1.0) (4.3) 2.2<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (47.2) 6.1 (2.1) 1.7<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (16.5) 6.1 (2.1) 1.7<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (16.3) 6.4 14.5 (11.5)<br />

Gross Margins (%) 37.4 40.3 40.9 41.0<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 22.4 24.0 24.6 24.5<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 17.5 18.8 22.5 19.5<br />

5% yoy decline in post-paid ARPU, 2% yoy decline in post-paid subscriber<br />

base in FY09F<br />

3% yoy decline in prepaid ARPU, 6% decline in pre-paid subscriber base in<br />

FY09F<br />

EBITDA margins stable at 39% in FY09F<br />

EBITDA margins rise to 39.5% in FY10F due to backhaul cost savings<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 55


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Singapore Airlines<br />

Bloomberg: SIA SP | Reuters: SIAL.SI<br />

BUY S$13.60 STI : 2,672.60<br />

Price Target : 12-Month S$ 15.25<br />

Potential Catalyst: Improving demand and yield<br />

Analyst<br />

Paul YONG CFA +86 21 6888 3372<br />

paulyong@dbsvickers.com<br />

Stronger prospects ahead<br />

• We expect demand to improve gradually along<br />

with <strong>the</strong> economy, boosted by <strong>the</strong> upcoming<br />

opening of Singapore’s two Integrated Resorts<br />

• Load factor and yield should also see an uptrend,<br />

as supply has been trimmed industry-wide<br />

• Key risks: jet fuel costs and pandemic.<br />

• BUY, TP S$15.25, based on 1.4x P/B.<br />

Price Relative<br />

17.40<br />

15.40<br />

13.40<br />

11.40<br />

9.40<br />

7.40<br />

S$<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Sing apore A irlines (LH S) Relative STI IN DEX (RH S)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Mar (S$ m) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 15,973 16,063 12,563 12,972<br />

EBITDA 3,998 2,888 2,254 2,986<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,547 1,337 527 1,238<br />

Net Profit 2,049 1,062 415 974<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 2,049 923 415 974<br />

EPS (S cts) 173.0 89.5 34.7 80.7<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 173.0 77.8 34.7 80.7<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 18 (55) (55) 133<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 166.7 86.3 33.7 79.2<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 100.0 40.0 25.0 30.0<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 1,276.8 1,174.6 1,119.3 1,174.2<br />

PE (X) 7.9 15.2 39.2 16.9<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 7.9 17.5 39.2 16.9<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 4.7 6.2 8.4 6.6<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 3.2 4.9 6.6 4.8<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 7.4 2.9 1.8 2.2<br />

P/Book Value (X) 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

ROAE (%) 13.6 7.3 3.0 7.1<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - -<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 15.3 73.3<br />

ICB Industry : Consumer Services<br />

ICB Sector: Travel & Leisure<br />

Principal Business: Singapore Airlines owns and operates SIA and<br />

Silk Air, and has two airline associates (Tiger, Virgin Atlantic). O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

businesses include ground operations (SATS) and aircraft<br />

maintenance operations (SIA Engineering).<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

203<br />

183<br />

163<br />

143<br />

123<br />

103<br />

83<br />

Demand and yields should improve on healthier<br />

economy and IRs. SIA’s operating statistics in July and<br />

August indicate that <strong>the</strong> decline in demand has<br />

bottomed and with capacity having been cut by over<br />

12%, load factors have also rebounded to above 78%<br />

in July and August, compared with an average of under<br />

70% in <strong>the</strong> preceding 5 months. Looking ahead, we<br />

expect both load factor and yield to improve as 1)<br />

demand improves along with economy, 2) excess<br />

capacity has been removed from <strong>the</strong> industry, and 3)<br />

upcoming Integrated Resorts in Singapore should boost<br />

tourist arrivals, which is positive for SIA.<br />

Earnings to rebound strongly in FY11, key risks<br />

being jet fuel costs and pandemic. Although SIA was<br />

unprofitable in 1Q10, we project a stronger second half<br />

to help SIA into <strong>the</strong> black for <strong>the</strong> full year, with net<br />

earnings of S$415m. FY11’s PAT is projected to fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

improve, on stronger load factor and yield, to S$974m.<br />

BUY, TP S$15.25. With improving earnings prospects,<br />

we peg our target price for SIA to 1.4x Price-to-Book,<br />

which is at <strong>the</strong> 50 th percentile of its historical trading<br />

range. This translates to a target price of S$15.25 for<br />

SIA. Catalysts for re-rating include a rebound in<br />

demand, yields and <strong>the</strong> completion of <strong>the</strong> upcoming<br />

Integrated Resorts in Singapore.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,187<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 16,137 / 11,407<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd (%) 54.5<br />

Free Float (%) 45.5<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 1,962<br />

Page 56<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: MY / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Singapore Airlines<br />

Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Mar 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F FY Mar 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 15,973 16,063 12,563 12,972 Net Fixed Assets 16,474 15,992 15,327 15,242<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (13,848) (15,160) (12,213) (11,952) Invts in Associates & JVs 1,216 983 778 918<br />

Gross Profit 2,125 904 349 1,020 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 512 1,007 482 482<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Cash & ST Invts 5,583 4,504 3,409 4,123<br />

Operating Profit 2,125 904 349 1,020 Inventory 508 503 394 406<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 181 114 15 35 Debtors 2,117 1,727 1,351 1,395<br />

Associates & JV Inc 161 175 180 200 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 105 102 102 102<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 81 6 (17) (17) Total Assets 26,515 24,819 21,842 22,668<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 138 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,547 1,337 527 1,238 ST Debt 58 309 90 90<br />

Tax (410) (190) (79) (186) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 5,810 5,610 4,348 4,276<br />

Minority Interest (88) (85) (34) (79) LT Debt 1,689 1,514 1,514 1,514<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 3,329 2,896 2,199 2,244<br />

Net Profit 2,049 1,062 415 974 Shareholder’s Equity 15,125 13,931 13,393 14,167<br />

Net Profit before Except. 2,049 923 415 974 Minority Interests 504 560 299 378<br />

EBITDA 3,998 2,888 2,254 2,986 Total Cap. & Liab. 26,515 24,819 21,842 22,668<br />

Sales Gth (%) 10.2 0.6 (21.8) 3.3 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (3,080) (3,277) (2,502) (2,372)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 29.3 (27.8) (21.9) 32.5 Net Cash/(Debt) 3,836 2,681 1,805 2,520<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 61.6 (57.5) (61.4) 192.3<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (3.7) (48.2) (60.9) 134.8<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 16.1 14.2 15.0 15.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Mar 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F FY Mar 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 2,547 1,337 527 1,238 Gross Margins (%) 13.3 5.6 2.8 7.9<br />

Dep. & Amort. 1,531 1,695 1,710 1,730 Opg Profit Margin (%) 13.3 5.6 2.8 7.9<br />

Tax Paid (196) (300) (348) (79) Net Profit Margin (%) 12.8 6.6 3.3 7.5<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (161) (175) (180) (200) ROAE (%) 13.6 7.3 3.0 7.1<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 780 (873) (506) (236) ROA (%) 7.8 4.1 1.8 4.4<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF (378) (308) 0 0 ROCE (%) 8.6 3.9 1.6 4.8<br />

Net Operating CF 4,123 1,376 1,203 2,453 Div Payout Ratio (%) 57.8 44.7 72.1 37.2<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (1,574) (1,138) (1,600) (1,600) Net Interest Cover (x) NM NM 21.0 60.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) (49) (466) 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV (16) (4) 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 46.5 43.7 44.7 38.6<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 111 134 60 60 Creditors Turn (avg days) 93.3 92.4 116.1 107.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 226 127 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 15.4 13.7 15.6 14.3<br />

Net Investing CF (1,301) (1,347) (1,540) (1,540) Current Ratio (x) 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.4<br />

Div Paid (1,370) (1,260) (474) (299) Quick Ratio (x) 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3<br />

Chg in Gross Debt (169) (68) 0 0 Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

Capital Issues (1,212) (5) 100 100 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) (0.3) (0.2) (0.1) (0.2)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (47) 24 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 90.1 62.4 99.8 99.8<br />

Net Financing CF (2,797) (1,309) (374) (199) Z-Score (X) 2.5 2.5 2.2 2.5<br />

Net Cashflow 25 (1,280) (712) 714 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (S cts) 323.8 226.1 150.9 208.8<br />

Opg CFPS (S cts) 282.2 189.6 142.8 222.9<br />

Free CFPS (S cts) 215.2 20.1 (33.2) 70.7<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Mar 2Q2009 3Q2009 4Q2009 1Q2010 FY Mar 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 4,379 4,160 3,321 2,871 Revenues (S$ m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (4,148) (3,807) (3,349) (3,191) Airline Operations 15,264 15,240 12,011 12,595<br />

Gross Profit 232 353 (28) (319) SATS 958 1,062 352 0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (3) (6) (2) (2) SIA Engineering 1,010 1,045 954 1,034<br />

Operating Profit 229 348 (30) (321) O<strong>the</strong>rs 207 207 207 207<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 23 54 (4) 2 Eliminations (1,466) (1,492) (962) (864)<br />

Associates & JV Inc 142 15 (86) 39 Total 15,973 16,063 12,563 12,972<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 10 10 10 10 EBIT (S$ m)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 138 0 Airline Operations 1,845 611 233 923<br />

Pre-tax Profit 404 426 29 (270) SATS 174 171 44 0<br />

Tax (59) (71) 37 (19) SIA Engineering 103 113 71 96<br />

Minority Interest (22) (22) (23) (18) O<strong>the</strong>rs (23) (1) (15) (20)<br />

Net Profit 324 334 42 (307) Total 2,148 905 364 1,040<br />

Net profit bef Except. 324 334 (96) (307) EBIT Margins (%)<br />

EBITDA 828 850 312 157 Airline Operations 12.1 4.0 1.9 7.3<br />

SATS 18.2 16.1 12.4 N/A<br />

Sales Gth (%) 6.0 (5.0) (20.2) (13.5) SIA Engineering 10.2 10.8 7.4 9.3<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (8.2) 2.7 (63.3) (49.6) O<strong>the</strong>rs NM NM NM NM<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (34.2) 51.9 (108.5) 980.8 Total 13.4 5.6 2.9 8.0<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (9.7) 3.0 (87.4) (832.9)<br />

Gross Margins (%) 5.3 8.5 (0.8) (11.1)<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 5.2 8.4 (0.9) (11.2)<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 7.4 8.0 1.3 (10.7)<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 57


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

SPH<br />

Bloomberg: SPH SP | Reuters: SPRM.SI<br />

BUY S$3.71 STI : 2,672.60<br />

Price Target : 12-month S$ 4.21 (Prev S$ 3.97)<br />

Potential Catalyst: Recovery in Ad revenues; special dividends and/or<br />

capital distribution<br />

Analyst<br />

Andy SIM CFA +65 6398 7969<br />

andysim@dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

5.10<br />

4.60<br />

4.10<br />

3.60<br />

3.10<br />

2.60<br />

2.10<br />

S$<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

SPH (LHS) R e la tive ST I IN D E X (R H S)<br />

R elativ e In d e x<br />

FY Aug (S$ m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 1,301 1,299 1,263 1,106<br />

EBITDA 582 564 578 463<br />

Pre-tax Profit 522 490 541 429<br />

Net Profit 437 395 443 353<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 464 395 443 353<br />

EPS (S cts) 27.6 24.9 27.9 22.3<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 29.3 24.9 27.9 22.3<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (7) (15) 12 (20)<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 26.7 24.0 27.0 21.5<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 27.3 20.0 24.0 20.0<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 131.9 129.3 137.2 135.5<br />

PE (X) 13.4 14.9 13.3 16.7<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 12.7 14.9 13.3 16.7<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 11.7 13.0 11.8 14.4<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 9.6 10.2 9.6 11.9<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 7.4 5.4 6.5 5.4<br />

P/Book Value (X) 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.7<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

ROAE (%) 20.5 19.1 20.9 16.3<br />

Earnings Rev (%): 0.1 9.8 8.5<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 23.9 26.7 23.2<br />

ICB Industry : Consumer Services<br />

ICB Sector: Media<br />

Principal Business: Publishes newspapers in Singapore and owns <strong>the</strong><br />

Paragon<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

210<br />

190<br />

170<br />

150<br />

130<br />

110<br />

90<br />

70<br />

50<br />

Go for <strong>the</strong> cash<br />

• Our final dividend assumed (13cents DPS) could<br />

have upside surprise (to 17cents) in FY09 results<br />

(12 Oct)<br />

• Raise FY10F earnings by +10% on higher AdEx<br />

growth assumptions, along with revised GDP<br />

(+5.2% in 2010)<br />

• Ad revenues to ride on media-worthy activities in<br />

2010 (IRs, YOG, etc)<br />

• BUY, sum-of-parts TP at S$4.21<br />

Upside surprise on cash dividends. Our conservative<br />

expectations of a final+special DPS of 13 Scents could<br />

surprise on <strong>the</strong> upside (bringing full year DPS to 20Scents)<br />

when SPH announces its FY09 results on 12 Oct. Assuming<br />

a payout of 76% of operating profits, <strong>the</strong> final dividend<br />

could be 16cents, bringing full year to 24cents. This<br />

equates to an immediate yield of 3.5% - 4.5% before <strong>the</strong><br />

year’s end.<br />

Raise FY10F by 10% on better GDP... Historically, ad<br />

revenues track closely to GDP growth. We revised our<br />

FY10F earnings up by 10% as we assumed a better ad<br />

revenue growth rate (4%, vs 2% previously) along with our<br />

economist’s revision of 2010 GDP to 5.2%. We also made<br />

a slight adjustment to <strong>the</strong> development property<br />

(Sky@Eleven) profit recognition towards FY10F.<br />

…and more media worthy events. We also expect ad<br />

revenues to pick up along with more media worthy events<br />

next year and <strong>the</strong> lead up to it. The opening of <strong>the</strong> two<br />

Integrated Resorts and Youth Olympics Games (YOG) are<br />

just two examples. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, we saw a slump in ad<br />

revenues in early 09 (c. -20% yoy) following <strong>the</strong> global<br />

crisis and this should magnify any reasonable growth next<br />

year.<br />

Go for <strong>the</strong> cash; BUY, TP: S$4.21. Our sum-of-parts TP is<br />

raised to S$4.21 as we revised up our FY10F earnings. We<br />

believe <strong>the</strong> prospect of a higher than expected final cum<br />

special dividend is an attractive investment <strong>the</strong>sis, along<br />

with improving operational prospect in <strong>the</strong> near term.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,592<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 5,907 / 4,175<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Free Float (%) 100.0<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 3,622<br />

Page 58<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: JS / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

SPH<br />

Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Aug 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Aug 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 1,301 1,299 1,263 1,106 Net Fixed Assets 490 479 469 461<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (611) (627) (575) (533) Invts in Associates & JVs 61 75 89 103<br />

Gross Profit 690 672 687 574 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 1,461 1,461 1,461 1,461<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (169) (173) (173) (173) Cash & ST Invts 854 897 1,056 1,134<br />

Operating Profit 521 499 514 401 Inventory 36 37 36 32<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 224 289 253 111<br />

Associates & JV Inc (1) 4 4 4 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 24 24 24 24<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 29 (13) 22 24 Total Assets 3,151 3,262 3,388 3,326<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (27) 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 522 490 541 429 ST Debt 1 1 1 1<br />

Tax (86) (95) (98) (75) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 367 366 367 332<br />

Minority Interest 2 0 0 0 LT Debt 574 724 724 724<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 108 108 108 108<br />

Net Profit 437 395 443 353 Shareholder’s Equity 2,089 2,051 2,176 2,149<br />

Net Profit before Except. 464 395 443 353 Minority Interests 12 12 12 12<br />

EBITDA 582 564 578 463 Total Cap. & Liab. 3,151 3,262 3,388 3,326<br />

Sales Gth (%) 12.1 (0.2) (2.8) (12.4) Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (82) (16) (54) (165)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 14.3 (3.1) 2.5 (19.9) Net Cash/(Debt) 279 173 331 409<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 16.3 (4.2) 3.2 (22.1)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (12.4) (9.8) 12.2 (20.2)<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 16.5 19.4 18.1 17.6<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Aug 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Aug 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 522 490 541 429 Gross Margins (%) 53.1 51.7 54.5 51.9<br />

Dep. & Amort. 62 61 60 58 Opg Profit Margin (%) 40.0 38.4 40.7 36.2<br />

Tax Paid (84) (92) (95) (98) Net Profit Margin (%) 33.6 30.4 35.1 31.9<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) 1 (4) (4) (4) ROAE (%) 20.5 19.1 20.9 16.3<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (49) (69) 34 134 ROA (%) 13.8 12.3 13.3 10.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 5 0 0 0 ROCE (%) 15.5 14.2 14.2 11.0<br />

Net Operating CF 457 386 536 519 Div Payout Ratio (%) 98.9 80.4 86.0 89.8<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (55) (50) (50) (50) Net Interest Cover (x) NM 38.1 NM NM<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 133 0 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV (13) (10) (10) (10) Debtors Turn (avg days) 52.6 72.0 78.2 59.9<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 70.7 65.4 69.8 70.1<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 0 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 18.5 23.7 25.9 26.0<br />

Net Investing CF 65 (60) (60) (60) Current Ratio (x) 3.1 3.4 3.7 3.9<br />

Div Paid (433) (433) (317) (381) Quick Ratio (x) 2.9 3.2 3.6 3.7<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 0 150 0 0 Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

Capital Issues 19 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2) (0.2)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (19) 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 9.6 6.9 6.9 6.9<br />

Net Financing CF (433) (283) (317) (381) Z-Score (X) 4.3 4.3 4.8 4.8<br />

Net Cashflow 89 43 159 78 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (S cts) 17.6 10.9 20.9 25.8<br />

Opg CFPS (S cts) 31.9 28.7 31.6 24.3<br />

Free CFPS (S cts) 25.4 21.2 30.6 29.6<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Aug 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 3Q2009 FY Aug 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 346 340 287 327 Revenues (S$ m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (166) (159) (145) (152) Newspaper ops 1,046 927 954 988<br />

Gross Profit 180 181 142 176 Rental 117 117 120 118<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (47) (48) (43) (39) Property devt. 138 255 189 0<br />

Operating Profit 133 133 99 137 O<strong>the</strong>rs N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Total 1,301 1,299 1,263 1,106<br />

Associates & JV Inc (1) (2) (4) (2)<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 2 (39) (6) 12 Opg Profit (S$ m)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (27) 0 0 0 Newspaper ops 325 218 279 302<br />

Pre-tax Profit 108 92 90 147 Rental 82 83 85 84<br />

Tax (16) (21) (4) (21) Property devt. 99 182 135 0<br />

Minority Interest 1 2 1 1 O<strong>the</strong>rs 15 15 15 15<br />

Net Profit 93 73 87 127 Total 521 499 514 401<br />

Net profit bef Except. 119 73 87 127<br />

EBITDA 148 148 112 152 Opg Profit Margins (%)<br />

Newspaper ops 31.0 23.5 29.2 30.5<br />

Sales Gth (%) 0.6 (1.8) (15.6) 13.9 Rental 70.1 71.0 71.0 71.0<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (3.7) (0.3) (24.4) 35.9 Property devt. 71.6 71.6 71.6 N/A<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (4.9) (0.1) (25.2) 37.6 O<strong>the</strong>rs N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (30.6) (21.1) 19.2 45.6 Total 40.0 38.4 40.7 36.2<br />

Gross Margins (%) 52.0 53.2 49.4 53.7<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 38.4 39.1 34.6 41.8 Key Assumptions<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 26.7 21.5 30.3 38.7 Adex growth rate (%) 8 (17) 4 5<br />

Newprint (US$/mt) 601 760 580 580<br />

Ave US/SGD 1.4138 1.5300 1.5100 1.4900<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 59


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Suntec REIT<br />

Bloomberg: SUN SP | Reuters: SUNT.SI<br />

BUY S$1.12 STI : 2,672.60<br />

Price Target : 12-Month S$ 1.23<br />

Potential Catalyst: Faster recovery of <strong>the</strong> office sector<br />

Analyst<br />

MunYee LOCK +65 6398 7972<br />

munyee@dbsvickers.com<br />

More room to shine<br />

• Portfolio diversity offers resilience<br />

• Balancing weaker office rents with steadier retail<br />

rents<br />

• BUY with TP of $1.23<br />

Price Relative<br />

2.20<br />

2.00<br />

1.80<br />

1.60<br />

1.40<br />

1.20<br />

1.00<br />

0.80<br />

0.60<br />

0.40<br />

S$<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

Suntec REIT (LHS) Relative STI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Relative Index<br />

FY Dec (S$ m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Gross Revenue 294 233 231 232<br />

Net Property Inc 220 172 169 170<br />

Total Return (88) 122 101 102<br />

Distribution Inc 201 167 145 145<br />

EPU (S cts) 15.4 7.8 6.2 6.0<br />

EPU Gth (%) 140 (49) (21) (4)<br />

DPU (S cts) 13.0 10.6 8.7 8.4<br />

DPU Gth (%) 60 (18) (18) (3)<br />

NAV per shr (S cts) 197.7 204.5 203.5 200.3<br />

PE (X) 7.3 14.3 18.0 18.6<br />

Distribution Yield (%) 11.6 9.5 7.8 7.5<br />

P/NAV (x) 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6<br />

Aggregate Leverage (%) 34.7 35.0 35.0 35.2<br />

ROAE (%) 6.5 3.5 2.9 2.9<br />

218<br />

198<br />

178<br />

158<br />

138<br />

118<br />

98<br />

78<br />

58<br />

Diversified portfolio. Suntec has a well-entrenched<br />

presence in <strong>the</strong> 3 core growth corridors of Marina<br />

Centre, Raffles Place and Bras Basah areas. Its diversified<br />

portfolio of 2.9msf of retail and office properties provide<br />

a well balanced exposure to <strong>the</strong> 2 major property subsectors<br />

while limiting <strong>the</strong> volatility from <strong>the</strong> more<br />

commoditised office market.<br />

Weaker office rents offset by steadier retail rents.<br />

Office rents are expected to continue sliding but <strong>the</strong><br />

pace of decline is likely to decelerate. With expiring rents<br />

averaging $6.64psf/mth, lease renewals are likely to<br />

remain positive in FY09, although at a smaller reversion<br />

gap than before. The anticipated opening of <strong>the</strong> 2 Circle<br />

Line MRT stations from mid 2010 is expected to improve<br />

Suntec Mall’s accessability. In addition, opening of <strong>the</strong><br />

Marina Bay IR should provide a new potential pool of<br />

shopper traffic.<br />

Maintain BUY, TP $1.23. We continue to like Suntec<br />

for its healthy balance sheet with gearing of 35% and<br />

lack of near term refinancing risks. Valuation is<br />

inexpensive at 7.8% FY10 yield. Our DCF-backed TP of<br />

$1.23, based on WACC of 7.7%, beta 0.97x and<br />

terminal growth of 1.5% offers potential 10% upside<br />

from here. Maintain BUY.<br />

Distn. Inc Chng (%): (1.0) (5.8) (5.3)<br />

Consensus DPU (S cts): 10.4 8.6 7.4<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Real Estate Investment Trust<br />

Principal Business: Suntec REIT is has a portfolio of office and retail<br />

properties in Suntec City, Park Mall and Chjimes, managed by ARA<br />

Trust Management Ltd.<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,629<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 1,824 / 1,289<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Asean Investment (%) 5.7<br />

Schroder Investment (%) 4.7<br />

UBS AG (%) 4.5<br />

Free Float (%) 85.1<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 8,566<br />

Page 60<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: JS / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Suntec REIT<br />

Statement of Total Return (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Gross revenue 294 233 231 232 Investment Properties 5,304 5,334 5,353 5,346<br />

Property expenses (75) (61) (61) (63) O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 61 73 73 73<br />

Net Property Income 220 172 169 170 Cash & ST Invts 54 59 71 82<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating expenses (39) (25) (25) (24) Inventory 0 0 0 0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 2 4 4 3 Debtors 10 19 18 19<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (52) (41) (61) (62) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 3 3 3 3<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (1) 0 0 0 Total Assets 5,432 5,487 5,518 5,523<br />

Net Income 232 124 103 104<br />

Tax (3) (2) (2) (2) ST Debt 824 824 824 824<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liabilities 71 70 70 76<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 LT Debt 1,037 1,070 1,078 1,086<br />

Net Income After Tax 229 122 101 102 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 44 44 44 44<br />

Total Return (88) 122 101 102 Unit holders’ funds 3,456 3,479 3,502 3,493<br />

Non-tax deductible Items 73 45 44 44 Minority Interests 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Inc available for Dist. 201 167 145 145 Total Funds & Liabilities 5,432 5,487 5,518 5,523<br />

Revenue Gth (%) 54.7 (20.8) (1.1) 0.7 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (58) (49) (49) (55)<br />

N Property Inc Gth (%) 56.1 (21.6) (1.7) 0.3 Net Cash/(Debt) (1,807) (1,835) (1,831) (1,828)<br />

Net Inc Gth (%) 161.1 (46.6) (17.5) 0.8<br />

Dist. Payout Ratio (%) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Income 232 124 103 104 Net Prop Inc Margins (%) 74.5 73.8 73.3 73.1<br />

Dep. & Amort. 31 31 31 31 Net Income Margins (%) 77.7 52.4 43.7 43.8<br />

Tax Paid 0 (3) (5) (5) Dist to revenue (%) 68.3 71.8 63.0 62.5<br />

Associates &JV Inc/(Loss) (104) (14) (16) (17) Managers & Trustee’s fees 13.4 10.7 10.7 10.5<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 23 (11) 0 0 to sales (%)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 83 45 44 44 ROAE (%) 6.5 3.5 2.9 2.9<br />

Net Operating CF 265 172 157 157 ROA (%) 4.6 2.2 1.8 1.8<br />

Net Invt in Properties (99) (8) (8) (8) ROCE (%) 3.6 2.7 2.6 2.6<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts (net) (91) (25) 0 0 Int. Cover (x) 3.5 3.6 2.4 2.3<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV (763) 0 0 0 Current Ratio (x) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1<br />

Div from Assoc. & JVs 0 0 0 0 Quick ratio (x) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 30 0 0 0 Aggregate Leverage (%) 34.7 35.0 35.0 35.2<br />

Net Investing CF (924) (33) (8) (8) Z-Score (X) 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1<br />

Distribution Paid (187) (167) (145) (145) Operating CFPS (S cts) 16.3 11.7 9.7 9.2<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 955 33 8 8 Free CFPS (S cts) 11.1 10.5 9.2 8.8<br />

New units issued 0 0 0 0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (71) 0 0 0<br />

Net Financing CF 696 (134) (137) (137)<br />

Net Cashflow 37 5 12 11<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m)<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009<br />

Gross revenue 61 63 65 65<br />

Property expenses (16) (16) (16) (16)<br />

Net Property Income 46 48 49 49<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating expenses (8) (9) (7) (7)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 6 7 7 7<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (17) (11) (9) (6)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (7) (9) (6) (19)<br />

Net Income 24 (40) 36 24<br />

Tax 0 (1) (1) (1)<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Income after Tax 23 (40) 35 23<br />

Total Return 56 (369) 35 23<br />

Non-tax deductible Items (12) 19 11 25<br />

Net Inc available for Dist. 44 44 46 48<br />

Revenue Gth (%) 4 3 2 (1)<br />

N Property Inc Gth (%) (1) 5 3 (1)<br />

Net Inc Gth (%) (60) (274) (187) (34)<br />

Net Prop Inc Margin (%) 74.2 75.5 75.7 75.6<br />

Dist. Payout Ratio (%) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0<br />

P/Bk NAV<br />

(x)<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 61


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

UOB<br />

Bloomberg: UOB SP | Reuters: UOBH.SI<br />

BUY S$17.00 STI : 2,672.60<br />

Price Target : 12-month S$ 18.60<br />

Potential Catalyst: Book value recovery, room for lower provisions and<br />

ROE to normalise.<br />

Analyst<br />

Sue Lin Lim +603 2711 0971<br />

suelin@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Price Relative<br />

25.40<br />

23.40<br />

21.40<br />

19.40<br />

17.40<br />

15.40<br />

13.40<br />

11.40<br />

9.40<br />

7.40<br />

S$<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

UOB (LHS) Relative STI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

Relative Index<br />

FY Dec (S$ m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 3,190 3,117 3,179 3,348<br />

Net Profit 1,937 1,657 1,946 2,340<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 1,937 1,657 1,946 2,340<br />

EPS (S cts) 128.1 109.6 128.7 154.7<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 128.1 109.6 128.7 154.7<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (7) (14) 17 20<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 128.1 109.6 128.7 154.7<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 13.3 15.5 13.2 11.0<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 59.7 54.8 64.4 77.4<br />

Div Yield (%) 3.5 3.2 3.8 4.6<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. (%) 12.6 10.7 11.4 12.9<br />

ROAE (%) 12.6 10.7 11.4 12.9<br />

ROA (%) 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 943 1,097 1,161 1,238<br />

P/Book Value (x) 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 113.4 132.8 150.2<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Banks<br />

Principal Business: Financials<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

219<br />

199<br />

179<br />

159<br />

139<br />

119<br />

99<br />

79<br />

On track for recovery<br />

• Operationally sound with selective interest in<br />

regional expansion.<br />

• ‘Normalised’ provisions levels should lift earnings<br />

and ROEs.<br />

• Key near term catalyst lies in <strong>the</strong> re-rating of its<br />

book value.<br />

Operationally sound. UOB remains operationally sound<br />

with pre-provision profits remaining robust up to 1H09<br />

despite going through a tough operating environment<br />

over <strong>the</strong> last 6-12 months. NIMs are expected to remain<br />

flattish for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> year with competition reemerging<br />

and corporate and SME loan spreads peaking.<br />

Positively, specific provisions have begun to taper off and<br />

we believe NPLs would peak by year-end. UOB remains<br />

selective in its regional expansion. It has a well-established<br />

exposure in Malaysia and Indonesia, while it aims to<br />

entrench its presence in China.<br />

Conservatism in provisions will pay off. UOB remains<br />

conservative as it continues to build its collective<br />

impairment reserves for <strong>the</strong> year. However, with <strong>the</strong><br />

impending economic recovery, we believe collective<br />

impairments would not be a feature in FY10, which<br />

implies a strong earnings recovery in FY10. This would be<br />

a key re-rating for UOB’s earnings and ROEs. Our FY10-11<br />

provision charge-off rate assumptions of 74bps and 40bps<br />

may still appear high compared to UOB’s historical<br />

‘normalised’ levels of 26bps.<br />

ROE re-rating by 2011. We expect FY09 earnings to<br />

remain sluggish with collective impairment building up.<br />

But, 2010 could be a year of earnings recovery, and we<br />

believe earnings and ROEs should normalize by 2011.<br />

UOB’s sustainable ROE of 13% stacks up better than its<br />

peers. UOB’s near term catalyst lies in its book recovery.<br />

Up to 1H09, UOB’s book value has recovered by 12%<br />

since it deteriorated in 4Q08. UOB’s stronger domestic<br />

market share for loans bodes well with <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

recovery play in 2010.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,524<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 25,909 / 18,314<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Wee Investment (%) 7.4<br />

Wah Hin & Co Pte (%) 5.3<br />

Free Float (%) 87.3<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 3,493<br />

Page 62<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: YM / sa: TW


Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

UOB<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 3,576 3,773 4,000 4,280 Cash/Bank Balance 20,290 20,884 22,346 23,910<br />

Non-Interest Income 1,675 1,632 1,708 1,864 Government <strong>Securities</strong> 11,310 12,215 13,192 14,247<br />

Operating Income 5,251 5,405 5,708 6,144 Inter Bank Assets 15,196 16,828 17,791 18,888<br />

Operating Expenses (2,061) (2,288) (2,529) (2,796) Total Net Loans & Advs. 99,840 102,549 108,417 115,102<br />

Pre-provision Profit 3,190 3,117 3,179 3,348 Investment 15,813 16,244 17,171 18,226<br />

Provisions (807) (1,112) (799) (461) Associates 1,096 1,188 1,271 1,346<br />

Associates 103 92 83 75 Fixed Assets 2,094 2,020 2,020 2,020<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0 Goodwill 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,486 2,097 2,464 2,961 O<strong>the</strong>r Assets 13,091 5,127 5,421 5,755<br />

Taxation (521) (398) (468) (563) Total Assets 182,941 181,266 191,839 203,706<br />

Minority Interests (27) (42) (49) (59) Customer Deposits 118,171 126,443 135,294 144,765<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 Inter Bank Deposits 28,452 23,638 24,034 24,293<br />

Net Profit 1,937 1,657 1,946 2,340 Debts/Borrowings 6,246 6,246 6,246 6,246<br />

Net Profit bef Except 1,937 1,657 1,946 2,340 O<strong>the</strong>rs 14,353 6,850 7,153 8,062<br />

Minorities 146 188 237 296<br />

Shareholders' Funds 15,573 17,901 18,875 20,044<br />

Total Liab& S/H’s Funds 182,941 181,266 191,839 203,706<br />

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios (%) Financial Stability Measures (%)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Margins, Costs & Efficiency<br />

Balance Sheet Structure<br />

Yld. On Earnings Assets 4.36 3.25 3.28 3.29 Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 86.3 83.3 82.3 81.5<br />

Avg Cost Of Funds 2.14 1.04 1.08 1.07 Net Loans / Total Assets 54.6 56.6 56.5 56.5<br />

Spread 2.21 2.20 2.20 2.22 Investment / Total Assets 8.6 9.0 9.0 8.9<br />

Net Interest Margin 2.27 2.28 2.30 2.32 Cust . Dep./Int. Bear. Liab. 77.3 80.9 81.7 82.6<br />

Cost-to-Income Ratio 39.2 42.3 44.3 45.5 Interbank Dep / Int. Bear. 18.6 15.1 14.5 13.9<br />

Employees ( Year End) 24,323 26,756 29,431 32,374 Asset Quality<br />

Effective Tax Rate 21.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 NPL / Total Gross Loans 2.0 2.7 3.0 2.9<br />

Business Mix NPL / Total Assets 1.1 1.6 1.7 1.7<br />

Net Int. Inc / Opg Inc. 68.1 69.8 70.1 69.7 Capital Strength<br />

Non-Int. Inc / Opg inc. 31.9 30.2 29.9 30.3 Total CAR 12.5 14.9 15.2 15.2<br />

Fee Inc / Opg Income 20.9 20.0 20.1 20.1 Tier-1 CAR 8.7 10.6 10.7 10.9<br />

Oth Non-Int Inc/Opg Inc 11.0 10.2 9.9 10.2 Growth<br />

Profitability Total Net Loans 8 3 6 6<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. 12.6 10.7 11.4 12.9 Customer Deposits 10 7 7 7<br />

ROAE 12.6 10.7 11.4 12.9<br />

ROA Pre Ex. 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2<br />

ROA 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$m)<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009<br />

Net Interest Income 893 957 949 908<br />

Non-Interest Income 320 391 435 550<br />

Operating Income 1,213 1,348 1,384 1,458<br />

Operating Expenses (507) (533) (493) (523)<br />

Pre-Provision Profit 706 815 891 935<br />

Provisions (158) (381) (378) (465)<br />

Associates 32 14 10 32<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0<br />

Pretax Profit 580 448 523 502<br />

Taxation (97) (109) (112) (23)<br />

Minority Interests (9) (7) (2) (8)<br />

Net Profit 475 332 409 470<br />

Rolling Forward P/BV Band<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

+2 SD<br />

+1 SD<br />

Mean<br />

-1 SD<br />

-2 SD<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 63


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Hong Kong/China<br />

Party continues<br />

While becoming a new stock market driver, <strong>the</strong> latest<br />

USD carry trade may quicken <strong>the</strong> return of inflation and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n exit from Quantitative Easing. High volatility will<br />

continue, substantially driven by speculation of<br />

government policies, still mixed economic data points<br />

and USD direction. While we continue believing stock<br />

market expectation is too good to be true, pair trade<br />

remains our preferred strategy.<br />

Triggered by <strong>the</strong> Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII) news, although<br />

basically irrelevant, <strong>the</strong> resumption of speculation of favourable policies before<br />

China’s 60 th anniversary has brought about ano<strong>the</strong>r major short-squeeze. While <strong>the</strong><br />

widespread USD carry trade came as a surprise, USD direction will become a major<br />

determinant of stock market performance in 4Q09.<br />

We continue to expect <strong>the</strong> earliest time for major correction to be late 2009 or<br />

early 2010 for <strong>the</strong> fact that economic statistics will continue to be satisfactory<br />

before <strong>the</strong>n while it is pre-mature for any tightening to emerge on investors’ radar<br />

screen.<br />

Without one of <strong>the</strong> four major catalysts kicking in, <strong>the</strong>re continue to be strong<br />

liquidity support at around 18,000-19,000 Hang Seng Index level. However, 14,000<br />

level continues to be our “worst case” 12-month support level when <strong>the</strong>se<br />

catalyst(s) emerge.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> big caps for long-only funds, we like MTRC (66 HK), Sinopec (386 HK),<br />

China Railway Group (390 HK), Bank of China Hong Kong (2388 HK) and Bank of<br />

China (3988 HK)<br />

Derek Cheung (852) 2971 1703 derek_cheung@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Page 64<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: LM / sa: TW


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

Index Close Chng -1 mth -3 mth -6 mth - 12 mth<br />

52-Week<br />

17-Sep-09 Net 1 m (%) (%) (%) (%) High Low<br />

Hang Seng 21,769 1631 8 20 69 23 21,930 10,676<br />

HS China Ent 12,668 1273 11 18 69 46 12,815 4,792<br />

HS China Aff 4,080 -28 -1 7 37 26 4,457 2,173<br />

HS Mid Cap 4,317 337 8 20 76 27 4,326 2,065<br />

HS Small Cap 2,284 306 15 31 115 28 2,295 832<br />

Transactions:<br />

YTD<br />

Volume (bn shs) 16,897<br />

Value (HK$bn) 10,821<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

3Q09 Review<br />

Volatility of Hang Seng (HS) Index increased substantially driven<br />

initially by fur<strong>the</strong>r improvement in sentiment towards US<br />

economic outlook, followed by fear towards China liquidity<br />

tightening, <strong>the</strong>n by speculation of favourable policies before<br />

<strong>the</strong> 60 th anniversary of China and by <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r weakening of<br />

USD. Beside stretched valuation, probably due to large number<br />

of IPOs, and concern about exit timing/strategy from global<br />

quantitative easing, market turnover has continued to fall. USD<br />

carry trade has become a new source of funding for <strong>the</strong> equity<br />

market.<br />

The Hang Seng Index and Hang Seng China Enterprises Index<br />

(HSCEI) gained 20% and 18% respectively in 3Q09. From <strong>the</strong><br />

trough in Oct 08, <strong>the</strong> HSI and HSCEI have rebounded by over<br />

98% and 154% respectively.<br />

China economic growth continues to be substantially driven by<br />

pump-priming through fixed asset investment. Consumption<br />

growth remains stable while exports and foreign direct<br />

investment (FDI) remain in downward trend. The August FDI<br />

showed 7% YoY growth, first positive growth in 7 months, but<br />

<strong>the</strong> PRC government officials indicated this was due more to<br />

<strong>the</strong> low-base effect.<br />

Among HS Index constituent sectors, Commerce and Industry<br />

and Hongs/Conglomerates were <strong>the</strong> best performing sectors,<br />

gaining 35% and 28% in <strong>the</strong> quarter respectively.<br />

HSI Sectors Performance - 3Q<br />

Sector<br />

% gain<br />

Comm/Ind 35%<br />

Hongs/Conglomerates 28%<br />

Properties 24%<br />

Banking and Finance 22%<br />

Power, Infra & Utilities 11%<br />

Telecom 4%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

HS Index & HSCEI – Past 1 year<br />

26,000<br />

24,000<br />

250-day MA<br />

HSI<br />

22,000<br />

20,000<br />

18,000<br />

16,000<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

50-day MA<br />

10,000<br />

Sep-08 Dec-08 Mar-09 Jun-09 Sep-09<br />

16,000<br />

14,000<br />

250-day MA<br />

HSCEI<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

50-day MA<br />

4,000<br />

Sep-08 Dec-08 Mar-09 Jun-09 Sep-09<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

Page 65


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Outlook – Meaningful correction unavoidable<br />

We continue to believe <strong>the</strong> stock market is due for a<br />

meaningful correction (Hang Seng Index returning to around<br />

14,000) as <strong>the</strong> equity market has been way too much ahead of<br />

<strong>the</strong> fundamentals driven by (1) expensive valuation and (2)<br />

appearance of ei<strong>the</strong>r one of <strong>the</strong> following four events (in order<br />

of probability) happening:<br />

<br />

<br />

US economic disappointment. Market may become less<br />

optimistic on global economic outlook causing<br />

significant flight to safety, ie US Treasuries. The resulting<br />

USD technical rebound <strong>the</strong>n brings down equity and<br />

commodity markets. This chain reaction was seen in <strong>the</strong><br />

17 August correction.<br />

China economic disappointment. Although our<br />

economist believes China is on a recovery path, any sign<br />

that China may not be able to decouple from <strong>the</strong> US and<br />

that its 2010 economic growth may be slower could<br />

trigger a meaningful correction. Although we believe<br />

China can still increase its pump-priming through its<br />

significant amount of reserves, it would likely happen<br />

after a major or a series of disappointment in <strong>the</strong> US or<br />

its economic conditions in order to avoid fur<strong>the</strong>r inflating<br />

<strong>the</strong> stock and property market overheating.<br />

<br />

<br />

US economic data remains mixed. No government would<br />

do anything, ie liquidity remains abundant supporting<br />

<strong>the</strong> currently over-valued stock market. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

stock market will continue to be volatile and range<br />

bound.<br />

The widespread USD carry trade came as a surprise,<br />

which has provided significant amount of new liquidity<br />

to <strong>the</strong> stock market. If <strong>the</strong> USD continues to weaken, we<br />

will likely see a longer stock market rally. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

resulting inflationary pressure will make interest rate hike<br />

more pending.<br />

As discussed in <strong>the</strong> recent extensive roadshow, economic data<br />

will continue to be satisfactory in 3Q2009 while it is still premature<br />

for any tightening to be implemented. The earliest time<br />

for major correction will only be towards <strong>the</strong> end of 2009 or<br />

early 2010.<br />

Differing from our regional strategist’s view, <strong>the</strong> author<br />

continues to believe in W-shape recovery. Even if <strong>the</strong> author<br />

were wrong, it would likely be that <strong>the</strong> correction may be more<br />

remote (> 12 months) than he had anticipated, not whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong>re would be a meaningful correction or not.<br />

