28.12.2014 Views

Retail Banking in CEE: Exploiting the Potential of ... - Roland Berger

Retail Banking in CEE: Exploiting the Potential of ... - Roland Berger

Retail Banking in CEE: Exploiting the Potential of ... - Roland Berger

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32<br />

CROSS-SEGMENT OFFERING – UTILIZING THE LINK OF BUSINESS AND PERSONAL NEEDS<br />

There is room for improvement <strong>in</strong><br />

cross-segment sales resp. service<br />

models as a lot <strong>of</strong> banks use just<br />

ad-hoc campaigns for this purpose<br />

ANALYSIS OF THE STATUS QUO<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions have at least an ad-hoc (campaign driven) cross-segment<br />

captur<strong>in</strong>g practice and 77% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviewed banks do apply <strong>the</strong>se models. Out<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se roughly three quarters, just 15% have a complete and elaborated methodology<br />

and <strong>the</strong> huge "rest" <strong>of</strong> 85% uses ad-hoc campaigns (see fig. 25). These actions are<br />

usually l<strong>in</strong>ked to one specific product resp. service <strong>of</strong>fer but do not <strong>of</strong>fer a jo<strong>in</strong>t service<br />

model for both private and bus<strong>in</strong>ess needs.<br />

Fig. 25: Cross-segment <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g practices <strong>in</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> banks [%]<br />

Banks not apply<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cross-segment sales/service<br />

23<br />

Banks with methodology for<br />

cross-segment sales/service 1)<br />

15<br />

Banks apply<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cross-segment <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

77<br />

85<br />

Banks us<strong>in</strong>g adhoc<br />

campaigns 1)<br />

1) Out <strong>of</strong> banks apply<strong>in</strong>g cross-segment <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Source: <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> Strategy Consultants<br />

There is an important l<strong>in</strong>k between micro sub-segments and cross-segment <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

because cross-segment target groups can be easily orig<strong>in</strong>ated from micro sub-segmentation.<br />

For example, banks may use <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>k between targeted pr<strong>of</strong>essions and <strong>the</strong> (usually)<br />

private affluent <strong>in</strong>dividuals segment assum<strong>in</strong>g that a lawyer PI client needs a bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

account, too. And vice versa, lawyers may be targeted by <strong>the</strong> banks to ga<strong>in</strong> affluent<br />

PI clients.<br />

Manag<strong>in</strong>g both <strong>the</strong> private and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional sides <strong>of</strong> a client relationship<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>the</strong> gross <strong>in</strong>come<br />

and can even double it<br />

COVERAGE MODELS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR <strong>CEE</strong> BANKS<br />

Previous European case studies highlighted <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g important facts:<br />

> Dual relationship is worth 30% to 100% more than s<strong>in</strong>gle relationship.<br />

> The proportion <strong>of</strong> NBI share between <strong>the</strong> private and <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional side varies<br />

strongly by sub-segment and develops over <strong>the</strong> life cycles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess owner.<br />

> Market<strong>in</strong>g strategy and product <strong>of</strong>fer require operational and tactical segmentation.<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong>se three facts, <strong>the</strong> split <strong>of</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess and private needs <strong>of</strong> clients shall be<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ed consider<strong>in</strong>g local market-specific sub-segment specialties. The results can<br />

lead to various important conclusions as to <strong>the</strong> optimal client coverage model. In <strong>the</strong><br />

example <strong>of</strong> figure 26, "X1" priority means that <strong>the</strong> client will generate a higher gross<br />

<strong>in</strong>come for <strong>the</strong> bank on <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional side. Therefore <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> e.g. <strong>the</strong> triumvirate<br />

coverage model (see fig. 28), <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess relationship manager shall play a more<br />

important role. At <strong>the</strong> same time for "X2" sub-segments, it is worth focus<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong><br />

clients' private needs and serv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m ra<strong>the</strong>r as private, not as micro clients.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!