31.12.2014 Views

nonfiction

nonfiction

nonfiction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“A refined jeremiad sure to<br />

shake up the Christian establishment.”<br />

from bad religion<br />

While Putin carefully maintains stability and order to keep his<br />

grip, Hugo Chávez of Venezuela cultivates popular chaos, stacking<br />

all government institutions with supporters so that he has<br />

amassed “unchecked executive power.” Besides speaking with<br />

plenty of brainwashed supporters of these regimes, Dobson<br />

sought out activists in the political opposition who have bravely<br />

endured terror and intimidation.<br />

A pertinent work of journalistic research that will gain<br />

fresh meaning as authoritarian regimes both evolve and fall.<br />

RON PAUL’S REVOLUTION<br />

The Man and the<br />

Movement He Inspired<br />

Doherty, Brian<br />

Broadside Books/<br />

HarperCollins (272 pp.)<br />

$26.99 | May 15, 2012<br />

978-0-06-211479-2<br />

A breezy and generally admiring<br />

though not hagiographic look at the<br />

quixotic fixture at the far-right extreme<br />

of the last couple of presidential elections.<br />

Reason editor Doherty (Gun Control on Trial: Inside the Supreme<br />

Court Battle Over the Second Amendment, 2009, etc.) would seem<br />

to share Ron Paul’s libertarian leanings, though he professes<br />

some amusement and bewilderment at Paul’s tactics, if not his<br />

message. Paul, for instance, has often spoken of terrorist activities<br />

as the blowback attendant in our messing around in other<br />

countries’ business, to which Doherty responds, presumably<br />

channeling Joe Six-Pack, “Whoa—a history lesson, recognizing<br />

consequences to our actions, an empathetic approach to what<br />

the rest of the world would think” The rhetorical trick gets a<br />

little old, but it’s clear that Doherty cares greatly about capturing<br />

what Paul’s supporters think about him and his ideas and,<br />

moreover, that he cares about representing them fairly. Much of<br />

the narrative is thus given over to fan notes, as against the words<br />

of the supposedly elite media. Not that the fan base is huge to<br />

begin with: “Paul’s rigorous hewing to a vision of government<br />

that almost every part of America’s learned political, academic,<br />

and media elites considers silly was only the start of his problems<br />

with the American electorate.” Doherty offers considerable<br />

insight into some aspects of Paul’s ongoing presidential<br />

campaigns. The chances of his ever being elected, after all, are<br />

vanishingly small, but one desired effect might be the opportunity<br />

to influence the choice of vice president, as he might have in<br />

2008. Yet Paul, a maverick if nothing else, keeps his own counsel,<br />

insisting, for instance, on giving lessons in Austrian economic<br />

theory and demanding the abolition of the Federal Reserve<br />

rather than sharpening crowd-pleasing attacks on America’s foreign<br />

wars and the ill-advised war on drugs at home.<br />

Illuminating, if sometimes a chore to read, and a welcome<br />

aid to understanding the evolution of Paul’s offbeat<br />

ideas.<br />

THE BLOOD OF HEROES<br />

The 13-Day Struggle for the<br />

Alamo—and the Sacrifice<br />

that Forged a Nation<br />

Donovan, James<br />

Little, Brown (544 pp.)<br />

$29.99 | May 15, 2012<br />

978-0-316-05374-7<br />

A popular historian revisits the most<br />

stirring siege in American history.<br />

On Feb. 24, 1836, vastly outnumbered<br />

and defending an old Spanish mission in San Antonio against<br />

Santa Anna’s Mexican army, garrison commander William Barret<br />

Travis issued a plea for reinforcements. To the people of<br />

Texas and “all Americans in the world,” he declared, “I shall<br />

never surrender or retreat.” He did neither, and the slaughter<br />

of the Alamo’s defenders has reverberated ever since. Donovan<br />

(A Terrible Glory: Custer and the Little Big Horn—The Last Great<br />

Battle of the American West, 2008, etc.) rightly deems the Battle<br />

of the Alamo the signal event of the Texas struggle for independence.<br />

The two-week siege bought precious time for the fledgling<br />

provincial government to organize, for settlers to recognize<br />

the immediacy of their peril and for Sam Houston’s Army of<br />

the People to assemble and train. The siege bogged down Santa<br />

Anna’s avenging force, killing many of his best troops. When,<br />

seven weeks later, Houston’s army surprised and routed the<br />

Napoleon of the West’s exhausted soldiers at San Jacinto, the<br />

Texans’ battle cry was “Remember the Alamo!” Donovan’s<br />