2010 GDP growth should be <strong>the</strong> focus<br />

<br />

<br />

China economic tightening. Although <strong>the</strong> policy<br />

direction has certainly reversed towards tightening, we<br />

continue to believe China will remain passive and any<br />

meaningful tightening will happen only after China is<br />

comfortable US is firmly on a recovery path.<br />

Exit from global quantitative easing. There seems to be<br />

more talks about exit strategy and timing both in <strong>the</strong><br />

media and by some US officials. With <strong>the</strong> experience<br />

learnt from <strong>the</strong> US Great Depression and Japanese<br />

bubble burst, we continue to believe this will likely be<br />

more remote than many believe. The situation would be<br />

even worse if <strong>the</strong> exit is driven by return of inflation as<br />

some fear for, ra<strong>the</strong>r than economic recovery.<br />

Attaining 8% GDP growth for China in 2009 is probably a<br />

done deal. The market focus will gradually shift towards<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r 2010 GDP growth outlook will maintain or grow. <strong>DBS</strong><br />

economist expects 8% and 9% GDP growth in 2009 and 2010<br />

respectively.<br />

China real GDP Growth<br />

Yoy, %<br />

14<br />

13<br />

12<br />

11<br />

Strong support except for <strong>the</strong> above catalysts<br />

We acknowledge that <strong>the</strong>re is a significant amount of liquidity<br />

in <strong>the</strong> system. If we do not see major catalyst like any of <strong>the</strong><br />

above, <strong>the</strong>re would be strong support for <strong>the</strong> Hang Seng Index<br />

at 18,000-19,000 level.<br />

Scenarios that could make our call wrong<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

1Q06<br />

2Q06<br />

3Q06<br />

4Q06<br />

1Q07<br />

2Q07<br />

3Q07<br />

4Q07<br />

1Q08<br />

2Q08<br />

3Q08<br />

4Q08<br />

1Q09<br />

2Q09F<br />

3Q09F<br />

4Q09F<br />

1Q10F<br />

2Q10F<br />

<br />

Sharp V-shape global recovery. If this were to happen,<br />

<strong>the</strong> excitement towards global economic outlook will<br />

more than offset <strong>the</strong> negative impact from liquidity<br />

tightening by China and global central banks.<br />

Source: CEIC, <strong>DBS</strong> Economics <strong>Research</strong><br />

The “decoupling” of Chinese economy so far has substantially<br />

been driven by significant credit expansion driving fixed asset<br />

investment, which may be at <strong>the</strong> expense of creating<br />

Page 66


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

overcapacity problems in <strong>the</strong> long-run. Understanding <strong>the</strong><br />

stock market may find it too early to start pricing in <strong>the</strong> risk of<br />

potential non-performing loans in a few years time, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

seems to be a need for fine-tuning of <strong>the</strong> pace and intensity of<br />

new credit creation.<br />

China fixed asset investments<br />

RMB m %<br />

3,000,000<br />

45<br />

2,500,000<br />

40<br />

35<br />

2,000,000<br />

30<br />

1,500,000<br />

25<br />

20<br />

1,000,000<br />

15<br />

500,000<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Source: CEIC,<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

China FAI<br />

Yoy % growth<br />

Pre-mature for material tightening expectation<br />

We continue to believe stock market fear towards material<br />

liquidity tightening in China in <strong>the</strong> near future is pre-mature.<br />

China will remain passive, awaiting concrete evidence of a<br />

sustainable US economic recovery, in determining <strong>the</strong> timing of<br />

liquidity tightening.<br />

China export<br />

US$m %<br />

150,000<br />

60<br />

50<br />

100,000<br />

40<br />

30<br />

50,000<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0<br />

(10)<br />

(50,000)<br />

(20)<br />

(30)<br />

(100,000)<br />

(40)<br />

Source: CEIC,<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

China exports<br />

Yoy % growth<br />

China utilized FDI<br />

US$m %<br />

27,000<br />

120<br />

22,000<br />

100<br />

17,000<br />

80<br />

60<br />

12,000<br />

40<br />

7,000<br />

20<br />

2,000<br />

0<br />

(3,000)<br />

(20)<br />

(8,000)<br />

(40)<br />

(13,000)<br />

(60)<br />

Source: CEIC,<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

China utilized FDI<br />

Yoy % growth<br />

The availability of short-term loans at low interest rates<br />

encourages individuals and corporates to take speculative risks<br />

in both <strong>the</strong> equity and property markets, which will likely be<br />

<strong>the</strong> focus of any Chinese policy shift. The sharp 28% YoY jump<br />

in corporate deposits alongside <strong>the</strong> 27% YoY fall in SOE profits<br />

in <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> year imply that <strong>the</strong> surge of funds at<br />

corporate accounts most likely originated from bank credit.<br />

China loan growth<br />

2008: 4,904<br />

2009F: 9,208<br />

2010F: 6,524<br />

(RMBbn)<br />

1,800<br />

1,600<br />

1,400<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

(200)<br />

(400)<br />

1Q09: 4,580 (50% of total)<br />

2Q09: 2,787 (30% of total)<br />

3Q09F: 1,100 (12% of total)<br />

4Q09F: 742 (8% of total)<br />

804<br />

243<br />

283<br />

464<br />

319<br />

332<br />

382<br />

272<br />

375<br />

182<br />

477<br />

772<br />

592<br />

665<br />

356<br />

410<br />

Jan-08<br />

Feb-08<br />

Mar-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

May-08<br />

Jun-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Aug-08<br />

Sep-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Nov-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Feb-09<br />

Mar-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

May-09<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Source: CEIC, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

1,620<br />

1,070<br />

1,890<br />

Retail<br />

Medium/LT & o<strong>the</strong>r enterprise<br />

Discounted bills<br />

ST enterprise loans<br />

1,530<br />

Page 67


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Our economist is confident that <strong>the</strong> Chinese authorities will not<br />

slow down medium-to-long term loans (tenors ranging from<br />

3yrs-5yrs) too much as 52% of outstanding loans in <strong>the</strong> state<br />

banking sector were used for financing long-term fiscal<br />

projects. Sudden withdrawal of credit support will jeopardize<br />

<strong>the</strong> progress of <strong>the</strong>se projects and create enormous amounts<br />

of economic wastage. In fact, projects such as railway<br />

construction will not start to yield economic value-added until<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are completed and fully functional. As such, our<br />

economist does not expect as increase in interest rates nor<br />

reserve requirement ratio for <strong>the</strong> remainder of <strong>the</strong> year. The<br />

CNY should also remain stable and trade in a tight range in<br />

4Q09.<br />

China M1 and M2 growth<br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Jan-00<br />

Jan-01<br />

Source: CEIC<br />

Jan-02<br />

Jan-03<br />

Jan-04<br />

M1<br />

Jan-05<br />

Jan-06<br />

Retail consumption growth remains stable<br />

Jan-07<br />

M2<br />

Jan-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Retail sales growth has been relatively stable at around 15%<br />

YoY in <strong>the</strong> past few months despite a series of favourable<br />

policies, eg subsidizing home appliance purchases for rural<br />

areas.<br />

Chinese consumers are still saving despite economic and wage<br />

growths. Saving deposits are still advancing at an average rate<br />

of 29% YoY in <strong>the</strong> first seven months of this year, up<br />

significantly from 11.3% YoY in <strong>the</strong> same period last year.<br />

Such strong saving bias amidst a low interest rate environment<br />

suggests that it is difficult to rely solely on private consumption<br />

to propel economic growth in <strong>the</strong> short-run.<br />

China retail sales<br />

RMB bn %<br />

1,200<br />

25<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Jan-07<br />

Source: CEIC,<br />

Apr-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

China Retail Sales<br />

Hong Kong quick turnaround<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Yoy % growth<br />

While a low-interest rate environment may be instrumental in<br />

driving a quick economic turnaround, <strong>the</strong> strong inflow of<br />

liquidity from mainland China as a partial result of its lax credit<br />

policy may play an even bigger role. Downward price<br />

adjustment in <strong>the</strong> current downturn has been <strong>the</strong> mildest<br />

amongst o<strong>the</strong>r major crisis in <strong>the</strong> past decade<br />

In <strong>the</strong> near-term, both <strong>the</strong> Fed and <strong>the</strong> PBOC are likely to<br />

refrain from raising interest rates, not until <strong>the</strong>y see sustainable<br />

domestic-demand recovery. Under <strong>the</strong> growth assumptions of<br />

10% (QoQ, saar) and 5% (QoQ, saar) in 3Q09 and 4Q09<br />

respectively, projection of real GDP growth for 2009 has been<br />

revised upward by our economist to -2.4% YoY from <strong>the</strong><br />

previous forecast of -6.5% YoY. It is expected to continue to<br />

grow at 5.5% YoY in 2010.<br />

Jul-09<br />

Material earnings upgrade based on mid-cycle outlook<br />

Our analysts have upgraded <strong>the</strong> earnings of various sectors<br />

based on mid-cycle outlook, which is consistent with our<br />

regional strategist’s outlook. Within <strong>the</strong> HS Index, <strong>the</strong> biggest<br />

upward adjustment came from Banking and Property sectors<br />

while Commodity, Banking and Consumer sectors were<br />

upgraded <strong>the</strong> most among <strong>the</strong> HSCEI constituents.<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Page 68


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Earnings upgrade – Hang Seng Index constituents<br />

Aggregate earnings for HSI<br />

2010F Earnings<br />

Sector 3Q 4Q Chg<br />

HK$m HK$m %<br />

HK$m 2008<br />

08A<br />

%<br />

09F % 10F %<br />

Chg 2009 Chg 2010 Chg<br />

Banking and Finance 171,594 204,989 19<br />

Power, Infra & Utilities 71,912 76,524 6<br />

Properties 31,597 32,872 4<br />

Hongs/Conglomerates 17,723 19,606 11<br />

Comm/Ind 14,592 15,179 4<br />

Telecom 49,893 45,968 (8)<br />

Total 357,311 395,138 11<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

Earnings upgrade – HSCEI Index constituents<br />

2010F Earnings<br />

Sector 3Q 4Q Chg<br />

HK$m HK$m %<br />

Consumers 2,029 2,373 17<br />

Energy 49,801 54,013 8<br />

Financials 109,959 150,050 36<br />

Industrial Goods 1,192 1,097 (8)<br />

Information Technolgy n.a. 1,086 n.a.<br />

Materials 4,206 6,205 48<br />

Utilities 2,206 2,205 (0)<br />

Property & Construction 10,606 10,862 2<br />

Services 1,695 980 (42)<br />

Telecom & Technology 5,272 5,105 (3)<br />

Total 186,967 233,976 25<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

Finance 131,154 -42 158,148 21 204,959 30<br />

Infra & Utilities 65,118 -10 60,938 -6 76,524 26<br />

Properties 29,212 -23 31,671 8 32,872 4<br />

Conglomerates 10,701 -69 15,510 45 19,465 25<br />

Comm/Ind 7,918 -57 11,264 42 15,170 35<br />

Telecom & Media 49,975 34 44,263 -11 45,968 4<br />

HSI Total 294,079 -31 321,794 9 394,957 23<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

After <strong>the</strong> latest round of earnings upgrade based on our<br />

regional strategist’s outlook, <strong>DBS</strong> expects 23% and 36% 2010<br />

earnings growth for HS Index and HSCEI respectively.<br />

Aggregate earnings for HSCEI<br />

HK$m 2008<br />

08A<br />

%<br />

Chg 2009<br />

09F %<br />

Chg 2010<br />

10F %<br />

Chg<br />

Consumer 1,720 9 2,124 23 2,382 12<br />

Energy 33,322 -19 38,757 16 48,917 26<br />

Financials 95,759 17 114,244 19 150,014 31<br />

Industrial Goods 1,297 -22 1,037 -20 1,097 6<br />

Info Technology 450 -36 815 81 1,086 33<br />

Materials 1,068 -90 3,606 238 11,304 213<br />

Utilities -888 -130 1,844 nm 2,205 20<br />

Ppty & Construc 5,936 -2 8,354 41 10,862 30<br />

Services 4,921 -61 -1,998 -141 980 -149<br />

Telecom & Tech 696 -87 3,686 430 5,105 39<br />

HSCEI Total 144,281 -12 172,468 20 233,953 36<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

Valuations<br />

The Hang Seng Index and HSCEI are now trading at 17.5x and<br />

18.1x FY09 PER, respectively, versus 5-year, 10-year and 20-<br />

year HSI average PER of about 14-15x. The PER for <strong>the</strong>se also<br />

compares with <strong>the</strong> peak PER of around 19x in 1997, 2000 and<br />

2007 “bubbles”. Assuming <strong>the</strong> forecast 23% for HS Index and<br />

36% for HSCEI earnings growth in 2010 is achievable, 2010<br />

PER for HSI and HSCEI would <strong>the</strong>n be 14.2x and 13.3x<br />

respectively.<br />

Page 69


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Hang Seng Index – PE Band<br />

Hang Seng China Enterprises Index – PE Band<br />

33,000<br />

28,000<br />

23,000<br />

18,000<br />

13,000<br />

8,000<br />

3,000<br />

Dec-90<br />

Dec-91<br />

Dec-92<br />

Dec-93<br />

Dec-94<br />

Dec-95<br />

Dec-96<br />

Dec-97<br />

Dec-98<br />

Dec-99<br />

Dec-00<br />

Dec-01<br />

Dec-02<br />

Dec-03<br />

Dec-04<br />

Dec-05<br />

Dec-06<br />

Dec-07<br />

Dec-08<br />

Dec-09<br />

22x<br />

19x<br />

15x<br />

12x<br />

9x<br />

25,500<br />

20,500<br />

28x<br />

23x<br />

15,500<br />

18x<br />

10,500<br />

13x<br />

5,500<br />

7x<br />

500<br />

Dec-01<br />

Jul-02<br />

Feb-03<br />

Sep-03<br />

Apr-04<br />

Nov-04<br />

Jun-05<br />

Jan-06<br />

Aug-06<br />

Mar-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

May-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Jul-09<br />

Feb-10<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

While normally being used as a benchmark for bottom-fishing<br />

in bear market, HS Index FY09 PBV is now trading at 2.04x,<br />

versus 5-year and 10-year averages of 1.93x and 1.94x<br />

respectively.<br />

Hang Seng Index – PBV Band<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

HSCEI PER and PBV are now at 18.5x and 2.4x, versus <strong>the</strong><br />

respective averages of 17.2x and 1.74x since its inception in<br />

2001.<br />

Hang Seng China Enterprises Index – PBV Band<br />

36,000<br />

31,000<br />

26,000<br />

21,000<br />

16,000<br />

11,000<br />

6,000<br />

Jan-99<br />

Aug-99<br />

Mar-00<br />

Oct-00<br />

May-01<br />

Dec-01<br />

Jul-02<br />

Feb-03<br />

Sep-03<br />

Apr-04<br />

Nov-04<br />

Jun-05<br />

Jan-06<br />

Aug-06<br />

Mar-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

May-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Jul-09<br />

Feb-10<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

3.1x<br />

2.6x<br />

2.1x<br />

1.6x<br />

1.1x<br />

30,500<br />

25,500<br />

20,500<br />

15,500<br />

10,500<br />

5,500<br />

500<br />

Jan-01<br />

Aug-01<br />

Mar-02<br />

Oct-02<br />

May-03<br />

Dec-03<br />

Jul-04<br />

Feb-05<br />

Sep-05<br />

Apr-06<br />

Nov-06<br />

Jun-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Aug-08<br />

Mar-09<br />

Oct-09<br />

May-10<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

4.5x<br />

3.6x<br />

2.6x<br />

1.6x<br />

0.6x<br />

Lack momentum post earnings upgrades<br />

While it is not always reliable to use forward PER and PBV as an<br />

investment tool given that consensus tends to overreact when<br />

<strong>the</strong> market is up as well as down, <strong>the</strong> following charts show<br />

you <strong>the</strong> current consensus forward PER and PBV versus history.<br />

Besides, share prices rises post material consensus earnings<br />

upgrades in 3Q09 had been dis-proportionally small implying<br />

stock market had priced <strong>the</strong>se upgrades in way before actual<br />

upgrades.<br />

Page 70


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Hang Seng forward PE (consensus)<br />

x<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Average: 13.5x<br />

Jan-80<br />

Jan-82<br />

Jan-84<br />

Jan-86<br />

Jan-88<br />

Jan-90<br />

Jan-92<br />

Jan-94<br />

Jan-96<br />

Jan-98<br />

Jan-00<br />

Jan-02<br />

Jan-04<br />

Jan-06<br />

Jan-08<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Hang Seng forward PBV (consensus)<br />

(x)<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

Strategy<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

+2SD<br />

2001<br />

+1SD<br />

Mean<br />

2003<br />

-2SD<br />

2005<br />

-1SD<br />

Market will remain highly volatile with lack of visibility in 4Q09.<br />

Pair trades remain our preferred strategy while long-only funds<br />

should adopt a defensive strategy.<br />

Defensive despite continuously strong liquidity.<br />

The railway construction sector will likely outperform even<br />

when <strong>the</strong> expected stock market correction and USD technical<br />

rebound present, given that RMB600bn has been earmarked<br />

for railway infrastructure development this year. Infrastructure<br />

investment is expected to peak towards end 2010 or early<br />

2011. 1H09’s project starts should start to generate profits in<br />

2007<br />

2009<br />

2H09 which should in turn lift overall GP margin. We like<br />

China Railway Group (390 HK) for this sector.<br />

Property sector<br />

The Hong Kong property sector should remain relatively<br />

resilient as any meaningful interest rate hike is unlikely in <strong>the</strong><br />

foreseeable future. Luxury projects have been in <strong>the</strong> spotlight<br />

and local investors and speculators have been returning,<br />

boosting both prices and take-up rate. Developers should<br />

return to expansion mode soon. Office rents remain on <strong>the</strong><br />

decline albeit on a moderating path. Capital values have<br />

rebounded while property investors are fairly priced in terms of<br />

valuation. We like MTRC (66 HK) for this sector.<br />

As for Chinese property sector, we believe <strong>the</strong> Chinese<br />

government’s real estate policy will remain favourable as it<br />

aims to increase new supply to control <strong>the</strong> pace of property<br />

price growth. The recovery of <strong>the</strong> domestic economy would<br />

support <strong>the</strong> growth of <strong>the</strong> sector going forward. Given that<br />

property prices will be on a moderate uptrend rate while sales<br />

volume will remain above <strong>the</strong> monthly average of 2007, this<br />

will pave way for decent 2010 earnings growth for majority of<br />

developers. We like CR Land (1109 HK), Shimao (813 HK) and<br />

Shui On Land (272 HK).<br />

Banking sector<br />

Most Hong Kong banks have guided for a more optimistic<br />

2H09 and 2010, especially with opportunities for <strong>the</strong>ir China<br />

operations given an expected slowdown in loan growth among<br />

Chinese banks in 2H09. Resilient asset quality and more write<br />

backs on securities are expected. We believe some mild rate<br />

hikes in <strong>the</strong> US sometime next year, as per our economist’s<br />

forecast, should help improve Hong Kong banks’ NIM going<br />

forward.<br />

Our banking analyst believes Chinese banks can expect<br />

‘moderately loose’ monetary policies to remain and only<br />

market tools ra<strong>the</strong>r than administrative measures to be used to<br />

fine-tune sector. Loan quota policy is unlikely and any loan<br />

decelerating in 2H09 should not be regarded as tightening of<br />

policy. Banks’ valuations will re-rate despite interest rate hikes,<br />

as rate hikes usually go along with good economic outlook and<br />

improving NIM. Chinese banks are still cheap at below midcycle<br />

valuations. We like Bank of China HK (2388 HK) and<br />

Bank of China (3988 HK).<br />

Telecoms Equipment Sector<br />

The China telecom equipment sector shows promising growth<br />

potential given <strong>the</strong> hundreds of billions of RMB in <strong>the</strong> telecom<br />

equipment market which we believe will give <strong>the</strong> sector scope<br />

for continuous re-rating. The sector has been trading at a<br />

discount in terms of valuation.<br />

Page 71


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

CCS (552 HK) is our sector top pick, for its attractive valuation<br />

and great long-term growth potential from <strong>the</strong> tower sharing<br />

measure in China. We also like CITIC 1616 (1883 HK) , for its<br />

steady earnings growth and low risk exposure. Comba (2342<br />

HK) is our long-term sector pick, as we see sustainable earnings<br />

growth for <strong>the</strong> next five years.<br />

Consumer - F&B<br />

Our analyst believes current valuation premiums for China F&B<br />

are likely to remain. 1H09 F&B results were generally inline or<br />

above expectations. Besides lower material costs, improvement<br />

in product mix was also seen especially in market leaders.<br />

Rebounds in raw material prices and fuel costs were noted but<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir levels were still below that of last year, hence positive<br />

margin impact should sustain into 2H09. Better earnings<br />

visibility is also seen with resilient demand for most F&B<br />

products. We recommend investors to focus on those with<br />

lagging valuations such as China Yurun (1068 HK) and China<br />

Mengniu (2319 HK).<br />

Consumer - Retail<br />

For retail in China market, sales expansion of most sectors has<br />

been seen, indicating <strong>the</strong> Chinese retail environment continues<br />

to recover. As fundamental improvement sets in, current<br />

valuations of selective retailers could potentially consolidate to<br />

remerge for better share price performance in <strong>the</strong> medium<br />

term.<br />

Retail sales in Hong Kong however, remains in <strong>the</strong> doldrums.<br />

As improvement seen in <strong>the</strong> local stock and property markets<br />

has yet to translate into real benefits for <strong>the</strong> economy. Given<br />

lack of any clear catalyst, our preference remains on those with<br />

better earnings visibilities such as Café de Coral (341 HK).<br />

Toll Road Sector<br />

The PRC toll road sector is becoming more promising given its high<br />

correlation to <strong>the</strong> macro economy and in anticipation of a full-scale<br />

economic recovery from 4Q09 onward. We like Sichuan Expressway<br />

(107 HK) and Jiangsu Expressway (177 HK).<br />

Telcos<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> tough challenges faced by China’s telcos in 2009,<br />

such as rising competition, heavy capex and growing opex, as<br />

well as <strong>the</strong> unfavourable economic conditions, we remain<br />

positive on <strong>the</strong> sector’s long-term outlook, given <strong>the</strong> low<br />

penetration of mobile and broadband users and potential<br />

ARPU expansion. We see great re-rating potential, due to its<br />

promising long-term growth outlook as well as industry<br />

deregulation. We like China Mobile (941 HK) but we are not<br />

positive on China Telecom (728 HK) and China Unicom (762<br />

HK). Competition in <strong>the</strong> local Hong Kong telecom market has<br />

subsided somewhat since mid-2008, partly due to <strong>the</strong> limited<br />

room for fur<strong>the</strong>r tariff cuts and clearer differentiated services<br />

and customer positioning among telcos. Hutchtel (215 HK )<br />

might continue to gain high-end market share while earnings<br />

outlook for o<strong>the</strong>r telcos continue to look gloomy.<br />

Oil<br />

With possible USD technical rebound and renewed market<br />

concern over <strong>the</strong> US recovery, we believe <strong>the</strong> near-term crude<br />

price lacks fundamental catalyst to increase materially from<br />

current level in 4Q09, especially given <strong>the</strong> weak recovery from<br />

world’s oil demand in market. The government’s decision to<br />

improve <strong>the</strong> domestic product oil price flexibility and <strong>the</strong><br />

relatively stable crude price level around US$70 should benefit<br />

Sinopec (386 HK).<br />

Pharmaceutical<br />

The strong interim results and <strong>the</strong> possible IPO of Sinopharm at<br />

high PE are <strong>the</strong> key catalysts for <strong>the</strong> market to re-rate <strong>the</strong><br />

pharmaceutical counters. Several major counters under our<br />

coverage have already reached <strong>the</strong>ir historical high share price.<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> promising growth outlook, attractive value, strong<br />

balance sheet and favourable policy support, we believe <strong>the</strong> rerating<br />

of <strong>the</strong> sector has just begun and has a long road ahead.<br />

Our top picks are Sino Biopharmaceutical (1177 HK),<br />

Guangzhou Pharmaceutical (874 HK) and China Shineway<br />

(2877 HK).<br />

Shipping<br />

We expect <strong>the</strong> marine transportation sector rally upside should<br />

be capped at <strong>the</strong> mid-cycle valuation level while looking for<br />

possible second dips in <strong>the</strong> sector’s performance The high level<br />

of iron ore inventory and possible cut of domestic steel output<br />

may pressure freight rates in 2H09. We recommend to sell<br />

overvalued dry bulk shipping companies, except for Pacific<br />

Basin (2343 HK). For container shipping counters, any recovery<br />

is unlikely to be sustainable given high level of idle vessels.<br />

We maintain Sell on CSCL (2866 HK) , but recommend<br />

investors to buy OOIL (316 HK) on weakness, given its<br />

attractive hidden value from properties in China.<br />

Fertilizer<br />

The overall fertilizer sector has been stabilizing although<br />

average selling prices remain weak. Certain fertilizer prices<br />

might remain or decline from current level for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong><br />

year as stocking would have completed by 3Q. Weak methanol<br />

prices are expected to recover gradually in 2H given rising<br />

demand as alternative energy application. The positive<br />

government policy to fur<strong>the</strong>r boost <strong>the</strong> agriculture sector and<br />

better develop rural areas should provide some support for<br />

fertilizer demand. The current oversupply across different<br />

fertilizer types is unlikely to improve significantly in <strong>the</strong> nearterm<br />

but condition is expected to gradually improve.<br />

Page 72


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Basic Materials<br />

We have a mixed bag for this sector amidst acceleration of<br />

construction activities expectations of a fall in coal prices, rising<br />

steel inventory and expectation of hedging against inflation.<br />

We like Asia Cement (China) Holdings (743 HK) for this sector.<br />

Technology<br />

savings measures executed earlier in <strong>the</strong> year. Improved<br />

optimism in 2H guidance is seen and point to a resilient<br />

consumer market. We believe corporate spending will pick up<br />

given <strong>the</strong> recent stability in <strong>the</strong> business environment. Stock<br />

valuations have continued to improve in general in 3Q,<br />

reflecting <strong>the</strong> increased optimism in <strong>the</strong> sector. We like AAC<br />

Acoustics (2018 HK) and ASM Pacific (522 HK).<br />

The sector is bouncing back on more than mere restocking<br />

activities. More significant earnings impact is seen from cost<br />

Page 73


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Economic Indicators<br />

2005A 2006A 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

China<br />

GDP Growth (%) 10.4 11.6 13.0 9.0 8.0 9.0<br />

FDI (US$bn) 72 73 84 108 70 80<br />

Exports (yoy %) 28 27 26 17 -21.0 22<br />

Retail Sales (yoy %) 12.9 13.7 16.8 21.6 16.0 17.5<br />

CPI (yoy %) 1.8 1.5 4.8 5.9 -1.0 3.0<br />

Hong Kong<br />

GDP Growth (%) 7.1 7.0 6.4 2.4 -2.4 5.5<br />

CPI (yoy %) 0.9 2.0 2.0 4.3 -0.1 1.0<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> Economics <strong>Research</strong><br />

Valuation – HSI<br />

Index Earnings Growth (%) PE (x) Yield (%)<br />

17-Sep 08A 09F 10F 08A 09F 10F 08A 09F 10F<br />

Finance -42 21 30 21.6 18.0 13.9 3.6 2.7 3.7<br />

Power, Infrastructure & Utilities -10 -6 26 14.3 15.3 12.1 3.0 3.1 3.6<br />

Properties -23 8 4 20.1 18.5 17.8 2.1 2.1 1.9<br />

ex Cheung Kong -6 -10 22 22.5 24.9 20.5 2.0 2.0 1.7<br />

Hongs/Conglomerates -69 45 25 31.7 21.9 17.5 2.5 2.4 2.5<br />

ex H utchison -90 515 4 116.2 18.9 18.1 2.2 2.0 2.2<br />

Com m/Ind -57 42 35 43.3 30.4 22.6 2.0 2.0 2.4<br />

Telecom & Media 34 -11 4 11.1 12.6 12.1 3.2 3.4 3.6<br />

HSI 21769 -31 9 23 19.0 17.4 14.2 3.2 2.7 3.3<br />

HSI ex Cheung Kong and Hutchison -30 10 24 19.3 17.5 14.2 3.2 2.7 3.3<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Valuation – HSCEI<br />

Index Earnings Growth (%) PE (x) Yield (%)<br />

17-Sep 08A 09F 10F 08A 09F 10F 08A 09F 10F<br />

Consumer 9 23 12 19.2 15.6 13.9 0.8 1.5 1.7<br />

Energy -19 16 26 20.6 17.7 14.0 1.8 2.0 2.6<br />

Financials 17 19 31 18.4 15.5 11.8 1.7 1.7 2.2<br />

Industrial Goods -22 -20 6 9.0 11.2 10.6 1.8 1.6 1.7<br />

Information Technology -36 81 33 110.7 61.1 45.9 0.0 1.1 1.1<br />

Materials -90 238 213 258.8 76.6 24.4 0.5 0.4 0.8<br />

Utilities -130 nm 20 nm 17.9 15.0 2.3 3.0 3.6<br />

Property & Construction -2 41 30 26.8 19.0 14.6 0.7 1.2 1.6<br />

Services -61 0 0 18.4 -45.3 92.3 2.1 1.1 1.1<br />

Telecom & Technology -87 430 39 92.0 17.4 12.5 1.8 1.4 2.1<br />

HSCEI 12668 -12 20 36 21.6 18.1 13.3 1.6 1.6 2.1<br />

Ex oil * -6.6 19.2 36.1 22.8 19.2 14.1 1.5 1.5 2.0<br />

* Ex 386, 857<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 74


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for Hong Kong<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Property<br />

Neutral<br />

Banking and Finance<br />

Positive<br />

Telecom<br />

Neutral<br />

Industrial<br />

Neutral<br />

Consumer<br />

Neutral<br />

Housing market fur<strong>the</strong>r heated up in 3Q09, with luxury projects in <strong>the</strong> spotlight. The<br />

release of The HarbourSide, The Cullinan and The Masterpiece drew significant buying<br />

interest. Local investors and speculators have been returning to <strong>the</strong> market, boosting<br />

<strong>the</strong> prices and take-up rate. Residential price has risen 26.9% YTD, surpassing <strong>the</strong> levels<br />

just before <strong>the</strong> collapse of Lehman Bro<strong>the</strong>rs. Following <strong>the</strong> strong rally, We expect <strong>the</strong><br />

housing market to be relatively stable in 4Q09. Having sold substantial number of<br />

primary units, developers should return to expansion mode soon. Given <strong>the</strong><br />

government’s tight land supply policy, we favour MTRC which boasts a huge<br />

development land bank in Hong Kong. Office rents remain on <strong>the</strong> downtrend given lack<br />

of new demand but <strong>the</strong> decline has been moderating. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, capital values<br />

rebounded on strong market liquidity. Valuation wise, property investors are largely<br />

fairly priced.<br />

Hong Kong banks are still on a secular uptrend despite <strong>the</strong> rallies YTD. Most Hong Kong<br />

banks guided a more optimistic outlook for <strong>the</strong> 2H09 and 2010. They see strong loan<br />

pipelines in 2H09, especially relating to <strong>the</strong>ir China operation. An expected slowdown in<br />

loan growth among Chinese banks in 2H09 offers opportunities for Hong Kong and<br />

foreign banks to re-gain <strong>the</strong>ir market shares in China. All of <strong>the</strong>m also believe <strong>the</strong> worst<br />

is over in terms of NPLs and provision charge, and <strong>the</strong>y expect resilient asset quality<br />

going forward, thanks to rising property price and stabilization in <strong>the</strong> global and China<br />

economy. After some MTM write-backs, we expect more write-backs on securities in<br />

2H09 on <strong>the</strong> back of continued improvement in capital market sentiment. Most banks<br />

also believe NIM has bottomed and we believe some mild rate hikes in <strong>the</strong> US sometime<br />

next year should help improve Hong Kong banks’ NIM going forward.<br />

Competition in <strong>the</strong> local Hong Kong telecom market has subsided somewhat since mid-<br />

2008, which was partly due to <strong>the</strong> limited room for fur<strong>the</strong>r tariff cuts and clearer<br />

differentiated services and customer positioning among telcos. In companies, Hutchtel<br />

HK gained high-end market share helped by <strong>the</strong> iPhone. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, Smartone<br />

suffered a big decline in earnings as its international roaming revenue was hit hard by<br />

<strong>the</strong> economic recession. Looking ahead, we believe Hutchtel might continue to gain<br />

high-end users market share, while earnings outlook for o<strong>the</strong>r telcos would continue to<br />

be gloomy.<br />

Bottomed in December 08 / January 09, US retail sales have shown a gradual uptrend.<br />

The latest retail sales as at Aug showed as strong as 2.7% gain, above market<br />

expectation. Stripping out autos, sales were up 1.1%, much stronger than market<br />

estimate of 0.4%. We believe such retail sales trend is encouraging, though it is still far<br />

from a V-shaped recovery. We, thus, suggest investors to cherry pick industry leaders<br />

who should be <strong>the</strong> first to enjoy <strong>the</strong> rebound. We like Yue Yuen, which is <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

OEM athletic shoes manufacturer. In addition, it has underperformed HSI by 14.5% in<br />

<strong>the</strong> past 1 month.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> improving export outlook, we believe those manufacturers that serve <strong>the</strong><br />

domestic market will remain strong on continual buoyant domestic demand for<br />

transport equipments from <strong>the</strong> government. China South Locomotive & Rolling Stock<br />

should benefit from <strong>the</strong> accelerated railway development program by <strong>the</strong> Ministry of<br />

Railway and high demand for technically advanced train vehicles following <strong>the</strong><br />

construction of new high-speed train tracks. Listing of China Nor<strong>the</strong>rn on <strong>the</strong> Shanghai<br />

A-share market should be positive on <strong>the</strong> valuation of China South Locomotive.<br />

The improvement seen in <strong>the</strong> local stock and property markets has obviously failed to<br />

translate into real benefits for <strong>the</strong> economy as yet. For <strong>the</strong> year till July, HK retail sales<br />

recorded 4.6% decline. Discretionary spending such as on apparels, motor vehicles and<br />

electrical goods remained relatively sluggish. Discounting and promotions continued to<br />

be <strong>the</strong> norm though <strong>the</strong> magnitude appeared to be less severe than that in early this<br />

year. Retailers, however, are still far from being out of <strong>the</strong> doldrums and unless a<br />

consistent recovery in sales can be noted, <strong>the</strong>ir performance should likely continue to<br />

lag. Given lack of any clear catalyst, our preference remains on those with better<br />

earnings visibilities such as Café de Coral.<br />

MTRC (66)<br />

BOC HK (2388)<br />

Dah Sing Financial (440)<br />

Hutchtel HK (215)<br />

Yue Yuen (551)<br />

China South Locomotive & Rolling<br />

Stock (1766)<br />

Café de Coral (341)<br />

Page 75


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for China<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Banking<br />

Positive<br />

Basic Materials –<br />

Industrial Metals<br />

and Mining<br />

Positive<br />

Cement<br />

Neutral<br />

Coal<br />

Slightly<br />

Cautious<br />

Steel<br />

We remain positive on Chinese banks. Government officials have clearly stated <strong>the</strong><br />

“moderately loose” monetary policy will remain, and only market tools (instead of<br />

administrative measures) will be used when conducting “dynamic fine-tuning”. Such market<br />

tools may include open market operations or even mild hikes of RRR and interest rates (we<br />

expect 81bps of rate hikes in 2Q10). While guidelines to ensure loans are directed to <strong>the</strong> real<br />

economy are possible, administrative controls such as loan quota policy is unlikely. Any loan<br />

deceleration in 2H09 due to seasonality is well expected and should not be regarded as a<br />

tightening policy. Recent proposal to exclude subordinated debt in CAR calculation is only in<br />

line with global trend to raise tier I capital (or equity) amid <strong>the</strong> financial tsunami, ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

a monetary tightening. Historical trend shows banks’ valuations will re-rate despite interest<br />

rate hikes, as rate hikes usually go along with good economic outlook and improving NIM.<br />

Chinese banks are still cheap at below mid-cycle valuations.<br />

We are POSITIVE on <strong>the</strong> cement sector, which will benefit from acceleration of construction<br />

activities along with seasonal factor in 4Q09. This will point to a pickup on cement prices –<br />

serving a catalyst to cement stocks. By region, we prefer cement market in central / west<br />

China, of which cement demand will benefit from <strong>the</strong> industrialization / urbanization move<br />

in central and reconstruction activities in west, particularly Sichuan. Meanwhile, we are<br />

NEUTRAL on coal sector, expecting coal prices will fall into a range-bound trading, against a<br />

mixed picture of rising supply following <strong>the</strong> resumption of small coal mines in Shanxi and<br />

traditionally peak season of coal demand in 4Q. We return SLIGHTLY CAUTIOUS on steel, to<br />

reflect concerns of rising steel inventory amid strong pickup on China steel output which will<br />

bring a downward pressure on steel prices in <strong>the</strong> near term. As for base metals, we become<br />

NEUTRAL for 4Q09 on expectation of high metal prices largely spurred by market interest on<br />

investing metals to hedge against inflation. This is in spite of unattractive metal equity<br />

valuation which is in <strong>the</strong> proximity of historical peak-cycle trading range. Our top pick for<br />

4Q09 is Asia Cement (China) Holdings. Target price is set at HK$7.56.<br />

BOC (3988)<br />

CCB (939)<br />

Asia Cement (China)<br />

Holdings (743)<br />

Neutral<br />

Base metals<br />

Basic Materials –<br />

Specialty Chemicals<br />

Neutral<br />

Construction &<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Positive<br />

The overall fertilizer sector has reached <strong>the</strong> bottom in early 2009 and is showing signs of<br />

stabilizing. The average selling price of certain fertilizers though still weak, has inched up<br />

slightly in 1H09. We expect fertiliser prices of certain types might remain at current level or<br />

decline slightly for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> year, as stocking would have completed by 3Q. The weak<br />

methanol prices in 1H are expected to gradually recover in 2H, because of rising demand<br />

especially as an alternative energy application. Overall, <strong>the</strong> positive government policy to<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r boost <strong>the</strong> agriculture sector and better development of <strong>the</strong> rural areas should provide<br />

some support for fertilizer demand. The current oversupply across different fertilizer types is<br />

unlikely to improve significantly in <strong>the</strong> near-term but condition is expected to gradually<br />

improve.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> announcement of <strong>the</strong> stimulus package in 4Q08, new contracts momentum<br />

continued to be strong in 2009. In 1H09, <strong>the</strong> major infrastructure construction companies<br />

have secured close to RMB500bn worth of new construction projects. It was reported some<br />

RMB600bn has been earmarked for railway infrastructure development alone this year. We<br />

expect <strong>the</strong> infrastructure investment on construction phase to peak towards end 2010 or<br />

early 2011, which should provide 3-4 years of earnings support to <strong>the</strong>se companies. Judging<br />

from <strong>the</strong> new project starts in 1H09 by <strong>the</strong> three major players, <strong>the</strong> momentum was rapid<br />

and has resulted in some upfront costs expensed but <strong>the</strong>se projects have not reached profit<br />

recognition stage, hence a mismatch in profit and cost, dragging blended GP margins slightly<br />

lower. We expect <strong>the</strong>se projects to start generating profits in 2H and that should lift <strong>the</strong><br />

overall GP margin. We have switched our top pick to China Railway Group (390) as <strong>the</strong><br />

company is improving on its overseas operations with a potential US$7.4bn construction<br />

project in Venezuela and a strong domestic orderbook.<br />

China BlueChem (3983)<br />

China Railway Group<br />

(390)<br />

Page 76


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for China (Cont’d)<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Telecoms<br />

Neutral – Telco<br />

Services<br />

Positive –<br />

Hardware and<br />

infrastructure<br />

Property<br />

Positive<br />

2009 remains a tough year for China’s telcos, which have faced growing challenges from<br />

rising competition (especially in <strong>the</strong> 3G market), heavy capex and growing opex, as well as<br />

<strong>the</strong> unfavourable economic conditions. By companies, China Mobile (CM) is suffering from<br />

slower growth, due to increasing penetration and growing threats from China Unicom (CU)<br />

and China Telecom (CT). CT is facing threats from CU in its fixed-line and broadband<br />

business in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn areas, while it remains a big challenge for CT to fulfil its target of<br />

