25.12.2014 Views

Fremantle Port Inner Harbour and Channel ... - Fremantle Ports

Fremantle Port Inner Harbour and Channel ... - Fremantle Ports

Fremantle Port Inner Harbour and Channel ... - Fremantle Ports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. Environmental Quality Indicators <strong>and</strong> Targets<br />

4.1. Water Quality<br />

4.1.1. Ecosystem Health (EQO1: Maintenance of Ecosystem Integrity)<br />

Light requirements for Seagrass <strong>and</strong> Coral Health<br />

Water quality triggers will be based on light attenuation in the water column, related to the<br />

minimum light requirements (MLR) of seagrass <strong>and</strong> corals, as described in the DSDMP<br />

(<strong>Fremantle</strong> <strong>Port</strong>s, 2009). Specifically, the Light Attenuation Coefficient (LAC), a measure of<br />

the attenuation of light with depth through the water column, will be assessed against trigger<br />

values that are specific to depth, habitat (seagrass or corals) <strong>and</strong> BPPH management zones.<br />

The higher the LAC, the less light that can penetrate the water column to reach<br />

photosynthesising BPP, such as seagrass <strong>and</strong> corals.<br />

Water quality triggers for each level of management response (see Section 5.1.1 – Seagrass<br />

<strong>and</strong> Coral Health) are based on a stepwise percentage increase above the LAC that was used<br />

to determine the inner boundary of the BPPH management zone being monitored. The<br />

predicted Zone of Loss (ZoL) is not included in management response, since any BPPH within<br />

the ZoL is assumed to be lost through physical disturbance (within the dredging <strong>and</strong> disposal<br />

footprints) or high turbidity <strong>and</strong> sedimentation immediately adjacent to Project activities.<br />

Table 4.1 presents the triggers developed during the environmental impact assessment<br />

(<strong>Fremantle</strong> <strong>Port</strong>s, 2009) for each management response level (Levels 1-4) with example LAC<br />

trigger levels for a hypothetical monitoring site within a seagrass community at 10 m depth.<br />

Actual trigger values to be applied at monitoring sites within the ZoI or ZoE have been<br />

calculated for one metre depth intervals for:<br />

1. Seagrass sites: based on a 10% MLR of the most sensitive species (Posidonia<br />

sinuosa) (Table 4.2); <strong>and</strong><br />

2. Coral sites: based on a 20% MLR - the light requirements obtained from the<br />

literature for coral taxa present at Hall Bank (Cooper, et al., 2007) (Table 4.3).<br />

Further rationale regarding the development <strong>and</strong> application of LAC trigger values is provided<br />

within the DSDMP (<strong>Fremantle</strong> <strong>Port</strong>s 2009).<br />

Table 4.1<br />

Water Quality Triggers for each Level of Management Response within the Zone of<br />

Influence (ZoI) <strong>and</strong> Zone of Effect (ZoE)<br />

Management<br />

Response<br />

Level<br />

Trigger<br />

Example LAC trigger levels<br />

(for a seagrass site at 10m depth)<br />

ZoI ZoE ZoI ZoE<br />

No Exceedance LAC0.100<br />

Level 2<br />

Level 3<br />

Level 4<br />

LAC>trigger<br />

for >21 days<br />

LAC>trigger<br />

for >4 wks<br />

LAC>trigger<br />

for >6 wks<br />

LAC 30% higher<br />

than trigger<br />

LAC 40% higher<br />

than trigger<br />

LAC 50% higher<br />

than trigger<br />

LAC>0.100<br />

for >21 days<br />

LAC>0.100<br />

for >4 wks<br />

LAC>0.100<br />

for >6 wks<br />

LAC>0.130<br />

LAC>0.140<br />

LAC>0.150<br />

10 Oceanica: <strong>Fremantle</strong> <strong>Port</strong>s: <strong>Inner</strong> <strong>Harbour</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Channel</strong> Deepening - Water Quality Monitoring Program

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!