15.01.2015 Views

PASS Scripta Varia 21 - Pontifical Academy of Sciences

PASS Scripta Varia 21 - Pontifical Academy of Sciences

PASS Scripta Varia 21 - Pontifical Academy of Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MICHAEL HELLER<br />

mological constant. And today there are strong reasons to believe that this<br />

constant has an important physical interpretation. From recent observations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Ia type supernovae we know, with a good degree <strong>of</strong> credibility, that<br />

the universe not only expands, but also accelerates its expansion. And to<br />

obtain agreement between these observations and theoretical models one<br />

should employ the equations with the cosmological constant (see below).<br />

This is a typical story. The history <strong>of</strong> relativistic astrophysics and relativistic<br />

cosmology from Einstein up to about the seventies <strong>of</strong> the previous<br />

century, consisted mainly in solving Einstein’s equations, analyzing and interpreting<br />

the structures <strong>of</strong> these solutions, and then looking at the sky to<br />

verify what the equations had predicted (<strong>of</strong> course, it is a highly idealized<br />

picture). In this process, various groups <strong>of</strong> people were engaged, there were<br />

many disputes and erroneous interpretations, in some <strong>of</strong> them other departments<br />

<strong>of</strong> physics had to be involved. In this way, young relativistic cosmology<br />

slowly crystallized. The new field <strong>of</strong> research was created, still full<br />

<strong>of</strong> question marks but ready for further developments.<br />

Einstein’s paper <strong>of</strong> 1917 was definitely wrong. Its static world model<br />

does not represent the world we live in. But the paper was epoch making;<br />

it opened a new way in our thinking <strong>of</strong> the universe.<br />

4. Domination <strong>of</strong> Philosophy<br />

The next move belonged to the Dutch astronomer Willem de Sitter.<br />

The story is well known; I shall only very briefly sketch its main stages. Yet<br />

in 1917 de Sitter found another cosmological solution <strong>of</strong> Einstein’s equations<br />

which represented a world devoid <strong>of</strong> matter (with vanishing matter<br />

density) and, as it turned out later, with expanding space, thus ruining Einstein’s<br />

hope that the ‘cosmological problem’ would have a unique solution.<br />

In 1922 and 1924, Russian mathematician and meteorologist Alexander<br />

Alexandrovitch Friedman published two papers in which he presented two<br />

infinite classes <strong>of</strong> solutions with the positive and negative curvature <strong>of</strong> space,<br />

respectively. In 1927 Georges Lemaître, for the first time, compared theoretical<br />

predictions <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the expanding cosmological models with the<br />

results <strong>of</strong> galactic red shift measurements, and found that there was no contradiction<br />

between them. All so far considered solutions satisfied the postulate<br />

<strong>of</strong> maximal spacial symmetry (isotropy and homogeneity <strong>of</strong> space). 9<br />

Mathematical discussion <strong>of</strong> such models was undertaken by Howard Percy<br />

9<br />

This postulate was called by Edward Arthur Milne the Cosmological Principle.<br />

340 The Scientific Legacy <strong>of</strong> the 20 th Century

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!