30m new CDMA subscribers this year. For CU, its huge capex and growing opex would eat<br />

into its earnings over <strong>the</strong> next couple of years. However, we remain positive on <strong>the</strong> sector’s<br />

long-term outlook, which would be driven by <strong>the</strong> low penetration of mobile and broadband<br />

users and potential ARPU expansion. Meanwhile, we see great re-rating potential, which is<br />

partly due to its promising long-term growth outlook as well as industry deregulation. CM<br />

remains our sector top pick this year, for its best earnings visibility and dominance in <strong>the</strong> 2G<br />

market which would continue into <strong>the</strong> mainstream technology in China in <strong>the</strong> next two<br />

years, in our view. However, we are not as positive on CT and CU, on concerns over low<br />

near-term earnings visibility.<br />

We remain positive on <strong>the</strong> telecom equipment sector. Due to <strong>the</strong> relatively smaller size<br />

compared to overseas peers, <strong>the</strong> sector has been trading at some discount in valuation.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong>ir promising growth potential underpinned by <strong>the</strong> hundreds of billions of RMB<br />

in <strong>the</strong> telecom equipment market, we believe <strong>the</strong> sector deserves continuous re-rating going<br />

forward. CCS is our sector top pick, for its attractive valuation and great long-term growth<br />

potential from <strong>the</strong> tower sharing measure in China. We also like Citic 1616, for its steady<br />

earnings growth and low risk exposure. Comba is our long-term sector pick, as we see<br />

sustainable earnings growth for <strong>the</strong> next five years.<br />

While policy remains a major overhang, we believe Chinese government’s real estate policy<br />

will remain favourable as it aims to increase new supply to control <strong>the</strong> pace of property price<br />

growth. In addition, our affordability analysis shows that <strong>the</strong>re is no urgent need for a reply<br />

of austerity measures. In our analysis, housing prices in majority of cities are still affordable<br />

despite asset bubbles appearing in some cities, which often catch press attentions. We also<br />

analyzed <strong>the</strong> impact of previous tightening measures on share prices of China property<br />

stocks and concluded that <strong>the</strong> impact from austerity measures is somehow overstated. Our<br />

analysis shows that property sales performance is more related to economic growth than<br />

tightening policies. In our view, <strong>the</strong> recovery of domestic economy would support <strong>the</strong><br />

growth of <strong>the</strong> sector going forward. We foresee slight volume growth in 4Q due to lower<br />

new supply and depletion of pent-up demand. Property prices will still be on uptrend yet at<br />

moderate rate. Having said that, we believe sales volume will remain above <strong>the</strong> monthly<br />

average of 2007 when <strong>the</strong> market was good. This shall pave way for decent 2010 earnings<br />

growth for majority of developers. After recent earnings/NAV upgrades and share price<br />

correction, <strong>the</strong> sector is now trading at 12XFY10 P/E and 16% discount to NAV. Valuations<br />

remain attractive. We like CR Land and Shimao in anticipation of more positive news flow.<br />

Their 2H sales are likely to remain decent, despite many of <strong>the</strong>ir peers facing potentially<br />

slower sales in <strong>the</strong> period due to <strong>the</strong> lack of new launches. We also like Shui On Land as its<br />

strategic shift to be volume focus and its prime location focus will ensure its growth potential<br />

going forward.<br />

China Mobile (941)<br />

CCS (552)<br />

CITIC 1616 (1883)<br />

China Resources Land<br />

(1109)<br />

Shimao Property (813)<br />

Shui On Land (272)<br />

Page 77


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for China (Cont’d)<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

China Consumer -<br />

Food & Beverages<br />

Neutral<br />

China Consumer -<br />

Retail<br />

Neutral<br />

Industrial<br />

Transportation -<br />

Marine<br />

Cautious<br />

The 1H09 results reported by F&B players were in general in line or above expectations, especially<br />

on <strong>the</strong> margin front where margin expansion was stronger than previously forecasted. Better<br />

impact from lower material costs aside, this also indicated improvement on product mix, which<br />

has been especially notable for market leaders. Despite some rebounds in raw material prices and<br />

in fuel costs were noted in recent months, <strong>the</strong>ir levels are still lower than of last year and hence<br />

positive margin impact should sustain in <strong>the</strong> 2H09. This, coupled with resilient demand for most<br />

of <strong>the</strong> F&B products (hence better earnings visibilities), should likely support current valuation<br />

premiums. We recommend investors to focus on those with lagging valuations such as China<br />

Yurun and China Mengniu.<br />

Retail sales growth in China stabilised at a mid-teens y-o-y rate and grew 15.4% for Aug09 and<br />

15.1% for 8M09. For enterprises above designated size, retail sales expansion of most sectors<br />

registered a supportive trend. They included a growth of 34.5% for automobile, 23.3% for<br />

clothing, 12.7% for grain & oil, and 10.9% for household electric appliances. All <strong>the</strong>se data firmly<br />

indicate that <strong>the</strong> Chinese retail environment continues to recover. While fundamental<br />

improvement kicks in, current valuations of selective retailers could potentially consolidate to reemerge<br />

for better share price performance in <strong>the</strong> medium-term.<br />

After <strong>the</strong> disappointing 2Q09 results and <strong>the</strong> pull back of Baltic Dry Index again, we expect <strong>the</strong><br />

sector rally upside should be capped at <strong>the</strong> mid-cycle valuation level. We are looking for <strong>the</strong><br />

possible second dips of <strong>the</strong> sector’s performance after <strong>the</strong> technical rebound in 2Q09. Looking<br />

forward, <strong>the</strong> high level of iron ore inventory and <strong>the</strong> possible cut of domestic steel output will<br />

probably give pressure to freight rates in 2H09. We recommend investors to Sell <strong>the</strong> overvalued<br />

dry bulk shipping companies like China COSCO and China Shipping Development, but hold Pacific<br />

Basin Shipping for pair-trade given its stronger internal management. For <strong>the</strong> container shipping<br />

counters, a short-term rally may arise from <strong>the</strong> seasonal recovery of freight rates and higher<br />

season demand in 3Q09. Never<strong>the</strong>less, as <strong>the</strong> recovery is unlikely to be sustainable due to <strong>the</strong> high<br />

level of idle vessels. We maintain Sell on CSCL, but recommend investors to buy OOIL on<br />

weakness, given its attractive hidden value from properties in China.<br />

China Yurun (1068)<br />

China Mengniu<br />

(2319)<br />

Gome (493)<br />

OOIL (316)<br />

Industrial<br />

Transportation - Toll<br />

Road<br />

Positive<br />

We have become more confident of <strong>the</strong> sector given its high correlation to <strong>the</strong> macro economy in<br />

anticipation of a full-scale economic recovery from 4Q09 onward. Our top picks are Sichuan<br />

Expressway (BUY, TP HK$4.26) and Jiangsu Expressway (BUY, TP HK$8.07). Sichuan Expressway<br />

has good acquisition opportunities and at <strong>the</strong> same time enjoys higher traffic growth than its<br />

peers. Jiangsu Expressway has quality road assets linking metropolises Nanjing and Shanghai,<br />

which provides <strong>the</strong> Group with strong cash flow and resilient traffic growth. In addition, we<br />

upgraded Shenzhen Expressway recently (BUY, TP HK$ 4.43), in anticipation of stronger recovery<br />

of export in <strong>the</strong> Pearl River Delta.<br />

Sichuan Expressway<br />

(107)<br />

Jiangsu Expressway<br />

(177)<br />

Page 78


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for China (Cont’d)<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Positive<br />

Pharmaceutical and<br />

Healthcare<br />

Positive<br />

Technology<br />

Power<br />

Positive<br />

Positive<br />

We continue to recommend investors to switch <strong>the</strong>ir investment focus from <strong>the</strong> upstream plays,<br />

Petrochina and CNOOC, to <strong>the</strong> downstream play, Sinopec in 4Q09. In view of <strong>the</strong> revival of<br />

market concern over <strong>the</strong> US recovery, we believe <strong>the</strong> near-term crude price lacks fundamental<br />

support to increase materially from current level in 4Q09, especially given <strong>the</strong> weak recovery from<br />

world’s oil demand in market. Sinopec remains our top pick in <strong>the</strong> sector, in view of its attractive<br />

mid-cycle valuation but at up-cycle earnings level in 2009-10. Given <strong>the</strong> recent positive<br />

government’s decision to improve <strong>the</strong> domestic product oil price flexibility and <strong>the</strong> relatively stable<br />

crude price level around US$70, we believe it is <strong>the</strong> most favourable condition for Sinopec to<br />

maintain high refining margin in 2009.<br />

As expected, <strong>the</strong> strong interim results and <strong>the</strong> possible IPO of Sinopharm at high PE are <strong>the</strong> key<br />

catalysts for <strong>the</strong> market to re-rate <strong>the</strong> pharmaceutical counters. For those major counters under<br />

our coverage, we identified several have already reached <strong>the</strong>ir share prices to historical highest<br />

level, such as Sino Biopharmaceutical, China Shineway and China Pharmaceutical. However, given<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir promising growth outlook, attractive value, strong balance sheet and favourable policy<br />

support, we believe <strong>the</strong> re-rating of <strong>the</strong> sector has just begun and has a long road ahead.<br />

Indeed, <strong>the</strong> pharmaceutical industry has shown that its growth is resilient to any unpredictable<br />

economic risk ahead. In <strong>the</strong> sector, our top picks are Sino Biopharmaceutical, Guangzhou<br />

Pharmaceutical and China Shineway.<br />

1H 2009 results have generally revealed a more sustained recovery of demand, as it is clear that<br />

<strong>the</strong> bounce back is more than mere restocking of inventories. As expected, we have seen marked<br />

improvement in 2Q QoQ growth figures as well as improved optimism in 2H guidance. In terms of<br />

earnings, we are starting to see <strong>the</strong> cost savings measure executed earlier in <strong>the</strong> year to have more<br />

significant impact. The recovery of demand has also improved profitability of underutilized<br />

capacities. The results and guidance from industry players have mostly pointed to a resilient<br />

consumer market, whilst corporate customers are still mostly in defensive mode. We believe this is<br />

likely to change, as <strong>the</strong> recent stability in <strong>the</strong> business environment will likely spur <strong>the</strong> relaxing of<br />

some corporate spending. Stock valuations have continued to improve in general in 3Q, reflecting<br />

<strong>the</strong> increased optimism in <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

For exposure in this sector, we continue to like AAC Acoustics (2018 HK), which should enjoy<br />

market share gains in major customers such as Nokia as well as ASP and margin improvements<br />

from volume shipments of new platforms. Despite recent pullbacks, we also like ASM Pacific (522<br />

HK) for its strong market position, strong balance sheet and its ability to benefit from <strong>the</strong><br />

improved business environment.<br />

A more volatile market should benefit Chinese IPPs because <strong>the</strong>y offer resilient domestic earnings.<br />

Improving earnings outlook for IPPs is evident in <strong>the</strong> stronger 1H09 results and we continue to<br />

expect sustainable growth ahead with stronger demand and stable coal price. CR Power and<br />

Huaneng remain our picks for <strong>the</strong>ir relatively higher leverage to a demand recovery and still<br />

attractive valuations. We also upgraded Datang to Buy recently as <strong>the</strong> sell-down provides an<br />

excellent opportunity to accumulate.<br />

Sinopec (386)<br />

Sino<br />

Biopharmaceutical<br />

(1177 )<br />

Guangzhou<br />

Pharmaceutical<br />

(874 )<br />

ASM Pacific (522)<br />

AAC Acoustics<br />

(2018)<br />

CR Power (836)<br />

Huaneng (902)<br />

Page 79


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bank of China Hong Kong<br />

Bloomberg: 2388 HK | Reuters: 2388.HK<br />

BUY HK$18.56 HSI : 21,769<br />

Price Target : 12-month HK$ 20.00<br />

Potential Catalyst: Fur<strong>the</strong>r improvement in bond market and economic<br />

recovery in HK and China<br />

Analyst<br />

Jasmine Lai +852 2971 1926<br />

jasmine_lai@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

HK$<br />

25.70<br />

20.70<br />

15.70<br />

10.70<br />

5.70<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Bank of China Hong Kong (LHS) Relative HSI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (HK$ m)<br />

2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 16,755 16,790 21,349 23,328<br />

Pre-prov. Profit Gth (%) (14) 0 27 9<br />

Pretax Profit 4,078 15,833 20,860 22,785<br />

Net Profit 3,343 12,842 16,983 18,525<br />

EPS (HK$) 0.32 1.21 1.61 1.75<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (78) 284 32 9<br />

PE (X) 56.8 15.3 11.6 10.6<br />

DPS (HK$) 0.44 0.79 1.04 1.14<br />

Div Yield (%) 2.4 4.3 5.6 6.1<br />

BV Per Share (HK$) 7.82 8.67 9.24 9.85<br />

P/Book Value (x) 2.4 2.1 2.0 1.9<br />

ROAE (%) 3.8 14.7 17.9 18.4<br />

ROAE (ex-exceptional 3.9 14.1 17.9 18.4<br />

ROA (%) 0.27 1.14 1.45 1.51<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$): 1.10 1.41 1.65<br />

ICB Industry: Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Banks<br />

Principal Business: Offers a range of financial products and<br />

services to retail and corporate customers and is one of <strong>the</strong> three<br />

banknote issuing banks in Hong Kong<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong>V, Bloomberg, HKEX<br />

208<br />

188<br />

168<br />

148<br />

128<br />

108<br />

88<br />

68<br />

48<br />

Tighter cooperation with parent<br />

• News about Vice Chairman selling c. 623K shares and<br />

recent exclusion from FTSE red-chip index should only<br />

have short-term negative impact on BOC HK’s share<br />

price<br />

• Closer co-operation with its parent brings in more<br />

cross-border businesses<br />

• More MTM loss write-backs possible and NIM should<br />

gradually recover<br />

• ROE will almost return to peak level by 2010,<br />

justifying fur<strong>the</strong>r re-rating<br />

More cross-border business referrals. BOC HK will continue<br />

to be a major beneficiary of rising economic integration<br />

between HK and China. This should enable its stock-broking,<br />

RMB businesses and o<strong>the</strong>r cross-border services to continue<br />

outperforming bank peers. In 1H09, BOC HK’s stock-broking<br />

fee was strong (+44% h-o-h vs industry’s +2%), thanks to<br />

referrals of mainland retail and institutional investors from<br />

parent, as well as, fund flows from China into HK. BOC HK also<br />

has niches in RMB trade settlement, trade financing and<br />

deposit-taking businesses, given it is <strong>the</strong> only designated<br />

settlement bank in HK and Macau. Besides, BOC HK can also<br />

provide cash management, custody and o<strong>the</strong>r cross-border<br />

services to corporate customers referred by its parent.<br />

Growing beyond HK in loan syndication. In early 2008,<br />

BOC HK was appointed by its parent as a Syndicated Loan<br />

Centre in <strong>the</strong> Asia Pacific. This paved way for BOC HK to<br />

expand its strength in loan syndication beyond HK, which saw<br />

<strong>the</strong> bank outdo bank peers in terms of growth in loan (+3% h-<br />

o-h) and loan fee (+59% h-o-h) during 1H09.<br />

Still cheap. We peg its target P/B at 2.2x Sep-10 book (vs 0.8-2.7x<br />

historically). BOC HK should trade well above mid-cycle P/B, given<br />

its ROE will be almost back to peak level by 2010. This will be<br />

driven by: 1) gradual NIM recovery as Hibor should normalize over<br />

time (we forecast 50bps US rate hike starting 2Q10) and 2) abovepeers<br />

growth in loan and fee in light of closer collaboration with<br />

parent. Trading at 11.6x 2010 P/E and 2.0x 2010 P/B, <strong>the</strong> counter<br />

is still cheap.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 10,573<br />

Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 196,231 / 25,319<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

Bank of China 66.06<br />

Free Float (%) 33.94<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 20.9<br />

Page 80<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed- LM / sa- RM


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bank of China Hong Kong<br />

Income Statement (HK$ m) Balance Sheet (HK$ m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 20,157 18,280 19,700 21,456 Cash/Bank Balance 153,269 114,952 120,699 127,338<br />

Non-Interest Income 5,369 9,674 11,377 12,426 Government <strong>Securities</strong> 0 0 0 0<br />

Operating Income 25,526 27,954 31,076 33,882 Inter Bank Assets 89,718 116,633 123,048 129,816<br />

Operating Expenses (8,771) (11,164) (9,728) (10,554) Total Net Loans & Advs. 469,493 492,073 515,648 543,007<br />

Pre-provision Profit 16,755 16,790 21,349 23,328 Investment 389,321 389,583 409,062 429,515<br />

Provisions (12,573) (1,485) (493) (550) Associates 88 61 64 67<br />

Associates 7 4 5 6 Fixed Assets 30,522 38,882 40,991 44,633<br />

Exceptionals (111) 524 0 0 Goodwill 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 4,078 15,833 20,860 22,785 O<strong>the</strong>r Assets 14,833 16,316 16,969 17,648<br />

Taxation (1,071) (2,612) (3,442) (3,759) Total Assets 1,147,244 1,168,500 1,226,482 1,292,024<br />

Minority Interests 336 (378) (435) (500) Customer Deposits 802,577 838,693 880,628 929,062<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 Inter Bank Deposits 88,779 79,901 83,896 88,091<br />

Net Profit 3,343 12,842 16,983 18,525 Debts/Borrowings 27,339 28,706 30,141 31,648<br />

Net Profit bef Except 3,454 12,318 16,983 18,525 O<strong>the</strong>rs 144,017 127,583 132,160 136,982<br />

Minorities 1,813 1,904 1,999 2,099<br />

Shareholders' Funds 82,719 91,714 97,658 104,142<br />

Total Liab& S/H’s Funds 1,147,244 1,168,500 1,226,482 1,292,024<br />

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios (%) Financial Stability Measures (%)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Margins, Costs & Efficiency<br />

Balance Sheet Structure<br />

Yld. On Earnings Assets 3.33 2.22 2.30 2.36 Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 58.8 59.1 59.1 59.1<br />

Avg Cost Of Funds 1.64 0.65 0.65 0.65 Net Loans / Total Assets 40.9 42.1 42.0 42.0<br />

Spread 1.68 1.56 1.64 1.70 Investment / Total Assets 33.9 33.3 33.4 33.2<br />

Net Interest Margin 1.90 1.65 1.72 1.78 Cust . Dep./Int. Bear. Liab. 84.2 85.2 85.3 85.5<br />

Cost-to-Income Ratio 34.4 39.9 31.3 31.1 Interbank Dep / Int. Bear. 9.3 8.1 8.1 8.1<br />

Employees ( Year End) 13,463 13,194 12,930 12,671 Asset Quality<br />

Effective Tax Rate 26.3 16.5 16.5 16.5 NPL / Total Gross Loans (%) 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4<br />

Business Mix Specific provision/NPL (%) 37.4 96.8 144.5 183.6<br />

Net Int. Inc / Opg Inc. 79.0 65.4 63.4 63.3 General provision ratio (%) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3<br />

Non-Int. Inc / Opg inc. 21.0 34.6 36.6 36.7 Total provision/NPL (%) 107.6 180.1 221.0 257.1<br />

Fee Inc / Opg Income 20.3 21.0 21.5 22.1 Capital Strength<br />

Oth Non-Int Inc/Opg Inc 0.7 13.6 15.1 14.6 Total CAR 16.2 17.4 17.7 18.1<br />

Profitability Tier-1 CAR 10.9 11.5 11.9 12.3<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. 3.9 14.1 17.9 18.4<br />

ROAE 3.8 14.7 17.9 18.4 Growth<br />

ROA Pre Ex. 0.28 1.10 1.45 1.51 Gross Loans 12 5 5 5<br />

ROA 0.27 1.14 1.45 1.51 Customer Deposits 1 5 5 6<br />

Z-Score (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

Interim Income Statement (HK$m)<br />

Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 1H2007 2H2007 1H2008 2H2008 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 8,903 10,492 10,029 10,128 NIM 2.0% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9%<br />

Non-Interest Income 3,157 4,702 4,010 1,359 Loan growth 11.9% 5.0% 5.0% 5.5%<br />

Operating Income 12,060 15,194 14,039 11,487 Fee growth -17.5% 13.1% 13.9% 12.0%<br />

Operating Expenses (3,418) (4,355) (4,088) (4,683) Cost-to-income 34.4% 39.9% 31.3% 31.1%<br />

Pre-Provision Profit 8,642 10,839 9,951 6,804 Credit cost 2.8% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1%<br />

Provisions 166 (1,614) (2,227) (10,346)<br />

Associates (2) 5 8 (1)<br />

Exceptionals 421 669 702 (813)<br />

Pretax Profit 9,227 9,899 8,434 (4,356)<br />

Taxation (1,599) (1,710) (1,253) 182<br />

Minority Interests (162) (209) (93) 429<br />

Net Profit 7,466 7,980 7,088 (3,745)<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 81


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bank of China<br />

Bloomberg: 3988 HK | Reuters: 3988.HK<br />

BUY HK$4.38 HSI : 21,769<br />

Price Target : 12-Month HK$ 5.30<br />

Potential Catalyst: Any rate hike potential and fur<strong>the</strong>r improvement of<br />

bond market<br />

Analyst<br />

Jasmine Lai +852 2971 1926<br />

jasmine_lai@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

5.50<br />

5.00<br />

4.50<br />

4.00<br />

3.50<br />

3.00<br />

2.50<br />

2.00<br />

1.50<br />

HK$<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Relative Index<br />

Bank of China (LHS) Relative HSI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (HK$ m)<br />

2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 131,484 128,242 155,759 188,138<br />

Pre-prov. Profit Gth (%) 20 (2) 21 21<br />

Pretax Profit 87,179 105,779 142,522 165,378<br />

Net Profit 64,360 77,946 105,207 121,864<br />

EPS (HK$) 0.28 0.34 0.46 0.53<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 14 21 35 16<br />

PE (X) 15.5 12.8 9.5 8.2<br />

DPS (HK$) 0.14 0.18 0.24 0.27<br />

Div Yield (%) 3.3 4.0 5.4 6.3<br />

BV Per Share (HK$) 2.04 2.20 2.42 2.68<br />

P/Book Value (x) 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6<br />

ROAE (%) 14.5 16.2 20.0 21.0<br />

ROAE (ex-exceptional 14.5 16.2 20.0 21.0<br />

ROA (%) 0.99 1.02 1.17 1.18<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$): 0.33 0.40 0.49<br />

ICB Industry: Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Banks<br />

Principal Business: One of <strong>the</strong> big four state-owned<br />

commercial banks in China; offers a range of financial<br />

products and services to retail and corporate customers<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong>V, Bloomberg, HKEX<br />

219<br />

169<br />

119<br />

69<br />

19<br />

An undervalued big three bank<br />

• BOC’s steep discount to ICBC and CCB unjustified<br />

given similar franchise<br />

• Its earnings growth can beat peers due to: 1) more<br />

MTM write-backs 2) niche in investment banking and<br />

3) benign asset quality resulting from significant<br />

improvement from BOC HK<br />

Steep discount unjustified. Its HK-listed subsidiary, BOC<br />

(HK), is already trading at 2.0x 2009 P/B. Stripping out BOC<br />

(HK)’s valuation, investors would be paying only 1.76x P/B for<br />

BOC’s domestic China operation. Given that BOC’s banking<br />

franchise is similar to ICBC’s and CCB’s, we believe its steep<br />

P/B discount to <strong>the</strong>se two big banks and <strong>the</strong> sector are<br />

unjustified (ICBC: 2.77x; CCB: 2.52x; Sector: 2.46x).<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r MTM write-backs & sharper decline in loan<br />

provision. BOC’s steep valuation discount in <strong>the</strong> past was<br />

mainly due to its relatively high exposure to overseas debt<br />

securities and hence uncertainties over fur<strong>the</strong>r MTM losses.<br />

However, BOC should now be a prime beneficiary of a<br />

significant improvement in global bond market since Mar-09,<br />

where bond prices have continued to rise in recent months.<br />

Some MTM write-backs were booked under “o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

impairment charge” and “trading gains” in 2Q09.<br />

Management does not rule out fur<strong>the</strong>r MTM write-backs.<br />

Besides, its asset quality and loan provision should be more<br />

resilient than peers, thanks to significant improvement from<br />

BOC (HK).<br />

Niche in investment banking. Similar to ICBC and CCB,<br />

exceptional strength was seen in investment banking<br />

businesses including underwriting for government & corporate<br />

bonds, investment consulting and financial advisory. In<br />

addition, its investment banking arm in HK, BOCI, has also<br />

been one of <strong>the</strong> most active equity underwriters in HK with<br />

long-established track-records.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital - H shares (m shs) 76,020<br />

- Non H shrs (m shs) 177,819<br />

H shs as a % of Total 30<br />

H Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 332,969 / 42,963<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

Central SAFE Inv 67.5<br />

Major H Shareholders (As % of H shares)<br />

Temasek 13.7<br />

Social Security Fund 11.0<br />

RBS China 10.7<br />

Asian Development Bank 0.7<br />

H Shares-Free Float (%) 64.0<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 370.7<br />

Page 82<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-LM / sa-RM


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bank of China<br />

Income Statement (HK$ m) Balance Sheet (HK$ m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 162,936 158,839 193,469 228,983 Cash/Bank Balance 72,533 134,186 154,314 172,832<br />

Non-Interest Income 65,960 68,085 79,865 96,781 Government <strong>Securities</strong> 74,518 85,696 90,837 96,288<br />

Operating Income 228,896 226,924 273,334 325,764 Inter Bank Assets 1,696,078 1,734,884 2,006,914 2,323,884<br />

Operating Expenses (97,412) (98,682) (117,575) (137,625) Total Net Loans & Advs. 3,189,652 4,232,124 4,895,628 5,659,992<br />

Pre-provision Profit 131,484 128,242 155,759 188,138 Investment 1,282,378 1,607,622 1,822,369 2,052,766<br />

Provisions (45,031) (23,043) (13,876) (23,463) Associates 7,376 8,482 9,331 11,197<br />

Associates 726 581 639 703 Fixed Assets 101,873 116,672 128,339 151,674<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0 Goodwill 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 87,179 105,779 142,522 165,378 O<strong>the</strong>r Assets 527,272 478,743 526,617 558,711<br />

Taxation (21,285) (25,916) (34,918) (40,518) Total Assets 6,951,680 8,398,409 9,634,349 11,027,342<br />

Minority Interests (1,534) (1,918) (2,397) (2,996) Customer Deposits 5,102,111 6,428,660 7,457,245 8,613,118<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 Inter Bank Deposits 658,989 724,888 833,621 958,664<br />

Net Profit 64,360 77,946 105,207 121,864 Debts/Borrowings 140,295 141,898 143,582 145,349<br />

Net Profit bef Except 64,360 77,946 105,207 121,864 O<strong>the</strong>rs 560,398 573,328 617,531 666,922<br />

Minorities 25,629 29,473 30,947 32,494<br />

Shareholders' Funds 464,258 500,161 551,423 610,794<br />

Total Liab& S/H’s Funds 6,951,680 8,398,409 9,634,349 11,027,342<br />

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios (%) Financial Stability Measures (%)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Margins, Costs & Efficiency<br />

Balance Sheet Structure<br />

Yld. On Earnings Assets 4.63 3.65 3.69 3.72 Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 64.6 67.7 67.4 67.4<br />

Avg Cost Of Funds 2.18 1.61 1.56 1.51 Net Loans / Total Assets 45.9 50.4 50.8 51.3<br />

Spread 2.45 2.04 2.13 2.22 Investment / Total Assets 18.4 19.1 18.9 18.6<br />

Net Interest Margin 2.63 2.16 2.24 2.31 Cust . Dep./Int. Bear. Liab. 80.2 82.7 83.3 83.8<br />

Cost-to-Income Ratio 42.6 43.5 43.0 42.2 Interbank Dep / Int. Bear. 10.4 9.3 9.3 9.3<br />

Employees ( Year End) N/A N/A N/A N/A Asset Quality<br />

Effective Tax Rate 24.4 24.5 24.5 24.5 NPL / Total Gross Loans (%) 2.7 1.8 1.7 1.6<br />

Business Mix Specific provision/NPL (%) 58.5 59.0 57.6 56.8<br />

Net Int. Inc / Opg Inc. 71.2 70.0 70.8 70.3 General provision ratio (%) 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6<br />

Non-Int. Inc / Opg inc. 28.8 30.0 29.2 29.7 Total provision/NPL (%) 121.7 147.6 151.7 159.4<br />

Fee Inc / Opg Income 17.5 21.6 22.7 23.7 Capital Strength<br />

Oth Non-Int Inc/Opg Inc 11.4 8.4 6.6 6.0 Total CAR 13.4 12.6 12.1 11.8<br />

Profitability Tier-1 CAR 10.8 10.1 9.8 9.5<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. 14.5 16.2 20.0 21.0<br />

ROAE 14.5 16.2 20.0 21.0 Growth<br />

ROA Pre Ex. 0.99 1.02 1.17 1.18 Gross Loans 16 32 16 16<br />

ROA 0.99 1.02 1.17 1.18 Customer Deposits 16 26 16 16<br />

Z-Score (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

Interim Income Statement (HK$m)<br />

Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 1H2007 2H2007 1H2008 2H2008 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 71,027 81,718 81,523 81,413 NIM 2.6% 2.2% 2.2% 2.3%<br />

Non-Interest Income 18,759 23,471 37,341 28,619 Loan growth 15.6% 32.0% 15.5% 15.5%<br />

Operating Income 89,786 105,189 118,864 110,032 Fee growth 12.4% 23.0% 26.1% 24.7%<br />

Operating Expenses (33,062) (52,216) (44,875) (52,537) Cost-to-income 42.6% 43.5% 43.0% 42.2%<br />

Pre-Provision Profit 56,724 52,973 73,989 57,495 Credit cost 1.5% 0.6% 0.3% 0.4%<br />

Provisions (6,409) (13,854) (17,144) (27,887)<br />

Associates 605 658 516 210<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0<br />

Pretax Profit 50,920 39,777 57,361 29,818<br />

Taxation (18,538) (10,123) (12,716) (8,569)<br />

Minority Interests (2,839) (2,949) (2,464) 930<br />

Net Profit 29,543 26,705 42,181 22,179<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 83


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

China Petroleum & Chem<br />

Bloomberg: 386 HK | Reuters: 0386.HK<br />

BUY HK$6.92 HSI : 21,769<br />

Price Target : 12 months HK$ 7.98<br />

Potential Catalyst: New high earnings, M&A, attractive value<br />

Analyst<br />

Gideon Lo CFA +852 2863 8880<br />

gideon_lo@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

HK$<br />

12.80<br />

10.80<br />

8.80<br />

6.80<br />

4.80<br />

2.80<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

China Petroleum & Chem (LHS) Relative HSI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (RMB bn) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 1,452 1,265 1,734 1,954<br />

EBITDA 81 135 163 187<br />

Pre-tax Profit 24 79 100 118<br />

Net Profit 30 58 73 86<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 30 58 73 86<br />

EPS (RMB) 0.34 0.67 0.84 0.99<br />

EPS (HK$) 0.39 0.76 0.96 1.13<br />

EPS Gth (%) (47.3) 93.8 26.8 17.8<br />

Diluted EPS (HK$) 0.39 0.76 0.96 1.13<br />

DPS (HK$) 0.14 0.23 0.29 0.34<br />

BV Per Share (HK$) 4.30 4.83 5.50 6.29<br />

PE (X) 17.8 9.2 7.2 6.1<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 17.8 9.2 7.2 6.1<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 7.0 5.0 4.2 3.7<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 8.3 5.5 4.6 3.9<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 2.0 3.3 4.2 4.9<br />

P/Book Value (X) 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.1<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3<br />

ROAE (%) 9.4 16.5 18.5 19.1<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - -<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$): 0.75 0.83 0.89<br />

ICB Industry: Oil & Gas<br />

ICB Sector: Oil & Gas Producers<br />

Principal Business: The second largest vertically integrated oil<br />

company in China<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong>V, Bloomberg, HKEX<br />

207<br />

187<br />

167<br />

147<br />

127<br />

107<br />

87<br />

Up-cycle profit, mid-cycle value<br />

• While crude price remains below US$80,<br />

Sinopec remains our top pick in <strong>the</strong> sector<br />

• The robust recovery in refining margin is set to<br />

push up profit to record high in 2009<br />

• Potential injection of parent’s overseas assets<br />

will be <strong>the</strong> future earnings driver<br />

• Its mid-cycle valuation is attractive, while <strong>the</strong><br />

profit has already recovered to up-cycle level<br />

Profit will see record high in 2009. After <strong>the</strong> strongerthan-expected<br />

earnings recovery in 1H09, we expect<br />

Sinopec to see its profit reaching new record high of<br />

Rmb57.7bn, up 94% y-o-y, in 2009. Though <strong>the</strong><br />

abnormally high 2Q profitability may not be sustainable<br />

in 2H, Sinopec should be <strong>the</strong> first oil company in China<br />

to revive to up-cycle earnings, riding on <strong>the</strong><br />

normalization of refining and chemical profitability.<br />

Top pick at current crude price level. With <strong>the</strong> startup<br />

contribution from its new refining and chemical<br />

facilities in Fujian and Tianjin, as well as <strong>the</strong> Puguang Gas<br />

projects, Sinopec will see healthy pick-up in volume<br />

growth in 2H09 along with <strong>the</strong> sustainable growth of<br />

economy in China. Longer term, we expect <strong>the</strong> potential<br />

injection of parent’s overseas E&P assets will be a driver<br />

for future earnings growth and valuation.<br />

Mid-cycle value, up-cycle profit. Sinopec is trading at<br />

mid-cycle PE of 9x and P/BV of 1.4x, which is not only at<br />

a 20-30% discount to sector peers in China but also<br />

lower than its historical average. After <strong>the</strong> recent profittaking<br />

activities, it should be an attractive entry level<br />

again for investors, given its promising earnings outlook.<br />

Indeed, Sinopec’s profit visibility is <strong>the</strong> best among <strong>the</strong><br />

three major oil companies if <strong>the</strong> crude price maintains at<br />

level at or below US$80 a barrel Maintain BUY.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital - H shares (m shs) 16,780<br />

- Non H shrs (m shs) 69,922<br />

H shs as a % of Total 19<br />

H Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 116,121 / 14,983<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

Sinopec Group 75.84<br />

Major H Shareholders (%)<br />

J.P. Morgan Chase 8.84<br />

Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings 5.98<br />

H Shares-Free Float (%) 85.18<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 187.4<br />

Page 84<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed- LM / sa- SL


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

China Petroleum & Chem<br />

Income Statement (RMB bn)<br />

Balance Sheet (RMB bn)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 1,452 1,265 1,734 1,954 Net Fixed Assets 525 587 641 700<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (1,428) (1,144) (1,579) (1,779) Invts in Assocs & JVs 0 0 0 0<br />

Gross Profit 24 121 155 175 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 78 79 80 82<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc 11 (38) (48) (50) Cash & ST Invts 8 19 53 83<br />

Operating Profit 35 83 106 125 Inventory 95 76 100 107<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 17 14 19 21<br />

Associates & JV Inc 1 2 2 3 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 45 45 45 45<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (11) (6) (9) (9) Total Assets 768 821 938 1,038<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 24 79 100 118 ST Debt 40 32 39 40<br />

Tax 2 (20) (25) (29) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 234 161 187 221<br />

Minority Interest 4 (1) (2) (2) LT Debt 90 184 214 217<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 54 54 54 54<br />

Net Profit 30 58 73 86 Shareholder’s Equity 329 369 420 481<br />

Net Profit before Except. 30 58 73 86 Minority Interests 21 22 24 26<br />

EBITDA 81 135 163 187 Total Cap. & Liab. 768 821 938 1,038<br />

Sales Gth (%) 20.5 (12.9) 37.0 12.7 Non-Cash Wkg. Cap (78) (26) (23) (48)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (39.4) 66.7 21.1 14.7 Net Cash/(Debt) (123) (196) (200) (173)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (59.9) 141.0 27.5 17.1<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (47.3) 93.8 26.8 17.8<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) N/A 25.0 25.0 25.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (RMB bn)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 24 79 100 118 Gross Margins (%) 1.6 9.6 8.9 9.0<br />

Dep. & Amort. 46 50 55 60 Opg Profit Margin (%) 2.4 6.6 6.1 6.4<br />

Tax Paid (21) (9) (22) (27) Net Profit Margin (%) 2.1 4.6 4.2 4.4<br />

(Pft)/ Loss on disposal of FAs 6 6 6 6 ROAE (%) 9.4 16.5 18.5 19.1<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (1) (2) (2) (3) ROA (%) 4.0 7.3 8.3 8.7<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 9 7 (6) 1 ROCE (%) 6.7 10.5 11.3 11.9<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 11 6 9 9 Div Payout Ratio (%) 34.9 30.0 30.0 30.0<br />

Net Operating CF 75 137 139 165 Net Interest Cover (x) 3.2 12.8 12.2 13.2<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (108) (112) (108) (119) Asset Turnover (x) 1.9 1.6 2.0 2.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) (5) 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 6.6 4.5 3.5 3.8<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 23.7 22.3 16.9 18.5<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 27.9 28.6 21.1 22.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 16 (40) (10) (9) Current Ratio (x) 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.0<br />

Net Investing CF (97) (152) (118) (128) Quick Ratio (x) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4<br />

Div Paid (13) (14) (20) (24) Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 45 47 41 27 Capex to Debt (%) 82.7 51.9 42.8 46.5<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Z-Score (X) 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.1<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (11) (7) (9) (10) N.Cash/(Debt)PS (RMB) (1.6) (2.6) (2.6) (2.3)<br />

Net Financing CF 21 26 13 (7) Opg CFPS (RMB) 0.86 1.71 1.90 2.15<br />

Net Cashflow (1) 12 34 30 Free CFPS (RMB) (0.44) 0.33 0.40 0.60<br />

Interim Income Statement (RMB bn)<br />

Segmental Breakdown (RMB bn) / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 1H2007 2H2007 1H2008 2H2008 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 551 653 722 730 Revenues (RMB)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (490) (596) (743) (686) Exploration & Production 197 151 208 247<br />

Gross Profit 61 58 (20) 44 Refining 819 623 874 986<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (7) (26) 30 35 Chemicals 241 206 278 310<br />

Operating Profit 54 32 10 79 Marketing & distribution 807 760 1,042 1,178<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc N/A 0 N/A 0 O<strong>the</strong>rs (611) (475) (668) (767)<br />

Associates & JV Inc 2 2 3 (3) Total 1,452 1,265 1,734 1,954<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (4) (3) (5) (6) Operating income (RMB)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0 Exploration & Production 67 16 37 45<br />

Pre-tax Profit 53 31 8 71 Refining (62) 31 36 40<br />

Tax (15) (10) 0 2 Chemicals (13) 16 11 12<br />

Minority Interest (1) (1) 0 4 Marketing & distribution 38 23 27 31<br />

Net Profit 36 20 8 76 O<strong>the</strong>rs (2) (2) (3) (3)<br />

Net profit bef Except. 36 20 8 76 Total 28 83 106 125<br />

EBITDA 76 58 36 100 Operating income Margins<br />

Exploration & Production 33.9 10.4 17.6 18.4<br />

Sales Gth (%) N/A N/A 31.0 11.7 Refining (7.5) 5.0 4.1 4.0<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) N/A N/A (52.5) 72.0 Chemicals (5.4) 7.9 3.9 3.8<br />

Opg Profit Gth N/A N/A (81.2) 145.2 Marketing & distribution 4.7 3.0 2.6 2.6<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) N/A N/A (77.3) 277.1 O<strong>the</strong>rs 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5<br />

Gross Margins (%) 11.1 8.9 (2.8) 6.0 Total 1.9 6.6 6.1 6.4<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 9.8 4.9 1.4 10.8 Key Assumptions<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 6.6 3.1 1.1 10.4 Realized crude price 73.8 47.0 65.0 70.0<br />

Crude output (m bbls) 296.8 301.0 305.6 308.6<br />

Gas output (bcfs) 293.1 323.4 395.3 503.1<br />

Refining EBIT margin (7.5) 5.0 4.1 4.0<br />

Chemical EBIT margin (5.4) 7.9 3.9 3.8<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 85


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

China Railway Group<br />

Bloomberg: 390 HK | Reuters: 0390.HK<br />

BUY HK$7.04 HSI: 21,769<br />

Heading high growth phase<br />

Price Target : 12-Month HK$8.40<br />

Potential Catalyst: New contracts from <strong>the</strong> stimulus package<br />

Analyst<br />

Rachel Miu +852 2863 8843<br />

rachel_miu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

• Orders on hand surging to record high<br />

• Gross margin improvement ahead<br />

• Maintain BUY, TP HK$8.4<br />

Price Relative<br />

HK$<br />

12.90<br />

10.90<br />

8.90<br />

6.90<br />

4.90<br />

Relative Index<br />

219<br />

169<br />

119<br />

69<br />

New contracts to be boosted by overseas projects.<br />

A potential overseas project worth US$7.5bn from<br />

parent should boost China Railway Group (CRG)<br />

orderbook value. Coupled with a rapidly growing<br />

domestic infrastructure market, we estimate backlog to<br />

hit RMB531bn by end of <strong>the</strong> year, rising to RMB634bn<br />

next year, which is a strong indicator to its future<br />

earnings outlook. By 1H09, <strong>the</strong> group has secured<br />

RMB257bn worth of new contracts.<br />

2.90<br />

Dec-07 May-08 Oct-08 Mar-09 Aug-09<br />

China Railway Group (LHS) Relative HSI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (RMB m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 225,029 300,639 359,062 423,598<br />

EBITDA 6,052 13,595 16,148 17,791<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,300 9,000 11,534 13,395<br />

Net Profit 1,350 6,306 7,907 9,162<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 1,350 6,306 7,907 9,162<br />

EPS (HK$) 0.07 0.34 0.42 0.49<br />

EPS Gth (%) (65.9) 367.1 25.4 15.9<br />

DPS (HK$) 0.02 0.08 0.11 0.12<br />

BV Per Share (HK$) 2.98 3.32 3.74 4.23<br />

PE (X) 97.9 20.9 16.7 14.4<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 169.4 8.5 13.2 3.8<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 23.3 10.1 8.6 6.3<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 0.3 1.2 1.5 1.7<br />

P/Book Value (X) 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.7<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.1 0.0 Cash Cash<br />

ROAE (%) 2.4 10.7 11.9 12.3<br />

19<br />

Margins expansion fur<strong>the</strong>r enhances earnings<br />

prospects. New projects which commenced in 1H09<br />

should start contributing to profits from 2H, thus a<br />

positive driver to gross margins. Expansion in gross<br />

margins to 7.1% this year and <strong>the</strong> strong orders on hand<br />

are positive contributors to its earnings outlook. Besides,<br />

raw material prices are still at low levels although <strong>the</strong><br />

RMB4tr stimulus package might result in some increase<br />

in raw material costs. However, we believe <strong>the</strong><br />

magnitude of any increase should be manageable.<br />

Reiterate BUY. We estimate net earnings CAGR at 21%<br />

(FY09-11) based on <strong>the</strong> fast expanding infrastructure<br />

sector in China. The growth outlook is impressive for<br />

CRG. We maintain BUY and CRG is our top pick in <strong>the</strong><br />

infrastructure construction sector. The company is<br />

diversifying its business base ahead of <strong>the</strong> possible<br />

normalization of <strong>the</strong> infrastructure spending after <strong>the</strong><br />

RMB4tr budget is completed.<br />

Earnings Rev (%) Nil Nil Nil<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$) 0.30 0.40 0.53<br />

