10.11.2012 Views

The Degree Rituals The Supreme Council, 33 ... - Scottish Rite, NMJ

The Degree Rituals The Supreme Council, 33 ... - Scottish Rite, NMJ

The Degree Rituals The Supreme Council, 33 ... - Scottish Rite, NMJ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Degree</strong> <strong>Rituals</strong><br />

pelican, the cubic stone, the three pillars of faith, hope, and charity, the mystic<br />

letters “I.N.R.I.”, and use of Jesus of Nazareth as the exemplar. Where the<br />

Francken ritual differed most radically from the modern ritual was in the stipulation<br />

that only Christians could be admitted to the degree.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 18° ritual approved by the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in 1870 reinforced and<br />

perpetuated the original Christian emphasis of the degree. This circumstance<br />

was not without its critics, however. For one, Albert Pike, Sovereign Grand<br />

Commander of the Southern Jurisdiction and a renowned Masonic ritualist in<br />

his own right, objected to the 18° ritual of the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction<br />

as a “strictly Christian degree.” <strong>The</strong> rebuttal to Pike was that he was an innovator,<br />

who had changed the ritual of the 18° to transform what always had<br />

been a Christian degree into a universal degree.<br />

<strong>The</strong> issue never was completely resolved, as some voices continued to advocate<br />

a ritual with a more universal message, that is to say, acceptable to all<br />

monotheistic faiths. This point of view finally gained concessions in the ritual<br />

of 1942, further refined in 1964, which made widespread changes to rephrase<br />

or delete overtly Christian dialogue and included a new prologue that emphasized<br />

the universal character of the degree. However, as it does to this<br />

day, the ritual retained Christian symbols, the beatitudes, “<strong>The</strong> Story of the<br />

Cross,” the mystic letters, and Jesus of Nazareth as the exemplar of the degree.<br />

Another refinement toward a more universal ritual was made in 1987,<br />

when the name “Jesus” replaced “Christ” in the prologue.<br />

In 1990-91, and again in 2007, the Committee on Ritualistic Matters expressed<br />

concern that the universalist philosophy of <strong>Scottish</strong> <strong>Rite</strong> Masonry<br />

was being compromised by local Valleys embellishing presentations of the<br />

18° with non-ritualistic, unauthorized Christian sermons, prayers, and hymns.<br />

As to the ritual itself, however, the 18° remains in equipoise between traditionalists<br />

and universalists. In effect, it has retained its Christian character<br />

but has been purged of theology and dogma.<br />

Aside from issues of Masonic philosophy, the ritual of the 18° has been<br />

impacted by the redefining changes made in the 17°. As previously explained,<br />

the 17° Ritual of 1957, based on the Book of Revelation, had been presented<br />

in conjunction with and as a prelude to the 18°. <strong>The</strong> decision to withdraw<br />

that ritual in 1994 prompted a revision of the 18° ritual to incorporate introductory<br />

material formerly communicated as part of the 17°. This resulted in<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!