17.01.2015 Views

View Actual EPA Method 332 (PDF File) - Columbia Analytical ...

View Actual EPA Method 332 (PDF File) - Columbia Analytical ...

View Actual EPA Method 332 (PDF File) - Columbia Analytical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

from groundwater and surface water sources, performance data should be<br />

collected for each source. Over time, LFSM data should be documented for all<br />

routine sample sources for the laboratory.<br />

9.3.7.1 Within each Analysis Batch, a minimum of one field sample is fortified<br />

as an LFSM for every 20 samples analyzed. The LFSM is prepared by<br />

fortifying a sample with an appropriate amount of the FS (Sect. 7.2.2.2).<br />

Select a fortification concentration that is greater than or equal to the<br />

native background concentration, if known. Selecting a duplicate aliquot<br />

of a sample that has already been analyzed aids in the selection of an<br />

appropriate fortification level. If this is not possible, use historical data<br />

and rotate through low, medium and high calibration concentrations<br />

when selecting a fortifying concentration.<br />

9.3.7.2 Calculate the recovery (%R) for the analyte using the following equation:<br />

%R = (A - B) X 100<br />

C<br />

where,<br />

A = measured concentration in fortified sample<br />

B = measured background concentration in an unfortified aliquot of<br />

the same sample<br />

C = fortification concentration<br />

9.3.7.3 Recoveries for LFSM samples should be 80-120%. Greater variability<br />

may be observed when LFSM samples have ClO 4- concentrations < the<br />

MRL. At these concentrations, LFSM sample recovery should be<br />

50-150%. If the accuracy of ClO 4<br />

-<br />

falls outside the designated range, and<br />

the laboratory performance is shown to be in control in the CCCs, the<br />

recovery is judged to be matrix biased. The result for ClO 4<br />

-<br />

in the<br />

unfortified sample should be labeled “suspect matrix” to inform the data<br />

user that the results are suspect due to matrix effects.<br />

NOTE: A high concentration of sulfate is a known interferant that may<br />

cause the sample to fail the m/z 99/101 area count ratio criteria<br />

(Sect. 9.3.5). In that case, the sample must be diluted or pretreated to<br />

reduce/remove the sulfate to an acceptable level. Refer to Section 11.6<br />

for required remedial action.<br />

NOTE: Field samples that have detectable native ClO 4- concentrations<br />

below the MRL that are fortified at concentrations at or near the MRL<br />

should be corrected for the native levels to obtain more accurate results.<br />

This is the only case where background subtraction of results below the<br />

MRL is permitted.<br />

<strong>332</strong>.0-22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!