ICB Industry: Industrials<br />

ICB Sector: Construction & Materials<br />

Principal Business: The company engages in infrastructure<br />

construction such as railways, roads, bridges and o<strong>the</strong>rs in China<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital - H shares (m shs) 4,207<br />

- Non H shrs (m shs) 17,093<br />

H shs as a % of total 20<br />

H Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 29,620 / 3,822<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

CRECG 58.30<br />

Major H Shareholders (%)<br />

Social Security Fund 9.09<br />

Barclays Global Investors 6.96<br />

H Shares-Free Float (%) 83.95<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 30.0<br />

Page 86<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa-AH


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

China Railway Group<br />

Income Statement (RMB m) Balance Sheet (RMB m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 225,029 300,639 359,062 423,598<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (208,534) (279,223) (333,081) (393,060)<br />

Gross Profit 16,495 21,416 25,982 30,538<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opg (Exp)/Inc (13,496) (10,885) (12,940) (15,828)<br />

Operating Profit 2,999 10,531 13,041 14,710<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc - - - -<br />

Associates & JV Inc 92 98 104 111<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (791) (1,630) (1,612) (1,426)<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,300 9,000 11,534 13,395<br />

Tax (631) (2,070) (2,768) (3,215)<br />

Minority Interest (319) (624) (859) (1,018)<br />

Net Profit 1,350 6,306 7,907 9,162<br />

Net Profit before Except. 1,350 6,306 7,907 9,162<br />

EBITDA 6,052 13,595 16,148 17,791<br />

Sales Gth (%) 26.9 33.6 19.4 18.0<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (16.0) 124.6 18.8 10.2<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (29.3) 251.2 23.8 12.8<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 27.4 23.0 24.0 24.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (RMB m)<br />

Net Fixed Assets 22,685 27,847 30,980 32,149<br />

Invts in Assocs & JVs 4,280 4,378 4,483 4,594<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 32,550 34,431 36,192 37,943<br />

Cash & ST Invts 49,376 48,269 43,700 66,147<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 143,028 159,987 175,498 198,089<br />

Total Assets 251,919 274,912 290,852 338,922<br />

ST Debt 36,594 19,148 20,003 19,687<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 128,954 150,017 162,192 205,081<br />

LT Debt 16,829 29,275 23,420 18,736<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 8,618 8,618 8,618 8,618<br />

Shareholder's Equity 55,995 62,301 70,208 79,370<br />

Minority Interests 4,929 5,553 6,412 7,430<br />

Total Cap. & Liab. 251,919 274,912 290,852 338,922<br />

Non-Cash Wkg. Cap 14,074 9,969 13,306 (6,992)<br />

Net Cash/(Debt) (4,047) (154) 277 27,724<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 2,300 9,000 11,534 13,395<br />

Dep. & Amort. 3,196 3,064 3,107 3,081<br />

Tax Paid (886) (631) (2,070) (2,768)<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (92) (98) (104) (111)<br />

Non-Cash Wkg. Cap. (9,066) 2,666 (4,035) 19,850<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 5,328 1,630 1,612 1,426<br />

Net Operating CF 780 15,630 10,043 34,873<br />

Capital Exp. (net) (6,511) (8,000) (6,000) (4,000)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts. (net) (6,685) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000)<br />

Invts. in Assoc. & JV (2,048) - - -<br />

Div from Assoc. & JV - - - -<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF (4,939) 1,171 1,143 1,029<br />

Net Investing CF (20,183) (8,829) (6,857) (4,971)<br />

Div Paid (32) - - -<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 10,648 (7,801) (7,755) (7,455)<br />

Capital Issues 1,119 - - -<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (121) (108) - -<br />

Net Financing CF 11,614 (7,909) (7,755) (7,455)<br />

Net Cashflow (7,789) (1,107) (4,568) 22,447<br />

Gross Margin (%) 7.3 7.1 7.2 7.2<br />

Opg Profit Margin (%) 1.3 3.5 3.6 3.5<br />

Net Profit Margin (%) 0.6 2.1 2.2 2.2<br />

ROAE (%) 2.4 10.7 11.9 12.3<br />

ROA (%) 0.6 2.4 2.8 2.9<br />

ROCE (%) 2.0 6.8 8.2 9.0<br />

Div Payout Ratio (%) 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3<br />

Interest Cover (x) 3.8 6.5 8.1 10.3<br />

Asset Turnover (x) 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.3<br />

Debtors Turn (days) 73.9 74.0 74.0 75.0<br />

Creditors Turn (days) 106.1 100.0 100.0 109.0<br />

Inventory Turn (days) 25.3 21.0 21.0 21.0<br />

Current Ratio (x) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2<br />

Quick Ratio (x) 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.1 0.0 Cash Cash<br />

Capex to Debt (%) (0.1) (0.2) (0.1) (0.1)<br />

N. Cash/(Debt)PS (HK$) (0.2) (0.0) 0.0 1.5<br />

Opg CFPS (HK$) 0.0 0.8 0.5 1.9<br />

Free CFPS (HK$) 0.4 1.3 0.9 2.1<br />

Interim Income Statement (RMB m) Segmental Breakdown (RMB m)<br />

FY Dec 1H07 2H07 1H08 1H08<br />

Turnover 73,450 103,941 93,088 131,941<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (67,894) (96,765) (85,646) (122,888)<br />

Gross Profit 5,556 7,176 7,442 9,053<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (4,008) (4,480) (4,358) (9,138)<br />

Operating Profit 1,548 2,696 3,084 (85)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc - - - -<br />

Associates & JV Inc (8) 16 5 87<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (347) (521) (230) (561)<br />

Pre-tax Profit 1,193 2,191 2,859 (559)<br />

Tax (378) (171) (651) 20<br />

Minority Interest (158) (189) (289) (30)<br />

Net Profit 657 1,831 1,919 (569)<br />

Net profit bef Except. 657 1,831 1,919 (569)<br />

EBITDA 2,852 4,351 4,932 4,932<br />

Sales Gth (%) 21.7 11.5 26.7 26.9<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 22.4 3.6 72.9 13.4<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 27.0 (4.6) 99.2 (103.2)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 36.0 17.1 192.1 (131.1)<br />

Gross Margins (%) 7.6 6.9 8.0 6.9<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 2.1 2.6 3.3 (0.1)<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Revenues<br />

Infrastructure construction 203,299 274,454 329,344 388,626<br />

Survey, design and consulting<br />

services 4,354 5,443 5,987 6,585<br />

Engineering equip &<br />

comp mfg 6,944 8,888 10,488 12,586<br />

Property development 3,805 3,995 4,794 5,513<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r business 10,696 13,370 15,777 18,932<br />

Inter-segment eliminations (4,069) (5,511) (7,328) (8,645)<br />

Total 225,029 300,639 359,062 423,598<br />

Gross Profit<br />

Infrastructure construction 11,907 16,931 20,749 24,483<br />

Survey, design and consulting<br />

services 1,207 1,633 1,796 1,943<br />

Engineering equip &<br />

comp mfg 1,011 1,600 1,888 2,265<br />

Property development 1,145 1,199 1,438 1,654<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r business 1,225 2,139 2,524 3,029<br />

Inter-segment elimination (2,086) (2,414) (2,837)<br />

Total 16,495 21,416 25,982 30,538<br />

Page 87


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

MTR Corporation<br />

Bloomberg: 66 HK | Reuters: 0066.HK<br />

BUY HK$27.35 HSI: 21,769<br />

Price Target : 12-Month HK$30.65<br />

Potential Catalyst: Favourable land supply, project tender, significant<br />

network expansion<br />

Analyst<br />

Jeff Yau CFA· (852) 2820 4912 ·<br />

Jeff_yau@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Ken Chen · (852) 2863 8923 ·<br />

ken_chen@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

HK$<br />

36.80<br />

31.80<br />

26.80<br />

21.80<br />

16.80<br />

11.80<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

Relative<br />

Index<br />

MTR (LHS) Relative HSI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (HK$m) 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 10,690 17,628 17,747 18,125<br />

EBITDA 5,912 9,325 9,257 9,542<br />

Pre-tax Profit 10,254 9,173 8,432 9,292<br />

Underlying Profit * 8,571 8,185 7,068 7,787<br />

EPS (HK$) 1.54 1.45 1.25 1.36<br />

EPS Gth (%) 42.1 (5.5) (14.1) 9.3<br />

DPS (HK$) 0.45 0.48 0.48 0.48<br />

PE (X) 17.8 18.8 21.9 20.1<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 25.5 16.2 17.0 16.2<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 31.0 19.6 19.8 19.2<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.8<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2<br />

ROAE (%) 10.2 8.7 7.0 7.4<br />

NAV (HK$) 30.0 31.9<br />

Disc. To NAV (%) -9% -14%<br />

Earnings Rev (%) Nil Nil<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$) 1.23 1.30<br />

209<br />

189<br />

169<br />

149<br />

129<br />

109<br />

* Excluding fair value change on investment properties<br />

ICB Industry : Consumer services<br />

ICB Sector : Travel & Leisure<br />

Principal Business: Operate pre-dominantly a rail-based<br />

transportation system in HK with exposure to residential and<br />

commercial markets<br />

89<br />

69<br />

Defensive growth stock<br />

• Network expansion to boost railway earnings, it<br />

had been resilient amid <strong>the</strong> economic downturn<br />

• Large land bank to drive development earnings,<br />

which are secured in <strong>the</strong> near term<br />

• Valuation remains attractive; Maintain BUY<br />

Railway earnings – “Defensive growth”. Patronage of<br />

domestic and cross boundary services was stable YTD<br />

despite a slower local economy and swine flu. The drop in<br />

Airport Express passenger volume has moderated since<br />

August. These imply resilient fare revenue. Significant<br />

network expansion in <strong>the</strong> coming decade should widen its<br />

catchment area, and hence, competitive edge over o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

public transport operators. This should cement its market<br />

dominance and provide room for long-term railway<br />

earnings growth.<br />

Secured near-term development earnings. In 1H09,<br />

MTRC recognized HK$2.15bn property development<br />

earnings, mainly relating to provision write-back for The<br />

Palazzo and The Capitol and final profit split for The<br />

HarbourSide. Lake Silver, which has been substantially sold,<br />

should take centre stage in 2H09. Profit sharing of Le<br />

Prestige, based on “sharing in kind” will be accounted for<br />

upon project completion ei<strong>the</strong>r in late 2009 or early 2010.<br />

Profits from <strong>the</strong>se two projects, which represent <strong>the</strong> bulk of<br />

near-term development profits, are well secured.<br />

Sizeable land reserve to support growth. Armed with a<br />

large development land bank mainly for residential use,<br />

MTRC will be a prime beneficiary of <strong>the</strong> government’s<br />

favourable land policy. With an improving balance sheet, it<br />

can afford to exploit <strong>the</strong> potential of its future property<br />

projects by increasing capital contribution in return for<br />

higher profit share.<br />

Attractively valued. The stock is now trading at 9%<br />

discount to our appraised current NAV. This remains<br />

attractive given its defensive railway earnings and long-term<br />

growth prospects. In <strong>the</strong> next six months, MTRC plans to<br />

offer Kowloon Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Link Sites C&D for tender. If it<br />

secures favourable terms, <strong>the</strong>re could be upside to <strong>the</strong> stock.<br />

We re-iterate our BUY call and HK$30.65 target price.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 5,713<br />

Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 156,239 / 20,159<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

The Financial Secretary Incorporated 76.75<br />

Free Float (%) 23.25<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 4.3<br />

Page 88<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa- RM


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

MTR Corporation<br />

Income Statement (HK$m)<br />

Balance Sheet (HK$m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 10,690 17,628 17,747 18,125<br />

EBITDA 5,912 9,325 9,257 9,542<br />

Depr/Amort (2,739) (2,930) (2,958) (2,986)<br />

EBIT 3,173 6,395 6,299 6,555<br />

Property development<br />

profit 8,304 4,670 3,648 4,413<br />

Assoc 99 159 166 173<br />

Interest (Exp)/Inc (1,316) (1,998) (1,670) (1,850)<br />

Exceptionals (6) (53) (10) -<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 10,254 9,173 8,432 9,292<br />

Tax (1,681) (992) (1,364) (1,505)<br />

Minority Interest (2) 4 - -<br />

Underlying Profit 8,571 8,185 7,068 7,787<br />

Sales Growth (%) 12.0 64.9 0.7 2.1<br />

Net Profit Gr (%) 43.7 (4.5) (13.6) 10.2<br />

EBITDA Mgn (%) 55.3 52.9 52.2 52.6<br />

Opg Mgn (%) 29.7 36.3 35.5 36.2<br />

Tax Rate (%) 16.4 10.8 16.2 16.2<br />

Cash Flow Statement (HK$m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

EBIT 3,173 6,395 6,299 6,555<br />

Tax Paid (1) (577) (1,364) (1,505)<br />

Depr/Amort 2,739 2,930 2,958 2,986<br />

Chg in Wkg Cap 11 113 (140) 110<br />

Othr Non-Cash 52 60 (10) -<br />

Operational CF 5,974 8,921 7,743 8,147<br />

Capex (2,481) (5,807) (8,500) (8,200)<br />

Assoc, MI, Invsmt (6,012) 3,268 11,585 6,590<br />

Investment CF (8,493) (2,539) 3,085 (1,610)<br />

Net Chg in Debt 5,542 (3,538) (7,000) 1,000<br />

New Capital 23 26 - -<br />

Dividend (1,168) (1,265) (2,708) (2,726)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r financing CF (1,609) (1,445) (1,101) (1,333)<br />

Financing CF 2,788 (6,222) (10,809) (3,058)<br />

Chg in Cash 269 160 19 3,479<br />

Chg in Net Cash (5,273) 3,698 7,019 2,479<br />

Source: Bloomberg, Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Fixed Assets 132,417 131,004 131,838 129,179<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 14,945 15,998 19,884 23,225<br />

Cash/ST Investments 909 1,264 1,283 4,762<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 7,397 11,072 5,334 5,274<br />

Total Assets 155,668 159,338 158,338 162,440<br />

ST Debt 509 1,705 1,269 1,429<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 6,804 6,745 6,685 6,735<br />

LT Debt 33,541 29,584 23,020 23,860<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liab 23,777 23,482 23,607 23,248<br />

Minority Interests 23 21 21 21<br />

Shareholders' Equity 91,014 97,801 103,737 107,147<br />

Total Capital 155,668 159,338 158,338 162,440<br />

Share Capital (m) 5,611 5,661 5,661 5,661<br />

Net Cash/(Debt) (33,474) (30,496) (23,477) (20,998)<br />

Working Capital 993 3,886 (1,337) 1,872<br />

Net Gearing (%) 37 31 23 20<br />

Segmental Breakdown (HK$m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Fare revenue 7,115 11,467 11,470 11,775<br />

Station commercial and<br />

rail related revenue 1,741 3,449 3,361 3,415<br />

Rental, management and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r revenue 1,834 2,712 2,916 2,934<br />

Total sales 10,690 17,628 17,747 18,125<br />

Page 89


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Malaysia<br />

Cherry-picking in <strong>the</strong> upcycle<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong> longer term uptrend for equities is intact.<br />

This should be supported by more positive domestic<br />

newsflow in <strong>the</strong> coming months. That said, after a stellar<br />

45% gain from <strong>the</strong> March low, we believe <strong>the</strong><br />

benchmark index is vulnerable to a correction in <strong>the</strong> near<br />

term. We are keen on banks, construction and property<br />

and recommend being selective in stock picks.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> macro front, we expect to see fur<strong>the</strong>r streng<strong>the</strong>ning of <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

recovery with <strong>the</strong> worst of <strong>the</strong> financial crisis behind us. Reforms initiated by <strong>the</strong><br />

new Prime Minister should continue in <strong>the</strong> coming months. We believe <strong>the</strong><br />

upcoming 2010 Budget will indicate a lower y-o-y deficit on lower operating<br />

expenses while higher development expenditure will help boost <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

recovery. We foresee a narrower 2.9% GDP contraction in 2009 but a fairly<br />

strong 4.5% rebound in 2010.<br />

In terms of picks, CIMB, Public Bank, AMMB and Hong Leong Bank trade at 13x<br />

forward earnings, relatively undemanding compared to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r index<br />

heavyweights and KLCI’s 15x. We are optimistic that <strong>the</strong>re should be upside for<br />

IJM Corp and Gamuda as <strong>the</strong> government pump-priming accelerates and<br />

construction contracts are rolled out over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months. Continued strong<br />

take-ups, margin upside and positive newsflow should lift valuations for property<br />

developers like SP Setia, E&O and DNP. O<strong>the</strong>r picks include Malaysia Airports and<br />

our contrarian Buy on MISC.<br />

Wong Ming Tek (603) 2711 0956 mingtek@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Malaysia <strong>Research</strong> Team<br />

Page 90<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: LM / sa: WMT


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

Indices Closed Chg Net -1 mth -3 mth -6 mth -12 mth 52-Week<br />

17 Sep 2009 -1 mth (%) (%) (%) (%) High Low<br />

KLCI 1,219 50 4 14 4 22 1,219 829<br />

KLCON Index 235 10 4 13 9 31 235 135<br />

KLCSU Index 366 15 4 14 21 28 367 262<br />

KLFIN Index 9,962 507 5 16 8 22 9,962 6,136<br />

KLIND Index 2,663 88 3 14 7 23 2,664 1,995<br />

KLPRO Index 91 1 1 5 (2) 9 93 64<br />

KLPLN Index 5,980 41 1 11 (17) 28 6,067 3,119<br />

KLPRP Index 796 16 2 5 7 27 809 495<br />

KLSER Index 159 6 4 13 2 19 159 112<br />

KLTEC Index 16 (0) (1) 10 (21) (5) 17 11<br />

FBMSC Index 9,947 26 0 5 5 22 10,355 6,024<br />

Transactions:<br />

YTD<br />

Volume (billion) 176<br />

Value (RM billion) 204<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

MARKET REVIEW<br />

For <strong>the</strong> quarter, <strong>the</strong> KLCI continued its strong momentum<br />

and went on to achieve YTD highs. At <strong>the</strong> close, <strong>the</strong><br />

benchmark index gained 13% to 1219 points (as at 17 Sep),<br />

fuelled by a combination of improving economic activities,<br />

investor sentiment and risk appetite.<br />

2Q09 GDP contracted 3.9% y-o-y, better than expected. It<br />

was a broad-based improvement as all sectors recorded<br />

better growth. The construction sector grew faster, possibly<br />

on <strong>the</strong> back of greater progress on government projects<br />

while recovery in <strong>the</strong> equity market helped lift financial<br />

services performance. On a q-o-q basis, <strong>the</strong> economy<br />

expanded 13.4%, indicating <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> recession.<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong> market moved up in anticipation of stronger<br />

2Q09 corporate earnings, which was announced by end-<br />

August. We saw good gains for <strong>the</strong> banking sector that beat<br />

market expectations.<br />

The improved stock market performance since March, cheap<br />

financing and incentives packages resulted in strong takeups<br />

for physical properties. The likes of SP Setia, E&O and<br />

IJM chalked up impressive sales within a few months. This in<br />

turn helped propel share prices of property counters on <strong>the</strong><br />

stock market.<br />

On politics, it was ano<strong>the</strong>r eventful quarter. The ruling<br />

Barisan Nasional coalition lost <strong>the</strong> Manek Urai, Kelantan (in<br />

July) and <strong>the</strong> Permatang Pasir, Penang (in August) state seat<br />

by-elections. There were also more developments on <strong>the</strong><br />

Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) controversy and a tussle in MCA<br />

leading to an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) on 10<br />

October that will see balloting on resolutions including a noconfidence<br />

motion against party president Datuk Seri Ong<br />

Tee Keat.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> quarter, crude oil prices gained 5% to USD72 per<br />

barrel. However, Malaysian crude palm oil futures slipped<br />

4% to RM2,182/MT. The Ringgit streng<strong>the</strong>ned against <strong>the</strong><br />

US dollar, appreciating 1% at <strong>the</strong> end of 3Q09 to<br />

RM3.47/USD.<br />

Page 91


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Kuala Lumpur Composite Index Key Events<br />

Index pts<br />

1500<br />

1400<br />

1300<br />

1200<br />

1100<br />

1000<br />

Oct 08<br />

8 - PM announced resignation<br />

in Mar 09<br />

11 - Koh Tsu Koon became<br />

Gerakan president after<br />

winning uncontested<br />

15 - Hindraf banned<br />

19 - MCA party election<br />

Nov 08<br />

2 - Deputy PM won <strong>the</strong> Umno<br />

president post uncontested<br />

4 - RM7b stimulus package<br />

announced<br />

25 - Bank Negara cuts OPR to<br />

3.25%<br />

Dec 08<br />

3 - Zaid Ibrahim sacked from<br />

Umno<br />

J an 09<br />

9 - BNM cuts OPR to 2.5%<br />

17 - PAS won T'ganu byelection<br />

Feb 09<br />

6 - BN took over Perak<br />

11 - Power tariff rev ised<br />

18 - Perak MB and<br />

assembly men suspended<br />

23 - Govt vetoed East@Labu<br />

airport<br />

24 - BNM cuts OPR to 2.0%<br />

27 - Toll hike defered<br />

Mar 09<br />

3 - Perak's PKR held<br />

emergency sitting under a<br />

tree<br />

5 - Anwar's sodomy trial<br />

transferred to High Court<br />

10 - RM60b 2nd stimulus<br />

package unveiled<br />

24-28 - UMNO General<br />

Assembly--Najib won No.1<br />

post, Muhyiddin No.2<br />

Apr 09<br />

3 - Najib sworn in as new<br />

PM<br />

7 - BN retained Btg Ai, PR<br />

regained Bkt Gantang &<br />

Bkt Selambau<br />

8 - Cabinet re-shuffle<br />

22 - Removal of 30% bumi<br />

equity for 27 service subsector<br />

27 - Liberalisation for<br />

finance sector<br />

May 09<br />

7 - Chaotic Perak State Assembly<br />

13 - First H1N1 case<br />

22 - Court of Appeal overturned<br />

High Court decision of declaring<br />

Nizar as valid Menteri Besar<br />

27 - 1Q09 GDP contracted 6.2%<br />

31 - PKR won Penanti byelection<br />

J un 09<br />

3 - PAS agreed on unity<br />

government talks<br />

13 - Zaid Ibrahim joined PKR<br />

16 - 1st stimulus package spent<br />

22 - First school closed due to<br />

H1N1 virus. 50 cases to date.<br />

22 - Anwar sodomy trial on 1 &<br />

8 J uly.<br />

Jul 09<br />

6 - FBMKLCI index rebranding<br />

11 - Najib annouced additional<br />

measures in conjuction with his<br />

100th day as PM<br />

16 - Death of Teoh Beng Hock<br />

21 - First H1N1 death<br />

Aug 09<br />

27 - 2Q09 GDP contracted 3.9%<br />

26 - PAS won Permatang Pasir byelection<br />

27 - Dr Chua sacked from MCA<br />

Sep 09<br />

4 - Bagan Pinang state<br />

assemblyman died, 9th byelection<br />

on Oct 11<br />

16 - MCA's EGM fixed on 10/10<br />

18 - Maxis IPO exposure draft out<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

Mar-<br />

08<br />

Apr-<br />

08<br />

May-<br />

08<br />

J un-<br />

08<br />

Jul-<br />

08<br />

Aug-<br />

08<br />

Sep-<br />

08<br />

Oct-<br />

08<br />

Nov-<br />

08<br />

Dec-<br />

08<br />

Jan-<br />

09<br />

Feb-<br />

09<br />

Mar-<br />

09<br />

Apr-<br />

09<br />

May-<br />

09<br />

Jun-<br />

09<br />

Jul-<br />

09<br />

Aug-<br />

09<br />

Sep-<br />

09<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, various media<br />

Page 92


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

2010 Budget: Shoring up growth<br />

Expect lower deficit. The 2010 Budget will be presented in<br />

Parliament on 23 October amidst a challenging economic<br />

environment. The Prime Minister will need to steer <strong>the</strong> economy<br />

towards robust economic growth while keeping <strong>the</strong> lid on a<br />

ballooning fiscal deficit. We expect a lower deficit in 2010 at<br />

6.8% of nominal GDP versus 8.5% this year on lower operating<br />

expenses.<br />

Higher development expenditure. To help shore up growth, we<br />

expect a record allocation of RM55b-RM58b from RM53.7b in<br />

2009. As pump-priming remains a cornerstone to drive<br />

economic growth, <strong>the</strong>re will likely be renewed emphasis on <strong>the</strong><br />

upcoming mega projects such as <strong>the</strong> LCCT, LRT extension and<br />

Interstate Water Transfer – which should start latest by next<br />

year-end. The focus should be on implementation of <strong>the</strong>se key<br />

projects and as such, we do not expect many o<strong>the</strong>r new mega<br />

projects.<br />

Likely ano<strong>the</strong>r raise in tobacco tax this year. In our opinion, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is good chance of higher excise duty for cigarette makers.<br />

Historically, <strong>the</strong> government increased sin taxes for <strong>the</strong> tobacco<br />

sector in eight out of <strong>the</strong> past eleven years. Our sensitivity<br />

analysis based on excise tax increase of 10%-40% indicates that<br />

<strong>the</strong> impact to BAT’s earnings would range from -1.7% to -<br />

18.1% for FY10F (assuming full price pass through) and our fair<br />

value would fall to a range of RM36.70 – 44.00 per share (from<br />

RM44.80)<br />

In our opinion, <strong>the</strong>re is a possibility of small incremental<br />

corporate tax cut, in line with <strong>the</strong> longer term objective to<br />

attract foreign investment. However, we think chances of<br />

individual tax cuts are low. The introduction of Goods and<br />

Services Tax (GST), which will broaden <strong>the</strong> tax base, is also<br />

unlikely next year given <strong>the</strong> economy is just recovering and<br />

<strong>the</strong> required preparations for implementation. But this<br />

budget could provide a timeframe for GST implementation<br />

in <strong>the</strong> future.<br />

In terms of GDP, we expect a contraction of 2.9% in 2009<br />

with <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector still in contraction mode. For<br />

2010, we forecast 4.5% growth, driven by improvement in<br />

all sectors and a big swing in manufacturing. As part of <strong>the</strong><br />

country’s longer term growth strategy, we also look for<br />

incentives/measures to stimulate investments in R&D,<br />

education and training. This will help upgrade our<br />

manufacturing capabilities and drive growth in selected<br />

services and sectors where we can achieve leadership, such<br />

as Islamic banking/securities business. Potential beneficiaries<br />

here would include CIMB, AMMB, Maybank.<br />

Construction growth and development expenditure<br />

RM billion<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

-<br />

%<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

-25<br />

-30<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

Development Expenditure<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

Construction Growth<br />

2009F<br />

Source: Economic Report 2008/2009, Statistics Department<br />

Page 93


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Expectations/wish list for 2010 Budget<br />

Sector<br />

Details<br />

Deficit Lower deficit in 2010 at 6.8% of nominal GDP versus 8.5% in 2009.<br />

Development Higher allocation of RM55b-RM58b from RM53.7b in 2009. Emphasis on implementation of key mega projects. Potential<br />

expenditure beneficiary: Construction sector; picks: IJM Corp, Gamuda.<br />

Tobacco<br />

Higher excise duty. Potential loser: BAT.<br />

Taxes<br />

Incremental corporate tax cut. Timeframe for implementation of Goods & Services Tax (GST) in future.<br />

Property<br />

Review of bumiputera policies for consistency and transparency. Redevelopment of more government land. Government to<br />

takeover provision of low-cost housing while developers contribute funds. Potential beneficiary: Property sector; picks: SP<br />

Setia, E&O, DNP.<br />

REITs<br />

Incentives to encourage cross-border acquisitions. Incentives for asset enhancement and/or asset acquisition. Relaxation of<br />

REIT ownership to encourage listing of foreign REITs in Msia. Fur<strong>the</strong>r reduction in withholding tax. Potential beneficiary:<br />

REITs; pick: Axis REIT.<br />

Airlines<br />

Incentives such as rebates for airlines that achieve certain passenger growth. Waiver on landing charges for new foreign<br />

and existing airlines that add new destinations or flight frequencies for a number of years (after which discounts will be<br />

given). New parking charges after <strong>the</strong> first three hours of free parking. Potential beneficiary: Malaysia Airports.<br />

Financials Incentives/measures in selected sectors where we can achieve leadership such as Islamic banking/securities business.<br />

Potential beneficiaries: CIMB, AMMB, Maybank.<br />

Auto<br />

Incentives to attract foreign investment. We view it positively should <strong>the</strong> NAP offer incentives for foreign auto companies to<br />

take-up under-utilized capacity in Malaysia. Potential beneficiaries: Proton, APM.<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, various media<br />

Page 94


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Outlook: Growth gaining momentum<br />

Recovery to streng<strong>the</strong>n. In <strong>the</strong> coming quarter, we expect GDP<br />

growth to continue. We look for 3Q09 GDP contraction to<br />

narrow to 2.5% and post a positive y-o-y growth of 1.0% in<br />

4Q09. This could lead to potential for earnings to surprise on<br />

<strong>the</strong> upside.<br />

We have seen signs of <strong>the</strong> expansion gaining momentum.<br />

Loan approvals for <strong>the</strong> banking system turned positive and<br />

grew 10.3% y-o-y (+7.0% m-o-m) to RM27.2b in June 09<br />

after nine months of y-o-y contractions, led by <strong>the</strong> household<br />

(+14.1% y-o-y) and business (+6.8% y-o-y) segments.<br />

Mortgage approvals grew a hefty 33.8% y-o-y (+16.0% m-om)<br />

to RM7.1bn, reflecting <strong>the</strong> acceleration of launches by<br />

developers and better take-ups resulting from low financing<br />

rates and attractive financing packages. The absolute amount<br />

of RM7.1b is a three-year high and exceeds pre-crisis levels.<br />

Our economist has also highlighted <strong>the</strong> increase in imports of<br />

capital goods (exclude transport equipment) that suggests<br />

producers are gearing up for stronger orders ahead.<br />

Expect recovery to streng<strong>the</strong>n in coming quarters<br />

% YoY, % QoQ<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>f<br />

Loan approvals: Positive growth in June & July after nine<br />

months of contraction<br />

140%<br />

120%<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

-20%<br />

-40%<br />

-60%<br />

Jan-06<br />

Apr-06<br />

Jul-06<br />

Oct-06<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Loan Approvals (y-o-y % change)<br />

Source: Bank Negara; <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

12-month M.A. (y-o-y % change)<br />

Loan applications and approvals: Loan appetite reviving;<br />

nearing pre-crisis high<br />

RM bil<br />

55.0<br />

50.0<br />

45.0<br />

40.0<br />

35.0<br />

30.0<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

5.0<br />

-<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

-10%<br />

-20%<br />

Jan-08<br />

Feb-08<br />

Mar-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

May-08<br />

Jun-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Aug-08<br />

Sep-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Nov-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Feb-09<br />

Mar-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

May-09<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

Mar-05 Mar-06 Mar-07 Mar-08 Mar-09<br />

Total Loan Application<br />

Source: Bank Negara; <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Total Loan Approval<br />

GDP growth % QoQ saar<br />

GDP growth %YoY<br />

Source: CEIC; <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Page 95


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Mortgage approvals: 3-year high; exceeds pre-crisis levels<br />

RMm<br />

8,000<br />

Brighter outlook for manufacturing: Increasing imports of<br />

capital goods<br />

7,000<br />

6,000<br />

RMm 2005=100<br />

6000<br />

120<br />

5,000<br />

4,000<br />

3,000<br />

2,000<br />

1,000<br />

0<br />

5500<br />

5000<br />

4500<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

115<br />

110<br />

105<br />

100<br />

95<br />

90<br />

85<br />

Jul-06<br />

Oct-06<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

3000<br />

Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09<br />

80<br />

Mortgages Hire-purchase Construction<br />

Source: Bank Negara; <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Source: CEIC; <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Imports of capital goods (ex trspt eqmt)<br />

Industrial production (RHS)<br />

Potential / Upcoming Events<br />

Date<br />

Events<br />

10 Oct 09 MCA Extraordinary General Meeting that will see balloting on resolutions including a no-confidence motion against party<br />

president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat.<br />

11 Oct 09 Bagan Pinang, Negeri Sembilan state by-election<br />

23 Oct 09 Tabling of 2010 Budget in Parliament<br />

end Oct 09 Tender for Low Cost Carrier Terminal (LCCT) contracts and prequalification tender for LRT contracts expected to be called<br />

by end of Oct.<br />

end Oct 09 National Automotive Policy (NAP) to be concluded with <strong>the</strong> aim of fur<strong>the</strong>r improving existing guidelines, policies and<br />

incentives.<br />

26 Nov 09 3Q09 GDP to be announced. <strong>DBS</strong> expects 2.5% y-o-y contraction. This follows 2Q09's 3.9% contraction.<br />

end Dec 09<br />

Target for EPU to review toll concessions.<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, various media<br />

GROWTH<br />

Sequential earnings growth. We have seen corporate earnings<br />

growing strongly on a q-o-q basis to normalized levels. Our<br />

2Q09 universe earnings grew 29% q-o-q (-17% y-o-y), gaining<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r momentum after 1Q09’s 17% q-o-q growth that<br />

marked <strong>the</strong> inflection point for corporate earnings (from 4Q08’s<br />

8% drop q-o-q).<br />

Broad-based q-o-q expansion. We saw a big q-o-q swing in Sime<br />

Darby and IOI’s profits. From a weak 3Q09, both registered<br />

strong rebound in most key operating units such as plantation,<br />

property, manufacturing and industrial. For <strong>the</strong> banks, a sharp<br />

surge in non-interest income more than offset noticeable<br />

increase in provisions. There was also q-o-q improvement from<br />

Axiata, driven by its Indonesian operations and Celcom. This<br />

offset weaker earnings from Tenaga dragged by higher power<br />

generation cost.<br />

Banks beat expectations. The proportion of companies that<br />

disappointed earnings dropped to 18% in 2Q09 from 28%<br />

in 1Q09. 18% beat expectations (vs 17% in 1Q09), while<br />

64% (vs 55%) reported earnings that were within<br />

expectations. The key sector that beat expectations this<br />

quarter were <strong>the</strong> banks. BCHB, Hong Leong Bank, EON<br />

Capital and RHB Capital beat ours and consensus forecasts<br />

(largely on better non-interest income). While <strong>the</strong><br />

percentage of companies with disappointing earnings fell<br />

versus 1Q09, we saw notable disappointments. Excluding its<br />

bumper impairment for BII, Maybank’s loan loss provisions<br />

almost doubled from 3Q09 – which we believe, to some<br />

extent, involved <strong>the</strong> “clean up” for BII. O<strong>the</strong>r big-cap<br />

disappointments came from Digi, Genting, UMW, MAS and<br />

KL Kepong.<br />

Page 96


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Stronger quarterly net profit growth<br />

(RMm)<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

-<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

4Q06 1Q07 2Q07 3Q07 4Q07 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09<br />

5.0% upgrade in 2009 universe earnings. Following <strong>the</strong> 2Q09<br />

results season, we lift 2009 and 2010 universe earnings by 5.0%<br />

and 7.5% respectively. This was much stronger than upgrades in<br />

1Q09 (+0.1% for 2009 and 3.4% for 2010). The big lift came<br />

from <strong>the</strong> banks - BCHB, Hong Leong Bank, AMMB and EON<br />

Capital – and Sime Darby and PPB Group for reasons mentioned<br />

earlier.<br />

2Q09 Net Profit Growth<br />

(RMm) 2Q08 1Q09 2Q09 % chg<br />

y-o-y<br />

%<br />

chg<br />

q-o-q<br />

Banking 2,345.1 2,400.9 2,660.2 13 11<br />

Non-bank financial 28.6 15.5 35.0 22 126<br />

Consumer 300.0 475.7 501.6 67 5<br />

Manufacturing/Industrial 415.9 (62.2) 36.3 -91 -158<br />

Media (2.6) (28.9) 34.5 nm -219<br />

Motor 244.3 127.6 162.0 -34 27<br />

Oil & Gas 166.8 202.3 144.8 -13 -28<br />

Conglomerate 1,354.4 422.4 1,381.5 2 227<br />

Construction 319.9 258.8 285.3 -11 10<br />

Concessionaires 300.3 298.0 281.3 -6 -6<br />

Gaming 709.6 646.3 605.8 -15 -6<br />

Plantation 1,073.1 223.7 716.6 -33 220<br />

Utility 1,053.5 1,307.1 931.0 -12 -29<br />

Property 188.1 104.4 187.1 -1 79<br />

Telecommunication 774.8 468.1 778.5 0 66<br />

Transportation/Logistic 766.5 (356.4) (380.4) -150 7<br />

Total 10,038.2 6,503.3 8,361.1 -17 29<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Earnings contraction this year reduced. Following our earnings<br />

upgrade, we expect 8.2% earnings contraction in 2009. The<br />

key drag on earnings will come from Plantation and<br />

Conglomerates (Sime Darby and PPB Group), on lower CPO<br />

price assumptions of RM2,300/t versus RM2,864/mt in 2008,<br />

as well as one-offs (forex losses for IOI). We also expect<br />

weaker earnings for Genting (Spore pre-operating expenses,<br />

lower plantation earnings) and Manufacturing (lower steel<br />

prices).<br />

Rebound next year. In 2010, we expect a 15.4% rebound in<br />

earnings, largely on lower provisions and higher noninterest<br />

income (recovery in capital markets) for banks,<br />

absence of forex losses (for plantation) and a recovery in<br />

power demand for Tenaga.<br />

Page 97


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Malaysia Universe: Earnings Growth by Sector<br />

Net profit ex EI Earnings Growth %) PE (x)<br />

2008 2009F 2010F 2008 2009F 2010F 2008 2009F 2010F<br />

Financial 10,362 10,539 11,885 5.2 1.7 12.8 16.0 15.7 14.0<br />

Consumer 1,677 1,796 1,925 1.3 7.1 7.2 16.6 15.5 14.4<br />

Manufacturing/Industrial 575 371 520 (16.4) (35.4) 40.0 9.4 14.6 10.4<br />

Media 158 164 192 (49.0) 3.7 17.3 42.3 40.8 34.8<br />

Motor 613 487 693 8.5 (20.6) 42.3 16.9 21.3 15.0<br />

Oil & Gas 624 699 760 42.0 11.9 8.7 11.1 9.9 9.1<br />

Conglomerate 4,799 3,686 4,102 64.5 (23.2) 11.3 14.6 19.1 17.1<br />

Construction 1,161 1,183 1,559 17.8 1.9 31.8 19.5 19.1 14.5<br />

Concessionaires 1,182 1,261 1,316 (7.9) 6.7 4.4 15.1 14.2 13.6<br />

Gaming 2,842 1,924 2,523 4.0 (32.3) 31.1 14.4 21.3 16.2<br />

Plantation 4,070 2,079 2,987 46.3 (48.9) 43.7 13.9 27.3 19.0<br />

Power 4,991 4,746 5,031 (22.0) (4.9) 6.0 14.9 15.7 14.8<br />

Property 691 776 887 (9.3) 12.3 14.3 17.8 15.9 13.9<br />

Telecommunication 2,503 2,528 2,813 (35.1) 1.0 11.3 22.0 21.8 19.6<br />

Transportation/Logistic ^ 1,220 2,171 2,498 (51.8) 78.0 15.1 33.2 18.7 16.2<br />

H<strong>DBS</strong>VR’s universe 37,467 34,408 39,690 (0.8) (8.2) 15.4 16.4 17.8 15.5<br />

Notes: (1) Companies with financial year ending Jan – Mar have been classified as preceding year’s results.<br />

(2) Earnings exclude exceptional items.<br />

(3) Excludes MAS<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Net Profit Change by Sector Ex-MAS<br />

RM'm 2009 2010<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

500<br />

-<br />

(500)<br />

(1,000)<br />

(1,500)<br />

(2,000)<br />

(2,500)<br />

1346<br />

177<br />

Financial<br />

119 129 149 6 28<br />

(204)<br />

Consumer<br />

Manufacturing/Industrial<br />

Media<br />

206<br />

(126)<br />

Motor<br />

61 416<br />

74<br />

(1113)<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Conglomerate<br />

376<br />

22 79<br />

56<br />

Construction<br />

Concessionaires<br />

(918)<br />

599<br />

Gaming<br />

908<br />

(244)<br />

(1991)<br />

Plantation<br />

Power<br />

285<br />

85111<br />

Property<br />

951<br />

285 327<br />

24<br />

Telecommunication<br />

Transportation/Logistic<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 98


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

VALUATIONS<br />

Impressive gains todate. Since <strong>the</strong> stock market’s recovery in<br />

March 2009, <strong>the</strong> benchmark KLCI has gained a hefty 45%.<br />

With that, <strong>the</strong> KLCI has regained 57% of <strong>the</strong> points lost in<br />

<strong>the</strong> crisis and is now 20% from its all-time high of 1,516<br />

points achieved in January 2008.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> stellar performance, <strong>the</strong> KLCI has lagged key<br />

regional markets in <strong>the</strong> run-up. And yet, at 15x forward<br />

earnings, <strong>the</strong> KLCI remains <strong>the</strong> most expensive compared to<br />

its peers because it did not drop as much in <strong>the</strong> crisis.<br />

At normalized valuations. At 15x forward earnings and 1.7x<br />

book value, <strong>the</strong> KLCI is at its historical average (since 1997;<br />

range: 10-19x earnings) levels. Post 1998 crisis, <strong>the</strong> KLCI’s<br />

historical average is 14x earnings (and 1.7x book value).<br />

To move up from here on, <strong>the</strong>re needs to be stronger<br />

earnings upgrades. This could come from: (i) stronger than<br />

expected capital market activities, lower provision chargeoff<br />

rates and NPLs for banks; (ii) higher crude palm oil (CPO)<br />

prices; (iii) faster progress billings on property sales; and (iv)<br />

for construction: faster margin recovery and bigger sized<br />

contract wins.<br />

We believe 14x forward earnings is a fair multiple for <strong>the</strong><br />

