17.01.2015 Views

A Guide to Conservation Agriculture in Zimbabwe - Canadian ...

A Guide to Conservation Agriculture in Zimbabwe - Canadian ...

A Guide to Conservation Agriculture in Zimbabwe - Canadian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

section ONE<br />

Promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Agriculture</strong> Among Farmers<br />

Figure 1.3 Average communal maize yield<br />

(<strong>to</strong>nnes/hectare) for <strong>Zimbabwe</strong> 1086 - 2007<br />

(Source: (ICRISAT)<br />

Gully erosion<br />

Cereal yield levels <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa have been<br />

decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g over the last 30 years, while yield levels <strong>in</strong> other<br />

parts of the world have been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g steadily. This is<br />

largely a result of low management standards, <strong>in</strong>adequate<br />

<strong>in</strong>put availability and poor extension support, comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

with unattractive producer prices and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

unreliable ra<strong>in</strong>fall patterns. Figure 1.2 shows the stagnation<br />

of cereal yields <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) compared <strong>to</strong><br />

the United States of America.<br />

Figure 1.2 Long-term cereal yield (t/ha) for<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa and the USA<br />

(Source: FAOSTAT 2005)<br />

t/ha<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

1986<br />

1987<br />

1988<br />

1989<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

Years<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

actual yields<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

trend <strong>in</strong> overall yields<br />

Average communal cereal yields <strong>in</strong> <strong>Zimbabwe</strong> have been<br />

decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sharply over the last 20 years (see Figure 1.3),<br />

due both <strong>to</strong> the problems cited previously, and <strong>to</strong> very<br />

low public and private <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> agriculture. Farmers<br />

faced with this situation usually try <strong>to</strong> expand cropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

areas <strong>to</strong> compensate for poor yields, sometimes grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

crops <strong>in</strong>appropriate <strong>to</strong> the area. However, this stretches<br />

their already limited resources (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g labour,<br />

implementation management ability, fertilizer and draught<br />

power) further and leads <strong>to</strong> greater land degradation. In<br />

turn soil degradation decreases average yields even more.<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

t/ha<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1961<br />

1963<br />

1965<br />

1967<br />

1969<br />

1971<br />

1973<br />

1975<br />

1977<br />

1979<br />

1981<br />

1983<br />

1985<br />

1987<br />

1989<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

2001<br />

2003<br />

2005<br />

Years<br />

USA Maize SAA Maize SAA Millet SSA Sorghum<br />

SSA maize yield data <strong>in</strong>cludes large scale commercial farmers, yields for<br />

small scale farmers are much lower.<br />

Poor soil, lack of water and many mouths <strong>to</strong> feed.<br />

9 Farm<strong>in</strong>g for the Future

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!