Apr - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Apr - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Apr - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1 All] Rama Shanker Shukla V. Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari Sitapur and others 437<br />
impugned order d<strong>at</strong>ed 26.3.1996.<br />
However, back wages was not provided.<br />
3. While assailing the impugned<br />
order, it has been submitted by the<br />
petitioner's counsel th<strong>at</strong> the petitioner is<br />
entitled for back wages as well as all<br />
service benefit.<br />
4. Learned Standing Counsel<br />
submitted th<strong>at</strong> the petitioner is not<br />
entitled for back wages on the principle<br />
<strong>of</strong> no work and no pay. Learned<br />
Standing Counsel has no objection with<br />
regard to petitioner's continuity in<br />
service and other service benefits. It has<br />
also been submitted th<strong>at</strong> the petitioner<br />
has been reinst<strong>at</strong>ed in terms <strong>of</strong> tribunal's<br />
order.<br />
5. So far as the back wages are<br />
concerned, we are <strong>of</strong> the view th<strong>at</strong> the<br />
petitioner is not entitled for payment <strong>of</strong><br />
back wages. However, so far as other<br />
benefits are concerned, the petitioner<br />
has got right to claim the same.<br />
6. Since the order <strong>of</strong> punishment<br />
has been set aside by the tribunal, the<br />
order <strong>of</strong> tribunal has <strong>at</strong>tained finality to<br />
the extent the respondents are<br />
concerned.<br />
7. In view <strong>of</strong> above, we dispose <strong>of</strong><br />
the writ petition with the direction to the<br />
respondents to provide all consequential<br />
benefits tre<strong>at</strong>ing the petitioner's<br />
continuity in service except the back<br />
wages.<br />
8. Subject to above, the writ<br />
petition is finally disposed <strong>of</strong>.<br />
---------<br />
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION<br />
CIVIL SIDE<br />
DATED: LUCKNOW 11.04.2011<br />
BEFORE<br />
THE HON'BLE DEVENDRA KUMAR ARORA,J.<br />
Service Single No. 1887 <strong>of</strong> 2011<br />
Rama Shanker Shukla ...Petitioner<br />
Versus<br />
Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari Sitapur and<br />
others<br />
...Respondent<br />
Counsel for the Petitioner:<br />
Sri R.K.Sharma<br />
Counsel for the Respondent:<br />
Sri Rakesh Kumar Tiwari<br />
Sri Rakesh Kumar Tiwari<br />
U. P. Recognised Basic Schools (Junior<br />
<strong>High</strong> Schools) (Recruitment and<br />
Conditions <strong>of</strong> services <strong>of</strong> Teacher) Rules,<br />
1978.-Rule-14-D<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> retirement<br />
teachers working in recognized<br />
institution-d<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> retirement shall be<br />
the d<strong>at</strong>e on which 62 th D<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Birth<br />
celebr<strong>at</strong>ed-meaning thereby the<br />
petitioner shall retire on 30.06.2011 as<br />
the d<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> birth is 01.07.49-friction <strong>of</strong> a<br />
day will be omitted-as the period <strong>of</strong><br />
counting will start from midnight <strong>of</strong> the<br />
d<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> birth-62 years shall be the<br />
midnight <strong>of</strong> 30.06.2011-by impugned<br />
notice rightly made to retire -No<br />
illegality in impugned order.<br />
Held: Para 6<br />
The section embodies th<strong>at</strong> in computing<br />
the age <strong>of</strong> any person, the day on which<br />
he was born is to be included as a whole<br />
day and he must be deemed to have<br />
<strong>at</strong>tained majority <strong>at</strong> the beginning <strong>of</strong> the<br />
eighteenth anniversary <strong>of</strong> th<strong>at</strong> day."<br />
On applying the principle laid down by<br />
Hon'ble Supreme <strong>Court</strong> on the facts and<br />
circumstances <strong>of</strong> the present case, the<br />
petitioner whose d<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> birth is