KLCI, given that post-1998 crisis <strong>the</strong> KLCI had only traded<br />

above 15x earnings from mid-June 2007 in <strong>the</strong> run-up to hit<br />

its all-time high of 1,516 in January 2008. Given <strong>the</strong><br />

prospects of earnings upgrades, if we assume 5% upgrade<br />

in our 2009-11 universe earnings, we derive an end-2010<br />

target of 1,300 (without earnings upgrade end-2010:<br />

1,240).<br />

Malaysia: Broader Market Underperformed YTD<br />

120.0<br />

Malaysia: Relatively High 2010 PE Multiples<br />

100.0<br />

80.0<br />

60.0<br />

40.0<br />

10F PE (x)<br />

16.0<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

20.0<br />

6.0<br />

-<br />

4.0<br />

Indonesia<br />

China<br />

Thailand<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Korea<br />

YTD chg (%) Since 1Mar09 chg (%)<br />

Singapore<br />

Philippines<br />

Malaysia<br />

2.0<br />

Korea<br />

Thailand<br />

China<br />

Indonesia<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Philippines<br />

Singapore<br />

Malaysia<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

KLCI forward PE<br />

KLCI forward P/BV<br />

35.0<br />

30.0<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

5.0<br />

-<br />

Dec-97<br />

Dec-98<br />

Nov-99<br />

Nov-00<br />

Oct-01<br />

Oct-02<br />

Sep-03<br />

Sep-04<br />

Aug-05<br />

Aug-06<br />

Jul-07<br />

Jul-08<br />

Jun-09<br />

1,600<br />

1,400<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

-<br />

F orward PE (LHS) Mean 1 Std Dev +/ - 6.4x FBMKLCI Index<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

-<br />

Dec-97<br />

Dec-98<br />

Nov-99<br />

Nov-00<br />

Oct-01<br />

Oct-02<br />

Sep-03<br />

Sep-04<br />

Aug-05<br />

Aug-06<br />

Jul-07<br />

Jul-08<br />

Jun-09<br />

1,600<br />

1,400<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

-<br />

Forward PBV (LHS) Mean 1 Std Dev +/ - 0.3x FBMKLCI Index<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 99


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

STRATEGY<br />

Banks: Positive Outlook. We expect: (i) stronger non-interest<br />

income on <strong>the</strong> back of improved pipeline of debt and equity<br />

deals in 2H09; (ii) possible capital repayment and/or higher<br />

dividend payouts could be a feature given that banks are<br />

generally well capitalized; (iii) stronger growth with lower<br />

provisions and better loans growth.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> heavyweights on <strong>the</strong> index, this sector is trading<br />

at relatively low PE multiples with Public Bank and BCHB<br />

trading on 13x forward earnings (although <strong>the</strong> common<br />

and our preferred valuation benchmark is P/Bk). Within our<br />

coverage, only Maybank trades above 16x forward earnings.<br />

Large caps sorted by PE: banks at relatively lower multiples<br />

(x)<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

5.0<br />

-<br />

Telekom<br />

Axiata<br />

Petronas Gas<br />

Sime Darby<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

MISC-F<br />

IOI Corporation<br />

KL Kepong<br />

Maybank<br />

BAT<br />

Average<br />

In terms of picks, we like: (i) Public Bank for its superior<br />

asset quality, extraordinary loans growth and inspiring ROEs<br />

of above 23%; (ii) capital market recovery plays: AMMB and<br />

BCHB; (iii) high quality laggard such as Hong Leong Bank<br />

that also has impressive ROEs and EON Capital, which is <strong>the</strong><br />

cheapest bank in our universe at 0.9x book value.<br />

Digi.Com<br />

Tenaga Nasional<br />

Genting Malaysia<br />

Genting<br />

AMMB Holdings<br />

CIMB<br />

Public Bank<br />

YTL Power<br />

PPB Group<br />

PLUS Expressway<br />

Hong Leong Bank<br />

RHB Capital<br />

Construction pump-priming: a sustainable <strong>the</strong>me. We<br />

remain optimistic about <strong>the</strong> construction sector and expect<br />

positive newsflow in <strong>the</strong> coming 12 months. The upcoming<br />

Budget in October would likely focus on key mega projects<br />

in <strong>the</strong> pipeline such as <strong>the</strong> LCCT, remaining phases of <strong>the</strong><br />

inter-state water transfer and LRT extensions. The sector<br />

had been one of <strong>the</strong> better performers in <strong>the</strong> market<br />

rebound. As a result, some profit-taking is bound to<br />

happen. Yet, we believe this would be good opportunity to<br />

accumulate stocks as we expect fur<strong>the</strong>r upside. We believe<br />

our and market assumptions for potential new orders are<br />

conservative, in our opinion.<br />

Our large cap picks in <strong>the</strong> sector are IJM Corp and Gamuda.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> excitement in <strong>the</strong> sector heats up, <strong>the</strong>re may be<br />

attractive upside for <strong>the</strong> small-mid cap contractors – which<br />

have smaller orderbooks and earnings base. Our picks in this<br />

space includes MRCB and Sunway Holdings. Fajarbaru (Not<br />

Rated) could be an upstart to watch for specific projects<br />

such as <strong>the</strong> LCCT.<br />

Property: Room for more upside. We have seen continued<br />

warm response for recent launches in KL and Penang.<br />

Developers are now resuming launches (including high-end),<br />

compared to <strong>the</strong>ir earlier focus on clearing inventories.<br />

Selling prices may be raised soon and incentives gradually<br />

pulled-back, resulting in margin expansion. We expect<br />

continued positive newsflow, ample liquidity and underinvestment<br />

in <strong>the</strong> sector to drive valuations higher.<br />

Our picks: large cap sector leader SP Setia and high-end<br />

niche developers E&O and DNP.<br />

Updates on key mega projects<br />

Project Est value (RMbn) Comment Potential beneficiaries<br />

Remaining portions of Interstate<br />

2-3 Prequalification for Kelau Dam expected to commence IJM, UEM<br />

water transfer<br />

soon; actual award likely towards 2Q10.<br />

Low Cost Carrier Terminal 2.0 Prequalification closed end-July. Tender likely in October<br />

2009.<br />

WCT, Fajarbaru, IJM<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn stretch of double<br />

tracking rail<br />

7-9 Mentioned by PM as project that <strong>the</strong> govt would consider<br />

awarding to Chinese companies. Never<strong>the</strong>less, Msian<br />

contractors may get subcontracts.<br />

LRT extension 6-7 Syarikat Prasana Negara expected to call for civil works<br />

prequalification next month.<br />

New LRT lines 10-20 Talk on intended work commencement in 4Q09, although<br />

likely to be delayed given <strong>the</strong> preparations required<br />

(design, determining alignment).<br />

Source: Bursa Malaysia, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

IJM, WCT<br />

IJM, MRCB, Gamuda, WCT, UEM<br />

IJM, MRCB, Gamuda, WCT, UEM<br />

Page 100


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Large cap Buys<br />

Company Mkt Cap Price TP PE(x) P/BV (x) Div Yield (%)<br />

(RMm) (RM) (RM) 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F<br />

CIMB 40,051 11.18 12.10 15.5x 13.4x 2.1x 1.9x 1.7% 1.7%<br />

Public Bank 36,026 10.20 11.10 14.3x 13.2x 3.2x 3.0x 5.6% 6.0%<br />

Tenaga 36,214 8.35 9.00 17.4x 15.2x 1.3x 1.3x 2.2% 2.3%<br />

MISC-F 33,106 8.90 9.60 23.6x 23.1x 1.6x 1.6x 3.9% 3.9%<br />

PLUS Expressway 16,450 3.29 3.80 13.9x 13.3x 2.7x 2.5x 4.9% 4.9%<br />

Genting Msia 16,409 2.78 3.40 13.2x 15.0x 1.8x 1.6x 2.3% 2.0%<br />

AMMB Holdings 12,961 4.30 5.20 13.6x 14.3x 1.5x 1.4x 1.4% 2.4%<br />

Hong Leong Bank 10,113 6.40 8.00 11.2x 10.6x 1.8x 1.6x 2.8% 2.8%<br />

Gamuda 6,604 3.28 4.25 32.8x 19.8x 2.1x 2.0x 1.8% 2.3%<br />

Tanjong 6,355 15.76 19.25 13.7x 9.4x 1.9x 1.7x 4.3% 4.9%<br />

IJM Corp 6,048 6.42 7.00 20.8x 18.3x 1.3x 1.2x 3.4% 1.4%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Small-mid cap Buys<br />

Company Mkt Cap Price TP PE(x) P/BV (x) Div Yield (%)<br />

(RMm) (RM) (RM) 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F<br />

SP Setia 4,454 4.38 5.00 23.6x 21.7x 2.2x 2.1x 2.5% 2.8%<br />

Msia Airports 3,905 3.55 4.50 12.7x 11.7x 1.2x 1.1x 3.9% 4.3%<br />

EON Capital 3,674 5.30 6.00 11.2x 10.9x 1.1x 1.0x 1.5% 1.1%<br />

KNM Group 3,103 0.78 1.10 7.8x 7.6x 1.4x 1.2x 0.5% 0.5%<br />

KLCC Property 3,026 3.24 3.70 13.6x 12.6x 0.9x 0.8x 3.2% 3.5%<br />

Top Glove 2,170 7.15 7.00* 14.1x 12.7x 2.7x 2.4x 2.1% 2.4%<br />

MRCB 1,243 1.37 1.50 59.1x 22.1x 1.9x 1.8x 0.4% 1.1%<br />

Sunrise 1,060 2.14 2.60 7.7x 7.4x 1.1x 1.0x 1.3% 1.4%<br />

Alam Maritim 892 1.80 2.00 9.0x 8.0x 1.9x 1.5x 0.3% 0.3%<br />

Sunway Holdings 779 1.42 1.70 9.1x 7.1x 1.2x 1.0x 0.0% 0.0%<br />

E&O 895 1.49 2.10 n.m. 45.3x 1.1x 0.8x 0.0% 0.0%<br />

DNP 528 1.65 2.60 38.7x 9.7x 0.7x 0.7x 2.9% 3.6%<br />

Axis REIT 466 1.82 1.90 11.3x 11.3x 1.0x 1.0x 8.4% 8.4%<br />

AEON Credit 467 3.89 4.50 9.6x 8.2x 2.2x 1.8x 3.9% 4.2%<br />

Evergreen 446 0.87 1.10 11.2x 10.3x 0.7x 0.6x 0.0% 1.6%<br />

APM Auto 407 2.02 2.20 8.3x 7.2x 0.7x 0.6x 5.2% 5.2%<br />

*Under review; Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Top Sell/Fully Valued Calls<br />

Company Mkt Cap Price TP PE(x) P/BV (x) Div Yield (%)<br />

(RMm) (RM) (RM) 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F<br />

Sime Darby 51,321 8.54 7.45 23.3x 20.1x 2.4x 2.2x 2.0% 2.5%<br />

Axiata 26,771 3.17 2.70 26.4x 22.4x 1.5x 1.4x 0.0% 0.0%<br />

UMW Holdings 7,024 6.34 4.20 19.5x 16.4x 1.9x 1.8x 3.5% 3.5%<br />

MAS 4,997 2.99 1.80 -2.3x 27.7x -3.6x -8.9x 0.0% 0.0%<br />

Bursa Msia 4,132 7.83 6.05 34.9x 32.8x 5.5x 5.4x 2.6% 2.7%<br />

AirAsia 3,231 1.36 1.25 7.5x 8.7x 1.3x 1.1x 0.0% 0.0%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 101


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Malaysia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Aviation & related<br />

Underweight<br />

Banks<br />

Overweight<br />

Construction<br />

Overweight<br />

Although we expect a slight pickup in air travel demand in 2H09 against 1H09,<br />

overall demand is still projected to remain weak y-o-y. We also remain cautious on<br />

<strong>the</strong> potential downside risk following <strong>the</strong> recent H1N1 virus outbreak. Meanwhile,<br />

additional capacity coming from AirAsia and more route liberalizations may<br />

intensify competition between <strong>the</strong> airlines in <strong>the</strong> domestic and regional markets.<br />

Airlines’ earnings could also be hit by rising jet fuel prices.<br />

We expect MAS to continue to record hedging losses given that it had hedged its<br />

jet fuel requirement at higher prices compared to our forecast spot prices.<br />

Meanwhile, cash flow remains an issue for AirAsia given its huge capital<br />

commitment and potential downside risk to load factor and yield. Our top pick is<br />

Malaysia Airports (Buy; PT RM4.50) for its increasing non-aeronautical business<br />

contribution (mainly rental), which could cushion weak passenger traffic growth.<br />

We believe MAHB’s recent restructuring enhances long-term earnings visibility and<br />

improves ROE with its increasing benchmark PSC formula and variable costs<br />

mechanism.<br />

We expect non-interest income to be <strong>the</strong> driving force for earnings given strong<br />

pipeline for debt and equity capital market activities. AMMB and BCHB are best<br />

proxies for capital market plays, although we prefer AMMB over BCHB for<br />

valuations. We believe that asset quality would remain resilient as banks are in a<br />

much stronger position now in terms of capital, ability to manage NPLs and risk<br />

management. We expect banks to continue hoarding capital in a still uncertain<br />

environment in 2009, with possible capital repayment and/or higher dividend<br />

payouts only next year. We believe BCHB, AMMB, Hong Leong Bank and Maybank<br />

could turn more active in capital management.<br />

We project earnings growth of 2% for 2009 driven by higher non-interest income.<br />

However, we remain conservative on our provision assumptions, which would<br />

mitigate <strong>the</strong> extent of earnings growth for 2009. Never<strong>the</strong>less, we expect a<br />

recovery in 2010 with earnings growth of 13% with a fur<strong>the</strong>r decline in provisions<br />

and higher non-interest income. Our top picks remain as AMMB for valuations and<br />

Public Bank for resilience and dividends. We like Hong Leong Bank as a laggard<br />

quality play. We suggest switching out of Maybank to BCHB for Indonesia exposure<br />

and also for <strong>the</strong> relative PBV-ROE parametric among big cap bank plays. Even Hong<br />

Leong Bank (although its shares are less liquid) stacks up better in terms of PBV-<br />

ROE compared to Maybank. For a small cap bank play, EON Cap looks attractive<br />

being <strong>the</strong> cheapest bank in our universe at 1.0x FY10 BV with limited downside<br />

risk.<br />

After some delay in <strong>the</strong> mega contract rollouts, newsflow has certainly picked up.<br />

Syarikat Prasnana Negara Bhd (SPNB), <strong>the</strong> State Infrastructure Company had<br />

recently indicated that it will call for prequalification tenders for <strong>the</strong> RM6-7bn LRT<br />

extensions next month. Construction works will likely commence in 2010 after<br />

obtaining final approval from <strong>the</strong> Transport Ministry. The RM2bn LCCT appears to<br />

be <strong>the</strong> only mega contract which is PFI-based to be awarded by end-2009. Going<br />

into 2010, <strong>the</strong> last year of rollout for <strong>the</strong> Ninth Malaysian Plan, we expect contract<br />

awards to accelerate. O<strong>the</strong>r likely projects are <strong>the</strong> RM9bn undersea cables for<br />

Bakun Hydroelectric plant, RM7bn Gemas to Johor Bahru double tracking and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r portions of <strong>the</strong> Pahang Selangor Water Transfer project.<br />

Key risks for <strong>the</strong> sector are execution and delay in contract awards, <strong>the</strong> ability to<br />

raise financing and <strong>the</strong> lack of transparency in awarding contracts. We think <strong>the</strong>se<br />

risks are being managed with evidence of financing raised for some of <strong>the</strong> projects<br />

such as <strong>the</strong> LRT extensions and recent contract wins have been via open tender<br />

system to <strong>the</strong> lowest bidder. Our top pick is IJM (Buy, PT RM7.00) as <strong>the</strong> more<br />

diversified pick to <strong>the</strong> sector with a presence in public and private sector. Valuations<br />

are also <strong>the</strong> cheapest. Our o<strong>the</strong>r picks are Gamuda (Buy, PT RM4.25) and MRCB<br />

(Buy, PT RM1.50) as GLC proxy construction stock.<br />

Malaysia Airports<br />

AMMB,<br />

Public Bank,<br />

Hong Leong Bank<br />

IJM, Gamuda, MRCB<br />

Page 102


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Malaysia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Concessionaires<br />

Overweight<br />

Gaming<br />

Overweight<br />

Shipping<br />

Neutral<br />

Motor<br />

Underweight<br />

The July 2009 deadline for <strong>the</strong> Economic Planning Unit (EPU) to address <strong>the</strong><br />

potential future increases in toll rates has since been extended to end-2009. Of<br />

late, Asas Serba Sdn Bhd a private company submitted a proposal to <strong>the</strong> Works<br />

Ministry to buy all <strong>the</strong> toll concessionaire companies in <strong>the</strong> country for RM50bn. It<br />

has promised to cut toll rates by 20% in return for an extension in <strong>the</strong> concession<br />

period for <strong>the</strong> concessions. We think <strong>the</strong> probability of this occurring is low given<br />

financing a purchase consideration of RM50bn has to be government backed as<br />

<strong>the</strong> private sector will unlikely be able to swallow such a colossal amount.<br />

We do not think <strong>the</strong> government will privatise PLUS, based on <strong>the</strong> Prime Minister’s<br />

recent statements that PLUS is an important company for <strong>the</strong> government and a<br />

cash cow. Also its listed status is a key positive for <strong>the</strong> Malaysian equity market and<br />

its overseas ventures. Having said that, with <strong>the</strong> government paring down its stakes<br />

in o<strong>the</strong>r GLCs, <strong>the</strong>re is always <strong>the</strong> odd possibility of this happening. We recently<br />

downgraded our rating on Litrak to Hold as we think <strong>the</strong> privatisation angle at<br />

current price is increasingly difficult to execute. All in, we are confident that any<br />

decision will be at least NPV neutral for <strong>the</strong> concessions.<br />

Our pick is PLUS, which will yield 5% based on its KPI dividend of 16 sen and is<br />

strong liquid proxy to stable free cash flows.<br />

Gaming operations should remain robust given its inelastic demand and being a<br />

small ticket item. Despite <strong>the</strong> H1N1 outbreak, visitor arrivals to Genting Highlands<br />

held up (during SARS outbreak in 2003, visitor arrivals grew 1.3%).<br />

The soft launch of Resorts World at Sentosa (RWS) may come as early as end-09.<br />

We expect Genting Highlands’ operations to remain largely resilient given 87% of<br />

visitor arrivals consist of locals (70% day-trippers) while Singaporeans 5%.<br />

Risks: a) Strict regulation on junket operators may affect RWS’ VIP business; b)<br />

viability of Genting Malaysia’s potential M&As with its RM5b cashpile.<br />

We expect petroleum tanker rates to improve from end 2009 onwards and grow by<br />

c.25% y-o-y in 2010 in anticipation of better tonnage demand and supply growth<br />

balance prospect. Downside risks to tanker rates could be limited as demand and<br />

supply growth gap is likely to narrow in 2010. Meanwhile, we also believe<br />

downside risk to container freight rates is limited, after touching its lowest level<br />

since 1993 and considering <strong>the</strong> supply-demand gap will narrow next year. We<br />

project average container freight rates to be unchanged y-o-y in 2010, supported<br />

by an expected recovery in demand. Our top pick is MISC (Buy; PT RM9.60). We<br />

like MISC given its better earnings outlook and it still lags <strong>the</strong> market despite its<br />

3.7% weighting in <strong>the</strong> FBM KLCI.<br />

Improving consumer sentiment continues to lend support for auto sales. Aug09 TIV<br />

(total industry sales) recorded <strong>the</strong> first y-o-y growth of 2.8% (-6.5% m-o-m) since<br />

Oct08. We expect Sep09 sales to remain firm for <strong>the</strong> Hari Raya season, before<br />

entering <strong>the</strong> seasonally low fourth quarter. The NAP (National Automotive Policy),<br />

which has been postponed till Oct09, was speculated to offer incentives to foreign<br />

car manufacturers to use Malaysia as <strong>the</strong>ir export hub while Proton is rumoured to<br />

be getting a foreign partner (speculated to be VW) who can help to take up<br />

Proton’s excess capacity. The downside risks are that <strong>the</strong> NAP could disappoint<br />

(especially when it comes to execution) and that Proton may not secure a new<br />

partner.<br />

PLUS<br />

Genting<br />

MISC<br />

APM<br />

Page 103


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Malaysia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Oil & gas<br />

Overweight<br />

Plantations<br />

Underweight<br />

Property<br />

Overweight<br />

Steel<br />

Neutral<br />

Telco<br />

Underweight<br />

We remain positive on <strong>the</strong> outlook of Malaysia oil and gas sector given Petronas’<br />

resilient capex and recovery of crude oil price. The key concern for <strong>the</strong> sector is on<br />

<strong>the</strong> rollout of new projects, which has been delayed over <strong>the</strong> last few months.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, we expect stronger contract flow in 4Q09 as Petronas has<br />

traditionally awarded most of <strong>the</strong> new projects towards year end. The continuous<br />

contract flow will help to enhance earnings visibility and benefit oil and gas players,<br />

especially those with captive market (such as Alam for Malaysian flagged vessels)<br />

and those with niche market such as KNM and Wah Seong for <strong>the</strong>ir exposure in<br />

process equipment and deep water pipe coating. Valuation of oil and gas stocks is<br />

reasonable, trading closer to <strong>the</strong>ir respective normalised mid-cycle valuation, but<br />

still decent at sector average 9x CY10 PE against sector average CY06-10 CAGR of<br />

22%.<br />

We expect 4Q09 palm oil price to rebound on seasonally slower palm oil supply<br />

growth and run down in US soybean oil inventory. However, as most plantation<br />

stocks have not moved in-tandem with CPO price’s current correction, we<br />

recommend investors to remain selective.<br />

Sales expected to remain robust driven by record low mortgage rates, incentives<br />

offered by developers, and improving consumer sentiments. Developers may bring<br />

forward launches and raise ASPs – leading to faster earnings recovery.<br />

Potential risks: a) Sustainability of sales if interest rates rise and developers pull-back<br />

incentives, and b) Higher construction cost as raw material prices recover –<br />

potential margin squeeze if not passed on to buyers.<br />

Steel demand is improving underpinned by re-stocking activities, which is expected<br />

to last ano<strong>the</strong>r 4 months (till <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> year). Most steel mills have increased<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir plant utilisation (for example, Kinsteel's upstream utilisation was lifted from<br />

50% to 100% and, Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Steel’s overall utilisation was also raised from <strong>the</strong><br />

previous low of 50%). In terms of new demand expected from government pump<br />

priming, we think meaningful contributions will flow in only next year. Overall, <strong>the</strong><br />

current healthy steel demand would support steel prices. Our key concern remains<br />

<strong>the</strong> timely award and execution of <strong>the</strong> various government projects. We<br />

recommend Hold on Kinsteel (TP RM0.85) and Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Steel (TP RM1.75).<br />

While competition in 1H09 centred on new broadband plans as well as iPhones and<br />

BlackBerrys, focus shifted back to prepaid voice plans in 3Q09. Celcom launched<br />

new plans that offer very cheap 12 sen/minute calls that led Digi to react in similar<br />

fashion. As usual, terms and conditions apply. Meanwhile, TuneTalk launched its<br />

cellular voice service in Aug09, with very attractive 25 sen/minute tariff. However,<br />

TuneTalk has limited distribution channel currently.<br />

We expect telcos to register a spike in volume during <strong>the</strong> Hari Raya season in<br />

Sep09, with even larger traffic volume in <strong>the</strong> seasonally high 4Q09. The key<br />

concern now is that a potential change in management of U Mobile could disrupt<br />

<strong>the</strong> competitive landscape in Malaysia, which is still rational. Among <strong>the</strong> telco<br />

stocks, we prefer TM for its commitment of 20 sen net DPS or c. 6% yield.<br />

However, Maxis, which is expected to be listed before <strong>the</strong> year-end, could put<br />

downward pressure on telco stock prices as investors rebalance <strong>the</strong>ir telco exposure<br />

in Malaysia towards Maxis.<br />

Alam Maritim<br />

KL Kepong<br />

SP Setia<br />

E&O<br />

DNP<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Steel<br />

TM<br />

Page 104


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Malaysia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Power<br />

Overweight<br />

REITs<br />

Neutral<br />

We expect stronger earnings ahead for TNB on <strong>the</strong> back of improved power<br />

demand following stronger economic activities and lower coal cost. As for <strong>the</strong> IPPs,<br />

our pick is now on Tanjong PLC for upside from potential new NFO game and<br />

attractive valuation backed by resilient power and gaming operations. While YTLP<br />

offers a higher yield of 7% against 5% for Tanjong, we expect investors to<br />

gradually switch out from YTLP to Tanjong given that YTLP’s Wimax investment will<br />

increase its risk profile and unlikely to be earnings accretive to <strong>the</strong> group over <strong>the</strong><br />

next 3-5 years.<br />

We expect improving investment interest in MREIT given <strong>the</strong> stronger credit market<br />

that allows fund and equity raising activities for MREIT to enhance asset base and<br />

earnings growth going forward. The stronger economic activities also ease<br />

concerns on rental renewal and property vacancy rate. While we expect share<br />

prices of MREITs to perform in line with <strong>the</strong> market given <strong>the</strong>ir attractive net yield<br />

of c.10%, MREITs are unlikely to outperform due to <strong>the</strong>ir low liquidity and<br />

unexciting growth. Our pick is Axis Risk for its attractive yield, attractive asset<br />

valuation and proven acquisition track record.<br />

Tanjong PLC<br />

Axis REIT<br />

Page 105


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Hong Leong Bank<br />

Bloomberg: HLBK MK | Reuters: HLBB.KL<br />

BUY RM6.60 KLCI : 1,218.80<br />

Price Target : 12-Month RM 8.00<br />

Potential Catalyst: Higher dividend payout, sustainable earnings<br />

Analyst<br />

Sue Lin Lim +603 2711 0971<br />

suelin@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Price Relative<br />

7.40<br />

6.90<br />

6.40<br />

5.90<br />

5.40<br />

4.90<br />

4.40<br />

RM<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Hong Leong Bank (LHS) Relative KLCI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Jun (RM m) 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 1,222 1,352 1,480 1,654<br />

Net Profit 905 954 1,043 1,170<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 905 954 1,043 1,170<br />

EPS (sen) 57.3 60.4 66.0 74.1<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (sen) 57.3 60.4 66.0 74.1<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 20 5 9 12<br />

Diluted EPS (sen) 57.3 60.4 66.0 74.1<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 11.5 10.9 10.0 8.9<br />

Net DPS (sen) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0<br />

Div Yield (%) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. (%) 16.7 15.8 15.4 15.4<br />

ROAE (%) 16.7 15.8 15.4 15.4<br />

ROA (%) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2<br />

BV Per Share (sen) 363 404 452 508<br />

P/Book Value (x) 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.3<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (sen): 57.3 65.1 72.3<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Banks<br />

Principal Business: Banking and Finance<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

222<br />

202<br />

182<br />

162<br />

142<br />

122<br />

102<br />

82<br />

62<br />

Flight to quality<br />

• On track for growth with resilient ROEs, good<br />

asset quality and robust capital.<br />

• On a regional expansion mode; its associate,<br />

Chengdu Bank is already contributing to profits<br />

just after a year since acquisition.<br />

• Additional catalyst includes a possible capital<br />

management play in future. Maintain BUY and<br />

TP of RM8.00.<br />

Strong operations. Hong Leong Bank’s strength is<br />

derived from its strong deposit franchise and conservative<br />

lending policies. Its lowest loan-to-deposit ratio among its<br />

peers allows ample room for growth in <strong>the</strong> future. Aside<br />

from its robust net interest income and NIM, operating<br />

income is driven by trading and forex income, which has<br />

proven sustainable given its solid treasury operations. Its<br />

NIM was marginally lower in its recent financial year end<br />

despite 75% variable rate loans and 55% fixed deposits,<br />

after imputing <strong>the</strong> full impact of <strong>the</strong> OPR cuts, which<br />

exemplifies <strong>the</strong> bank’s strong asset-liability management<br />

amidst re-pricing and competitive pressures. Meanwhile,<br />

capital ratios are robust with Tier-1 CAR and RWCAR at<br />

14.7%, among <strong>the</strong> highest in <strong>the</strong> industry.<br />

Improving earnings ahead. We expect Hong Leong<br />

Bank to propel ahead with earnings improvement from<br />

lower provision charge-off rates. NIM should remain flat at<br />

1.8%, while non-interest income is expected to remain<br />

strong. Its 19.99% associate, Chengdu Bank, made its full<br />

year maiden contribution of RM100m in FY09 and we<br />

expect fur<strong>the</strong>r improvement. Hong Leong Bank is still<br />

scouting for regional acquisitions. Its wholly-owned<br />

banking subsidiary in Vietnam is expected to start<br />

operations in Oct09. We do not discount a higher dividend<br />

payout once it completes its regional acquisitions.<br />

Attractive valuations. We believe Hong Leong Bank<br />

offers attractive value proposition with a sustainable<br />

15% ROE, in addition to a 3% stable dividend yield with<br />

an upside potential. Maintain BUY with TP of RM8.00.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,580<br />

Mkt. Cap (RMm/US$m) 10,429 / 3,004<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Hong Leong Financial Group 63.5<br />

Employees Provident Fund (%) 9.6<br />

Free Float (%) 26.9<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 865<br />

Page 106<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed:LM / sa: WMT


Income Statement (RM m) Balance Sheet (RM m)<br />

Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Hong Leong Bank<br />

FY Jun 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F FY Jun 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Net Interest Income 1,353 1,447 1,521 1,634 Cash/Bank Balance 18,344 19,474 21,400 23,563<br />

Non-Interest Income 570 614 675 743 Government <strong>Securities</strong> 369 1,510 1,644 1,790<br />

Islamic Banking Income 176 194 213 235 Inter Bank Assets 5,417 5,959 6,555 7,210<br />

Operating Income 2,099 2,255 2,410 2,612 Total Net Loans & Advs. 34,795 36,462 39,396 42,559<br />

Operating Expenses (877) (903) (930) (958) Investment 17,517 19,269 21,195 23,315<br />

Pre-provision Profit 1,222 1,352 1,480 1,654 Associates 0 0 0 0<br />

Provisions (190) (190) (211) (227) Fixed Assets 319 325 332 339<br />

Associates 99 110 121 133 Goodwill 30 30 30 30<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r Assets 2,397 2,442 2,488 2,534<br />

Pre-tax Profit 1,132 1,272 1,390 1,560 Total Assets 79,405 85,710 93,302 101,629<br />

Taxation (228) (318) (348) (390) Customer Deposits 67,583 72,990 79,559 86,719<br />

Minority Interests 0 0 0 0 Inter Bank Deposits 2,404 2,524 2,651 2,783<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 Debts/Borrowings 730 730 730 730<br />

Net Profit 905 954 1,043 1,170 O<strong>the</strong>rs 2,693 2,826 2,964 3,110<br />

Minorities 43 43 43 43<br />

Shareholders' Funds 5,734 6,380 7,138 8,026<br />

Total Liab& S/H’s Funds 79,405 85,710 93,302 101,629<br />

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios (%) Financial Stability Measures (%)<br />

FY Jun 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F FY Jun 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Margins, Costs & Efficiency<br />

Balance Sheet Structure<br />

Yld. On Earnings Assets 3.92 3.87 3.83 3.80 Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 52.7 51.2 50.7 50.3<br />

Avg Cost Of Funds 2.24 2.17 2.17 2.17 Net Loans / Total Assets 43.8 42.5 42.2 41.9<br />

Spread 1.68 1.71 1.66 1.63 Investment / Total Assets 22.1 22.5 22.7 22.9<br />

Net Interest Margin 1.81 1.84 1.79 1.76 Cust . Dep./Int. Bear. Liab. 95.6 95.7 95.9 96.1<br />

Cost-to-Income Ratio 41.8 40.0 38.6 36.7 Interbank Dep / Int. Bear. 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1<br />

Employees ( Year End) 0 0 0 0 Asset Quality<br />

Effective Tax Rate 20.1 25.0 25.0 25.0 NPL / Total Gross Loans 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.0<br />

Business Mix NPL / Total Assets 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9<br />

Net Int. Inc / Opg Inc. 64.5 64.2 63.1 62.6 Capital Strength<br />

Non-Int. Inc / Opg inc. 27.1 27.2 28.0 28.4 Total CAR 15.9 16.4 16.9 17.5<br />

Fee Inc / Opg Income 14.2 14.6 15.0 15.2 Tier-1 CAR 15.8 16.3 16.8 17.4<br />

Oth Non-Int Inc/Opg Inc 12.9 12.7 13.0 13.2 Growth<br />

Profitability Total Net Loans 1 5 8 8<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. 16.7 15.8 15.4 15.4 Customer Deposits 8 8 9 9<br />

ROAE 16.7 15.8 15.4 15.4<br />

ROA Pre Ex. 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2<br />

ROA 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (RMm)<br />

FY Jun 1Q2009 2Q2009 3Q2009 4Q2009<br />

Net Interest Income 357 363 328 305<br />

Non-Interest Income 150 163 129 129<br />

Operating Income 550 564 491 494<br />

Operating Expenses (217) (217) (218) (224)<br />

Pre-Provision Profit 333 347 273 270<br />

Provisions (44) (26) (28) (91)<br />

Associates 27 19 24 29<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0<br />

Pretax Profit 316 340 269 208<br />

Taxation (74) (83) (62) (9)<br />

Minority Interests 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Profit 242 257 207 199<br />

Rolling forward PBV band<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

2nd Dev<br />

1st Dev<br />

Mean<br />

1st Dev<br />

2nd Dev<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 107


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

MISC<br />

Bloomberg: MISF MK | Reuters: MISC.KL<br />

BUY RM8.95 KLCI : 1,218.80<br />

Price Target : 12 months RM 9.60<br />

Potential Catalyst: Higher tanker and container rates, new oil & gas<br />

contract wins<br />

Analyst<br />

Juliana Ramli +603 2711 2222<br />

juliana@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Improved outlook<br />

• We believe downside to container and tanker<br />

rates is limited after hitting record lows<br />

• Expect FY11F-12F earnings to grow 25% and 9%<br />

respectively y-o-y, driven by smaller liner losses<br />

and higher tanker rates<br />

• Maintain BUY with TP of RM9.60 based on sumof-parts<br />

method.<br />

Price Relative<br />

RM<br />

11.00<br />

10.50<br />

10.00<br />

9.50<br />

9.00<br />

8.50<br />

8.00<br />

7.50<br />

7.00<br />

6.50<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

MISC (LHS) Relative KLCI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

Relative Index<br />

FY Mar (RM m) 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Turnover 15,783 13,543 15,034 16,025<br />

EBITDA 3,668 3,848 4,323 4,558<br />

Pre-tax Profit 1,595 1,713 2,066 2,213<br />

Net Profit 1,405 1,432 1,789 1,956<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 1,405 1,432 1,789 1,956<br />

EPS (sen) 37.8 38.5 48.1 52.6<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (sen) 37.8 38.5 48.1 52.6<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (37) 2 25 9<br />

Diluted EPS (sen) 37.8 38.5 48.1 52.6<br />

Net DPS (sen) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0<br />

BV Per Share (sen) 563.3 566.8 579.9 597.5<br />

PE (X) 23.7 23.3 18.6 17.0<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 23.7 23.3 18.6 17.0<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 10.8 10.7 9.2 8.6<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 11.4 10.8 9.7 9.0<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9<br />

P/Book Value (X) 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3<br />

ROAE (%) 7.1 6.8 8.4 8.9<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (sen): 36.6 47.2 61.1<br />

ICB Industry : Industrials<br />

ICB Sector: Industrial Transportation<br />

Principal Business: LNG, petroleum, bulk, chemical and container<br />

shipping and related business.<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

216<br />

196<br />

176<br />

156<br />

136<br />

116<br />

96<br />

76<br />

56<br />

Tanker and container rates may have bottomed out<br />

after hitting record lows. We believe downside risks for<br />

rates are now limited, given improved demand-supply<br />

growth balance outlook for next year. We expect tanker<br />

rates to rise by 25% in FY11F on slower tonnage supply<br />

growth and recovering global oil demand. Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong><br />

liner division could post smaller losses going forward, as<br />

MISC reduces capacity and withdraws from <strong>the</strong> Grand<br />

Alliance consortium.<br />

Offshore and heavy engineering segments will<br />

cushion earnings. We expect <strong>the</strong>se divisions to account<br />

for 37%-44% of MISC’s pre-tax profit in FY10F- FY11F.<br />

Existing long-term offshore contracts and its current large<br />

heavy engineering orderbook provide good earnings<br />

visibility for <strong>the</strong> divisions for at least 2-3 years. The heavy<br />

engineering division should remain busy for <strong>the</strong> next 2-3<br />

years with its current orderbook at c.RM9.3bn (average<br />

completion of 12-30 months).<br />

A laggard. Apart from better earnings outlook, we<br />

believe MISC is worth a buy because it is still lagging <strong>the</strong><br />

market despite its 3.7% weighting in <strong>the</strong> FBM KLCI.<br />

MISC’s share price YTD-09 has underperformed <strong>the</strong><br />

market, rising only 7% against <strong>the</strong> FBM KLCI’s 36%.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 3,720<br />

Mkt. Cap (RMm/US$m) 33,292 / 9,591<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Petronas (%) 62.4<br />

EPF (%) 5.8<br />

Free Float (%) 31.8<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 586<br />

Page 108<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed:LM / sa: WMT


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

MISC<br />

Income Statement (RM m) Balance Sheet (RM m)<br />

FY Mar 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F FY Mar 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Turnover 15,783 13,543 15,034 16,025 Net Fixed Assets 27,385 27,994 28,841 28,421<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (12,986) (10,699) (11,693) (12,435) Invts in Associates & JVs 315 409 499 562<br />

Gross Profit 2,797 2,844 3,342 3,590 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 1,673 1,698 1,853 1,988<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (836) (774) (933) (1,027) Cash & ST Invts 3,725 1,847 1,175 1,927<br />

Operating Profit 1,961 2,070 2,409 2,563 Inventory 442 327 363 387<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 3,217 2,202 2,445 2,606<br />

Associates & JV Inc 37 94 90 63 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (403) (450) (433) (413) Total Assets 36,757 34,479 35,177 35,891<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 1,595 1,713 2,066 2,213 ST Debt 3,104 3,104 3,104 3,104<br />

Tax (68) (112) (115) (110) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 3,482 2,987 3,316 3,535<br />

Minority Interest (123) (170) (161) (147) LT Debt 8,748 6,641 6,228 5,802<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 129 153 286 406<br />

Net Profit 1,405 1,432 1,789 1,956 Shareholder’s Equity 20,953 21,083 21,570 22,224<br />

Net Profit before Except. 1,405 1,432 1,789 1,956 Minority Interests 341 511 672 819<br />

EBITDA 3,668 3,848 4,323 4,558 Total Cap. & Liab. 36,757 34,479 35,177 35,891<br />

Sales Gth (%) 21.9 (14.2) 11.0 6.6 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital 177 (458) (509) (542)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (11.6) 4.9 12.3 5.4 Net Cash/(Debt) (8,127) (7,897) (8,157) (6,980)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (26.9) 5.5 16.4 6.4<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (42.0) 1.9 25.0 9.3<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 4.2 6.5 5.6 4.9<br />

Cash Flow Statement (RM m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Mar 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F FY Mar 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 1,595 1,713 2,066 2,213 Gross Margins (%) 17.7 21.0 22.2 22.4<br />

Dep. & Amort. 1,707 1,779 1,914 1,995 Opg Profit Margin (%) 12.4 15.3 16.0 16.0<br />

Tax Paid (68) (112) (115) (110) Net Profit Margin (%) 8.9 10.6 11.9 12.2<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (37) (94) (90) (63) ROAE (%) 7.1 6.8 8.4 8.9<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (157) 635 50 34 ROA (%) 4.3 4.0 5.1 5.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 368 368 368 368 ROCE (%) 6.3 6.0 7.2 7.6<br />

Net Operating CF 3,409 4,289 4,193 4,437 Div Payout Ratio (%) 92.7 90.9 72.8 66.6<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (3,982) (2,358) (2,730) (1,543) Net Interest Cover (x) 4.9 4.6 5.6 6.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 23 23 23 23 Asset Turnover (x) 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV (22) 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 64.6 73.0 56.4 57.5<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 3 3 3 3 Creditors Turn (avg days) 100.8 132.4 117.6 119.8<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 48 75 37 23 Inventory Turn (avg days) 13.6 15.7 12.9 13.1<br />

Net Investing CF (3,930) (2,258) (2,667) (1,494) Current Ratio (x) 1.1 0.7 0.6 0.7<br />

Div Paid (1,367) (1,352) (1,352) (1,352) Quick Ratio (x) 1.1 0.7 0.6 0.7<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 3,264 (2,107) (413) (425) Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF 384 (450) (433) (413) Capex to Debt (%) 33.6 24.2 29.3 17.3<br />

Net Financing CF 2,282 (3,909) (2,198) (2,191) Z-Score (X) 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.7<br />

Net Cashflow 1,761 (1,878) (673) 752 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (sen) (218.5) (212.3) (219.3) (187.6)<br />

Opg CFPS (sen) 95.9 98.2 111.4 118.4<br />

Free CFPS (sen) (15.4) 51.9 39.3 77.8<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (RM m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Assumptions<br />

FY Mar 2Q2009 3Q2009 4Q2009 1Q2010 FY Mar 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Turnover 4,456 3,679 3,999 3,893 Revenues (RM m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (3,983) (3,318) (3,807) (3,633) Shipping 8,024 7,668 8,495 8,627<br />

Gross Profit 473 362 192 260 Integrated Liner Logistics 4,550 2,023 2,487 3,371<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc 124 49 101 95 FPSO/FSO 692 807 807 782<br />

Operating Profit 597 411 293 355 Heavy Engineering 2,518 3,045 3,245 3,245<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>rs 0 0 0 0<br />

Associates & JV Inc 1 6 31 16 Total 15,784 13,543 15,034 16,025<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (100) (104) (99) (88) Pre-tax profit (RM m)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 (8) Shipping 2,038 1,829 1,855 1,904<br />

Pre-tax Profit 498 312 225 273 Integrated Liner Logistics (877) (724) (422) (285)<br />

