Ludwig von Mises on Money and Inflation.pdf - The Ludwig von ...
Ludwig von Mises on Money and Inflation.pdf - The Ludwig von ...
Ludwig von Mises on Money and Inflation.pdf - The Ludwig von ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER<br />
FOURTEEN<br />
Two M<strong>on</strong>etary Problems<br />
e functi<strong>on</strong> of the government is to prevent violence. e functi<strong>on</strong> which<br />
the government adopted, accepted, <strong>and</strong> held with respect to m<strong>on</strong>ey, was<br />
to say what the parties had meant <strong>and</strong> whether or not the parties to the<br />
agreement had d<strong>on</strong>e what they were bound to do according to the agreement<br />
which they had voluntarily accepted. In these agreements the term<br />
“m<strong>on</strong>ey” was used in order to specify the medium of exchange used by<br />
the parties when they met, when they made the c<strong>on</strong>tract. But when the<br />
government faced this situati<strong>on</strong> they adopted the privilege of coining the<br />
metal used in these agreements <strong>and</strong> using the coins, at first without any<br />
bad intenti<strong>on</strong>s. At the beginning this didn’t mean anything more than the<br />
government’s declarati<strong>on</strong> that the coin was a piece of metal of a definite<br />
weight <strong>and</strong> that it could be used as such by the parties. But again <strong>and</strong> again<br />
in various nati<strong>on</strong>s, governments misused the positi<strong>on</strong> which this situati<strong>on</strong><br />
gave them. e situati<strong>on</strong> was simply this. Already in very ancient times, in<br />
the history of almost every group of nati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>and</strong> of every civilizati<strong>on</strong> there<br />
developed am<strong>on</strong>g governments that did this, that coined certain pieces of<br />
metal, the idea that they had the right to—it is very difficult for me to<br />
say this word—“swindle.” If <strong>on</strong>e talks about all these things, <strong>on</strong>e must not<br />
forget that they did it with a bad c<strong>on</strong>science. But when government got<br />
involved with m<strong>on</strong>ey it led to two problems.<br />
e first problem, the <strong>on</strong>e which is not recognized as a m<strong>on</strong>etary problem<br />
by the government, by official spokesmen <strong>and</strong> writers, is that of the<br />
increase in prices, the so-called “inflati<strong>on</strong>.” One of the most important features<br />
of the “New Ec<strong>on</strong>omics,” 1 <strong>on</strong>ce simply known as “bad ec<strong>on</strong>omics,”<br />
1 e doctrine derived primarily from the teachings of the British John Maynard Keynes<br />
59