09.01.2015 Views

Literature Review on Skill Fade - Human Factors Integration ...

Literature Review on Skill Fade - Human Factors Integration ...

Literature Review on Skill Fade - Human Factors Integration ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HFIDTC/2/WP10.3/2<br />

Versi<strong>on</strong> No. 1/ 25 May 2007<br />

1. C<strong>on</strong>sistent <strong>Skill</strong>s – usually psychomotor skills, require that they are trained to<br />

automaticity so they can not be affected by unexpected stimuli<br />

2. Complex <strong>Skill</strong>s – usually cognitive skills, require the individual is trained to a<br />

level where they have an excellent grasp of the underlying principles.<br />

5.2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>Literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Review</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

The Summers et al. paper includes McGuinness et al.’s (1995) tabulati<strong>on</strong> of their findings<br />

from a literature review <strong>on</strong> the topics relating to skill fade. McGuinness et al.’s tabulati<strong>on</strong><br />

puts their review of the literature into broad categories proposed by Hurlock and<br />

M<strong>on</strong>tague (1982). These categories are Task Characteristics, Learning <strong>Factors</strong>, Post<br />

Learning Activities, Job C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s and Pers<strong>on</strong>al Characteristics. For completeness the<br />

table is included below, however, it is not felt the informati<strong>on</strong> adds anything additi<strong>on</strong>al to<br />

Arthur et al.’s summary of the literature (See Table 1).<br />

Table 1. The Tabulati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>Skill</strong> Retenti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Review</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Training Factor Element Summary Findings<br />

Task Characteristics<br />

Psychomotor<br />

• We lack a comm<strong>on</strong> metric for retenti<strong>on</strong>,<br />

across different types of task.<br />

Procedural<br />

Cognitive<br />

Social/Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

C<strong>on</strong>tinuous; Discrete<br />

• Differences in retenti<strong>on</strong> may be<br />

attributable to task type (e.g.<br />

procedural, cognitive) or how tasks are<br />

organised.<br />

• Analysis of a skill in terms of its<br />

individual comp<strong>on</strong>ents is critical if the<br />

objective is to identify which<br />

comp<strong>on</strong>ents are relatively vulnerable to<br />

decay or relatively stable over time.<br />

• The majority of research has been for<br />

psychomotor skills. There is very little<br />

corresp<strong>on</strong>ding work <strong>on</strong> complex<br />

cognitive skills.<br />

Learning <strong>Factors</strong><br />

Learning, overlearning<br />

and retenti<strong>on</strong><br />

• L<strong>on</strong>g term retenti<strong>on</strong> of task competence<br />

can be improved by increasing the level<br />

of original learning.<br />

• Criteri<strong>on</strong> by which the level of<br />

‘mastery’ is being tested needs to be<br />

clearly defined to differentiate between<br />

learning and overlearning, particularly<br />

during the original learning phase.<br />

• 50% overtraining would appear to be<br />

the maximum amount required to<br />

promote retenti<strong>on</strong> of task mastery.<br />

• For maintaining optimal performance<br />

for cognitive tasks, the interval between<br />

training and performance should be no<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!