14.01.2015 Views

DP9-Aboriginal-Spirituality

DP9-Aboriginal-Spirituality

DP9-Aboriginal-Spirituality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

There is an intrinsic and wholistic link between <strong>Spirituality</strong> and relationships to land and landforms, including<br />

watercourses, since these are the tangible links between living humans and all that is unseen and eternal. This<br />

is where the creation ancestors rest and are still actors in the creation drama, releasing spirit children and the<br />

life force of their totem; the whole is sacred and contains sites of significance to the creation stories (Stockton<br />

1995:56).<br />

To understand our law, our culture and our relationship to the physical and spiritual world, you must begin<br />

with the land. Everything about <strong>Aboriginal</strong> society is inextricably woven with, and connected to, the land.<br />

Culture is the land, the land and spirituality of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people, our cultural beliefs or reason for existence<br />

is the land. You take that away and you take away our reason for existence. We have grown the land up. We<br />

are dancing, singing and painting for the land. We are celebrating the land. Removed from our lands, we are<br />

literally removed from ourselves (Dodson 1997:41).<br />

Dodson goes on to argue that land rights flow from ‘a traditional relationship to land in which spiritual, cultural<br />

and economic interests are integrated’, and although traditional relationships to land are ‘profoundly spiritual’,<br />

they are also ‘profoundly practical’ (Dodson 1997:43). The spiritual relationships are also those that ensure the<br />

preservation and sustainability of the natural resource base of the country.<br />

Professor W. E. H. Stanner also explains the inability of the English language to convey the essence of <strong>Aboriginal</strong><br />

cultural relationships to land. He says:<br />

No English words are good enough to give a sense of the links between an <strong>Aboriginal</strong> group and its homeland.<br />

Our word ‘home’, as warm and suggestive though it may be, does not match the <strong>Aboriginal</strong> word that may<br />

mean ‘camp’, ‘heart’, ‘country’, ‘everlasting home’, ‘totem place’, ‘life source’, ‘spirit centre’ and much else in one.<br />

Our word land is too spare and meagre. We can now scarcely use it except with economic overtones unless<br />

we happen to be poets… The <strong>Aboriginal</strong> would speak of earth and use it in a rich symbolic way to mean his<br />

‘shoulder’ or his ‘side’. I have seen an <strong>Aboriginal</strong> embrace the earth he walked on… a different tradition leaves<br />

us tongueless and earless towards this other world of meaning and significance (Stanner 1968:230–1).<br />

The call for <strong>Aboriginal</strong> land rights is often misunderstood by the settler colonial society, whose main concern<br />

with land is as an economic resource, to produce a surplus and so gain capital. Tasmanian activist Puralia Jim<br />

Everett explains:<br />

<strong>Aboriginal</strong> land rights does not simply mean that the people are entitled to land. Nor does the term mean that<br />

the land owes anything to the people. Aborigines do not justify land rights in terms of economy, accommodation<br />

or possession, Rather land rights represent a whole set of responsibilities, among which is the obligation to<br />

preserve the unique essence of their <strong>Aboriginal</strong> law. Aborigines have the responsibility to be custodians of land,<br />

sea and sky. They must remain accountable to the ecological world, which accepts Indigenous intrusion and<br />

use of that ecology only on sound practices of interaction with the spirit of the land, manifested in strict rules<br />

of respect and tradition (Everett 1994:xii).<br />

When describing the impacts of colonisation on <strong>Aboriginal</strong> Australia, Deborah Bird Rose says:<br />

Once a multiplicity of nourishing terrains, there is now a multiplicity of devastations. And yet, the relationship<br />

between Indigenous people and country persists. It is not a contract but a covenant, and no matter what the<br />

damage, people care (Rose 1996:81).<br />

In this connection it is important to note the primacy of returning to country, as well as to family and kin, for<br />

the children of the Stolen Generations. Archie Roach exemplifies this in song:<br />

Back where their hearts grow strong<br />

Back where they all belong<br />

The children came back…<br />

Back where they understand<br />

Back to their mother’s land<br />

The children came back (Rose 1996:81).<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!