thoroughly researched and agreeably told story focuses on the<br />

13-day standoff, but he also supplies crucial context, helping us<br />

to understand the history of the breakaway province and notable<br />

characters in the revolution like Houston, Stephen Austin,<br />

Ben Milam and James C. Neill. He explains how the principal<br />

actors in the Alamo drama—including, of course, former congressman<br />

and frontiersman David Crockett and knife-fighter<br />

James Bowie—arrived at this juncture in history. Yes, the Alamo<br />

is remembered, but not without controversy. What really happened<br />

inside those battered walls Did Travis really draw a line<br />

in the sand, asking all who would stand with him to step across<br />

it Without breaking the flow of his compelling story, Donovan<br />

reliably separates fact from legend, persuasively assessing the<br />

evidence and artfully setting the scene.<br />

An authoritative, moving retelling of an enduring episode<br />

of sacrifice and courage. (Author tour to Dallas, Houston,<br />

Austin, San Antonio, Killeen)<br />

BAD RELIGION<br />

How We Became<br />

a Nation of Heretics<br />

Douthat, Ross<br />

Free Press (336 pp.)<br />

$26.00 | Apr. 17, 2012<br />

978-1-4391-7830-0<br />

A piercing critique of heresy in a<br />

country where “traditional Christian<br />

teachings have been warped into justifications<br />

for solipsism and anti-intellectualism,<br />

jingoism and utopianism, selfishness and greed.”<br />

New York Times columnist and National Review film critic<br />

Douthat (Privilege: Harvard and the Education of the Ruling<br />

Class, 2005, etc.), a practicing Catholic, takes aim at the forces,<br />

on both the left and the right, that are corrupting American<br />

Christianity from within. From its glory days after World War<br />

II, when preachers were respected as legitimate moral arbiters<br />

and theologians had huge followings, Christianity has fallen on<br />

hard times. The traditional pillars of American religion—the<br />

once-omnipresent Protestant mainline exemplified by Reinhold<br />

Niebuhr, the nuanced and self-confident Catholicism of<br />

Archbishop Fulton Sheen, the evangelical revival led by Billy<br />

Graham and the beleaguered but transcendent black church of<br />

Martin Luther King Jr.—have all ceded their place in the public<br />

imagination, writes the author, as hundreds of dubious upstart<br />

doctrines claim converts in droves. The mushy universalism<br />

embraced by Protestant churches has caused believers to lose<br />

interest, the Catholic Church has been riven by dissension and<br />

scandal and the evangelical and historically black churches have<br />

given way to the creepy prosperity gospel of Joel Osteen, Creflo<br />

Dollar and others. While some of the particulars of Douthat’s<br />

arguments will be controversial—e.g., his portrayal of the academics<br />

involved in the Jesus Seminar as being as unconcerned<br />

with the facts as are fabulists like Dan Brown—his full-throated<br />

defense of Christian orthodoxy deserves to be heard in an age<br />

when theology, if not spirituality, has become something of a<br />

niche interest. For Douthat, the beauty of Christianity lies in<br />

the “paradoxical character” of Jesus, who “sets impossible standards<br />

and then forgives the worst of sinners.” When churches<br />

focus on only one aspect of Jesus’ nature and profess to offer<br />

easy answers to all of life’s problems, he writes, they hold up a<br />

false idol for worship.<br />

A refined jeremiad sure to shake up the Christian<br />

establishment.<br />

GODFORSAKEN<br />

Bad Things Happen.<br />

Is There a God Who Cares<br />

Yes. Here’s Proof.<br />

D’Souza, Dinesh<br />

Tyndale House (290 pp.)<br />

$24.99 | Feb. 17, 2012<br />

978-1-4143-2485-2<br />

Conservative writer and speaker<br />

D’Souza (The Roots of Obama’s Rage, 2010,<br />

etc.) draws on years of experience publicly<br />

debating atheists in crafting a new argument for the existence, and<br />

benevolence, of God.<br />

Though widely sympathetic to the reasons that most atheists<br />

and agnostics have decided against faith, the author argues<br />

that too often belief against the existence of God stems primarily<br />

from a disappointment with God, which is then rationalized<br />

into unbelief. Therefore, a defense of God’s existence cannot be<br />

divorced from a sound theodicy, an explanation of why God allows<br />

814 | 15 april 2012 | <strong>nonfiction</strong> | kirkusreviews.com |<br />

| kirkusreviews.com | <strong>nonfiction</strong> | 15 april 2012 | 815

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!