Zhone Technologies Annual Report 2004
Zhone Technologies Annual Report 2004
Zhone Technologies Annual Report 2004
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
By product family, revenue for our SLMS product family declined by $11.9 million or 36% in 2003 as<br />
compared to 2002. Revenue for our legacy and service products declined by $17.7 million or 22% in 2003. The<br />
percentage decline in SLMS product line revenue exceeded the overall percentage decline in revenue. Due to the<br />
economic environment affecting service providers during 2003, our customers and potential customers limited<br />
capital expenditures to sustain their current revenue generating activities while significantly reducing capital<br />
expenditures for newer technologies. As a result, during 2003, network service providers continued to invest in<br />
our legacy equipment and applications while spending more conservatively on newer technologies in the SLMS<br />
product line.<br />
In 2003, Motorola and Qwest accounted for approximately 17% and 11% of total revenue, respectively. In<br />
2002, Motorola accounted for approximately 12% of total revenue. No other customer accounted for 10% or<br />
more of total revenue in either period.<br />
Cost of Revenue<br />
Total cost of revenue decreased $18.6 million to $51.1 million for 2003 compared to $69.7 million for 2002,<br />
driven primarily by the overall decrease in revenue. Total cost of revenue was 61% of revenue for 2003,<br />
compared to 62% of revenue for 2002. Cost of revenue included excess inventory charges of $6.0 million in 2003<br />
and $2.4 million in 2002, representing 7% and 2% of revenue, respectively. The higher excess inventory charges<br />
recorded in 2003 were primarily due to the impact of our reduced sales forecasts.<br />
Excluding the effect of excess inventory charges, total cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue would<br />
have been 54% in 2003 compared to 60% in 2002. This improvement was primarily attributable to a shift in<br />
product mix towards a higher percentage of revenue from certain high margin legacy products.<br />
Research and Product Development Expenses<br />
Research and product development expenses decreased 25% or $7.3 million to $22.5 million for 2003<br />
compared to $29.8 million for 2002. The decrease was primarily due to lower depreciation expense and facilities<br />
related costs, and a decrease in personnel-related expenses resulting from our restructuring activities in 2002,<br />
which resulted in a consolidation of product offerings and more focused development programs. Depreciation<br />
expense and facilities related costs decreased by approximately $4.1 million due to the effect of an impairment<br />
charge for certain facilities and equipment in 2002 and a consolidation of research and product development<br />
office locations. Personnel related expenses decreased by approximately $2.0 million for 2003 due primarily to<br />
headcount reductions resulting from the consolidation of product offerings.<br />
Sales and Marketing Expenses<br />
Sales and marketing expenses decreased 19% or $3.8 million to $15.9 million for 2003 compared to $19.7<br />
million for 2002. The decrease was primarily due to a credit to sales and marketing expense of $2.4 million<br />
recorded in 2003, as a result of the termination of a customer financing agreement with a financial institution.<br />
The amount represented the recovery of a reserve for projected credit losses which had originally been recorded<br />
as sales and marketing expense in 2001.<br />
General and Administrative Expenses<br />
General and administrative expenses decreased 51% or $5.5 million to $5.3 million for 2003 compared to<br />
$10.8 million for 2002. The decrease was primarily due to lower provisions for doubtful accounts of<br />
approximately $7.1 million which occurred because there were no additional specifically reserved customer<br />
accounts in 2003. This decrease was partially offset by higher legal and accounting expenses of approximately<br />
$1.5 million, which was primarily attributable to increased costs associated with being an SEC registrant.<br />
12