23.12.2014 Views

Apr - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Apr - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Apr - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 All] Rama Shanker Shukla V. Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari Sitapur and others 439<br />

represent<strong>at</strong>ion d<strong>at</strong>ed 20.1.2011, he sent a<br />

reminder on 23.3.2011.<br />

3. It is also submitted by learned<br />

counsel for the petitioner th<strong>at</strong> since the<br />

opposite parties are intending to retire the<br />

petitioner one day before the age <strong>of</strong> 62<br />

years, therefore, he is compelled to<br />

approach this <strong>Court</strong> by means <strong>of</strong> the<br />

present writ petition.<br />

Heard learned counsel for parties and<br />

perused the record.<br />

The main controversy involved in the<br />

present writ petition is “Whether the<br />

petitioner will compete the age <strong>of</strong> 62<br />

years on 30.6.2011 or on 1st July, 2011,<br />

keeping in view the fact th<strong>at</strong> his d<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

birth is 01.7.1949.”<br />

4. The services <strong>of</strong> the petitioner are<br />

governed by U. P. Recognised Basic<br />

Schools (Junior <strong>High</strong> Schools)<br />

(Recruitment and Conditions <strong>of</strong> services<br />

<strong>of</strong> Teacher) Rules, 1978.(hereinafter<br />

referred to as 'Service Rules'). As per<br />

Rule 14 <strong>of</strong> the Service Rules an Asst.<br />

Teacher will retire on the last day <strong>of</strong> the<br />

month in which he <strong>at</strong>tained the age <strong>of</strong><br />

superannu<strong>at</strong>ion (62) years. It further<br />

provides th<strong>at</strong> an Asst. Teacher who retires<br />

during the academic session, shall<br />

continue to work till 30th June following<br />

next after the d<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> his retirement and<br />

such period shall be deemed as extended<br />

period <strong>of</strong> employment.<br />

5. The Hon'ble Supreme <strong>Court</strong> while<br />

analyzing the similar controversy in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> Prabhu Dayal Sesma vs. St<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

Rajasthan and another reported in<br />

1986 (4) SCC 59 was pleased to observe<br />

th<strong>at</strong> while counting the age <strong>of</strong> a person,<br />

whole <strong>of</strong> the day should be reckoned and<br />

it starts from 12 O'clock in the mid-night<br />

and he <strong>at</strong>tains the specified age on the<br />

preceding, the anniversary <strong>of</strong> his birth<br />

day. The observ<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Hon'ble Supreme<br />

<strong>Court</strong> in paras- 9 to 14 read as under:-<br />

"9........... At first impression, it may<br />

seem th<strong>at</strong> a person born on January 2,<br />

1956 would <strong>at</strong>tain 28 years <strong>of</strong> age only on<br />

January 2, 1984 and not on January 1,<br />

1984. But this is not quite accur<strong>at</strong>e. In<br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ing a person's age, the day <strong>of</strong> his<br />

birth must be counted as a whole day and<br />

he <strong>at</strong>tains the specified age on the day<br />

preceding, the anniversary <strong>of</strong> his<br />

birthday. We have to apply well accepted<br />

rules for comput<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> time. One such<br />

rule is th<strong>at</strong> fractions <strong>of</strong> a day will be<br />

omitted in computing a period <strong>of</strong> time is<br />

years or months in the sense th<strong>at</strong> a<br />

fraction <strong>of</strong> a day will be tre<strong>at</strong>ed as a full,<br />

day. A legal day commences <strong>at</strong> 12 O'clock<br />

midnight and continues until the same<br />

hour the following night. There is a<br />

popular misconception th<strong>at</strong> a person does<br />

(sic not) <strong>at</strong>tain a particular age unless<br />

and until he has completed a given<br />

number <strong>of</strong> years. In the absence <strong>of</strong> any<br />

express provision, it is well settled th<strong>at</strong><br />

any specified age in law is to be computed<br />

as having been <strong>at</strong>tained on the day<br />

preceding the anniversary <strong>of</strong> the birthday.<br />

10. In Halsbury's Laws <strong>of</strong> England,<br />

3rd edn. Vol. 37, para 178 <strong>at</strong> p. 100, the<br />

law was st<strong>at</strong>ed thus:<br />

“In computing a period <strong>of</strong> time, <strong>at</strong><br />

any r<strong>at</strong>e when counted in years or<br />

months, no regard is, as a general rule,<br />

paid to fractions <strong>of</strong> a day, in the sense<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the period is regarded as complete<br />

although it is short to the extent <strong>of</strong> a<br />

fraction <strong>of</strong> a day.... Similarly, in<br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ing a person's age the day <strong>of</strong> his

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!