Tax (14) (32) (12) (2) FPSO/FSO 251 382 380 341<br />

Minority Interest (34) (30) (32) (38) Heavy Engineering 349 365 389 389<br />

Net Profit 450 250 182 233 O<strong>the</strong>rs (166) (139) (136) (136)<br />

Net profit bef Except. 450 250 182 242 Total 1,595 1,713 2,066 2,213<br />

Pre-tax profit Margins (%)<br />

Sales Gth (%) 22.1 (17.4) 8.7 (2.6) Shipping 25.4 23.9 21.8 22.1<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (9.5) (31.1) (28.6) 20.9 Integrated Liner Logistics (19.3) (35.8) (17.0) (8.4)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (13.9) (44.6) (27.1) 28.4 FPSO/FSO 36.3 47.4 47.1 43.6<br />

Gross Margins (%) 10.6 9.8 4.8 6.7 Heavy Engineering 13.9 12.0 12.0 12.0<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 13.4 11.2 7.3 9.1 O<strong>the</strong>rs N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 10.1 6.8 4.5 6.0 Total 10.1 12.7 13.7 13.8<br />

Key Assumptions<br />

New LNG ships 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0<br />

Change in tanker rate (%) 34.3 (54.4) 25.4 4.6<br />

Change in container rate (33.3) (42.0) 0.0 5.0<br />

MYR/USD 3.4 3.6 3.4 3.3<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 109


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Thailand<br />

Liquidity driven rally<br />

There could be a consolidation in <strong>the</strong> near term following<br />

<strong>the</strong> SET Index’s 85% surge from its trough and 58% rise<br />

YTD (up to 17 Sep). But <strong>the</strong> magnitude should be limited<br />

due to an improving economic outlook and ample<br />

liquidity. We tracked <strong>the</strong> market back to 1982, and<br />

found that SET rallies post-economic crisis always ended<br />

close to <strong>the</strong> first interest rate hike of each cycle, implying<br />

possible fur<strong>the</strong>r market appreciation until 2Q10. For<br />

4Q09, we recommend increasing exposure in Banks,<br />

Property, upstream Energy and Construction Materials.<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong> macro conditions are quite favorable for <strong>the</strong> Thai equity market.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> economy has bottomed out, benign inflationary pressure should keep<br />

interest rates low for ano<strong>the</strong>r two to three quarters at least. We recommend<br />

investors increase exposure in Banks. Our top picks are KASIKORNBANK (KBANK<br />

TB) and Bangkok Bank (BBL TB).<br />

We maintain our Overweight positions on Property, where our top picks include<br />

Preuksa Real Estate (PS TB), Quality Houses (QH TB), Supalai (SPALI TB) and Asian<br />

Property (AP TB). We also remain Overweight on upstream Energy stocks, with<br />

PTT Exploration & Production (PTTEP) and PTT (PTT) as our top picks.<br />

We upgrade Construction Material to Overweight with Siam Cement (SCC TB)<br />

and Tata Steel Thailand (TSTH TB) as our top picks for <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

Chirasit Vuttigrai +662 657 7836 chirasitv@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Page 110<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa-TW


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

52-Week<br />

Indices<br />

Close<br />

17 Sep -09<br />

Chg Net<br />

-1 mth<br />

-1 mth<br />

(%)<br />

-3 mth<br />

(%)<br />

-6 mth<br />

(%)<br />

-12 mth<br />

(%)<br />

High<br />

(%)<br />

Low<br />

(%)<br />

SET 709 56.0 8.6 18.7 64.4 18.9 720 380<br />

SET 50 508 40.7 8.7 18.0 69.2 21.8 516 261<br />

SET 100 1,092 89.5 8.9 19.2 71.4 21.7 1,110 553<br />

SET Agribusiness 77 7.7 11.0 29.9 69.9 48.8 79 39<br />

SET Banks 263 14.3 5.8 14.6 77.6 25.2 269 124<br />

SET Construction Materials 5,797 792.6 15.8 44.3 118.6 63.4 5,912 2,306<br />

SET Communication 82 10.9 15.2 16.8 31.4 18.0 84 49<br />

SET Energy 16,567 1,186.3 7.7 14.2 65.5 16.6 16,860 8,453<br />

SET Electronics 612 (4.2) (0.7) 31.6 96.9 18.6 631 305<br />

SET Finance 660 39.0 6.3 11.9 62.6 6.2 670 380<br />

SET Petrochemicals 502 65.6 15.0 41.5 130.1 24.7 530 190<br />

SET Transport 93 9.7 11.7 35.5 101.3 31.2 95 38<br />

SET Property 112 11.6 11.5 33.1 105.1 28.7 206 82<br />

Transactions:<br />

YTD<br />

Volume (bn shares) 5,675<br />

Value (Bt bn) 28,439<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

MARKET REVIEW<br />

SET Index surges 18.7% QTD. The strong run-up in <strong>the</strong><br />

market is attributed to (i) improving economic numbers, (ii)<br />

ample liquidity, (iii) easing political tension, and (iv) strong<br />

foreign funds flow. The SET Index performed slightly better<br />

than its regional peers, as measured by <strong>the</strong> MSCI Far East<br />

(ex. Japan) which rose 18.2% during <strong>the</strong> same period.<br />

SET Index vs MSCI Far East Asia ex-Japan Index<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

MSCI F ar East ex-japan Index<br />

SET Index (RHS)<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

Construction Materials, Petrochemicals and Transport led<br />

<strong>the</strong> rally, surging 44.3%, 41.5%, and 35.5% QTD,<br />

respectively. The Construction Material sector outperformed<br />

<strong>the</strong> market led by Siam Cement (SCC TB). The counter<br />

surged due to (i) recovering cement demand with <strong>the</strong><br />

economy having bottomed out, and (ii) brighter outlook for<br />

its petrochemical unit. The Petrochemicals sector<br />

outperformed <strong>the</strong> market due to (i) stronger-than-expected<br />

prices and spreads, (ii) inventory restocking, (iii) strong<br />

demand from China, and (iv) tight supply in some products,<br />

such as Benzene. The Transportation sector rose following a<br />

sharp earnings recovery at Thai Airways (THAI TB).<br />

Foreign funds continue to flow in with a net buying position<br />

of Bt11bn QTD (vs. Bt5.5bn net sell in 1Q09 and Bt26bn net<br />

buy in 2Q09). This was attributed to (i) investors’ increasing<br />

risk appetite following signs of economic green shoots, and<br />

(ii) a weak US$ compared to Asian currencies.<br />

100<br />

300<br />

Jun-08<br />

Aug-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Feb-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jun-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 111


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Thailand Stock Market: Foreign Net Buy (Sell) Position<br />

Btm<br />

40,000<br />

30,000<br />

20,000<br />

10,000<br />

-<br />

(10,000)<br />

(20,000)<br />

(30,000)<br />

(40,000)<br />

Jan-08<br />

Mar-08<br />

May-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Sep-08<br />

Nov-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Mar-09<br />

May-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Source: SET, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Foreign net buy (sell)<br />

Avg Daily Turnover (RHS)<br />

As of 17 Sep 09<br />

Btm<br />

30,000<br />

25,000<br />

20,000<br />

15,000<br />

10,000<br />

5,000<br />

2Q09 growth marks <strong>the</strong> end of recession. 2Q09 GDP grew<br />

9.2% (QoQ, saar), within consensus expectations but lower<br />

than our 12% forecast, and marking <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong><br />

recession. Y-o-y contraction was in between our forecast (-<br />

4.6%) and consensus forecast (-5.2%), due to revisions to<br />

preceding quarters’ data.<br />

The second quarter expansion comes after two quarters of<br />

negative output growth – minus 24% (QoQ, saar) and minus<br />

7% (QoQ, saar). This implies that <strong>the</strong> 30% drop in output<br />

since Oct08 has recovered. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, output dropped<br />

7.5% from <strong>the</strong> peak in 3Q08 and has grown by 2.3% from<br />

<strong>the</strong> bottom reached in 1Q09.<br />

A breakdown by expenditure revealed <strong>the</strong> turnaround in<br />

second quarter was driven mainly by a pause in inventory<br />

drawdown and a large rise in public investment spending<br />

(60% QoQ, saar). In fact, stocks contributed a full 20 ppts<br />

(QoQ, saar) to second quarter growth. We note <strong>the</strong> difficulty<br />

of implementing public investment projects (because of<br />

political uncertainties) has been one of <strong>the</strong> key constraints of<br />

Thailand’s growth in <strong>the</strong> past few years. From this<br />

perspective, <strong>the</strong> acceleration in government investment<br />

spending is positive.<br />

However, two aspects within <strong>the</strong> positive growth data<br />

disappointed; <strong>the</strong>y are exports and domestic consumer<br />

spending. Exports fell a disappointing 9% (QoQ, saar)<br />

marking <strong>the</strong> fourth consecutive quarter of contraction.<br />

Private consumption rose only 3% (QoQ saar), following <strong>the</strong><br />

shocking 14% (QoQ, saar) drop in <strong>the</strong> previous quarter.<br />

-<br />

Thailand: Real GDP Growth – recovery in 2Q09<br />

Real GDP Growth 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09<br />

(% Chg y-o-y)<br />

Private<br />

2.5 2.7 2.1 -2.6 -2.5<br />

Consumption<br />

Government<br />

-3.7 -2.9 11.0 2.8 5.9<br />

Consumption<br />

GFCF 1.9 0.6 -3.3 -15.8 -10.1<br />

Private 4.3 3.5 -1.3 -17.7 -16.1<br />

Public -5.2 -5.5 -10.2 -9.1 +9.6<br />

Exports 11.9 11.2 -8.9 -16.4 -21.8<br />

Imports 6.7 13.1 1.0 -31.4 -25.4<br />

GDP 5.5 3.8 -4.2 -7.0 -4.9<br />

Source: NESDB, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

July data continues to point to recovery. July supply and<br />

demand side data point to continued strong recovery in<br />

output in <strong>the</strong> third quarter. Sequential (seasonally adjusted),<br />

manufacturing output, private consumer spending and<br />

investor spending rose 1.9%, 3.4% and 1.6%, respectively.<br />

Export and import volumes grew 1.9% and 3.5%,<br />

respectively in July. On <strong>the</strong> whole, we expect c.7% (QoQ,<br />

saar) growth in 3Q – not far from <strong>the</strong> over 9% (QoQ, saar)<br />

growth in 1Q - which should help to restrict <strong>the</strong> 2009<br />

growth to close to our forecast of -3.2%. The big picture we<br />

are expecting is <strong>the</strong> large sequential pick up in GDP in 3Q,<br />

like that witnessed in 2Q, followed by a moderation in<br />

growth to c.4% p.a. from 4Q onwards.<br />

Corporate earnings recovered fur<strong>the</strong>r in 2Q09. Aggregate<br />

2Q09 net profit grew 17% q-o-q to Bt92bn, but it is still<br />

20% below 2Q08 profit, <strong>the</strong> peak of <strong>the</strong> previous earnings<br />

cycle. Aggregate 2Q09 earnings exceeded our and<br />

consensus forecasts by 15% and 11%, respectively. Strong<br />

results were seen for most sectors, except Contractors and<br />

Media. O<strong>the</strong>r key observations are: (i) earnings of most<br />

commodity companies continued to recover from 1Q09 led<br />

by higher product prices and stock gains; (ii) consumer<br />

staples (Commerce) were still resilient; (iii) exporters<br />

(Electronics and Food) are turning around significantly; and<br />

(iv) Banks reported solid 2Q09 results.<br />

Page 112


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Quarterly aggregate net profit and y-o-y growth*<br />

Btbn %<br />

120<br />

80<br />

100<br />

40<br />

80<br />

60<br />

0<br />

40<br />

-40<br />

20<br />

-80<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

-120<br />

-40<br />

-160<br />

1Q06<br />

2Q06<br />

3Q06<br />

4Q06<br />

1Q07<br />

2Q07<br />

3Q07<br />

4Q07<br />

1Q08<br />

2Q08<br />

3Q08<br />

4Q08<br />

1Q09<br />

2Q09<br />

Banks Energy Telecom<br />

Property Building mat. O<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

Growth (RHS)<br />

Note: * Only stocks under our coverage, excludes new listing<br />

Source: SET and <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Sectors with positive y-o-y growth in 2Q09<br />

Contractors (+122%): Sector earnings turned positive<br />

from a huge loss (from ITD) a year ago.<br />

Petrochem (+53%): Sales recovery, widening margins and<br />

stock gains.<br />

Commerce (+25%): Aggressive branch expansion in 2H08<br />

and rising SSS.<br />

Property (+11%): Higher sales and margins following <strong>the</strong><br />

continued drop in interest rates and <strong>the</strong> government’s<br />

incentive measures.<br />

Sectors with y-o-y earnings contraction in 2Q09<br />

Transport (-100%): Lower freight rates and weak tourism<br />

numbers.<br />

Industrial estate (-53%): Weak FDI resulting in a sharp drop<br />

in land sales.<br />

Media (-29%): A sharp drop in ad income at MAJOR and<br />

BEC’s c.Bt110m extra expenses for donation and events for<br />

its 39th anniversary.<br />

Construction Material (-28%): 2Q08 was when commodity<br />

product prices peaked.<br />

Energy (-32%): 2Q08 was when commodity product prices<br />

peaked.<br />

Electronics (-29%): Product prices declined throughout<br />

2008 and only recently picked up in 2Q09.<br />

Aggregate 2Q09 SET net profit<br />

YE Dec<br />

(Btm)<br />

2Q08 1Q09 2Q09 Chg<br />

y-o-y<br />

Chg<br />

q-o-q<br />

Banking 20,988 21,190 20,340 -3.1% -4.0%<br />

Finance 340 82 328 -3.5% 302%<br />

Petrochem. 429 681 658 53% -3.4%<br />

Con. Mat. 9,316 5,206 6,669 -28% 28%<br />

Property 4,572 4,201 5,076 11% 21%<br />

Contractors -230 392 51 122% -87%<br />

Ind. estate 788 209 367 -53% 76%<br />

Energy 65,952 24,151 44,731 -32% 85%<br />

Commerce 1,663 2,216 2,078 25% -6.2%<br />

Media 1,444 888 1,026 -29% 16%<br />

Transport -1,301 10,289 -2,606 -100% -125%<br />

Telecom 7,335 5,754 7,068 -3.6% 23%<br />

Electronics 1,789 815 1,265 -29% 55%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs 2,742 2,416 5,173 89% 114%<br />

Total 115,828 78,490 92,224 -20% 17%<br />

Source: Companies and <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

POLITICS<br />

Recent demonstrations were peaceful. After postponing<br />

demonstrations twice (to 30 Aug and 5 Sep), <strong>the</strong> pro-Thaksin<br />

red-shirt protesters ga<strong>the</strong>red at <strong>the</strong> Royal Plaza on 19 Sep,<br />

which is also <strong>the</strong> 3 rd year anniversary of <strong>the</strong> Coup (19 Sep<br />

2006). The demonstration was peaceful and ended around<br />

midnight. However, <strong>the</strong> leaders warned of ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

demonstration in October.<br />

Pro-Thaksin protests losing momentum. We reiterate our<br />

view that political tension has eased and <strong>the</strong> probability of<br />

future protests turning violent is low for three reasons.<br />

First, <strong>the</strong> pro-Thaksin rally is losing momentum after <strong>the</strong><br />

riots in April. Ex-PM Thaksin has lost credibility due to that.<br />

The fact that <strong>the</strong> planned rallies had to be rescheduled twice<br />

also supports our view that <strong>the</strong>y are losing momentum.<br />

Second, <strong>the</strong>re is no compelling reason for a demonstration<br />

for <strong>the</strong> time being. And <strong>the</strong> longer <strong>the</strong> gap between<br />

demonstrations, <strong>the</strong> more difficult it will be to ga<strong>the</strong>r<br />

support for <strong>the</strong> next rally.<br />

Third, PM Abhisit Vejjajiva has bought more time by<br />

proposing that a constitution drafting assembly be set up to<br />

handle changes in <strong>the</strong> constitution. He claims <strong>the</strong>y should<br />

come up with a single charter amendment draft, which <strong>the</strong>y<br />

could agree upon and be tabled in parliament for a vote.<br />

Page 113


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

After which, a public referendum could be held to approve<br />

<strong>the</strong>m.<br />

LIQUIDITY<br />

Benign inflationary pressure. Thailand’s headline CPI<br />

contracted 1.0% y-o-y in Aug 2009, while 8M09 headline<br />

inflation fell 1.9%. Meanwhile, core CPI contracted 0.2% y-<br />

o-y in Aug 2009 but grew 0.4% in 8M09. In sequential<br />

terms, August inflation rose 0.4% m-o-m due to higher fuel<br />

prices. Retail diesel prices rose 5% (MoM, sa) as a result of<br />

<strong>the</strong> over 10% rise in crude oil price. On a y-o-y basis,<br />

inflation has bottomed and should be in positive territory by<br />

November. But given <strong>the</strong> large excess capacity, core inflation<br />

could remain benign in 2009 and 2010.<br />

Thailand: Inflation no longer a concern<br />

% (y-o-y)<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

-6<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Headline CPI<br />

Core CPI<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Source: Ministry of Commerce, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Policy rate should remain at 1.25% over <strong>the</strong> next six<br />

months. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) kept 1-day<br />

repurchase rate (policy rate) unchanged at 1.25% at its<br />

policy meeting on 26 Aug 2009. Following <strong>the</strong> meeting, <strong>the</strong><br />

central bank stated clearly that fur<strong>the</strong>r accommodation<br />

would be necessary only if <strong>the</strong> economy weakens fur<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

We certainly do not expect <strong>the</strong> economy to weaken fur<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Instead, we foresee a recovery in <strong>the</strong> months ahead, even if<br />

only a weak one. The pick up in exports and non-oil imports<br />

recently also streng<strong>the</strong>n our view that it would only be a<br />

matter of time before Thai exports picked up along with <strong>the</strong><br />

region. The pick up in oil price also supports our view of a<br />

recovery. Given <strong>the</strong>se, <strong>the</strong> central bank is unlikely to change<br />

rates in <strong>the</strong> near future.<br />

As a result, <strong>DBS</strong> economist has removed <strong>the</strong> remaining<br />

25bps rate cut in our policy trajectory, and expects rates to<br />

be unchanged at 1.25% for <strong>the</strong> next six months.<br />

Oc t- 08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Thailand: Policy rate likely to be stable<br />

5%<br />

4%<br />

3%<br />

2%<br />

1%<br />

0%<br />

1Q07<br />

2Q07<br />

3Q07<br />

4Q07<br />

1Q08<br />

2Q08<br />

Source: Bank of Thailand, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

3Q08<br />

4Q08<br />

1Q09<br />

2Q09<br />

3Q09<br />

4Q09F<br />

Thai baht performance. The Thai baht has streng<strong>the</strong>ned<br />

from Bt34.02/USD at end-2Q09 to Bt33.69/USD on 17 Sep.<br />

Thailand’s international reserve has grown steadily, from<br />

only US$25bn at end 2007 to US$127bn at end Aug 2009.<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> economist expects <strong>the</strong> Thai baht to streng<strong>the</strong>n fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

and end <strong>the</strong> year at Bt33.6/USD.<br />

Thai baht vs US dollar<br />

Bt<br />

42<br />

40<br />

38<br />

36<br />

34<br />

32<br />

30<br />

1/2/06<br />

3/27/06<br />

6/19/06<br />

9/11/06<br />

12/4/06<br />

2/26/07<br />

5/21/07<br />

8/13/07<br />

11/5/07<br />

1/28/08<br />

Source: Reuters<br />

Thailand: International Reserve<br />

US$bn<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

2001<br />

2003<br />

Source: Bank of Thailand, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

4/21/08<br />

7/11/08<br />

10/3/08<br />

12/26/08<br />

3/20/09<br />

6/12/09<br />

9/4/09<br />

2005<br />

2007<br />

11-Sep-09<br />

Page 114


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

GROWTH and VALUATION<br />

Thailand’s 2009 GDP still expected to contract by 3.2%. The<br />

recent economic data has reaffirmed our view that <strong>the</strong> Thai<br />

economy had hit its trough in 1Q09. <strong>DBS</strong> economist expects<br />

strong third quarter growth (7-9% QoQ, saar) to make up<br />

for <strong>the</strong> weaker than expected second quarter. We also<br />

expect 4Q09 economic growth to revert to positive territory<br />

y-o-y. Hence, <strong>DBS</strong> economist is retaining Thailand’s GDP<br />

growth projections at -3.2% for 2009 and +4.0% for 2010.<br />

Thailand: Quarterly GDP Growth (y-o-y)<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

-2%<br />

-4%<br />

-6%<br />

-8%<br />

Source: NESDB, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Thailand: Annual GDP Growth (y-o-y)<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

-2%<br />

-4%<br />

-6%<br />

-8%<br />

-10%<br />

-12%<br />

1Q07<br />

1998<br />

2Q07<br />

3Q07<br />

2000<br />

4Q07<br />

Source: NESDB, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

1Q08<br />

2002<br />

2Q08<br />

3Q08<br />

2009 EPS growth raised to 24.2%. Following better-thanexpected<br />

2Q09 results and an improving economic outlook,<br />

our EPS growth assumption for Thailand was raised from<br />

18.7% (as of Jun 2009) to 24.0%. The impressive EPS<br />

growth for 2009 would be driven by (i) Petrochemicals<br />

(+69.8%) led by IRP’s capacity expansion, (ii) Energy<br />

(+42.9%) after huge inventory losses last year, (iii) Food &<br />

Beverage (+31.0%) led by strong earnings recovery at MINT,<br />

and (iv) Finance (+25.1%) in <strong>the</strong> absence of investment<br />

2004<br />

4Q08<br />

1Q09<br />

2006<br />

2Q09<br />

3Q09F<br />

2008<br />

4Q09F<br />

2010F<br />

losses booked last year. For 2010, we expect market EPS to<br />

rebound by 13.0% on <strong>the</strong> back of an improving economy.<br />

The following chart shows Thai listed companies’ 2009-2010<br />

EPS growth vs regional peers.<br />

Regional Earnings Growth<br />

%<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

(10)<br />

(20)<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Consensus earnings upgrade underway. Following <strong>the</strong><br />

downgrade of consensus EPS forecasts in 2H08, we saw <strong>the</strong><br />

first up-tick in <strong>the</strong> same in early 1Q09. This is an encouraging<br />

sign. In our view, <strong>the</strong> worst is behind us, and room for<br />

earnings disappointment is narrowing following lower<br />

market expectations. Actual 1H09 aggregate net profit (of<br />

stocks under our coverage) makes up 53% of our full year<br />

forecast and 55% of consensus’ forecast. Hence, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

little room for 2H09 earnings to disappoint.<br />

SET: Consensus earnings revision<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

Feb-07<br />

China H<br />

Thailand<br />

Sep-07<br />

Source: IBES, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Hongkong<br />

2009<br />

Apr-08<br />

Indonesia<br />

09F<br />

Nov-08<br />

Malaysia<br />

2010<br />

10F<br />

Singapore<br />

Jun-09<br />

Page 115


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Valuations remain low. Despite <strong>the</strong> strong run-up in <strong>the</strong> past<br />

four months, <strong>the</strong> SET valuations remain low compared to its<br />

long-term historical averages. We believe P/BV multiple is a<br />

more appropriate valuation metric than PE or dividend yield<br />

currently, when market earnings are abnormally low (at <strong>the</strong><br />

bottom of <strong>the</strong> earnings and economic cycle).<br />

The current 12-month trailing P/BV is still below its long-term<br />

average, which is not demanding.<br />

SET: Current P/BV is still below historical average<br />

x<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

+1 sd<br />

-1 sd<br />

End 94<br />

End 95<br />

End 96<br />

End 97<br />

End 98<br />

End 99<br />

End 00<br />

End 01<br />

End 02<br />

End 03<br />

End 04<br />

End 05<br />

End 06<br />

End 07<br />

End 08<br />

Source: SET, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Thai market is still cheap relative to regional peers.<br />

Compared to o<strong>the</strong>r markets in <strong>the</strong> region, <strong>the</strong> Thai market is<br />

still <strong>the</strong> cheapest in terms of PE and dividend yield. It is now<br />

trading at 2009 PE of 12.5x vs 16.3x for <strong>the</strong> region. It also<br />

offers generous 2009 dividend yield of 3.4% vs <strong>the</strong> regional<br />

average of 2.8%.<br />

Regional valuation comparison<br />

09 PE (x)<br />

20<br />

19<br />

18<br />

17<br />

16<br />

15<br />

14<br />

13<br />

12<br />

Expensive<br />

China H<br />

1.4 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.8<br />

09 Dividend yield (%)<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Hong Kong<br />

Indonesia<br />

Malaysia<br />

Singapore<br />

Thailand<br />

Cheap<br />

Earnings Estimates by Sector<br />

EPS Growth %<br />

PE (x)<br />

2008A 2009F 2010F 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Banking 44.6 (4.2) 16.3 11.8 12.3 10.6<br />

Construction Materials (35.8) 9.6 16.5 15.0 13.7 11.7<br />

Chemicals & Plastics 43.9 69.8 11.8 11.1 6.5 5.9<br />

Commerce 51.9 9.0 12.2 20.7 16.9 15.1<br />

Communication (14.2) (26.7) 9.2 18.0 16.1 14.8<br />

Electronics Components (18.6) (30.1) 4.5 7.5 10.5 9.5<br />

Energy (50.5) 42.9 20.3 16.9 9.8 9.3<br />

Entertainment & Recreation (0.4) (18.2) 17.5 12.8 16.0 13.3<br />

Finance & <strong>Securities</strong> (29.7) 25.1 (12.0) 16.3 13.1 14.6<br />

Food and Beverage (10.0) 32.6 13.5 14.9 11.4 10.1<br />

Property Development (0.2) 24.9 7.4 16.4 13.1 12.3<br />

Transportation n.m. n.m. 32.2 mn 7.5 5.7<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs 41.2 88.2 9.5 15.5 8.3 7.5<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Universe (30.0) 24.0 16.6 16.4 12.5 10.7<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 116


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

INVESTMENT STRATEGY<br />

Possible mild correction before next upturn. Given <strong>the</strong> 85%<br />

surge in <strong>the</strong> SET Index from its trough on 29 Oct 2008 and<br />

58% YTD, a mild market correction would not be surprising.<br />

But <strong>the</strong> magnitude of <strong>the</strong> correction should be limited, as<br />

investors who missed <strong>the</strong> boat in <strong>the</strong> recent run-up are<br />

waiting to buy shares during a correction. Foreign investors<br />

registered Bt162bn net selling in 2008, but <strong>the</strong>ir position<br />

YTD is net buying of only Bt51bn.<br />

Given (i) improving economic conditions, (ii) ample liquidity,<br />

and (iii) attractive valuations, our positive view on <strong>the</strong> Thai<br />

market is intact. A market correction will be a good<br />

opportunity for investors to increase exposure in <strong>the</strong> Thai<br />

market to capture <strong>the</strong> market recovery.<br />

We tracked <strong>the</strong> market back to 1982, and found that SET<br />

rallies post-economic crisis always ended close to <strong>the</strong> first<br />

interest rate hike of each cycle. As <strong>DBS</strong> economist does not<br />

expect a rate hike before 2Q10, <strong>the</strong> market could appreciate<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r over <strong>the</strong> next 6 months.<br />

Buy Banks, Property, upstream Energy and Construction<br />

Materials. Banking and Property counters should benefit<br />

from government pump priming and <strong>the</strong> current low<br />

interest rate environment. The Energy sector should benefit<br />

from <strong>the</strong> rebound in oil price, while we have also seen an<br />

up-tick in construction material sales volume.<br />

Our top picks in <strong>the</strong> Banking sector are Kasikornbank<br />

(KBANK TB) for its good asset quality, lowest NPL ratio<br />

among peers, and attractive valuation, and Bangkok Bank<br />

(BBL TB) for its strong balance sheet, highest NPL coverage<br />

ratio, and strong capital base.<br />

Our top picks for <strong>the</strong> Property sector are Preuksa Real Estate<br />

(PS TB), Asian Property Development (AP TB) and Supalai<br />

(SPALI TB) for <strong>the</strong>ir large backlogs, attractive valuations and<br />

high dividend yields. Quality Houses (QH TB) is also rated a<br />

Buy for its attractive valuation and strong earnings growth<br />

next year due to condominium transfers.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Energy sector, we prefer upstream plays like PTT<br />

Exploration & Production (PTTEP TB) and PTT (PTT TB), which<br />

will directly benefit from strong crude oil price. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

refining industry should remain under pressure due to<br />

oversupply, and valuations appear unattractive.<br />

We upgraded <strong>the</strong> Construction Material sector to<br />

Overweight after seeing a recovery in domestic sales<br />

volumes of cement and steel. The sector will also be a prime<br />

beneficiary of <strong>the</strong> government’s economic stimulus package.<br />

Our top picks are Siam Cement (SCC) and Tata Steel<br />

(Thailand) (TSTH).<br />

SET Index target of 774. We derived a SET target of 774<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> bottom-up approach.<br />

SET performance after economic crisis<br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Fed Funds rate Thai Interbank Policy rate SET Index (RHS)<br />

Econ. crisis<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Dec 82<br />

Dec 84<br />

Dec 86<br />

Dec 88<br />

Dec 90<br />

Dec 92<br />

Dec 94<br />

Dec 96<br />

Dec 98<br />

Dec 00<br />

Dec 02<br />

Dec 04<br />

Dec 06<br />

Dec 08<br />

Dec 10<br />

Note: Inflation targeting regime introduced on 23 May 2000<br />

Source: Federal Reserve, NBER, BoT, Bloomberg and <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 117


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Stock picks for 4Q09. We feature six companies for 4Q09.<br />

Three of <strong>the</strong>m (SCC TB, DTAC TB, and THAI TB) are big-cap<br />

counters, and <strong>the</strong> rest (TISCO TB, IRP TB, and TSTH TB) are<br />

mid-caps.<br />

Siam Cement (SCC TB) is Thailand’s largest conglomerate<br />

with core businesses in cement, petrochemical, paper, and<br />

building products. Despite <strong>the</strong> petrochemical down cycle,<br />

SCC’s expanding capacity will cushion against <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

of weakening product spreads. Its non-chemical<br />

businesses should be prime beneficiaries of <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

recovery and <strong>the</strong> government’s economic stimulus<br />

package. SCC’s solid balance sheet will streng<strong>the</strong>n fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

after <strong>the</strong> end of major capex for <strong>the</strong> new naphtha cracker.<br />

We recommend Buy with a target price of Bt252, based<br />

on 13x 2010 PE.<br />

Total Access Communication (DTAC TB) will be a prime<br />

beneficiary of 3G licenses, with potential 54% NPV<br />

enhancement (from Bt43.00 to Bt66.00). Its current<br />

valuations (12.8x FY10 PE and 5.0x EV/EBITDA) reflect<br />

only <strong>the</strong> value of its 2G operations. Reiterate BUY with a<br />

revised DCF-based target price of Bt54.50 (50%<br />

probability of 3G license).<br />

Thai Airways (THAI TB) is Thailand’s national flag carrier. It<br />

operates 870 international and domestic flights per week.<br />

Its prospects are brighter due to (i) continued cost cuts, (ii)<br />

better management of fuel surcharge vs fuel cost, and (iii)<br />

expectations that <strong>the</strong> new president (DD) will turn THAI<br />

around. Cabin factor is improving m-o-m, and THAI<br />

should benefit from <strong>the</strong> high tourist season in 4Q09.<br />

Liquidity risk is also easing as it continues to secure<br />

funding as planned and successfully delays A380 delivery<br />

to Aug 2012. THAI should turn in Bt5bn net profit in<br />

FY09F compared to <strong>the</strong> large Bt21bn loss last year.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Tisco Financial Group (TISCO TB) has a strong niche in<br />

consumer finance, asset management, brokerage, and<br />

investment banking. It is <strong>the</strong> third largest hire purchase<br />

bank in Thailand by turnover, with double-digit loan<br />

growth in <strong>the</strong> past three years. TISCO’s prospects are<br />

turning positive following <strong>the</strong> domestic automotive<br />

market recovery in 2H09, which will boost hire purchase<br />

loan growth. None<strong>the</strong>less, TISCO’s increased penetration<br />

rate in <strong>the</strong> captive market and successful inorganic growth<br />

in 1H09 lead us to believe that it will again post <strong>the</strong><br />

strongest hire purchase loan growth among peers. We<br />

estimate FY09F and FY10F loan growth at 13.5% and<br />

13.0%, respectively. We value TISCO at 1.4x FY10F P/BV,<br />

which a target price of Bt26.00.<br />

Indorama Polymers (IRP TB) will become <strong>the</strong> world’s 2nd<br />

largest PET producer after <strong>the</strong> completion of its AlphaPet<br />

project in 4Q09. The current PET industry rationalization<br />

and IRP’s timely expansion allow <strong>the</strong> group to gain market<br />

share as several competitors were forced to shut down<br />

inefficient facilities. Earnings growth will be driven mainly<br />

by new capacity and lower interest expense. Core net<br />

profit should jump 327% (70% net profit growth) in<br />

2009, and continue to grow by 12% and 7%,<br />

respectively, in 2010-11F.<br />

Tata Steel Thailand (TSTH TB) is <strong>the</strong> largest and most<br />

efficient long steel producer in Thailand. It should be a<br />

prime beneficiary when mega projects kick off in 4Q09F.<br />

Rebar price has already picked up following signs of<br />

demand recovery, rising 14% from 1QFY10 average to c.<br />

Bt19.5/kg currently. Sales volume inched up 9% from<br />

1H09 average to c. 90,000 tons/month in July and<br />

August, thanks to higher exports and recovering demand.<br />

Going forward, we remain positive on steel prices and<br />

believe that it will continue to pick up, and enhance group<br />

margins. TSTH’s new mini blast furnace that will start<br />

ramping up production in Sep09 is also expected to help<br />

save costs and lift group margins fur<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Page 118


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Thailand<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Banks & Finance<br />

Overweight (Upgrade from<br />

Neutral)<br />

Commerce<br />

Neutral<br />

Communication<br />

Neutral<br />

Under Thailand’s 1st and 2nd stimulus packages, <strong>the</strong> government plans to<br />

borrow from <strong>the</strong> domestic financial market from 2H09 onwards - this should<br />

benefit banks largely in terms of credit growth. In addition, large and blue<br />

chip corporates are switching from foreign to domestic banks for funding,<br />

which should create opportunities for domestic banks, and seasonally stronger<br />

demand from SMEs. Following this, we forecast FY09F loan growth at 2.2%,<br />

including inorganic growth at BAY and TISCO, and 4.8% growth for FY10F. In<br />

terms of asset quality, NPL ratio should improve to 6.6% by YE09F from 6.9%<br />

by YE08, with most banks still trying to reduce NPLs through write-offs and<br />

sale <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> year.<br />

KBANK and BBL are our top picks. We like KBANK for its good asset quality,<br />

lowest NPL ratio among peers, and attractive valuation, and BBL for its strong<br />

balance sheet, highest NPL coverage ratio, and strong capital base to cover<br />

rising NPL without <strong>the</strong> need to raise capital.<br />

The Consumer Confidence Index has improved for 3 consecutive months<br />

since June 2009, and our optimistic view of <strong>the</strong> Commerce sector is<br />

unchanged. We are maintaining our view that <strong>the</strong> three companies under<br />

our coverage (CPALL, BIGC, and HMPRO) are still strong in <strong>the</strong>ir respective<br />

markets, and <strong>the</strong>ir revenues are considered resilient to <strong>the</strong> weak economy<br />

relative to o<strong>the</strong>r sectors on <strong>the</strong> SET. We expect <strong>the</strong>m to grow revenue and<br />

earnings continuously this year and next, led by continuous network<br />

expansion and effective cost control. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> government has<br />

extended several stimulus measures to boost consumption, e.g. cash<br />

handouts for low-income earners, which should be positive for <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

These companies also have strong balance sheets.<br />

In our view, <strong>the</strong> convenience store format will grow <strong>the</strong> fastest in Thailand<br />

for <strong>the</strong> following reasons: (i) as <strong>the</strong> name implies, <strong>the</strong>y offer convenient and<br />

quick services to clients, (ii) favorable locations, (iii) availability of value-added<br />

services such as bill payments, (iv) <strong>the</strong>y are profitable because most work<br />

under a franchise model with good store management.<br />

Our top pick remains CPALL for its strong balance sheet, and earnings<br />

growth prospects led by (i) continued store expansion, (ii) increasing highmargin<br />

food products contribution, and (iii) positive impact from <strong>the</strong> full-year<br />

de-consolidation of loss-making Lotus Supercenter business in China this<br />

year.<br />

Thai Telecom sector underperformed <strong>the</strong> SET Index in Mar-Jun 2009 because<br />

cyclicals led <strong>the</strong> early phase of <strong>the</strong> market recovery. None<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> sector<br />

outperformed <strong>the</strong> market lately due to <strong>the</strong> progress of 3G license awarding.<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong> sector is attractive, and <strong>the</strong> next share price catalyst would be<br />

<strong>the</strong> award of 3G licenses. The National Telecommunication Commission<br />

approved <strong>the</strong> first draft of <strong>the</strong> 3G regulation on 9 Sep. The trial auction and<br />

final public consultation will be held in late September. The next few steps<br />

would be announcing <strong>the</strong> final 3G regulation in October and awarding <strong>the</strong><br />

licenses awarded in early 2010. In our view, <strong>the</strong> replacement of four NTC<br />

commissioners is unlikely to take place before <strong>the</strong> 3G regulation is officially<br />

announced, and <strong>the</strong> NBTC is also unlikely to be set up before 2H 2010.<br />

All <strong>the</strong> major cellular operators will benefit from 3G licenses, but DTAC will<br />

benefit <strong>the</strong> most. DTAC is trading at only 12.8x FY10 PE and 5.0x EV/EBITDA,<br />

Its current valuations reflect only <strong>the</strong> value of its 2G operations. We also<br />

reiterate our Trading BUY call for TRUE.<br />

KBANK and BBL<br />

CPALL<br />

DTAC<br />

Page 119


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Thailand<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Construction Materials<br />

Overweight<br />

(Upgrade from Neutral)<br />

Contractor<br />

Neutral<br />

Electronics Components<br />

Neutral<br />

Domestic cement sales volume turned positive y-o-y for two consecutive<br />

months in June and July, up 5% and 3%, respectively. Steel sales volume is<br />

also improving, and positive economic growth expectations should support<br />

steel prices. Rebar price has inched up 15% in Aug from 2Q09 average.<br />

Meanwhile, although <strong>the</strong> Consumer Confidence Index remains near a 7-year<br />

low, August data has ticked up for 3 consecutive months since May. In<br />

addition, <strong>the</strong> 2nd stimulus package, worth Bt1.43 trillion and covers <strong>the</strong><br />

government’s fiscal years October 2010-12, should accelerate domestic<br />

construction activities. 73% of <strong>the</strong> package is earmarked for infrastructurerelated<br />

projects. All <strong>the</strong> above factors point to signs of recovering demand<br />

for construction materials from 4Q09 onwards. Our top picks for <strong>the</strong> Sector<br />

are Siam Cement (SCC) and Tata Steel (Thailand) (TSTH).<br />

Contractors will be <strong>the</strong> prime beneficiary of government pump priming,<br />

especially its Stimulus Package 2 (SP 2), which will be focusing on<br />

infrastructure. The package will commence in Oct 2009 (fiscal 2009/2010),<br />

and spending should be seen in early 2010.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> sector will also benefit from falling construction material prices,<br />

which should result in margin expansion. Our top pick in <strong>the</strong> sector is Sino-<br />

Thai Engineering (STEC) for four reasons. First, <strong>the</strong> company has a large<br />

backlog (e.g. <strong>the</strong> second Purple line contract). Second, its net cash position<br />

will enable <strong>the</strong> company to bid for more projects. Third, its margins should<br />

improve considerably due to <strong>the</strong> end of its loss-making Airport link project.<br />

Lastly, <strong>the</strong> company has good connections with <strong>the</strong> government.<br />

We remain positive about a demand recovery in <strong>the</strong> Electronics sector from<br />

2Q09 onwards, and that global demand had bottomed out in 1Q09.<br />

Following 12 months of manufacturers consuming <strong>the</strong>ir chip stockpiles due<br />

to slack demand in <strong>the</strong> face of <strong>the</strong> recession, inventories are now depleted to<br />

<strong>the</strong> point where new orders are needed. At <strong>the</strong> end of 2Q09, iSuppli<br />

estimates inventory value has fallen to US$24.9bn from US$32.6bn in 2Q08.<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> economic stimulus programs in China, including incentives for<br />

purchasing consumer products and investments in 3G/TDSCDMA<br />

communications infrastructure, have helped to drive semiconductor sales in<br />

<strong>the</strong> world’s largest chip market. Hence, sales volume should start to improve<br />

q-o-q, and have a positive impact on Thailand’s Electronics sector. Fur<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

Hana Microelectronics (HANA) has hired over 600 new employees since<br />

Apr09 following its 19% workforce reduction between Oct08 and Mar09<br />

(from 9,120 to 7,364). It is likely to hire ano<strong>the</strong>r 400-500 staff in 2H09. This<br />

is a positive development because it reflects expectations of a demand<br />

recovery since 2Q09 (compared to sharp drops in production orders in 4Q08<br />

and 1Q09).<br />

The current outlook for electronics export orders remains strong, and 2H09<br />

prospects remain positive h-o-h. This will be led by (i) continued<br />

replenishment of <strong>the</strong> supply chain (following reduced capacity of<br />

manufacturers in 4Q08), (ii) increasing orders as demand improves, (iii) peak<br />

season in 3Q, and (v) low base in 4Q08.<br />

SCC and TSTH<br />

STEC<br />

DELTA, HANA and CCET<br />

Page 120


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Thailand<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Energy<br />

