01.01.2015 Views

Ludwig von Mises on Money and Inflation.pdf - The Ludwig von ...

Ludwig von Mises on Money and Inflation.pdf - The Ludwig von ...

Ludwig von Mises on Money and Inflation.pdf - The Ludwig von ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER<br />

FOURTEEN<br />

Two M<strong>on</strong>etary Problems<br />

e functi<strong>on</strong> of the government is to prevent violence. e functi<strong>on</strong> which<br />

the government adopted, accepted, <strong>and</strong> held with respect to m<strong>on</strong>ey, was<br />

to say what the parties had meant <strong>and</strong> whether or not the parties to the<br />

agreement had d<strong>on</strong>e what they were bound to do according to the agreement<br />

which they had voluntarily accepted. In these agreements the term<br />

“m<strong>on</strong>ey” was used in order to specify the medium of exchange used by<br />

the parties when they met, when they made the c<strong>on</strong>tract. But when the<br />

government faced this situati<strong>on</strong> they adopted the privilege of coining the<br />

metal used in these agreements <strong>and</strong> using the coins, at first without any<br />

bad intenti<strong>on</strong>s. At the beginning this didn’t mean anything more than the<br />

government’s declarati<strong>on</strong> that the coin was a piece of metal of a definite<br />

weight <strong>and</strong> that it could be used as such by the parties. But again <strong>and</strong> again<br />

in various nati<strong>on</strong>s, governments misused the positi<strong>on</strong> which this situati<strong>on</strong><br />

gave them. e situati<strong>on</strong> was simply this. Already in very ancient times, in<br />

the history of almost every group of nati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>and</strong> of every civilizati<strong>on</strong> there<br />

developed am<strong>on</strong>g governments that did this, that coined certain pieces of<br />

metal, the idea that they had the right to—it is very difficult for me to<br />

say this word—“swindle.” If <strong>on</strong>e talks about all these things, <strong>on</strong>e must not<br />

forget that they did it with a bad c<strong>on</strong>science. But when government got<br />

involved with m<strong>on</strong>ey it led to two problems.<br />

e first problem, the <strong>on</strong>e which is not recognized as a m<strong>on</strong>etary problem<br />

by the government, by official spokesmen <strong>and</strong> writers, is that of the<br />

increase in prices, the so-called “inflati<strong>on</strong>.” One of the most important features<br />

of the “New Ec<strong>on</strong>omics,” 1 <strong>on</strong>ce simply known as “bad ec<strong>on</strong>omics,”<br />

1 e doctrine derived primarily from the teachings of the British John Maynard Keynes<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!