Linguistic categories and speech perception

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Kuhl: by 6 months of age babies have also developed language-specific vowel <strong>categories</strong> Discrimination by 6 month old babies Exemplars of American /i/s: good bad Exemplars of Swedish /i/s: good bad American babies poor good no difference Swedish babies no difference poor good
Development of prototypical representations, each acting as a perceptual magnet “pulling” similar sounds towards it in perceptual space so they become less discriminable Psychoacoustic space with no phonetic category: no magnet effect Psychoacoustic space with a phonetic category: perceptual magnet effect
Page 1 and 2: Linguistic categories and speech pe
Page 3 and 4: 3 ways discrete linguistic-phonetic
Page 5 and 6: Structure of a category poor ok goo
Page 7 and 8: Reminder: Ladefoged and Broadbent (
Page 9 and 10: 0.2683 0 -0.2286 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Page 11 and 12: • “Ganong effect” (word~nonwo
Page 13 and 14: CP: category goodness Eye-tracking
Page 15 and 16: Does speech convey invariant inform
Page 17 and 18: Classical assumptions Most of these
Page 19 and 20: Do linguistic units have invariant
Page 21 and 22: Robust features (e.g. Zue, 1985)
Page 23 and 24: Islands of auditory reliability •
Page 25 and 26: Islands of acoustic/auditory reliab
Page 27 and 28: Acoustic/Auditory invariance theory
Page 29 and 30: Summary: Relationships between prop
Page 31: Cognitive construction of categorie
Page 35 and 36: Neurological and neuropsychological
Page 37 and 38: Brain activation for category bound
Page 39 and 40: Brain activation for native vs. non
Page 41 and 42: If you adopt this view, then lingui

Linguistic categories and speech perception

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?