Overweight<br />

Entertainment<br />

Underweight<br />

(Downgrade from Neutral)<br />

Property Development<br />

Overweight<br />

We expect crude oil price to remain volatile at around US$70, but should<br />

move upward towards year-end supported by seasonally stronger demand<br />

for heating oil in winter. Although refining margin has bottomed out,<br />

continued high inventory levels and new refining capacities should remain an<br />

overhang and cap refining margin gains. Refining margin bottomed out at<br />

US$2.4/bbl average in July, but has since recovered to US$3-4. We expect<br />

margins to hover at US$3-5 going forward.<br />

Refinery stocks strongly outperformed <strong>the</strong> SET and domestic and regional<br />

peers in 3Q09. This was fuelled by speculations about upcoming merger<br />

plans between PTT’s refinery and petrochemical affiliates. In our view,<br />

refinery share prices have risen ahead of a fundamental recovery. Therefore,<br />

we continue to favor upstream and integrated plays, like PTT Exploration &<br />

Production (PTTEP) and PTT, which are direct beneficiaries of rising crude oil<br />

price.<br />

Overall ad spending for 7M09 fell 4.3%, while TV ad spending for <strong>the</strong> same<br />

period softened only 1.0%. Despite minimal ad spending recovery currently,<br />

<strong>the</strong> dispute between Ch7 and Unilever has resulted in ad migration from Ch7<br />

to o<strong>the</strong>r channels, especially BEC’s Ch3 and MCOT’s Ch9. And with <strong>the</strong><br />

dispute expected to continue throughout <strong>the</strong> year, <strong>the</strong> ad migration will<br />

continue into 2H09. This, coupled with <strong>the</strong> recent recovery of overall ad<br />

spending, means BEC and MCOT will still enjoy strong loading even during<br />

<strong>the</strong> low season (August). Generally, ad income in 3Q is lower than 2Q, but<br />

now it seems 3Q09 ad income could buck <strong>the</strong> trend. We expect earnings to<br />

be relatively strong in 4Q09 for three reasons: (i) 4Q is a high season for ad<br />

spending in Thailand; (ii) <strong>the</strong> economy should have improved by <strong>the</strong>n; and (iii)<br />

positive impact of ad migration from Ch7 should continue into <strong>the</strong> quarter.<br />

We reiterate our BUY rating for BEC and MCOT. BEC remains our top pick in<br />

<strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

Thai Property sector reported 3% y-o-y and 22% q-o-q earnings growth in<br />

2Q09 led by (i) stronger sales, (ii) wider gross margins, and (iii) relatively flat<br />

SG&A expenses. Most property companies still have healthy balance sheets<br />

with average net gearing of 70% at end-2Q09. Prospects for <strong>the</strong> sector<br />

remain positive in 2H09, supported by (i) <strong>the</strong> low interest rates environment,<br />

(ii) rebounding consumer confidence, (iii) improving economy, and (iv) falling<br />

supply particularly from small & non-listed developers. Several companies<br />

have also secured large backlogs, which should ensure revenue streams this<br />

year and next. Major companies are also planning to launch more projects in<br />

2H09 and 2010, which should result in higher bookings and revenue.<br />

Share prices in <strong>the</strong> sector have risen 87% YTD, out-performing <strong>the</strong> SET<br />

Index’s 58% gain. But several stocks are still trading at below historical<br />

valuations while offering very generous dividend yields. We recommend<br />

investors focus on companies with strong balance sheets, large quality<br />

backlogs (implying clearer earnings visibility), diversified portfolios, and<br />

attractive valuations. Our top picks are Preuksa Real Estate (PS TB), Asian<br />

Property Development (AP TB) and Supalai (SPALI TB) for <strong>the</strong>ir large backlogs,<br />

attractive valuations and high dividend yields. Quality Houses (QH TB) is also<br />

rated a Buy for its attractive valuation and strong earnings growth next year<br />

due to condominium transfers.<br />

PTTEP and PTT<br />

BEC and MCOT<br />

PS, AP, SPALI and QH<br />

Page 121


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Thailand<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Vehicles & Parts<br />

Neutral<br />

(Upgrade from Underweight)<br />

Toyota Motor Thailand Co. Ltd. reported that Thailand’s domestic car sales<br />

were stable m-o-m with 43,251 units sold in Aug 2009, but fell 8% y-o-y.<br />

This takes 8M09 domestic sales to 317,835 units, which implies 23% y-o-y<br />

contraction. However, domestic car sales have been improving in <strong>the</strong> past<br />

few months, in line with improving consumer confidence.<br />

In our view, domestic car sales will continue to improve <strong>the</strong> rest of this year,<br />

and we remain optimistic about Thailand’s auto sector outlook. We believe<br />

that domestic car sales could streng<strong>the</strong>n y-o-y in 4Q09 due to <strong>the</strong> low base<br />

effect in 4Q08. Looking forward, we expect Aug-Oct 2009 domestic sales to<br />

be stable m-o-m before rising in <strong>the</strong> last three months of <strong>the</strong> year. Thailand’s<br />

auto sector outlook for late-2009 looks positive as we expect <strong>the</strong> sector to<br />

bottom out in 2Q-3Q 2009.<br />

AH<br />

Page 122


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

This page has been left blank intentionally<br />

Page 123


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Siam Cement<br />

Bloomberg: SCC TB | Reuters: SCC.BK<br />

BUY Bt229.00 SET : 709.23<br />

Price Target : 12-month Bt 252.00<br />

Potential Catalyst: Sustained petrochemical spreads, economic recovery<br />

Analyst<br />

Vichitr Kuladejkhuna CFA +66 2657 7826<br />

vichitrk@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

280<br />

230<br />

180<br />

130<br />

80<br />

Bt<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Siam Cement ( LHS ) Relative SET INDEX ( RHS )<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (Bt m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 293,230 235,563 295,249 312,934<br />

EBITDA 38,981 50,637 55,076 53,175<br />

Pre-tax Profit 20,968 29,864 33,268 31,458<br />

Net Profit 16,771 21,262 23,238 21,521<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 16,507 21,262 23,238 21,521<br />

EPS (Bt) 14.0 17.7 19.4 17.9<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Bt) 13.8 17.7 19.4 17.9<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (36) 29 9 (7)<br />

Diluted EPS (Bt) 14.0 17.7 19.4 17.9<br />

Net DPS (Bt) 7.5 8.5 10.0 10.0<br />

BV Per Share (Bt) 72.7 82.4 92.5 100.5<br />

PE (X) 16.4 12.9 11.8 12.8<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 16.6 12.9 11.8 12.8<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 11.3 9.8 8.9 9.7<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 10.7 8.4 7.5 7.6<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 3.3 3.7 4.4 4.4<br />

P/Book Value (X) 3.1 2.8 2.5 2.3<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.6<br />

ROAE (%) 19.3 22.8 22.1 18.6<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Bt): 17.5 18.6 22.3<br />

ICB Industry : Industrials<br />

ICB Sector: Construction & Materials<br />

Principal Business: Thailand’s largest conglomerate with core<br />

businesses in cement, petrochemical, paper, and building materials.<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

219<br />

199<br />

179<br />

159<br />

139<br />

119<br />

99<br />

79<br />

59<br />

Riding on economic recovery<br />

• Sustainable demand and delay in new capacity<br />

will keep petrochemical spreads at healthy levels<br />

• Latest data on domestic cement sales and<br />

Consumer Confidence Index are encouraging<br />

• Petrochemical may not have bottomed out, but its<br />

non-chemical business should recover in tandem<br />

with <strong>the</strong> economy in 2010<br />

• Maintain BUY and Bt252 TP (13x 2010 PE).<br />

Resilient petrochemical spreads, early recovery<br />

signs in non-chemical business. HDPE and PPnaphtha<br />

spreads remained at above US$600/tonne,<br />

supported by firm regional demand attributed to<br />

economic stimulus packages across <strong>the</strong> region, <strong>the</strong><br />

industry’s low inventory level, and delay in new capacity.<br />

SCC’s new naphtha cracker capacity should cushion<br />

against weaker petrochemical spreads in 2010.<br />

Improving prospects for non-chemical businesses.<br />

Domestic cement sales turned around to grow y-o-y<br />

starting in June, while <strong>the</strong> Consumer Confidence Index<br />

had ticked up for 3 consecutive months since May. The<br />

government’s 2nd stimulus package should accelerate<br />

domestic construction activities from 2010 onwards.<br />

Maintain BUY. SCC’s prospects will improve, led by an<br />

economic recovery, better than previously expected<br />

petrochemical outlook, strong balance sheet, and solid<br />

cash flow. Hence, we maintain a BUY rating, with a<br />

14% total return to our Bt252 target price.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,200<br />

Mkt. Cap (Btm/US$m) 274,800 / 8,152<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

The Crown Property Bureau (%) 30.0<br />

Thai NVDR (%) 8.9<br />

Chase Nominees Limited 42 (%) 3.7<br />

Free Float (%) 67.9<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 2,757<br />

Page 124<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa-CS


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Siam Cement<br />

Income Statement (Bt m) Balance Sheet (Bt m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 293,230 235,563 295,249 312,934 Net Fixed Assets 137,261 158,500 147,796 133,615<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (248,096) (185,515) (241,314) (260,661) Invts in Associates & JVs 0 0 0 0<br />

Gross Profit 45,135 50,048 53,935 52,273 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 64,630 68,348 76,570 85,572<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (27,273) (24,210) (26,899) (27,987) Cash & ST Invts 26,714 24,129 27,084 33,466<br />

Operating Profit 17,862 25,837 27,036 24,286 Inventory 30,107 27,827 33,784 36,492<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 4,262 4,000 4,000 4,000 Debtors 19,313 21,201 23,620 25,035<br />

Associates & JV Inc 4,669 7,039 8,222 9,002 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 7,692 6,609 6,109 6,109<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (6,089) (7,012) (5,989) (5,830) Total Assets 285,717 306,614 314,963 320,288<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 264 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 20,968 29,864 33,268 31,458 ST Debt 38,180 28,500 27,500 62,500<br />

Tax (4,562) (6,193) (6,214) (6,471) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 26,373 30,802 33,684 35,511<br />

Minority Interest 365 (2,409) (3,816) (3,465) LT Debt 108,127 118,841 109,341 64,841<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 1,650 3,013 3,026 3,038<br />

Net Profit 16,771 21,262 23,238 21,521 Shareholder’s Equity 87,257 98,920 111,058 120,579<br />

Net Profit before Except. 16,507 21,262 23,238 21,521 Minority Interests 24,129 26,538 30,354 33,819<br />

EBITDA 38,981 50,637 55,076 53,175 Total Cap. & Liab. 285,717 306,614 314,963 320,289<br />

Sales Gth (%) 9.5 (19.7) 25.3 6.0 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital 30,739 24,835 29,828 32,125<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (27.3) 29.9 8.8 (3.5) Net Cash/(Debt) (119,593) (123,212) (109,757) (93,875)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (29.4) 44.6 4.6 (10.2)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (44.7) 26.8 9.3 (7.4)<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 21.8 20.7 18.7 20.6<br />

Cash Flow Statement (Bt m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 20,968 29,864 33,268 31,458 Gross Margins (%) 15.4 21.2 18.3 16.7<br />

Dep. & Amort. 12,188 13,761 15,818 15,886 Opg Profit Margin (%) 6.1 11.0 9.2 7.8<br />

Tax Paid (4,562) (6,193) (6,214) (6,471) Net Profit Margin (%) 5.7 9.0 7.9 6.9<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (4,669) (7,039) (8,222) (9,002) ROAE (%) 19.3 22.8 22.1 18.6<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (2,722) 9,217 (4,981) (2,284) ROA (%) 6.3 7.2 7.5 6.8<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 9,362 1,869 0 0 ROCE (%) 5.9 7.7 7.9 6.8<br />

Net Operating CF 30,566 41,479 29,669 29,588 Div Payout Ratio (%) 53.7 48.0 51.6 55.8<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (34,864) (35,000) (5,115) (1,705) Net Interest Cover (x) 2.9 3.7 4.5 4.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 0 0 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 1.1 0.8 1.0 1.0<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 4,578 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 28.4 31.4 27.7 28.4<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 27.6 30.5 29.1 29.9<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 2,305 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 52.0 61.6 49.9 52.4<br />

Net Investing CF (27,981) (35,000) (5,115) (1,705) Current Ratio (x) 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.0<br />

Div Paid (15,503) (9,600) (11,100) (12,000) Quick Ratio (x) 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.6<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 39,942 536 (10,500) (9,500) Net Debt/Equity (X) 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.6<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (4,455) 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 23.8 23.8 3.7 1.3<br />

Net Financing CF 19,983 (9,064) (21,600) (21,500) Z-Score (X) 2.0 2.0 2.7 3.0<br />

Net Cashflow 22,568 (2,585) 2,954 6,383 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (Bt) (99.7) (102.7) (91.5) (78.2)<br />

Opg CFPS (Bt) 27.7 26.9 28.9 26.6<br />

Free CFPS (Bt) (3.6) 5.4 20.5 23.2<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Bt m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 79,313 55,062 55,211 56,880 Revenues (Bt m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (65,466) (51,127) (42,369) (43,760) Cement 49,999 47,646 49,131 49,393<br />

Gross Profit 13,847 3,936 12,842 13,120 Petrochemicals 136,527 98,000 162,004 177,033<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (7,142) (6,570) (6,035) (6,220) Paper 47,110 41,510 44,532 45,423<br />

Operating Profit 6,704 (2,634) 6,807 6,900 Building products 23,351 24,752 26,732 28,336<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 902 850 916 1,504 O<strong>the</strong>rs 36,243 23,656 12,849 12,749<br />

Associates & JV Inc 1,786 (1,636) 1,171 2,044 Total 293,230 235,563 295,249 312,934<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (1,325) (1,995) (1,633) (1,335) Net profit (Bt m)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (27) 43 (134) (46) Cement 6,006 6,444 6,895 7,126<br />

Pre-tax Profit 8,040 (5,372) 7,126 9,068 Petrochemicals 6,136 10,800 11,691 8,936<br />

Tax (1,531) 128 (1,183) (1,366) Paper 1,658 1,902 2,197 2,621<br />

Minority Interest (570) 1,764 (755) (865) Building products 778 1,310 1,775 2,022<br />

Net Profit 5,940 (3,480) 5,188 6,837 O<strong>the</strong>rs 2,193 806 680 816<br />

Net profit bef Except. 5,967 (3,524) 5,322 6,882 Total 16,771 21,262 23,238 21,521<br />

EBITDA 12,533 (256) 12,104 13,441 Net profit Margins (%)<br />

Cement 12.0 13.5 14.0 14.4<br />

Sales Gth (%) (1.2) (30.6) 0.3 3.0 Petrochemicals 4.5 11.0 7.2 5.0<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (8.6) (102.0) (4,832.7) 11.0 Paper 3.5 4.6 4.9 5.8<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (3.8) (139.3) (358.4) 1.4 Building products 3.3 5.3 6.6 7.1<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (17.4) (158.6) (249.1) 31.8 O<strong>the</strong>rs 6.0 3.4 5.3 6.4<br />

Gross Margins (%) 17.5 7.1 23.3 23.1 Total 5.7 9.0 7.9 6.9<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 8.5 (4.8) 12.3 12.1 Key Assumptions<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 7.5 (6.3) 9.4 12.0 Cement - sales (m tonnes) 18.2 17.0 17.6 18.2<br />

Paper - sales (m tonnes) 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.1<br />

Polyolefins - sales (m tonnes) 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.8<br />

HDPE spread (US$/tonne) 660 588 520 426<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 125


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Thai Airways<br />

Bloomberg: THAI TB | Reuters: THAI.BK<br />

BUY Bt21.70 SET : 709.23<br />

Price Target : 12-month Bt 23.80<br />

Potential Catalyst: Recovering traffic volume<br />

Analyst<br />

Nalyne Viriyasathien +662 657 7823<br />

nalynev@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Taking off in <strong>the</strong> high season<br />

• Passenger traffic will grow during <strong>the</strong> high<br />

tourism season in 4Q09<br />

• Expect a turnaround from losses last year, with an<br />

effective recovery plan, recovering traffic, and<br />

lower fuel cost y-o-y<br />

• Trading at attractive valuation with 11% upside<br />

to our Bt23.80 TP, maintain BUY.<br />

Price Relative<br />

55 .80<br />

45 .80<br />

35 .80<br />

25 .80<br />

15 .80<br />

5 .80<br />

Bt<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Thai Airways ( LHS ) Relative SET INDEX ( RHS )<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (Bt m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 200,118 154,981 167,127 177,404<br />

EBITDA 5,568 29,030 35,838 38,849<br />

Pre-tax Profit (23,600) 5,563 7,823 9,184<br />

Net Profit (21,379) 5,017 7,154 8,471<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) (16,908) 2,400 7,154 8,471<br />

EPS (Bt) (12.6) 3.0 4.2 5.0<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Bt) (10.0) 1.4 4.2 5.0<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (521) nm 198 18<br />

Diluted EPS (Bt) (12.6) 3.0 4.2 5.0<br />

Net DPS (Bt) 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.3<br />

BV Per Share (Bt) 26.8 29.8 34.0 37.9<br />

PE (X) nm 7.3 5.2 4.4<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) nm 15.4 5.2 4.4<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) nm 1.4 1.2 1.1<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 31.7 6.2 4.9 4.2<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 0.0 0.0 5.1 6.0<br />

P/Book Value (X) 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 3.0 2.8 2.4 1.9<br />

ROAE (%) (37.7) 10.4 13.2 13.9<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Bt): 1.3 2.3 2.7<br />

ICB Industry : Consumer Services<br />

ICB Sector: Travel & Leisure<br />

Principal Business: THAI operates domestic, regional and<br />

intercontinental flights to key destinations around <strong>the</strong> world and<br />

within Thailand.<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

204<br />

184<br />

164<br />

144<br />

124<br />

104<br />

84<br />

64<br />

44<br />

24<br />

Improving operation. July passenger cabin factor<br />

showed signs of a turnaround at 71% compared to<br />

average of 66% in 2Q09, due to successful marketing<br />

and recovering traffic demand. 2H09 is expected to be<br />

profitable and traffic should be favorable for THAI<br />

during <strong>the</strong> peak tourist season in 4Q09.<br />

Positive outlook. Prospects are brighter with its plan to<br />

cut costs fur<strong>the</strong>r (especially fixed costs), better<br />

management of fuel surcharge vs fuel cost, and<br />

expectations that <strong>the</strong> new president (DD) will turn THAI<br />

around. We expect THAI to post Bt5bn net profit for<br />

FY09F compared to Bt21bn loss last year. FY10F earnings<br />

should grow 43% to Bt7.2bn on <strong>the</strong> back of an improving<br />

economy and rising tourist arrivals. Its liquidity risk is<br />

easing as it continues to secure funding as planned and<br />

successfully rolls over its short-term facilities, and delays<br />

A380 delivery to Aug 2012.<br />

Undemanding valuation. THAI’s share price rose 280%<br />

YTD on improving sentiment. Despite this, it is still trading<br />

at attractive 0.6x P/BV and 4.9x EV/EBITDA (2010), still <strong>the</strong><br />

cheapest compared to regional peers’ averages of 1.1x<br />

and 10.1x, respectively. Coupled with an 11% upside<br />

potential to our target price of Bt23.80, based on 0.7x<br />

2010 P/BV, we reiterate our BUY call for THAI.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,699<br />

Mkt. Cap (Btm/US$m) 36,866 / 1,094<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Ministry Of Finance (%) 51.0<br />

Yayupak Fund1 (%) 17.1<br />

Thai NVDR (%) 4.5<br />

Free Float (%) 27.4<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 11,447<br />

Page 126<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa-CS


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Thai Airways<br />

Income Statement (Bt m) Balance Sheet (Bt m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 200,118 154,981 167,127 177,404 Net Fixed Assets 207,064 218,297 223,806 218,268<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (190,154) (133,134) (140,029) (148,483) Invts in Associates & JVs 1,337 1,331 1,364 1,398<br />

Gross Profit 9,964 21,846 27,098 28,921 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 9,015 8,865 8,875 8,487<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (25,342) (15,260) (16,073) (17,034) Cash & ST Invts 8,024 4,975 4,541 4,902<br />

Operating Profit (15,378) 6,586 11,025 11,887 Inventory 6,779 4,419 4,612 4,858<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 1,307 1,695 1,838 1,951 Debtors 15,829 14,745 15,900 16,878<br />

Associates & JV Inc (65) (12) 67 68 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 11,486 11,256 11,031 10,479<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (4,992) (5,323) (5,107) (4,723) Total Assets 259,535 263,888 270,128 265,271<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (4,471) 2,617 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit (23,600) 5,563 7,823 9,184 ST Debt 40,764 38,280 29,792 17,656<br />

Tax 2,285 (484) (604) (648) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 57,819 60,536 63,517 66,718<br />

Minority Interest (65) (62) (65) (65) LT Debt 106,417 109,957 114,404 111,729<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 8,652 4,153 4,236 4,321<br />

Net Profit (21,379) 5,017 7,154 8,471 Shareholder’s Equity 45,603 50,620 57,773 64,376<br />

Net Profit before Except. (16,908) 2,400 7,154 8,471 Minority Interests 279 341 406 471<br />

EBITDA 5,568 29,030 35,838 38,849 Total Cap. & Liab. 259,535 263,888 270,128 265,271<br />

Sales Gth (%) 1.4 (22.6) 7.8 6.1 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (23,725) (30,116) (31,974) (34,503)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (79.8) 421.4 23.5 8.4 Net Cash/(Debt) (139,157) (143,263) (139,655) (124,483)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (268.3) nm 67.4 7.8<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (736.8) nm 42.6 18.4<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) N/A 8.7 7.7 7.1<br />

Cash Flow Statement (Bt m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit (23,600) 5,563 7,823 9,184 Gross Margins (%) 5.0 14.1 16.2 16.3<br />

Dep. & Amort. 19,704 20,761 22,909 24,942 Opg Profit Margin (%) (7.7) 4.2 6.6 6.7<br />

Tax Paid (1,478) 2,285 (484) (604) Net Profit Margin (%) (10.7) 3.2 4.3 4.8<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) 65 12 (67) (68) ROAE (%) (37.7) 10.4 13.2 13.9<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (1,506) 3,622 1,737 2,485 ROA (%) (7.9) 1.9 2.7 3.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 18,087 (7,104) 9 409 ROCE (%) (7.4) 3.0 5.0 5.5<br />

Net Operating CF 11,273 25,139 31,927 36,348 Div Payout Ratio (%) N/A 0.0 26.1 26.1<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (21,403) (31,925) (28,349) (19,336) Net Interest Cover (x) (3.1) 1.2 2.2 2.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 18 (5) (2) (2) Asset Turnover (x) 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 131 6 (33) (34) Debtors Turn (avg days) 31.6 36.0 33.5 33.7<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 18.4 23.4 23.2 23.1<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 944 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 13.8 18.2 14.1 14.0<br />

Net Investing CF (20,309) (31,924) (28,385) (19,372) Current Ratio (x) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4<br />

Div Paid (765) 0 0 (1,869) Quick Ratio (x) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 3,661 3,674 (4,042) (14,811) Net Debt/Equity (X) 3.0 2.8 2.4 1.9<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) 3.1 2.8 2.4 1.9<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (12,179) 62 65 65 Capex to Debt (%) 14.5 21.5 19.7 14.9<br />

Net Financing CF (9,283) 3,736 (3,977) (16,615) Z-Score (X) 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8<br />

Net Cashflow (18,319) (3,050) (434) 361 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (Bt) (81.9) (84.3) (82.2) (73.3)<br />

Opg CFPS (Bt) 7.5 12.7 17.8 19.9<br />

Free CFPS (Bt) (6.0) (4.0) 2.1 10.0<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Bt m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 53,669 41,310 40,683 34,362 Revenues (Bt m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (52,611) (41,551) (32,482) (32,851) Air Transportation 191,072 146,298 158,270 168,370<br />

Gross Profit 1,058 (241) 8,201 1,511 Business Units 7,948 7,551 7,702 7,856<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (4,386) 843 (3,796) (3,774) O<strong>the</strong>r Activities 1,098 1,132 1,155 1,178<br />

Operating Profit (3,328) 602 4,405 (2,263) Total 200,118 154,981 167,127 177,404<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 408 334 513 226<br />

Associates & JV Inc (60) 24 (1) 31<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (1,242) (1,385) (1,376) (1,382)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 4,734 (12,230) 4,522 (1,905)<br />

Pre-tax Profit 512 (12,654) 8,064 (5,294)<br />

Tax (72) (2,102) (177) (92)<br />

Minority Interest (14) (12) (18) (17)<br />

Net Profit 426 (14,768) 7,869 (5,403)<br />

Net profit bef Except. (4,308) (2,538) 3,346 (3,498)<br />

EBITDA 2,109 5,565 9,990 3,165<br />

Sales Gth (%) 6.7 (23.0) (1.5) (15.5)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (33.4) 163.9 79.5 (68.3)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 41.3 nm 631.3 nm<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (104.6) nm nm nm<br />

Gross Margins (%) 2.0 (0.6) 20.2 4.4<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) (6.2) 1.5 10.8 (6.6)<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 0.8 (35.7) 19.3 (15.7)<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 127


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Total Access Communication<br />

Bloomberg: DTAC TB | Reuters: DTAC.BK<br />

BUY Bt42.75 SET : 709.23<br />

Price Target: 12-month Bt54.50<br />

Potential Catalyst: Tariff rate hike and award of 3G licenses<br />

Analyst<br />

Chirasit Vuttigrai +66 2657 7836<br />

chirasit@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

58 . 90<br />

53 . 90<br />

48 . 90<br />

43 . 90<br />

38 . 90<br />

33 . 90<br />

28 . 90<br />

23 . 90<br />

18 . 90<br />

Bt<br />

Jun - 07 Dec - 07 Jun - 08 Dec - 08 Jun - 09<br />

Relative Index<br />

Total Access Communication ( LHS ) Relative SET INDEX ( RHS )<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

219<br />

169<br />

119<br />

69<br />

19<br />

Best 3G play<br />

• Prime beneficiary of a 3G license, expected in<br />

1Q 2010. NPV could be enhanced by 54% from<br />

Bt43 to Bt66<br />

• Based on 50% probability of securing a 3G<br />

license, DTAC’s target price is Bt54.50, implying<br />

an attractive 28% upside potential<br />

• Reiterate BUY for DTAC, which remains our top<br />

pick in <strong>the</strong> sector and one of our top 10 picks in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Thai market.<br />

Prime beneficiary of 3G license. We estimate DTAC’s<br />

NPV will be enhanced by 54% (from Bt43 to Bt66) if it<br />

secures a 3G license. First, DTAC is a pure cellular<br />

operator. Second, it has more room to reduce regulatory<br />

fees than ADVANC (DTAC: from 30% after Oct 2011 to<br />

c.6%; ADVANC: from 24% to c.6%), and third, DTAC<br />

has higher financial gearing than ADVANC (c. 0.16x vs.<br />

0.24x at end-2009). The increase in cash flow of a highergeared<br />

company results in a larger increase in equity<br />

value.<br />

FY Dec (Bt m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 67,695 66,672 68,616 70,154<br />

EBITDA 20,773 19,581 21,602 22,306<br />

Pre-tax Profit 10,122 8,699 10,615 12,114<br />

Net Profit 9,329 6,491 7,922 8,348<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 7,568 6,491 7,922 8,348<br />

EPS (Bt) 3.94 2.74 3.35 3.53<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Bt) 3.20 2.74 3.35 3.53<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 21.3 (14.2) 22.1 5.4<br />

Diluted EPS (Bt) 3.94 2.74 3.35 3.53<br />

Net DPS (Bt) 1.50 0.82 1.00 1.06<br />

BV Per Share (Bt) 25.1 26.3 28.9 31.4<br />

PE (X) 10.9 15.6 12.8 12.1<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 13.4 15.6 12.8 12.1<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 5.3 6.3 5.6 5.6<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 5.9 5.9 5.0 4.6<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 3.5 1.9 2.3 2.5<br />

P/Book Value (X) 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 35.3 23.9 11.4 1.3<br />

ROAE (%) 16.8 10.7 12.1 11.7<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Bt): 2.6 2.9 2.7<br />

ICB Industry : Telecommunications<br />

ICB Sector: Mobile Telecommunications<br />

Principal Business: DTAC is <strong>the</strong> second largest cellular operator in<br />

Thailand with a subscriber base market share of 30%.<br />

Clearer visibility of 3G license award. The draft 3G<br />

Information Memorandum (IM) was approved on 9 Sep.<br />

The final IM should be announced in October, and <strong>the</strong><br />

auction should be carried out in January. The award is<br />

expected early 2010.<br />

Reiterate BUY. DTAC’s current valuations (12.8x FY10<br />

PE and 5.0x EV/EBITDA) reflect only <strong>the</strong> value of its 2G<br />

operations. Reiterate BUY with a DCF-based target price<br />

of Bt54.50, based on a 50% probability of securing a<br />

3G license.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 2,368<br />

Mkt. Cap (Btm/US$m) 101,224 / 3,003<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Telenor Asia Pte Ltd (%) 35.0<br />

Thai Telco Holdings Limited (%) 30.0<br />

TOT (%) 14.9<br />

Free Float (%) 29.1<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 7,657<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

Page 128<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa-CS


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Total Access Communication<br />

Income Statement (Bt m) Balance Sheet (Bt m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 67,695 66,672 68,616 70,154 Fixed assets 82,972 79,867 78,742 78,011<br />

EBITDA 20,773 19,581 21,602 22,306 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 4,860 5,057 5,310 5,575<br />

Depr/Amort (9,293) (9,668) (10,205) (9,835) Cash/ST Investments 7,082 6,100 5,711 7,034<br />

Opg Profit 11,480 9,912 11,398 12,471 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 9,521 10,303 10,603 10,841<br />

Asso & O<strong>the</strong>r Inc 38 63 80 104 Total Assets 104,435 101,327 100,366 101,461<br />

Interest (Exp)/Inc (1,396) (1,277) (863) (461) ST Debt 11,097 3,000 - -<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 10,122 8,699 10,615 12,114 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liabilities 16,484 17,601 18,184 18,826<br />

Tax (2,558) (2,212) (2,697) (3,770) LT Debt 17,291 18,300 13,785 8,271<br />

Minority Interest 4 3 4 4 Minority Interests 41 38 34 29<br />

Extra & Forex 1,761 - - - Shareholders' equity 59,450 62,389 68,364 74,335<br />

Net Profit 9,329 6,491 7,922 8,348 Total Capital 104,435 101,327 100,366 101,461<br />

Sales Growth (%) 3.2 (1.5) 2.9 2.2 Share Capital (m) 2,368 2,368 2,368 2,368<br />

Net Profit Gr (%) 59.7 (30.4) 22.1 5.4 Net cash/(debt) (20,990) (14,900) (7,789) (966)<br />

EBITDA Mgn (%) 30.7 29.4 31.5 31.8 Working capital 6,963 7,297 7,581 7,985<br />

Tax Rate (%) 25.4 25.3 25.3 31.0 Gearing (%) 47.2 33.6 19.7 10.8<br />

Cash Flow Statement (Bt m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

EBITDA 20,731 19,538 21,557 22,259 ROE (%) 16.8 10.7 12.1 11.7<br />

Working Capital 2,880 (354) (362) (272) ROA (%) 9.1 6.3 7.9 8.3<br />

Taxes Paid (3,526) (2,231) (2,583) (3,576) Net Margin (%) 13.8 9.7 11.5 11.9<br />

(i) Operatiing FCF 20,085 16,953 18,612 18,411 Div. Coverage (x) 2.6 3.3 3.3 3.3<br />

Net Interest Payment (911) (875) (575) (233) Interst Coverage (x) 6.6 6.9 11.3 19.8<br />

(ii) Net FCF 19,173 16,078 18,037 18,177 Asset Turnover (x) 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7<br />

Cash Flow from Investing (10,729) (6,436) (8,979) (8,978) Asset/Debt (x) 3.7 4.8 7.4 12.7<br />

(iii) Residual Cash Flow 8,444 9,642 9,058 9,200 Gearing (%) 47.2 33.6 19.7 10.8<br />

Cash Flow from Equity (1,749) (3,552) (1,947) (2,377) Net Gearing (%) 35.3 23.9 11.4 1.3<br />

Change in Net Cash/Debt 6,695 6,090 7,111 6,823 Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.4 1.1 0.6 0.4<br />

Ending Net Cash/Debt (20,990) (14,900) (7,789) (966) Debt/ Market Cap (x) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1<br />

Gross CF/Shr (Bt) 7.8 6.8 7.6 7.6 Capex/Debt (x) 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.1<br />

CF Opera/Shr (Bt) 8.3 7.4 8.1 8.0 Capex/Sales (x) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1<br />

Net FCF/Shr (Bt) 8.1 6.8 7.6 7.7 EV (Btbn) 122 116 109 102<br />

CF Int. Cover (x) 0.2 11.5 18.0 28.5 EV/EBITDA (x) 5.9 5.9 5.0 4.6<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Bt m)<br />

Revenue Breakdown (Btm)<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 16,725 16,391 16,501 16,029 -Post-paid Service 9,511 9,611 9,510 9,422<br />

EBITDA 5,130 4,465 4,792 4,761 -Prepaid Service 29,455 29,303 30,115 30,450<br />

Depr/Amort (2,377) (2,523) (2,447) (2,616) -VAS 7,464 8,210 8,867 9,399<br />

Opg Profit 2,752 1,942 2,345 2,144 -IR 2,334 2,217 2,395 2,538<br />

Asso & O<strong>the</strong>r Inc 11 16 18 25 -IC 14,878 13,560 13,832 14,315<br />

Interest (Exp)/Inc (305) (272) (361) (335) -O<strong>the</strong>rs 2,958 2,781 2,892 3,007<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 2,458 1,685 2,002 1,835 -Sales & O<strong>the</strong>rs 1,095 989 1,005 1,022<br />

Tax (620) (464) (521) (474) Total Revenues 67,695 66,672 68,616 70,154<br />

Minority Interest (2) 5 10 5<br />

Extra & Forex (3) 18 (12) 4 -Access Charge - - - -<br />

Net Profit 1,834 1,244 1,480 1,369 -Concession Fee (13,933) (13,840) (14,095) (15,051)<br />

Sales Growth (%) 2.3 (2.7) (6.8) (5.0) -Deprec. & Amor. (7,963) (8,260) (8,606) (8,271)<br />

Net Profit Gr (%) 34.6 (21.6) (36.9) (64.9) -IC (15,033) (14,294) (14,309) (14,561)<br />

EBITDA Mgn (%) 30.7 27.2 29.0 29.7 -COS & O<strong>the</strong>rs (7,712) (8,165) (8,406) (8,574)<br />

Tax Rate (%) 25.4 27.5 26.0 26.0 Total Cost of Good Sold (44,643) (44,559) (45,416) (46,459)<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 129


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Indonesia<br />

Raising growth momentum<br />

Indonesia has officially entered a new era with an established<br />

democratic culture, which leads us to remain upbeat on long-term<br />

prospects. The completion of presidential polls and <strong>the</strong> victory of SBY-<br />

Boediono team mark Indonesia’s coming of age as a democratic<br />

country. We believe this will provide a base for a long-term sustainable<br />

economic development. At <strong>the</strong> same time, GDP growth of 4% in 1H09<br />

also shows that Indonesia’s domestically driven economy is in a better<br />

economic position than its peers. Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> progress of<br />

infrastructure projects and commitment from <strong>the</strong> elected government<br />

to accelerate infrastructure development will increase growth<br />

opportunities in Indonesia. This is just <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> renewed<br />

growth momentum.<br />

The presidential polls were completed with SBY-Boediono winning <strong>the</strong> election<br />

with significant 61.7% of <strong>the</strong> votes. With this margin, <strong>the</strong> election did not have<br />

to go through to a second round. We believe <strong>the</strong> completion of <strong>the</strong> presidential<br />

polls shows an established democratic culture that sets a base for a sustainable<br />

economic development for Indonesia. On <strong>the</strong> economic front, Indonesia grew<br />

4.0% yoy in 2Q09 (+4.4% in 1Q), and economic data including cement and<br />

auto sales have shown a recovery, marking acceleration in growth momentum.<br />

Meanwhile, we believe that <strong>the</strong> new government will maintain <strong>the</strong> same<br />

economic policies with prudence and accommodative policies.<br />

JCI has outperformed o<strong>the</strong>r markets in <strong>the</strong> region; it was one of <strong>the</strong> best<br />

performers in <strong>the</strong> global market YTD. JCI posted a 78.6% return YTD, and is<br />

currently trading at 13.3x FY10 PER. We believe that <strong>the</strong> investment <strong>the</strong>me for<br />

4Q09 onwards should be based on increasing economic growth momentum, a<br />

low interest rate environment and a pick-up in infrastructure related sectors. As<br />

such, we are positive on banking, cement & construction, energy and<br />

telecommunication sectors. We pick BBRI and PTBA as our top picks in 4Q09 on<br />

<strong>the</strong> back of expected stronger revenue growth.<br />

Agus Pramono, CFA (6221) 39832668 . agus.pramono@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Page 130<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

Ed: LM / sa: TW


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

Close Chg net % Change 52 week<br />

15-Sep-09 -1mth -1mth -3mth -6mth -12mth High Low<br />

JCI 2,420.1 83.1 3.6 19.2 82.7 39.4 2,420.1 1,111.4<br />

LQ45 472.5 15.7 3.4 19.9 82.7 36.5 472.5 206.7<br />

Agriculture 1,745.1 (112.7) (6.1) 9.4 71.5 33.5 1,913.6 615.0<br />

Basic Industries 235.7 11.2 5.0 24.4 90.8 52.1 235.7 99.7<br />

Consumer 573.1 (13.7) (2.3) 23.2 67.2 54.8 601.2 279.5<br />

Finance 289.5 19.5 7.2 19.4 83.6 45.0 294.9 125.9<br />

Infrastructure 686.3 7.1 1.1 12.0 45.8 29.0 709.1 370.6<br />

Manufacturing 475.1 26.1 5.8 30.7 94.8 64.9 475.1 189.1<br />

Mining 2,236.8 (34.5) (1.5) 13.1 137.9 33.2 2,577.2 770.7<br />

Misc. Industry 592.4 83.8 16.5 46.0 139.3 90.7 592.4 164.7<br />

Property 162.4 7.7 5.0 14.2 68.0 17.7 165.2 94.0<br />

Trade & Service 267.6 16.3 6.5 23.3 80.3 9.0 295.3 129.1<br />

Transactions (JSX):<br />

YTD<br />

Vol (bln shrs) 1,202.6<br />

Val Rptr) 705.0<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

MARKET REVIEW<br />

JCI registered ano<strong>the</strong>r good quarter in 3Q09 by posting a<br />

19% return during <strong>the</strong> quarter. However, we did not see<br />

election euphoria in <strong>the</strong> market even though SBY, who was<br />

widely expected to win <strong>the</strong> election, achieved a victory JCI<br />

had priced in <strong>the</strong> election outcome.<br />

In 3Q09, miscellaneous industry, manufacturing and<br />

consumer sectors were <strong>the</strong> market drivers. We also noted a<br />

performance surprise from <strong>the</strong> consumer sector that was a<br />

laggard in <strong>the</strong> previous quarter. We believe that recovery in<br />

<strong>the</strong> sector was driven by higher confidence in <strong>the</strong> economy,<br />

impact from <strong>the</strong> election campaign as well as seasonality<br />

factor from <strong>the</strong> fasting season. Bakrie Group stocks still<br />

dominated trading activities and BUMI and BNBR posted<br />

55% and 47% q-o-q gains, respectively, during <strong>the</strong> period.<br />

In terms of trading liquidity, <strong>the</strong>re was a slight drop in<br />

average trading value. On average, trading value dropped<br />

5% from previous quarter. However, it was due to<br />

seasonality as we approached Eid Festival holidays.<br />

Meanwhile, some small cap stocks that were laggards in<br />

2Q09 became more active during 3Q09.<br />

LIQUIDITY<br />

Bank Indonesia (BI) finally lowered BI rate to a historic low<br />

of 6.5% in Aug 09 following fur<strong>the</strong>r easing in inflation. This<br />

marked <strong>the</strong> ninth straight month of rate-cutting since Dec<br />

08, bringing <strong>the</strong> cumulative reduction to 300bp. The central<br />

bank took <strong>the</strong> decision, on <strong>the</strong> expectation that inflation will<br />

remain benign in FY09 due to lower inflation expectations.<br />

Deposit, lending rates could fall 200bps<br />

% Spread (RHS)<br />

bps<br />

25<br />

Ave time depo rate 1000<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

BI 7% deposit ceiling<br />

Latest: Aug09<br />

0<br />

Jan-03 Jan-05 Jan-07 Jan-09<br />

Source: BI<br />

Ave base lending rate<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Inflation was still benign in Aug09 with 2.8% y-o-y.<br />

However, in m-o-m terms, <strong>the</strong>re were signs of rising<br />

inflationary pressure. CPI was up 0.6% m-o-m, driven by<br />

inflation in food prices, while it may still rise again driven by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Eid Festival. BI foresees <strong>the</strong> potential of rising inflation<br />

Page 131


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

next year, driven by recovery in domestic demand and<br />

elevated global commodity prices. Never<strong>the</strong>less, according<br />

to <strong>DBS</strong> economists, core inflation remains benign as <strong>the</strong><br />

economy is still experiencing some excess capacity. As such,<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>DBS</strong> economic team estimates that BI may start to<br />

moderately elevate <strong>the</strong> benchmark rate in 3Q10.<br />

Despite BI’s decision to lower benchmark rates in nine<br />

consecutive months since Nov 09, <strong>the</strong> banking sector<br />

lowered lending rates at a much slower pace. As such, BI<br />

pushed banks to lower lending rate by setting <strong>the</strong> highest<br />

deposit rate, as <strong>the</strong> sector always used high cost of funds as<br />

a reason for keeping lending rate high. Last month, BI made<br />

an informal agreement with 14 domestic big banks to cap<br />

deposit rates by 150bp from <strong>the</strong> BI Rate starting 1 Sep 09<br />

and by 50bp starting 1 Dec 09. As such, we believe that<br />

liquidity should improve fur<strong>the</strong>r going forward and loan<br />

growth should also accelerate.<br />

Election<br />

The completion of <strong>the</strong> presidential election has marked a<br />

new era for Indonesia, in that a democratic system and<br />

culture has been established in <strong>the</strong> country. We believe this<br />

sets a base for a sustainable economic development for<br />

Indonesia. Despite some weakness in <strong>the</strong> system that<br />

resulted in a legal battle between non-winning candidates<br />

against <strong>the</strong> election committee, <strong>the</strong> legal battle itself shows<br />

that any disagreement would have to go through <strong>the</strong><br />

constitutional system for a solution.<br />

SBY-Boediono won <strong>the</strong> presidential election by a significant<br />

