Ludwig von Mises on Money and Inflation.pdf - The Ludwig von ...
Ludwig von Mises on Money and Inflation.pdf - The Ludwig von ...
Ludwig von Mises on Money and Inflation.pdf - The Ludwig von ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
know; it reduced the ratio of gold to the U.S. dollar. In 1935 the U.S.<br />
Supreme Court ruled 2 that, as the b<strong>on</strong>dholders had received payment in<br />
legal tender notes, they could not show damage <strong>and</strong> would not be paid in<br />
gold. is country of Utopia said, “We also accept this new ‘price.’ We<br />
will pay you, the b<strong>on</strong>dholder, <strong>on</strong>ly the lower quantity of gold according<br />
to the new American law, a law which didn’t exist at the time we sold you<br />
this obligati<strong>on</strong> when we bound ourselves to pay to you.” at means the<br />
right of governments c<strong>on</strong>cerning m<strong>on</strong>ey is c<strong>on</strong>sidered as something quite<br />
special today, something which is not subject to the general c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
<strong>and</strong> practices of the market ec<strong>on</strong>omy. is precisely is the reas<strong>on</strong> for the<br />
m<strong>on</strong>etary problem which we now have.<br />
All this was possible <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong> account of the fact that government is<br />
the instituti<strong>on</strong> that determines what the agreements between the citizens<br />
mean, what the c<strong>on</strong>tent of these agreements are. Government has the<br />
power to force people who, according to their government’s declarati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
do not comply with their agreement to pay the sums required. And as the<br />
government assumes, necessarily, that the courts should have the power<br />
to declare whether or not the parties have complied with an agreement<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cluded between them, so do the governments presume that they al<strong>on</strong>e<br />
have the power to declare what m<strong>on</strong>ey is <strong>and</strong> what m<strong>on</strong>ey is not. Just<br />
as the courts have to determine if there is a c<strong>on</strong>flict between the parties<br />
to an agreement as to whether a certain thing referred to in a c<strong>on</strong>tract<br />
is wool, for instance, or is not wool, so do the governments presume to<br />
say whether a certain thing is m<strong>on</strong>ey or is not m<strong>on</strong>ey of a certain definite<br />
quantity. And in this way, again <strong>and</strong> again, governments have destroyed<br />
the markets of the world. And in destroying the markets they have g<strong>on</strong>e<br />
so far as to destroy completely the system of m<strong>on</strong>ey, making it necessary<br />
to develop a new m<strong>on</strong>etary system.<br />
What we have to realize is this: Every kind of human arrangement is<br />
c<strong>on</strong>nected in some way or other with m<strong>on</strong>ey payments. And, therefore<br />
if you destroy the m<strong>on</strong>etary system of a country or of the whole world,<br />
you are destroying much more than simply <strong>on</strong>e aspect. When you destroy<br />
the m<strong>on</strong>etary system, you are destroying in some regards the basis<br />
of all interhuman relati<strong>on</strong>s. If <strong>on</strong>e talks of m<strong>on</strong>ey, <strong>on</strong>e talks about a field<br />
in which governments were doing the very worst thing which could be<br />
d<strong>on</strong>e, destroying the market, destroying human cooperati<strong>on</strong>, destroying<br />
2 e majority of the Court found <strong>on</strong> February 18, 1935 in the Gold Clause cases that<br />
the plaintiffs had not been harmed by the abrogati<strong>on</strong> of the gold clause because they did<br />
not show that in relati<strong>on</strong> to buying power they had sustained any loss whatsoever. —BBG<br />
15