15.01.2015 Views

PASS Scripta Varia 21 - Pontifical Academy of Sciences

PASS Scripta Varia 21 - Pontifical Academy of Sciences

PASS Scripta Varia 21 - Pontifical Academy of Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MICHAEL HELLER<br />

all sides’ is as difficult to implement as ‘to make the sharpest needle stand<br />

upright on its point upon a looking glass’. 3 The problem <strong>of</strong> gravitational<br />

instability was one <strong>of</strong> the most difficult questions with which the physics<br />

<strong>of</strong> the universe had to cope.<br />

Newton’s conundrum with gravitational field instability, later known as<br />

the Seeliger paradox, led to some attempts at modifying the law <strong>of</strong> gravity,<br />

and quite unexpectedly surfaced in Einstein’s first cosmological paper <strong>of</strong> 1917.<br />

In this paper, Einstein had to add to his equations the so-called cosmological<br />

constant to obtain a static model <strong>of</strong> the universe. It was a particularly malicious<br />

twist <strong>of</strong> history when some ten years later it turned out that the Einstein<br />

static model, in spite <strong>of</strong> this ‘saving procedure’, is in fact unstable.<br />

The Seeliger paradox, in the 19 th century, was paralleled by the optical<br />

Olbers paradox (in fact, this paradox was also known to Newton): if the infinitely<br />

extending universe is uniformly filled with stars (or galaxies, or<br />

galactic clusters, in the more modern version), the night sky should be as<br />

bright as the surface <strong>of</strong> the Sun, but this conclusion remains in sharp contrast<br />

with what can be seen with the naked eye.<br />

In the second part <strong>of</strong> the 19 th century there were strong reasons to believe<br />

that the universe as a totality cannot be made obedient to physical<br />

laws discovered in our local neighbourhood. Agnes Mary Clerke, the astronomer<br />

and historian <strong>of</strong> astronomy, was not an exception when, in 1890,<br />

she declared: ‘With the infinite possibilities beyond [our Milky Way], science<br />

has no concern’. 4 Helge Kragh quotes an anonymous reviewer who in 1907<br />

wrote: ‘when there are no facts to be explained, no theory is required’. 5 In<br />

spite <strong>of</strong> these reservations, the universe is a challenge to the human mind.<br />

We prefer to create fancy hypotheses in order to tame the Unknown rather<br />

than to acknowledge our ignorance. Besides the ‘cosmological skeptics’, in<br />

the second half <strong>of</strong> the 19 th century, there was a crowd <strong>of</strong> physicists, philosophers,<br />

amateurs, and sometimes also astronomers, who indulged their imagination<br />

and developed various cosmic scenarios.<br />

3<br />

Newton claimed even more: since there is an infinite number <strong>of</strong> stars in the universe,<br />

to make the system <strong>of</strong> stars stable ‘…this is as hard as to make, not one needle<br />

only, but an infinite number <strong>of</strong> them stand accurately poised upon their points’. Newton’s<br />

Letter to Bentley, in: Isaac Newton’s Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy, ed. by I.B.<br />

Cohen, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971, p. 292.<br />

4<br />

After H. Kragh, Matter and Spirit in the Universe, Imperial College Press, London,<br />

2004, p. 20.<br />

5<br />

Ibid.<br />

336 The Scientific Legacy <strong>of</strong> the 20 th Century

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!