61.7% of votes. As such, <strong>the</strong> election did not have to go<br />

through a second round. The absolute victory of SBY-<br />

Boediono also signalled that <strong>the</strong> elected president will have<br />

a strong government with more independence from its<br />

coalition parties in selecting ministers, which are expected to<br />

be filled by bureaucrats and professionals ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

politicians.<br />

Election result<br />

SBY-Boediono<br />

Megawati-<br />

Prabowo<br />

JK-Wiranto<br />

Source: KPU<br />

5.0% 15.0% 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0%<br />

The victory also gives expectations that <strong>the</strong>re will be no<br />

significant change in <strong>the</strong> new economic team with its<br />

prudent and accommodative economic policies. The new<br />

government is also expected to accelerate <strong>the</strong> development<br />

of badly needed infrastructure in Indonesia, which is a<br />

significant problem for <strong>the</strong> country. However, once <strong>the</strong><br />

development is realized, it will drive <strong>the</strong> economy faster<br />

given <strong>the</strong> expected US$34bn expected to be spent on<br />

infrastructure projects for 2009- 2017, as indicated by <strong>the</strong><br />

National Planning Agency (Bapenas) data.<br />

New surprise development from JORR project in West Jakarta – infrastructure development will be accelerated<br />

Source: Kompas<br />

Page 132


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Infrastructure project<br />

Province Quantity Project cost (US$m)<br />

North Sumatra 7 1,954.0<br />

West Sumatra 2 1,213.0<br />

Riau 1 845.0<br />

Riau Archipelago 1 220.0<br />

South Sumatra 5 1,578.0<br />

Lampung 4 1,723.0<br />

Banten 4 1,201.0<br />

DKI Jakarta 10 5,945.0<br />

West Java 20 3,711.0<br />

Central Java 6 2,326.0<br />

D.I. Yogyakarta 2 842.0<br />

East Java 3 1,556.0<br />

Bali 3 198.0<br />

Central Kalimantan 10 9,009.0<br />

East Kalimantan 3 878.5<br />

North Sulawesi 3 726.0<br />

South Sulawesi 2 212.0<br />

Papua 1 2.0<br />

Total 87 34,139.5<br />

Sector/sub-sector Quantity Project cost (US$m)<br />

Air transportation 3 1,416.5<br />

Land transportation 2 94.0<br />

Marine transportation 5 947.0<br />

Railways 15 11,960.0<br />

Toll roads 32 15,248.0<br />

Water resources 0 -<br />

Water supply 20 659.0<br />

Solid waste and sanitation 2 120.0<br />

Telecommunication 0 -<br />

Power 8 3,695.0<br />

Oil and gas 0 -<br />

Total 87 34,139.5<br />

Source: State Ministry of National Development Planning/National<br />

Development Planning Agency<br />

GROWTH<br />

Indonesia is in a enviable position amid <strong>the</strong> global<br />

contraction with its domestically driven economy. The<br />

Indonesian economy grew 4.0% yoy in 2Q09 (+4.4% in<br />

1Q), within expectation, which marks fur<strong>the</strong>r acceleration in<br />

growth momentum. Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> growth appears to<br />

have relied heavily on fiscal policies as consumer spending<br />

was weaker than expected. Consumer spending rose 4.8%<br />

y-o-y, lower than <strong>the</strong> 1Q09 growth of 6%. On <strong>the</strong> contrary,<br />

government spending rose 17% y-o-y for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong><br />

year, recovery in consumer and investment spending will<br />

take over as <strong>the</strong> main engines of growth.<br />

GDP growth<br />

%-pt contrib to QoQ sa growth<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

Latest: 2Q09<br />

-2<br />

Mar-07 Sep-07 Mar-08 Sep-08 Mar-09<br />

PCE GCE Capex<br />

Stocks Net X GDP QoQ sa<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> estimates<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> Economics believes that Bank Indonesia and <strong>the</strong><br />

government will maintain accommodative monetary and<br />

fiscal policies. As such, <strong>DBS</strong> Economics foresees that BI rate<br />

will remain at 6.5% until 2Q10 before gradually being raised<br />

to compensate for <strong>the</strong> inflation rate. However, <strong>the</strong> rise in BI<br />

rate will be at a manageable level for business and capital<br />

markets.<br />

Lending was relatively flat in 6M09 with 1.3% YTD growth.<br />

However, with strong growth in <strong>the</strong> agribusiness sector as<br />

well as <strong>the</strong> consumer segment, we believe that loan growth<br />

should accelerate in 2H09. This view is also supported by <strong>the</strong><br />

surprising strength of BBRI’s 2Q09 loan growth of 11.7% q-<br />

o-q, driven by SME and consumer segments. At <strong>the</strong> same<br />

time, <strong>the</strong> agreement between 14 banks to lower deposit<br />

rates is expected to boost lending as <strong>the</strong> banks will be able<br />

to offer a lower lending rate. We are positive on <strong>the</strong> banking<br />

sector.<br />

Loan growth<br />

32.0%<br />

24.0%<br />

16.0%<br />

26.0%<br />

30.8%<br />

8.0%<br />

0.0%<br />

Source: BI<br />

1.3%<br />

2007 2008 Ytd09<br />

Page 133


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Loan growth by economic sector<br />

2008 1Q09 Q-o-Q 1Q09 Y-o-Y Jun09 Y-o-Y Jun09 Ytd<br />

Total 30.8% -0.4% 26.1% 15.9% 1.3%<br />

Agriculture 18.6% 1.8% 22.5% 19.3% 8.0%<br />

Mining 20.5% -5.9% 4.0% -8.3% -12.5%<br />

Manufacturing Industry 32.1% -1.8% 24.9% 6.2% -8.3%<br />

Trade 21.0% 0.1% 22.5% 15.3% 4.7%<br />

Services 45.4% -1.7% 36.4% 22.9% 0.3%<br />

Electricity, Gas and Water 143.0% 6.4% 99.6% 115.7% 18.0%<br />

Construction 32.9% 0.0% 31.8% 18.5% 5.4%<br />

Transportation 70.0% -1.2% 52.1% 37.5% 2.9%<br />

Business Services 39.4% -3.7% 28.8% 12.9% -5.1%<br />

Social Services 13.6% -0.6% 22.7% 16.5% 3.0%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs 30.0% 1.2% 24.4% 19.1% 6.6%<br />

Source: BI<br />

Infrastructure, <strong>the</strong> old story that was very slow to<br />

materialize, has started to attract attention with <strong>the</strong> progress<br />

of some toll roads that were previously overlooked. The<br />

progress of Jakarta outer ring road (JORR) and some toll<br />

roads in West Java have convinced investors that<br />

infrastructure development will accelerate in SBY’s second<br />

term. The infrastructure project developments will create a<br />

multiplier effect on o<strong>the</strong>r sectors. Cement sector is a direct<br />

beneficiary of infrastructure development.<br />

VALUATION AND STRATEGY<br />

YTD, JCI has outperformed o<strong>the</strong>r markets in <strong>the</strong> region. It<br />

even featured as one of <strong>the</strong> best performers in <strong>the</strong> global<br />

market, with JCI posting a 78.6% return YTD, and is currently<br />

trading at 13.3x FY10 PER. The strong performance is<br />

supported by <strong>the</strong> fact that i) Indonesia’s economy is in a better<br />

position with GDP growth of 4% in 2Q09, ii) from <strong>the</strong> 2Q09<br />

results of companies under our universe, 26% of <strong>the</strong><br />

companies’ FY09 estimates had to be revised up to anticipate<br />

better than expected FY09 performance.<br />

JCI PER band<br />

3,000<br />

2,500<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

We believe that <strong>the</strong> investment <strong>the</strong>me for 4Q09 onwards<br />

should be based on increasing economic growth momentum,<br />

a low interest rate environment and a pick up in infrastructure<br />

related sector. As such, we are positive on banking, cement &<br />

construction, energy and telecommunication sectors. We pick<br />

BBRI and PTBA as our top picks in 4Q09 on <strong>the</strong> back of<br />

expected stronger revenue growth. BBRI will benefit from<br />

faster growth in corporate (infrastructure), SME and consumer<br />

segments, while its NIM will also stabilize with <strong>the</strong> decline in<br />

cost of funds. PTBA is a beneficiary of rising domestic demand,<br />

especially with <strong>the</strong> development of infrastructure and power<br />

plant projects.<br />

15x<br />

13x<br />

11x<br />

9x<br />

7x<br />

5x<br />

Page 134


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Earnings Estimates by Sector<br />

EPS Growth (%) EPS PATMI (Rpbn) PER (x)<br />

09F 10F CAGR (%) 09F 10F 09F 10F<br />

Conglomerate/Automotive (4.4) 21.3 15.5 8,785 10,660 15.6 12.9<br />

Infrastruct. 25.4 14.6 15.7 5,351 6,135 14.2 12.4<br />

Consumer 12.0 23.6 22.8 1,950 2,410 18.2 14.5<br />

Banks 21.5 9.0 11.9 22,567 24,591 15.0 14.0<br />

Plantation (25.6) 8.7 8.3 2,646 2,877 15.9 14.7<br />

Basic Materials (66.9) 181.4 75.9 2,074 5,836 38.0 13.9<br />

Oil, Gasn & Energy 35.1 6.0 14.0 23,475 24,886 14.2 13.2<br />

Telecomm. 10.3 (0.3) 7.0 13,783 13,746 14.2 13.2<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 135


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Indonesia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Conglomerate/<br />

Automotive<br />

Neutral<br />

Cement and Construction<br />

Overweight<br />

Consumer Goods<br />

Neutral<br />

Banking<br />

Overeweight<br />

Plantation<br />

Neutral<br />

Auto sales have shown a recovery since May09 and <strong>the</strong> latest auto<br />

sales data indicate that <strong>the</strong> decline in car and motorcycle sales could<br />

be lower than our estimate. However, on motorcycle sales, Astra<br />

may have lost its domination as Yamaha has reached <strong>the</strong> same<br />

market share. While data on ASII and its subsidiaries have shown<br />

positive developments, its valuation has become demanding and all<br />

positive expectation have been priced in on ASII stock price.<br />

We are upbeat on <strong>the</strong> sector on <strong>the</strong> back of <strong>the</strong> expected demand<br />

recovery, demand from infrastructure as well as continued<br />

improvement exercised by cement producers. We expect cement<br />

sales to fully recover next year on <strong>the</strong> back of faster economic growth<br />

with recovery in <strong>the</strong> property sector. We pick SMGR as our top pick<br />

as we believe that <strong>the</strong> company still offers more upside potential<br />

from efficiency programs. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> construction<br />

commencement of SMGR’s two cement plants will ensure <strong>the</strong><br />

company’s leading position in <strong>the</strong> market.<br />

The outlook for consumer goods companies should get a boost from<br />

lower borrowing costs in 4Q09, as banks look set to lower<br />

borrowing rates. Stable commodity and fuel prices as well as lower<br />

consumer borrowing rates should be toge<strong>the</strong>r maintain momentum<br />

for consumer staples and discretionary in 4Q09, despite a seasonally<br />

lower demand post-Eid festival. However, recent jump in stock prices<br />

has priced in <strong>the</strong>se expectations.<br />

We are positive on <strong>the</strong> banking sector as we have seen <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

recovery in <strong>the</strong> sector. A strong sign of recovery in loan growth is<br />

seen from some banks preparing to issue sub-debts. At <strong>the</strong> same<br />

time, loan quality should improve in 3Q09. The agreement between<br />

14 banks and BI also signal that banks will temporarily enjoy higher<br />

NIM as deposit rates fall faster than lending rates, although we<br />

believe that <strong>the</strong> latter will follow deposit rate but with some time<br />

lag. At <strong>the</strong> end, <strong>the</strong> lower lending rate that is expected to start in<br />

4Q09 will increase demand for loan from all segments.<br />

We expect 4Q09 palm oil price to rebound on seasonally slower palm<br />

oil supply growth and run down in US soybean oil inventory.<br />

However, as most plantation stocks have not moved in-tandem with<br />

CPO price’s current correction, we recommend investors to remain<br />

selective. We currently have Hold calls on both Astra Agro Lestari and<br />

London Sumatra.<br />

-<br />

SMGR<br />

KLBF<br />

BBRI<br />

-<br />

Page 136


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Indonesia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Basic Materials<br />

Neutral<br />

Energy<br />

Overweight<br />

Telecommunications<br />

Overweight<br />

Metal prices such as nickel and tin have rebounded strongly<br />

followed by sharp increases in metal producer share price (+114%<br />

ytd). However, for nickel producers, <strong>the</strong> share price has already<br />

increased, implying much higher commodity prices compared to<br />

current level, thus valuation is rich. Yet, for one company, Timah<br />

(TINS), we believe <strong>the</strong> upside remains attractive. TINS is <strong>the</strong> one of<br />

<strong>the</strong> top tin producers in <strong>the</strong> world, and is thus well positioned to<br />

directly benefit from rising tin price.<br />

We remain positive on energy sector, especially coal, as rising<br />

domestic demand will play a more prominent role going forward.<br />

Development of <strong>the</strong> 10,000MW coal-fired power plants continues to<br />

progress with estimated completion in 2010. The power plants will<br />

demand c.35-40mn tons of coal p.a. on top of current domestic<br />

consumption of about 50mn tons p.a. This will provide plenty of<br />

growth opportunities for coal producers in our view.<br />

Having said that, we pick Bukit Asam (PTBA) as our top pick in <strong>the</strong><br />

sector underpinned by its strong exposure in domestic market and<br />

<strong>the</strong> several projects underway (incl. transportation infrastructure<br />

enhancement, power plant projects and acquisition) to ramp up its<br />

production going forward.<br />

TLKM reported higher than expected 2Q09 earnings on <strong>the</strong> back of<br />

strong margins, which we believe is due to <strong>the</strong> rising effective tariff<br />

environment in <strong>the</strong> Indonesian telco industry. While this benefited<br />

telcos in general (including Excelcomindo), ISAT departed from <strong>the</strong><br />

norm by reporting disappointing 2Q09 results. Following a change in<br />

management (after Qtel has taken control of ISAT), <strong>the</strong> company<br />

raised its effective tariff aggressively with <strong>the</strong> aim of shifting its focus<br />

to high ARPU subscribers. In a price sensitive market, ISAT suffered<br />

13% q-o-q fall in subscriber base while 1H09 ARPU drop 17% y-o-y.<br />

Looking ahead, we think its competitors would take advantage of<br />

ISAT’s weakness to gain market share while ISAT continues to churn<br />

out customers. We remain optimistic on TLKM given its strong track<br />

record in <strong>the</strong> cellular business as well as its strong balance sheet<br />

(FY10F: 0.3x net gearing). We reiterate our BUY call on TLKM with a<br />

DCF-based price target of Rp10,500.<br />

TINS<br />

PTBA<br />

TLKM<br />

Page 137


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bank Rakyat Indo<br />

Bloomberg: BBRI IJ | Reuters: BBRI.JK<br />

BUY Rp7,450 JCI : 2,420.11<br />

Price Target : 12-Month Rp 10,400<br />

Potential Catalyst: Lower cost of fund<br />

Analyst<br />

Agus Pramono CFA +6221 3983 2668<br />

agus.pramono@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

9,093<br />

8,093<br />

7,093<br />

6,093<br />

5,093<br />

4,093<br />

3,093<br />

2,093<br />

Rp<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Bank Rakyat Indo (LHS) Relative JCI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (Rp bn) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 11,190 13,636 16,006 18,796<br />

Net Profit 5,958 7,022 9,010 11,087<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 5,958 7,022 9,010 11,087<br />

EPS (Rp) 484 570 731 900<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Rp) 484 570 731 900<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 23 18 28 23<br />

Diluted EPS (Rp) 484 570 731 900<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 15.4 13.1 10.2 8.3<br />

Net DPS (Rp) 242 285 366 450<br />

Div Yield (%) 3.2 3.8 4.9 6.0<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. (%) 28.5 28.8 30.9 31.5<br />

ROAE (%) 28.5 28.8 30.9 31.5<br />

ROA (%) 2.6 2.6 2.9 3.0<br />

BV Per Share (Rp) 1,814 2,142 2,588 3,123<br />

P/Book Value (x) 4.1 3.5 2.9 2.4<br />

211<br />

191<br />

171<br />

151<br />

131<br />

111<br />

91<br />

71<br />

Faster than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

• Loan growth should accelerate<br />

• Loan quality will recover in 4Q09<br />

• NIM should stop declining<br />

• Undemanding valuation, maintain BUY rating and<br />

Rp10,400 TP.<br />

The worst is over. BBRI posted 14.6% YTD loan<br />

growth, <strong>the</strong> highest in <strong>the</strong> sector. Going forward, with<br />

recovering domestic consumption, extensive marketing<br />

efforts and outlet expansion, BBRI should be able to<br />

register stronger loan growth. Meanwhile, although<br />

BBRI’s gross NPL ratio increased in 2Q09 to 3.7%, loan<br />

quality should improve in 4Q09. The management<br />

expects NPL to inch up in 3Q09 before falling in 4Q09;<br />

<strong>the</strong> rise in NPL in 3Q09 will be due to higher loan<br />

growth, conservative provisioning policy, as well as full<br />

provision for loans to high risk segments.<br />

NIM should stabilise. BBRI should be a beneficiary of<br />

lower deposit and lending rates. It has some fixed rate<br />

loans or fixed income loans which should not be<br />

affected by falling lending rates. The bank should also<br />

benefit from <strong>the</strong> agreement between banks to lower<br />

deposit rates. We think that its cost of funds could fall<br />

by 110bps in 2H09, slightly more than asset yield.<br />

Undemanding valuation. We raised our target price<br />

to Rp10,400 based on 4x FY10 PBV. If we use <strong>the</strong> DDM<br />

method with 25% sustainable ROE, 12.5% sustainable<br />

growth and 14.5% required rate of return, we arrive at<br />

6.2x PBV. The stock is currently trading at 2.9x FY10<br />

PBV, but deserves a higher valuation for its high ROE<br />

and strong growth.<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Rp): 549 676 817<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Banks<br />

Principal Business: Banking<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 12,334<br />

Mkt. Cap (Rpbn/US$m) 91,885 / 9,286<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Govt of Indonesia (%) 59.0<br />

Free Float (%) 41.0<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 17,332<br />

Page 138<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: SGC / sa: TW


Income Statement (Rp bn)<br />

Balance Sheet (Rp bn)<br />

Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bank Rakyat Indo<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 19,648 21,601 25,994 31,706 Cash/Bank Balance 50,843 54,193 57,330 61,982<br />

Non-Interest Income 2,385 3,371 3,242 2,329 Government <strong>Securities</strong> 20,929 24,068 25,272 26,535<br />

Operating Income 22,033 24,972 29,237 34,035 Inter Bank Assets 1,561 2,491 2,989 3,587<br />

Operating Expenses (10,843) (11,335) (13,231) (15,238) Total Net Loans & Advs. 153,103 186,450 233,024 279,535<br />

Pre-provision Profit 11,190 13,636 16,006 18,796 Investment 9,486 11,121 11,955 12,830<br />

Provisions (2,844) (4,129) (3,945) (3,949) Associates 0 0 0 0<br />

Associates 0 0 0 0 Fixed Assets 1,346 928 489 12<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0 Goodwill 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 8,822 10,031 12,690 15,615 O<strong>the</strong>r Assets 8,809 7,440 8,441 8,199<br />

Taxation (2,864) (3,009) (3,680) (4,528) Total Assets 246,077 286,693 339,501 392,681<br />

Minority Interests 0 0 0 0 Customer Deposits 201,537 235,445 278,854 325,977<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 Inter Bank Deposits 3,428 2,520 2,974 2,747<br />

Net Profit 5,958 7,022 9,010 11,087 Debts/Borrowings 4,067 8,716 11,625 11,597<br />

Net Profit bef Except 5,958 7,022 9,010 11,087 O<strong>the</strong>rs 14,687 13,613 14,149 13,881<br />

Minorities 0 0 0 0<br />

Shareholders' Funds 22,357 26,399 31,898 38,480<br />

Total Liab& S/H’s Funds 246,077 286,693 339,501 392,681<br />

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios (%) Financial Stability Measures (%)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Margins, Costs & Efficiency<br />

Balance Sheet Structure<br />

Yld. On Earnings Assets 15.35 14.77 14.61 14.72 Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 79.9 83.4 88.0 90.3<br />

Avg Cost Of Funds 4.50 5.40 5.34 5.29 Net Loans / Total Assets 62.2 65.0 68.6 71.2<br />

Spread 10.85 9.37 9.27 9.43 Investment / Total Assets 3.9 3.9 3.5 3.3<br />

Net Interest Margin 10.73 9.45 9.43 9.66 Cust . Dep./Int. Bear. Liab. 98.0 96.4 96.0 96.6<br />

Cost-to-Income Ratio 49.2 45.4 45.3 44.8 Interbank Dep / Int. Bear. 1.7 1.0 1.0 0.8<br />

Employees ( Year End) 0 0 0 0 Asset Quality<br />

Effective Tax Rate 32.5 30.0 29.0 29.0 NPL / Total Gross Loans 2.8 3.7 3.5 3.5<br />

Business Mix NPL / Total Assets 1.8 2.5 2.5 2.6<br />

Net Int. Inc / Opg Inc. 89.2 86.5 88.9 93.2 Capital Strength<br />

Non-Int. Inc / Opg inc. 10.8 13.5 11.1 6.8 Total CAR 13.3 13.9 13.1 13.0<br />

Fee Inc / Opg Income 8.0 8.5 5.7 5.7 Tier-1 CAR 13.7 12.3 11.9 11.7<br />

Oth Non-Int Inc/Opg Inc 2.8 5.0 5.4 1.1 Growth<br />

Profitability Total Net Loans 43 22 25 20<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. 28.5 28.8 30.9 31.5 Customer Deposits 22 17 18 17<br />

ROAE 28.5 28.8 30.9 31.5<br />

ROA Pre Ex. 2.6 2.6 2.9 3.0<br />

ROA 2.6 2.6 2.9 3.0<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Rpbn)<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009<br />

Net Interest Income 14,702 19,648 5,402 10,980<br />

Non-Interest Income 1,354 2,484 820 1,830<br />

Operating Income 16,056 22,132 6,223 12,809<br />

Operating Expenses (7,462) (10,942) (2,974) (5,293)<br />

Pre-Provision Profit 8,594 11,190 3,249 7,516<br />

Provisions (2,317) (2,844) (886) (2,675)<br />

Associates 0 0 0 0<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0<br />

Pretax Profit 6,310 8,822 2,377 4,891<br />

Taxation (2,072) (2,864) (658) (1,399)<br />

Minority Interests 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Profit 4,238 5,958 1,719 3,492<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Loan growth<br />

Rptr<br />

200.0<br />

150.0<br />

100.0<br />

50.0<br />

-<br />

184.6<br />

161.1<br />

33.7<br />

113.9 30.8 13.8<br />

90.3<br />

12.5<br />

75.5<br />

19.8<br />

52.9<br />

62.4<br />

44.5<br />

12.0 8.4<br />

4.7<br />

9.9 7.4 31.1<br />

24.4<br />

30.5<br />

36.2<br />

2.9 8.5<br />

17.5 21.6<br />

14.4 16.5 19.2 22.0<br />

19.2 22.8 27.3 32.6 42.8 48.0<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jun-09<br />

Micro Consumer Commercial<br />

Medium Corporate Total<br />

Page 139


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bukit Asam<br />

Bloomberg: PTBA IJ | Reuters: PTBA.JK<br />

BUY Rp14,800 JCI : 2,420.11<br />

Price Target : 12-Month Rp 18,550<br />

Potential Catalyst: Higher coal price<br />

Analyst<br />

Yusuf Winoto CFA +6221 3983 2668<br />

yusuf.winoto@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Domestic play<br />

• Beneficiary of rising domestic demand<br />

• Projects are underway to boost production<br />

• Plenty of reserves to support growth<br />

• BUY with Rp18,550 TP.<br />

Price Relative<br />

Rp<br />

17,395<br />

15,395<br />

13,395<br />

11,395<br />

9,395<br />

7,395<br />

5,395<br />

3,395<br />

1,395<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Tambang Batubara (LHS) Relative JCI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (Rp bn) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 7,216 10,097 10,781 12,168<br />

EBITDA 2,514 4,620 4,288 5,237<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,552 4,485 3,814 4,210<br />

Net Profit 1,708 3,220 2,851 3,146<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 1,708 3,220 2,851 3,146<br />

EPS (Rp) 741 1,397 1,237 1,366<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Rp) 741 1,397 1,237 1,366<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 125 89 (11) 10<br />

Diluted EPS (Rp) 741 1,397 1,237 1,366<br />

Net DPS (Rp) 165 371 699 619<br />

BV Per Share (Rp) 1,735 2,762 3,300 4,047<br />

PE (X) 20.0 10.6 12.0 10.8<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 20.0 10.6 12.0 10.8<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 19.2 10.3 11.2 9.6<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 12.4 6.7 7.6 6.6<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 1.1 2.5 4.7 4.2<br />

P/Book Value (X) 8.5 5.4 4.5 3.7<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH 0.0<br />

ROAE (%) 50.2 62.1 40.8 37.2<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Rp): 1,301 1,116 1,339<br />

ICB Industry : Energy<br />

ICB Sector: Coal<br />

Principal Business: Coal Mining<br />

431<br />

381<br />

331<br />

281<br />

231<br />

181<br />

131<br />

81<br />

Rising domestic demand. The 10,000MW coal-fired<br />

power plant expected to be completed by 2010 will<br />

raise coal demand by 35-40mn tons annually, on top of<br />

<strong>the</strong> current domestic consumption of c.50mn tons p.a.<br />

PTBA produces <strong>the</strong> type of coal that is suitable for use<br />

by power plants and its strong exposure to <strong>the</strong> domestic<br />

market (74% of total sales) will allow it to benefit<br />

directly from rising domestic demand.<br />

Boosting production with infrastructure and power<br />

plant projects. PTBA’s ongoing and future projects<br />

include enhancing its current transportation<br />

infrastructure (2 projects) and building up mine-mouth<br />

power plants (2 projects) that will utilize its vast coal<br />

reserves. These projects are slated for completion<br />

between 2012 and 2013, and will raise coal production<br />

by 36mn tons annually when fully completed. Note that<br />

PTBA has c.2bn tons of coal reserves and produces only<br />

14.5m tons (FY09F) p.a. Thus, PTBA is well positioned to<br />

capture <strong>the</strong> growing domestic coal market.<br />

Reiterate BUY recommendation. Our target price for<br />

PTBA of Rp18,550 implies 15x FY10 PE. This is derived<br />

based on DCF valuation, and assuming 12.6% WACC<br />

(ERP=5%, RF=9.5%, LTG=0%).<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 2,304<br />

Mkt. Cap (Rpbn/US$m) 34,101 / 3,446<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Govt. of Indonesia (%) 65.0<br />

Free Float (%) 35.0<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 5,860<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

Page 140<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: SGC / sa: TW


Income Statement (Rp bn)<br />

Balance Sheet (Rp bn)<br />

Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bukit Asam<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 7,216 10,097 10,781 12,168 Net Fixed Assets 583 1,940 4,828 8,033<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (3,686) (3,962) (4,750) (5,144) Invts in Associates & JVs 0 0 0 0<br />

Gross Profit 3,530 6,135 6,031 7,024 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 574 591 609 627<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (1,036) (1,616) (1,941) (2,190) Cash & ST Invts 3,042 4,663 4,936 5,643<br />

Operating Profit 2,494 4,520 4,090 4,834 Inventory 420 529 635 687<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc (51) 0 0 0 Debtors 1,377 1,982 2,116 2,389<br />

Associates & JV Inc 1 1 2 2 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 112 112 112 112<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 108 (36) (278) (625) Total Assets 6,107 9,817 13,236 17,491<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,552 4,485 3,814 4,210 ST Debt 0 0 0 0<br />

Tax (837) (1,256) (954) (1,053) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 1,353 1,382 1,401 1,411<br />

Minority Interest (7) (10) (10) (12) LT Debt 0 1,282 3,441 5,966<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 676 710 710 710<br />

Net Profit 1,708 3,220 2,851 3,146 Shareholder’s Equity 3,998 6,364 7,605 9,326<br />

Net Profit before Except. 1,708 3,220 2,851 3,146 Minority Interests 80 80 80 80<br />

EBITDA 2,514 4,620 4,288 5,237 Total Cap. & Liab. 6,107 9,817 13,236 17,491<br />

Sales Gth (%) 75.0 39.9 6.8 12.9 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital 555 1,241 1,462 1,777<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 138.7 83.7 (7.2) 22.1 Net Cash/(Debt) 3,042 3,381 1,495 (322)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 163.7 81.2 (9.5) 18.2<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 124.6 88.5 (11.5) 10.4<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 32.8 28.0 25.0 25.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (Rp bn)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 2,552 4,485 3,814 4,210 Gross Margins (%) 48.9 60.8 55.9 57.7<br />

Dep. & Amort. 70 99 196 402 Opg Profit Margin (%) 34.6 44.8 37.9 39.7<br />

Tax Paid (837) (1,256) (954) (1,053) Net Profit Margin (%) 23.7 31.9 26.4 25.9<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) 0 0 0 0 ROAE (%) 50.2 62.1 40.8 37.2<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (995) (686) (220) (315) ROA (%) 34.0 40.4 24.7 20.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 838 (27) (28) (30) ROCE (%) 42.0 49.3 30.3 26.0<br />

Net Operating CF 1,628 2,615 2,809 3,214 Div Payout Ratio (%) 22.3 26.5 56.5 45.3<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (429) (1,456) (3,084) (3,606) Net Interest Cover (x) NM 125.9 14.7 7.7<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 0 0 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 1.4 1.3 0.9 0.8<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 0 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 49.0 60.7 69.4 67.6<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 8.5 7.9 8.6 9.4<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 0 34 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 34.9 44.9 46.7 50.9<br />

Net Investing CF (429) (1,422) (3,084) (3,606) Current Ratio (x) 3.7 5.3 5.6 6.3<br />

Div Paid 0 (854) (1,610) (1,425) Quick Ratio (x) 3.3 4.8 5.0 5.7<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 0 1,282 2,159 2,524 Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH 0.0<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) (0.8) (0.5) (0.2) 0.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (380) 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) N/A 113.6 89.6 60.5<br />

Net Financing CF (380) 428 549 1,099 Z-Score (X) 7.7 7.7 9.5 6.4<br />

Net Cashflow 819 1,621 273 707 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (Rp) 1,320 1,467 649 (140)<br />

Opg CFPS (Rp) 1,138 1,433 1,315 1,532<br />

Free CFPS (Rp) 520 503 (120) (170)<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Rp bn)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 2,079 2,249 2,330 2,171 Revenues (Rp bn)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (975) (1,181) (874) (952) Domestic 4,242 6,833 6,506 6,638<br />

Gross Profit 1,103 1,068 1,457 1,218 Export 2,974 3,264 4,275 5,530<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (294) (343) (271) (319)<br />

Operating Profit 809 725 1,186 900 Total 7,216 10,097 10,781 12,168<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 28 (80) 40 (17)<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 1 0 0<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 29 37 65 63 Key Assumptions<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0 Sales Volume-mn tons 12 14 16 18<br />

Pre-tax Profit 866 683 1,291 946 Price Domestic (IDR'000/ton) 544 723 678 656<br />

Tax (254) (288) (371) (273)<br />

Minority Interest (1) (9) 1 (1)<br />

Net Profit 611 386 921 672<br />

Net profit bef Except. 611 386 921 672<br />

EBITDA 837 646 1,226 883<br />

Sales Gth (%) 25.7 8.2 3.6 (6.9)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 46.0 (22.8) 89.7 (28.0)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 43.1 (10.4) 63.5 (24.1)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 44.1 (36.8) 138.3 (27.0)<br />

Gross Margins (%) 53.1 47.5 62.5 56.1<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 38.9 32.2 50.9 41.4<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 29.4 17.2 39.5 30.9<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 141


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V recommendations are based an Absolute Total Return* Rating system, defined as follows:<br />

STRONG BUY (>20% total return over <strong>the</strong> next 3 months, with identifiable share price catalysts within this time frame)<br />

BUY (>15% total return over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months for small caps, >10% for large caps)<br />

HOLD (-10 to +15% total return over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months for small caps, -10 to +10% for large caps)<br />

FULLY VALUED (negative total return i.e. > -10% over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months)<br />

SELL (negative total return of > -20% over <strong>the</strong> next 3 months, with identifiable catalysts within this time frame)<br />

Share price appreciation + dividends<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong> is available on <strong>the</strong> following electronic platforms: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> (www.dbsvresearch.com); Thomson<br />

(www.thomson.com/financial); Factset (www.factset.com); Reuters (www.rbr.reuters.com); Capital IQ (www.capitaliq.com) and Bloomberg<br />

(<strong>DBS</strong>R GO). For access, please contact your <strong>DBS</strong>V salesperson.<br />

GENERAL DISCLOSURE/DISCLAIMER<br />

This document is published by <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd ("<strong>DBS</strong>VR"), a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

<strong>Securities</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd ("<strong>DBS</strong>VS") and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> Holdings Pte Ltd ("<strong>DBS</strong>VH").<br />

[This report is intended for clients of <strong>DBS</strong>V Group only and no part of this document may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any<br />

form by any means or (ii) redistributed without <strong>the</strong> prior written consent of <strong>DBS</strong>VR.]<br />

The research is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not make any representation or warranty as<br />

to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. This document is prepared for<br />

general circulation. Any recommendation contained in this document does not have regard to <strong>the</strong> specific investment objectives, financial<br />

situation and <strong>the</strong> particular needs of any specific addressee. This document is for <strong>the</strong> information of addressees only and is not to be taken<br />

in substitution for <strong>the</strong> exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. <strong>DBS</strong>VR accepts no liability<br />

whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this document or fur<strong>the</strong>r communication given in relation to this<br />

document. This document is not to be construed as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities. <strong>DBS</strong>VH is a whollyowned<br />

subsidiary of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd. <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd along with its affiliates and/or persons associated with any of <strong>the</strong>m may from time to<br />

time have interests in <strong>the</strong> securities mentioned in this document. <strong>DBS</strong>VR, <strong>DBS</strong>VS, <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd and <strong>the</strong>ir associates, <strong>the</strong>ir directors, and/or<br />

employees may have positions in, and may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein and may also perform or seek to perform<br />

broking, investment banking and o<strong>the</strong>r banking services for <strong>the</strong>se companies.<br />

The assumptions on commodities used in this report are for <strong>the</strong> purpose of making forecasts for <strong>the</strong> companies mentioned herein. They<br />

are not to be construed as recommendations to trade in <strong>the</strong> physical commodities or in <strong>the</strong> futures contract relating to <strong>the</strong> commodities<br />

mentioned in <strong>the</strong> report.<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>VUSA does not have its own investment banking or research department, nor has it participated in any investment banking transaction<br />

as a manager or co-manager in <strong>the</strong> past twelve months. Any US persons wishing to obtain fur<strong>the</strong>r information, including any clarification<br />

on disclosures in this disclaimer, or to effect a transaction in any security discussed in this document should contact <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA exclusively.<br />

ANALYST CERTIFICATION<br />

The research analyst primarily responsible for <strong>the</strong> content of this research report, in part or in whole, certifies that <strong>the</strong> views about <strong>the</strong><br />

companies and <strong>the</strong>ir securities expressed in this report accurately reflect his/her personal views. The analyst also certifies that no part of<br />

his/her compensation was, is, or will be, directly, or indirectly, related to specific recommendations or views expressed in this report. As of<br />

25 Sep 2009, <strong>the</strong> analyst and his / her spouse and/or relatives who are financially dependent on <strong>the</strong> analyst, do not hold interests in <strong>the</strong><br />

securities recommended in this report (“interest” includes direct or indirect ownership of securities, directorships and trustee positions).<br />

COMPANY-SPECIFIC / REGULATORY DISCLOSURES<br />

1. <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd and its subsidiaries do not have a proprietary position in <strong>the</strong> mentioned<br />

company as of 23 Sep 2009<br />

2. <strong>DBS</strong>VR, <strong>DBS</strong>VS, <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd and/or o<strong>the</strong>r affiliates of <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> (USA) Inc ("<strong>DBS</strong>VUSA"), a U.S.-registered<br />

broker-dealer, beneficially own a total of 1% or more of any class of common equity securities of Suntec Reit, Capitaland<br />

as of 25 Sep 2009.<br />

3. Compensation for investment banking services:<br />

1) <strong>DBS</strong>VR, <strong>DBS</strong>VS, <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd and/or o<strong>the</strong>r affiliates of <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA have received compensation, within <strong>the</strong> past 12<br />

months, and within <strong>the</strong> next 3 months may receive or intends to seek compensation for investment banking services<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Capitaland, A-Reit, Kencana Agri, SIA, Hyflux.<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>VHK, <strong>DBS</strong>VR, <strong>DBS</strong>VS, <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd and/or o<strong>the</strong>r affiliates of <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA have received compensation, within <strong>the</strong><br />

past 12 months, and within <strong>the</strong> next 3 months may receive or intends to seek compensation for investment banking<br />

services from Asia Cement (743 HK), China South Locomotive (1766 HK), Huaneng Power (902 HK) and Shimao<br />

Property (813 HK) mentioned in this document.<br />

Page 142


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

2) <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA does not have its own investment banking or research department, nor has it participated in any<br />

investment banking transaction as a manager or co-manager in <strong>the</strong> past twelve months. Any US persons wishing to<br />

obtain fur<strong>the</strong>r information, including any clarification on disclosures in this disclaimer, or to effect a transaction in any<br />

security discussed in this document should contact <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA exclusively.<br />

4. "Your attention is drawn to <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd's ["Bank"] interest as Joint Lead Manager and Underwriter to Ascendas Real<br />

Estate Trust in relation to a private placement, of which <strong>the</strong> Bank will receive/ has received fees. This report and any<br />

recommendations relate to <strong>the</strong> securities that <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd has acquired, or is or will or may be required to acquire,<br />

under <strong>the</strong> underwriting or sub-underwriting agreement by reason that some or all of <strong>the</strong> securities have not been<br />

subscribed or purchased. This report is written independently of <strong>the</strong> Bank and does not take into account any<br />

confidential information which may be in <strong>the</strong> possession of certain officers in <strong>the</strong> Bank.<br />

This document is for information purposes only and does not constitute or form part of an offer, solicitation or invitation<br />

of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities in Singapore."<br />

RESTRICTIONS ON DISTRIBUTION<br />

General<br />

This report is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or<br />

resident of or located in any locality, state, country or o<strong>the</strong>r jurisdiction where such distribution, publication,<br />

availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation.<br />

Australia<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Singapore<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Dubai/<br />

United Arab Emirates<br />

United States<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r jurisdictions<br />

This report is being distributed in Australia by <strong>DBS</strong>VR and <strong>DBS</strong>VS, which are exempted from <strong>the</strong> requirement to<br />

hold an Australian financial services licence under <strong>the</strong> Corporation Act 2001 [“CA] in respect of financial services<br />

provided to <strong>the</strong> recipients. <strong>DBS</strong>VR and <strong>DBS</strong>VS are regulated by <strong>the</strong> Monetary Authority of Singapore [“MAS”]<br />

under <strong>the</strong> laws of Singapore, which differ from Australian laws. Distribution of this report is intended only for<br />

“wholesale investors” within <strong>the</strong> meaning of <strong>the</strong> CA.<br />

This report is being distributed in Hong Kong by <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> (Hong Kong) Limited which is licensed and<br />

regulated by <strong>the</strong> Hong Kong <strong>Securities</strong> and Futures Commission.<br />

This report is being distributed in Singapore by <strong>DBS</strong>VR, which holds a Financial Adviser’s licence and is regulated<br />

by <strong>the</strong> MAS. This report may additionally be distributed in Singapore by <strong>DBS</strong>VS (Company Regn. No.<br />

198600294G), which is an Exempt Financial Adviser as defined under <strong>the</strong> Financial Advisers Act. Any research<br />

report produced by a foreign <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> entity, analyst or affiliate is distributed in Singapore only to<br />

“Institutional Investors”, “Expert Investors” or “Accredited Investors” as defined in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> and Futures<br />

Act, Chap. 289 of Singapore. Any distribution of research reports published by a foreign-related corporation of<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>VR/<strong>DBS</strong>VS to “Accredited Investors” is provided pursuant to <strong>the</strong> approval by MAS of research distribution<br />

arrangements under Paragraph 11 of <strong>the</strong> First Schedule to <strong>the</strong> FAA.<br />

This report is being distributed in <strong>the</strong> UK by <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> (UK) Ltd, who is an authorised person in <strong>the</strong><br />

meaning of <strong>the</strong> Financial Services and Markets Act and is regulated by The Financial Services Authority. <strong>Research</strong><br />

distributed in <strong>the</strong> UK is intended only for institutional clients.<br />

This report is being distributed in Dubai/United Arab Emirates by <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd, Dubai (PO Box 506538, 3 rd Floor,<br />

Building 3, Gate Precinct, DIFC, Dubai, United Arab Emirates) and is intended only for clients who meet <strong>the</strong><br />

DFSA regulatory criteria to be a Professional Client. It should not be relied upon by or distributed to Retail<br />

Clients. <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd, Dubai is regulated by <strong>the</strong> Dubai Financial Services Authority.<br />

Nei<strong>the</strong>r this report nor any copy hereof may be taken or distributed into <strong>the</strong> United States or to any U.S. person<br />

except in compliance with any applicable U.S. laws and regulations.<br />

In any o<strong>the</strong>r jurisdictions, except if o<strong>the</strong>rwise restricted by laws or regulations, this report is intended only for<br />

qualified, professional, institutional or sophisticated investors as defined in <strong>the</strong> laws and regulations of such<br />

jurisdictions.<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd – 8 Cross Street, #02-01 PWC Building, Singapore 048424<br />

Tel. 65-6533 9688, Fax: 65-6226 8048<br />

Company Regn. No. 198600295W<br />

Page 143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!