o .eg an Jo of En1tomol0lD' - Norsk entomologisk forening
o .eg an Jo of En1tomol0lD' - Norsk entomologisk forening
o .eg an Jo of En1tomol0lD' - Norsk entomologisk forening
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ERRATUM<br />
The fauna <strong>of</strong> predatory bugs (Heteroptera, Miridae<br />
<strong>an</strong>d Anthocoridae) in Norw<strong>eg</strong>i<strong>an</strong> apple orchards.<br />
Fauna norv. Ser. B 27,3-8. 1980.<br />
Marit Presth<strong>eg</strong>ge Austreng & Lauritz S0mme.<br />
In the paper referred to above we published a .Jist <strong>of</strong><br />
species including Anthocoris butleri LeQuesne <strong>an</strong>d A.<br />
( Book reviews )<br />
Turin, H. 1981. Provisional checklist <strong>of</strong> the Europe<strong>an</strong><br />
ground-beetles (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae & Carabidae).<br />
Monographieen v<strong>an</strong> de Nederi<strong>an</strong>dse Entomologische<br />
Vereniging No. 9, 249 pp. Price: Dutch<br />
Guilders 60, - (C<strong>an</strong> be obtained from Ned. Ent.<br />
Ver., Pl<strong>an</strong>tage Middenla<strong>an</strong> 64, IQI8 DH Amsterdam,<br />
Nederl<strong>an</strong>d).<br />
136<br />
visci Douglas. Later Dr. c.-c. Couli<strong>an</strong>os. The University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Stockholm, has kindly checked the material,<br />
<strong>an</strong>d conclude that our identification was wrong.<br />
The two species should still be considered as unknown<br />
to the Norw<strong>eg</strong>i<strong>an</strong> fauna. The erroneous identification<br />
is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the authors, not <strong>of</strong> colleagues<br />
acknowledged in the original paper.<br />
The main part <strong>of</strong> this extensive work on the distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> Europe<strong>an</strong> ground-beetles is a list <strong>of</strong><br />
more th<strong>an</strong> 2500 alphabetically ordered species<br />
within systematically arr<strong>an</strong>ged genera. For each<br />
species the geographical distribution is given for<br />
20 Europe<strong>an</strong> r<strong>eg</strong>ions (that may overlap). The<br />
data have been compiled from the most recent<br />
treatments <strong>of</strong> the faunas in each r<strong>eg</strong>ion. Fennosc<strong>an</strong>dia<br />
is treated as one r<strong>eg</strong>ion. In addition<br />
Sweden <strong>an</strong>d Denmark are treated as two separate<br />
r<strong>eg</strong>ions. For Fennosc<strong>an</strong>dia the data is taken<br />
from CH. Lindroths «Die Fennosc<strong>an</strong>dischen<br />
Carabidre» <strong>an</strong>d «Catalogus Coleopterorum Fennosc<strong>an</strong>diae<br />
et D<strong>an</strong>iae» with corrections in 1970<br />
by A. Str<strong>an</strong>d. (Later corrections could not be taken<br />
into account). Unfortunately this makes it<br />
impossible to say if a species is found in Norway,<br />
only if it is found in Fennosc<strong>an</strong>dia. Two<br />
indices containing all generic, specific <strong>an</strong>d subspecific<br />
names (including commonly used synonyms)<br />
makes it easy to find ones way to the<br />
w<strong>an</strong>ted name. I presume this list will be <strong>of</strong> great<br />
help for everyone interested in which groundbeetle<br />
to find where, whether it is from a purely<br />
scientific or a collectors point <strong>of</strong> view.<br />
A table with the numbers <strong>of</strong> species for each •<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 199 genera which occur ill the respective<br />
r<strong>eg</strong>ions (plus North America) gives <strong>an</strong> interesting<br />
comparison between faunas. Here you<br />
might for inst<strong>an</strong>ce find that Italy holds 76 Trechl{s-species!<br />
You will find a lot <strong>of</strong> additional interesting in-.<br />
formation in this book, as for inst<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong> extensive<br />
list <strong>of</strong> valuable catalogues, atlases <strong>an</strong>d<br />
checklists for each r<strong>eg</strong>ion, <strong>an</strong>d references to<br />
where species <strong>an</strong>d geI'eca are described for the<br />
first time. I will recommend this book to everyone<br />
interested in Europe<strong>an</strong> ground-beetles.<br />
Arild Andersen<br />
L<strong>an</strong>ge, R. H. & 1. Blodorn, 1981.<br />
Das elektronen mikroskop TEM + REM. Leitfa<br />
den fUr Biologen und Mediziner. (in Germ<strong>an</strong>),<br />
G. Thieme, Stuttgart. 327 pp. DM. 28.80<br />
(F1exibles Taschenbuch) ISBN 3 13 597001 9.<br />
The authors state that their book treats the instrumental<br />
technique more thoroughly th<strong>an</strong> the<br />
preparation techniques, <strong>an</strong>d this is certainly<br />
true. About 90 % <strong>of</strong> the text is concerned with<br />
the prinsiples <strong>of</strong> instrumental construction <strong>an</strong>d<br />
operation.<br />
Introductory chapters on vacum-technology,<br />
electron emission, interaction between electron<br />
beam <strong>an</strong>d matter <strong>an</strong>d electron lenses provide a<br />
very useful background knowledge <strong>of</strong>ten missed<br />
by biologists. The tr<strong>an</strong>smission <strong>an</strong>d sc<strong>an</strong>ning<br />
electron microscopes <strong>an</strong>d their constituent parts<br />
are then described in detail, as are the most import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
steps in the operation <strong>of</strong> their electron<br />
optics <strong>an</strong>d detector systems. Detailed accounts<br />
on electron diffraction in general, on the assembly<br />
<strong>of</strong> asymetrical biological building blocks<br />
<strong>an</strong>d on the qu<strong>an</strong>titative evalution <strong>of</strong> various<br />
samples are also presented. Brief summaries <strong>of</strong><br />
specimen preparation techniques for TEM <strong>an</strong>d<br />
SEM <strong>an</strong>d a survey <strong>of</strong> electron microscopic literature<br />
complete the book.<br />
It is my opinion that most biologists, even<br />
those with long practise in electron microscopy,<br />
will find m<strong>an</strong>y valuable informations in most<br />
chapters <strong>of</strong> this book, information which in<br />
m<strong>an</strong>y cases will enable them to get better results<br />
<strong>of</strong> their instruments.<br />
Tow minor drawbacks should not alter this<br />
overall positive impression <strong>of</strong> the book; I find no<br />
justification for almost twenty pages <strong>of</strong> mainly<br />
technical specifications <strong>of</strong> partly outdated commercial<br />
TEM-models in a book like this <strong>an</strong>d I<br />
find the Germ<strong>an</strong> text at places to be unnecessarily<br />
heavy <strong>an</strong>d difficult to underst<strong>an</strong>d.<br />
Per R. Flood<br />
Assoc.pr<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong>atomy<br />
Fauna narY. Ser. B 29 .. 136. Oslo 1982.