Ludwig von Mises on Money and Inflation.pdf - The Ludwig von ...
Ludwig von Mises on Money and Inflation.pdf - The Ludwig von ...
Ludwig von Mises on Money and Inflation.pdf - The Ludwig von ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER<br />
THIRTEEN<br />
Many Ec<strong>on</strong>omics Professors Believe the Quantity of<br />
M<strong>on</strong>ey Should be Increased<br />
Many famous professors of ec<strong>on</strong>omics think that the supply of m<strong>on</strong>ey is<br />
insufficient. It’s unbelievable but we have now already for a l<strong>on</strong>g time,<br />
for many years, textbooks that say, in every new editi<strong>on</strong>, that the quantity<br />
of m<strong>on</strong>ey must increase by 2%, or 5%, or 7%. ey change it from<br />
year to year—this is without any importance, what quantity they recommend<br />
is not so important—what is important is that they say that such<br />
an increase is good from the point of view of their policies. W<strong>on</strong>derful!<br />
e government, the banks, can distribute more m<strong>on</strong>ey, but they cannot<br />
distribute more goods. And this is the problem. As this additi<strong>on</strong>al m<strong>on</strong>ey<br />
will raise the prices of goods, those who do not get any of this additi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
m<strong>on</strong>ey are hurt. And this is what people d<strong>on</strong>’t realize, what they d<strong>on</strong>’t see.<br />
If this m<strong>on</strong>ey is increased every year it means <strong>on</strong>ly that other groups can<br />
say “Why did we not get more” And then the government gives them a<br />
quantity too <strong>and</strong> then again to others also. And this is the situati<strong>on</strong> we<br />
have today. e questi<strong>on</strong> will always be: To whom do you give this additi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
quantity Because if the additi<strong>on</strong>al quantity is given to somebody<br />
else, your c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s will be impaired.<br />
I d<strong>on</strong>’t say that the quantity of m<strong>on</strong>ey should be increased, or that it<br />
should be decreased. It is n<strong>on</strong>sensical if people complain in their textbooks<br />
about the increase in wealth of some groups of the populati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> about<br />
the decrease in wealth of other groups of the populati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> then recommend<br />
policies which will bring about precisely those c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s they<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sider wr<strong>on</strong>g. From the point of view of most people, of the masses, an<br />
increase in the m<strong>on</strong>ey supply is bad.<br />
54