Minutes of the Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland PCT ... - NHS
Minutes of the Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland PCT ... - NHS
Minutes of the Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland PCT ... - NHS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Paper A<br />
LLR <strong>PCT</strong> Cluster Board meeting<br />
14 June 2012<br />
It was RESOLVED<br />
- to approve LLR CSS operating in shadow/arm’s length<br />
arrangements with immediate effect.<br />
- to approve <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> LLR CSS OMG as a committee<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cluster Board.<br />
- to approve <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> reference for <strong>the</strong> LLR CSS OMG as at<br />
Appendix 1 subject to <strong>the</strong> changes above.<br />
CB/12/141<br />
Equality Delivery System<br />
Mrs Cathy Ellis, Chair <strong>of</strong> LLR <strong>PCT</strong> Cluster introduced Ms Christina<br />
Marriott, Contract lead for <strong>the</strong> LLR <strong>PCT</strong> <strong>and</strong> LPT Integrated Equality<br />
Service, who presented a report on <strong>the</strong> Equality Delivery System (as<br />
attached in Minute Book – Appendix Number CB/05/10/F).<br />
The Equality Act 2010 places a ‘Specific Duty’ to publish Equality<br />
Objectives by <strong>the</strong> 6 April 2012. The Integrated Equality Service (IES)<br />
developed equality objectives last year, based on available evidence<br />
<strong>and</strong> identified those that were highest priority in a consultation with<br />
both members <strong>of</strong> staff, members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public <strong>and</strong> stakeholders. These<br />
were approved by <strong>the</strong> Cluster Board <strong>and</strong> published last year on our<br />
website, giving <strong>the</strong> Trust compliance with <strong>the</strong> second Specific Duty.<br />
The Trust is an early adopter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Equality Delivery System, although<br />
we are not using it to set our equality objectives. Since <strong>the</strong> Board was<br />
last updated in January 2012, <strong>the</strong> IES has commenced engagement<br />
both internally <strong>and</strong> with external stakeholders <strong>and</strong> an action plan has<br />
been developed.<br />
Ms Marriott noted that <strong>the</strong> two <strong>PCT</strong>s as <strong>the</strong> statutory bodies retain<br />
responsibility for implementation <strong>and</strong> delivery although this will<br />
increasingly transfer to <strong>the</strong> CCGs.<br />
Mrs Ellis asked about communication with <strong>the</strong> stakeholders that had<br />
been present at <strong>the</strong> meeting in February. Ms Marriott said that she had<br />
been in contact with <strong>the</strong>m <strong>and</strong> would be again after this meeting. She<br />
also noted that this paper has gone to <strong>the</strong> 3 CCGs.<br />
Mr Finan asked about <strong>the</strong> fifth Equality Objective about preventing age<br />
discrimination <strong>and</strong> asked why it was restricted to secondary care <strong>and</strong><br />
did not for example mention primary care. Ms Marriott said that age<br />
discrimination in any area is illegal but <strong>the</strong> wording in this objective<br />
denotes <strong>the</strong> most urgent need as voiced by organisations like Age<br />
Concern <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> general public. Mr Finan said that he was<br />
uncomfortable with <strong>the</strong> wording. Mr Skea said that <strong>the</strong> <strong>PCT</strong> Cluster<br />
was not saying that it would only tackle some areas <strong>of</strong> age<br />
discrimination. Ms Griffiths reaffirmed that age discrimination in<br />
secondary care was <strong>the</strong> current priority <strong>and</strong> that it had been highlighted<br />
9